📚 Year 10 CAIE Law: Vocabulary & Terminology Quick-Memorisation Guide | Year 10 CAIE 法律：词汇术语速记指南
Mastering legal terminology is the first and most crucial step towards success in CAIE IGCSE Law. Without a clear grasp of the key Latin phrases and English legal concepts, analysing cases and applying the law becomes almost impossible. This guide breaks down the essential vocabulary for Year 10 students, pairing each term with a simple memorisation trick. Practise these daily, and soon you will 'think like a lawyer'.
掌握法律术语是通往 CAIE IGCSE 法律成功的第一步，也是最关键的一步。如果对关键的拉丁短语和英语法律概念没有清晰的理解，分析案例和适用法律几乎是不可能的。本指南为 Year 10 学生分解了必备词汇，并为每个术语配上一个简单的记忆技巧。每天练习，你很快就能 '像律师一样思考'。
1. Actus Reus and Mens Rea | 犯罪行为与犯罪意图
The physical element of a crime is called the actus reus, which is Latin for 'guilty act'. This can be an action, a failure to act (omission), or a state of affairs. Imagine a person hitting another: the act of hitting is the actus reus.
犯罪的物理要素被称为 actus reus，拉丁语意为 '有罪的行为'。这可以是一个作为、不作为（疏忽）或一种状态。想象一个人殴打他人：击打的行为就是犯罪行为。
The mental element is the mens rea, meaning 'guilty mind'. It refers to the defendant's state of mind at the time of the crime, such as intention or recklessness. Without mens rea, most crimes cannot be proved. Think of it like this: Actus reus = the body of the crime; Mens rea = the mind of the crime.
心理要素是 mens rea，意为 '有罪的意图'。它指的是被告在犯罪时的心理状态，例如故意或轻率。没有犯罪意图，大多数犯罪无法成立。你可以这样记：Actus reus = 罪行本身；Mens rea = 犯罪的内心。
A handy way to remember the pair is the phrase: 'An act does not make a man guilty unless his mind is also guilty.' This captures the general principle that both elements must coincide in time for a conviction.
记住这一对的简便方法是这句话：'一个行为不会使一个人有罪，除非他的内心也有罪。' 这抓住了定罪通常要求两要素在时间上同时发生的基本原则。
2. Strict Liability | 严格责任
Strict liability offences are crimes that do not require proof of mens rea for at least one element of the actus reus. The prosecution only needs to prove that the defendant committed the forbidden act. Common examples include speeding, selling alcohol to minors, and many regulatory offences.
严格责任 犯罪是指对于犯罪行为中至少一个要素，无需证明犯罪意图的犯罪。控方只需证明被告实施了被禁止的行为。常见的例子包括超速、向未成年人售酒以及许多管理性犯罪。
The rationale is that these offences are not 'truly criminal' in the moral sense, but rather matters of social regulation where public protection is paramount. Memorise this using the 'no fault needed' rule: even if the defendant took all reasonable care, they can still be convicted.
其理由在于，这些犯罪在道德意义上并非 '真正刑事'，而是社会管理事项，其中保护公众至关重要。用'无需过错'规则来记忆：即使被告尽到了所有合理的注意义务，仍可能被定罪。
To distinguish strict liability from absolute liability, remember: strict liability may allow a defence of due diligence in some statutes, but the core idea is that actus reus alone is enough.
要区分严格责任与绝对责任，请记住：严格责任在某些法规中可能允许尽职抗辩，但核心思想是仅有犯罪行为就足够了。
3. Causation | 因果关系
In criminal law, the prosecution must prove that the defendant's act caused the prohibited consequence. Causation has two parts: factual causation and legal causation. Think of them as the 'what' and the 'law'.
在刑法中，控方必须证明被告的行为导致了被禁止的后果。因果关系由两部分组成：事实因果关系与法律因果关系。可以把它们想成 '事实' 和 '法律'。
Factual causation is tested by the 'but for' test: but for the defendant's actions, would the harm have occurred? If the answer is no, factual causation is established. For example, 'but for the defendant striking the victim, the victim would not have been injured.'
事实因果关系通过'若非'检验来检测：若非被告的行为，损害是否会发生？如果答案是否定的，事实因果关系就成立了。例如，'若非被告击打受害人，受害人不会受伤。'
Legal causation requires that the defendant's act was a substantial and operating cause of the harm. The chain of causation may be broken by a novus actus interveniens, an intervening act so extraordinary that it eclipses the original act.
法律因果关系要求被告的行为是损害的实质且有效的原因。因果关系链可能因新介入行为而中断，这是一种非常异常的介入行为，使最初的行为被遮盖。
Visualise causation as a chain: the defendant's act starts the chain; an intervening act like a third party's free, deliberate and informed act can snap it. Remember: the chain must remain unbroken for liability to attach.
