📚 Case Study Practice for Year 11 Eduqas Accounting | 案例分析实战演练
Welcome to this focused case study designed to strengthen your Year 11 Eduqas Accounting skills. By working through a realistic business scenario, you will practise preparing financial statements, calculating key ratios, and interpreting financial performance. This mirrors the application and analysis skills required in your examination and helps bridge the gap between textbook knowledge and real-world decision-making.
欢迎来到这个专为提升你11年级Eduqas会计技能而设计的案例研究。通过处理一个真实的商业场景，你将练习编制财务报表、计算关键比率并解释财务业绩。这反映了考试中要求的应用与分析技能，并有助于弥合课本知识与现实决策之间的差距。
1. Case Study Background | 案例背景
Greenfield Traders is a retail business selling eco-friendly household goods. The owner, Maria Green, has provided the following trial balances and additional notes for the years ended 31 December 2023 and 31 December 2024. All figures are in GBP (£). Maria wants to understand whether the business has improved its profitability, liquidity, and overall financial health. You are acting as a financial adviser to analyse the data.
Greenfield Traders 是一家销售环保家居用品的零售企业。老板 Maria Green 提供了截至2023年12月31日和2024年12月31日止年度的试算平衡表及补充说明。所有数字均以英镑 (£) 为单位。Maria 希望了解企业的盈利能力、流动性以及整体财务健康状况是否有所改善。你将作为财务顾问对这些数据进行分析。
The summarised financial information is as follows: Revenue for 2023 was £240,000 and for 2024 was £300,000. Cost of sales was £144,000 in 2023 and £195,000 in 2024. Operating expenses totalled £68,000 in 2023 and £74,000 in 2024. The statement of financial position at each year-end shows: non-current assets at net book value £85,000 (2023) and £92,000 (2024); inventory £22,000 (2