把因果关系想象成一条链条：被告的行为开启了链条；像第三人自由、故意且知情的行为这样的介入行为可以把它扯断。请记住：链条必须保持完整，责任才能依附。
4. The Tort of Negligence | 过失侵权
Negligence is a tort – a civil wrong – that arises when a person breaches a duty of care owed to another, causing damage. For the claimant to succeed, three elements must be proven: duty of care, breach of that duty, and resulting damage. Think of the 'negligence triangle'.
过失 是一种侵权行为——民事不法行为——产生于一个人违反了对另一个人的注意义务并造成了损害。要使原告胜诉，必须证明三个要素：注意义务、违反该义务以及由此造成的损害。可以想成'过失三角'。
The famous case Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) established the modern law of negligence, introducing the 'neighbour principle'. You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour – anyone closely and directly affected by your actions.
著名案例 Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) 确立了现代过失法，引入了'邻人原则'。你必须采取合理的注意，避免那些你能够合理预见可能会伤害你邻人的作为或不作为——即任何被你行为紧密且直接影响的人。
A quick memorisation aid: 'Duty, Breach, Damage – DBD'. If any one element is missing, the negligence claim fails. Keep these three letters in mind, and you have the skeleton of every negligence essay question.
一个快速记忆辅助口诀：'Duty, Breach, Damage – DBD'。只要缺少任何一个要素，过失索赔就会失败。牢记这三个字母，你就掌握了每个过失论文问题的骨架。
5. Duty of Care | 注意义务
The duty of care is a legal obligation to avoid causing harm to another person. The test for whether a duty exists comes from Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990): the three-part test of foreseeability of damage, proximity, and whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty.
注意义务 是一种避免对他人造成损害的法律义务。检验是否存在义务的标准来自 Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990)：损害的可预见性、近邻关系以及施加义务是否公平、正义且合理的三部分检验。
Remember 'F-P-FJR': Foreseeability, Proximity, Fair, Just and Reasonable. This sequence is used by the courts in novel situations. For established categories, such as doctor-patient or road user to other road user, a duty is automatically recognised.
请记住'F-P-FJR'：Foreseeability（可预见性），Proximity（近邻关系），Fair, Just and Reasonable（公平、正义且合理）。法院在新颖情形中使用这一顺序。对于既定的类别，如医患或道路使用者对其他道路使用者，义务会自动被承认。
Do not confuse this with a moral duty; it is a legal duty recognised by the courts. If a duty is not established, the defendant cannot be liable, no matter how careless they were.
不要将这混淆为道德义务；它是由法院承认的法律义务。如果注意义务未确立，被告即不承担责任，无论其行为多么粗心大意。
6. Breach of Duty | 违反义务
Once a duty of care is established, the claimant must prove breach of duty. This means the defendant fell below the standard of care expected in the circumstances. The standard is that of the reasonable person: an ordinary, prudent individual. For professionals, it is the standard of a reasonably competent member of that profession.
一旦注意义务成立，原告必须证明违反义务。这意味着被告的行为低于在当时情况下预期的注意标准。该标准是理性人的标准：一个普通、谨慎的人。对于专业人员，标准是具有合理能力的同行从业人员的标准。
The court considers risk factors: the likelihood of harm, the seriousness of potential harm, the cost and practicality of precautions, and the social utility of the defendant's activity. These are known as the 'L-S-C-U factors' (Likelihood, Seriousness, Cost, Utility).
法院会考虑风险因素：损害发生的可能性、潜在损害的严重性、采取预防措施的成本与可行性，以及被告行为的社会效益。这被称为'L-S-C-U 因素' （可能性、严重性、成本、效益）。
Think of it as a balancing exercise: if the risk is high and precautions are cheap, breach is easily found. If the activity was a life-saving emergency, the standard may be slightly relaxed. Use 'Likely Serious, Can't Underestimate' to recall L-S-C-U.
可以把它想象成一个权衡过程：如果风险高而预防措施成本低，就很容易认定违反义务。如果该行为是救命的紧急情况，标准可能会略微放宽。用 'Likely Serious, Can't Underestimate' 来回忆 L-S-C-U。
7. Damages and Remedies | 损害赔偿与救济
Damages are the primary remedy in tort law, a monetary sum awarded to the claimant to compensate for loss suffered. The aim is to put the claimant in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred, so far as money can do.
损害赔偿金 是侵权法中的主要救济方式，是判给原告以补偿所遭受损失的一笔金钱。其目的在于，尽可能用金钱将原告置于如果侵权行为未曾发生时所处的地位。
There are different types of damages: special damages (quantifiable financial losses up to the date of trial, like medical bills) and general damages (non-monetary losses such as pain and suffering, future loss of earnings). Punitive or exemplary damages are rare in English law.
损害赔偿金有不同种类：特别损害赔偿金（截至审判日期可量化的经济损失，如医疗账单）和一般损害赔偿金（非金钱损失，如痛苦与折磨、未来收入损失）。惩罚性或示范性损害赔偿金在英国法中很少见。
Other civil remedies include injunctions (an order to do or stop doing something) and specific performance (an order to perform a contract). However, in negligence claims, damages remain the dominant remedy. Remember: 'Damages compensate; injunctions command.'
其他民事救济方式包括禁令（命令做或停止做某事）和特定履行（命令履行合同）。然而，在过失索赔中，损害赔偿金仍是主要的救济方式。请记住：'损害赔偿金是补偿性的；禁令是命令性的。'
8. Precedent in Common Law | 普通法中的先例
The doctrine of precedent (stare decisis) means that courts must follow the decisions of higher courts in cases with similar material facts. This principle ensures consistency, fairness and predictability in the legal system. Lower courts are bound by the decisions of courts above them in the hierarchy.
先例 原则（遵循先例）意味着法院在具有类似关键事实的案件中必须遵循上级法院的判决。这一原则确保了法律体系的一致性、公平性和可预测性。下级法院受其上级法院判决的约束。
A judgment contains the ratio decidendi (the legal reasoning necessary for the decision, which is binding) and obiter dicta (other remarks made 'by the way', which are persuasive but not binding). Imagine a tree: the ratio is the trunk; obiter are the branches.
一个判决包含判决理由（做出判决所必需的法律推理，具有约束力）和附带意见（'顺便提及' 的其他评论，具有说服力但不具有约束力）。想象一棵树：判决理由是树干；附带意见是树枝。
The Supreme Court (formerly the House of Lords) is the highest court; its decisions bind all lower courts. The Court of Appeal is bound by the Supreme Court and its own previous decisions, subject to limited exceptions. Use the mnemonic: 'Ratio Rules, Obiter Only Persuades.'
最高法院（前身为上议院）是最高级别的法院；它的判决约束所有下级法院。上诉法院受最高法院及其自身先前判决的约束，但有有限的例外。用助记口诀：'判决理由统治，附带意见仅说服。'
9. Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta | 判决理由与附带意见
Identifying the ratio decidendi is a skill. It is not always explicitly labelled; it is the legal principle that explains why the court reached its decision on those facts. When reading a case, ask: 'What was the legal rule the court used to decide the outcome?' That is the ratio.
识别判决理由是一项技能。它并不总是被明确标注；它是解释法院为何根据那些事实做出该判决的法律原则。阅读案例时，问自己：'法院用以决定结果的法律规则是什么？' 那就是判决理由。
Obiter dicta (singular obiter dictum) are judicial observations that do not form part of the binding ratio. A famous example is Lord Atkin's neighbour principle in Donoghue v Stevenson, which was obiter in its original context but later became the foundation of the modern law of negligence. Obiter can be highly influential.
附带意见 （单数 obiter dictum）是法官的论述，不构成有约束力的判决理由的一部分。一个著名的例子是 Lord Atkin 在 Donoghue v Stevenson 案中的邻人原则，该原则在其原始语境中是附带意见，但后来成为现代过失法的基础。附带意见可能极具影响力。
To separate them, imagine you are trimming a hedge: the ratio is the essential shape you must keep; obiter are the loose trimmings that may inspire future designs but are not compulsory. The diagram: Ratio = Binding; Obiter = Persuasive.
要区分它们，想象你在修剪树篱：判决理由是你必须保留的基本形状；附带意见是可能启发未来设计但并非强制要求的松散修剪物。图示：判决理由 = 有约束力；附带意见 = 有说服力。
10. Civil vs Criminal Law | 民法与刑法
Year 10 students must clearly distinguish between civil and criminal law. Criminal law deals with conduct the state defines as unacceptable, and the state prosecutes the defendant. If found guilty, the defendant is convicted and sentenced to punishment like imprisonment or a fine.
Year 10 学生必须清晰地区分民法与刑法。刑法处理国家定义为不可接受的行为，由国家起诉被告。如果被判定有罪，被告被定罪并判处刑罚，如监禁或罚款。
Civil law governs disputes between individuals or organisations. The claimant sues the defendant seeking a remedy, usually damages. The standard of proof in criminal cases is 'beyond reasonable doubt', while in civil cases it is 'on the balance of probabilities'. Think of it as 99% certainty vs. 51% likelihood.
民法调整个人或组织之间的纠纷。原告起诉被告寻求救济，通常是损害赔偿金。刑事案件中的证明标准是'排除合理怀疑'，而在民事案件中则是'基于可能性平衡'。可以想象成 99% 确定性对比 51% 可能性。
Terminology also differs: in crime, it is 'prosecution' versus 'defendant'; in tort, it is 'claimant' versus 'defendant'. The outcome in crime is a conviction and sentence; in civil law, a judgment finding liability. Commit this table to memory:
术语也不同：在刑事案件中，是 '控方' 对 '被告'；在侵权案中，是 '原告' 对 '被告'。刑事案件的结果是定罪与刑罚；民事案件的结果是判定承担责任。将以下表格熟记于心：
| Feature | Criminal Law | Civil Law |
|---|---|---|
| Parties | Prosecution (state) vs Defendant | Claimant vs Defendant |
| Purpose | Punish and deter | Compensate the victim |
| Standard of proof | Beyond reasonable doubt | Balance of probabilities |
| Outcome | Conviction and sentence | Liability and remedy |
11. Key Court Terminology | 关键法庭术语
Navigating the court system requires knowing the roles. The judge in a trial rules on points of law and, in a criminal trial without a jury, decides the verdict. In a jury trial, the jury decides facts and delivers the verdict. The magistrates hear less serious criminal cases in the Magistrates' Court.
驾驭法院体系需要了解各种角色。审判中的法官对法律问题作出裁决，并在没有陪审团的刑事审判中决定判决。在有陪审团的审判中，陪审团裁决事实并作出判决。治安法官在治安法院审理较轻的刑事案件。
A barrister or solicitor-advocate represents clients in higher courts, while a solicitor typically advises clients and prepares cases. The claimant (formerly plaintiff) brings the civil action; the defendant is the party against whom the case is brought. In criminal cases, the prosecution brings the case on behalf of the Crown.
大律师 或事务律师辩护人在高级别法院代表当事人，而事务律师通常向当事人提供咨询并准备案件。原告（旧称 plaintiff）提起民事诉讼；被告是案件所针对的当事人。在刑事案件中，控方代表王室提起诉讼。
A verdict of 'guilty' or 'not guilty' applies in criminal trials. In civil trials, the court enters a judgment for the claimant or the defendant. Do not mix up 'not guilty' with 'innocent' – the law only finds an accused not proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
刑事审判中的裁决是'有罪'或'无罪'。在民事审判中，法院作出有利于原告或被告的判决。不要混淆 '无罪' 与 '清白'——法律只认定被告未被证明超出合理怀疑有罪。
Remember the hierarchy: Magistrates' own Court → Court of Appeal → Supreme Court. Criminal cases often start in the Magistrates' Court, while high-value civil claims begin in the High Court.
记住层级：治安法院 → 刑事法院 → 上诉法院 → 最高法院。刑事案件通常始于治安法院，而高额民事索赔始于高等法院。
12. Sources of Law | 法律渊源
English law comes from two main sources: Parliament-made law (statute law or legislation) and judge-made law (common law and equity). Acts of Parliament are the supreme source of law; no court can strike down an Act of Parliament due to parliamentary sovereignty.
英格兰法律有两个主要渊源：议会制定的法律（成文法或立法）和法官制定的法律（普通法和衡平法）。议会法律是最高法律渊源；由于议会主权，任何法院都不能推翻议会法律。
Common law evolved from customs and judicial decisions over centuries. Equity developed separately to mitigate the harshness of the common law, introducing remedies like injunctions and trusts. Today, common law and equity are administered by the same courts, though the principles remain distinct.
普通法 是从几个世纪以来的习俗和司法判决演变而来。衡平法 则独立发展，以缓和普通法的严苛性，引入了诸如禁令和信托等救济方式。今天，普通法和衡平法由同样的法院实施，尽管其原则仍是区别的。
Secondary sources include delegated legislation (statutory instruments, by-laws) and European Union law (historically significant but retained in modified form post-Brexit). For Year 10, focus on the primary sources: 'Parliament legislates; courts interpret and create precedent.'
次要渊源包括授权立法（法定文件、地方法规）和欧盟法（具有历史重要性，但在英国脱欧后以修改形式保留）。对于 Year 10 来说，重点在于主要渊源：'议会制定立法；法院解释并创制先例。'
A final memory hook: envision a large tree. Parliament is the trunk (legislation); common law is the thickest branch (judicial precedent); equity is a branch grafted on to soften the fruit (remedies). This organic picture can help you recall the relationships in an exam.
最后一个记忆挂钩：想象一棵大树。议会是树干（立法）；普通法是最粗的树枝（司法先例）；衡平法是嫁接上去以使果实柔和的一根枝条（救济方式）。这个有机的画面可以帮助你在考试中回忆起这些关系。
Published by TutorHao | Law Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图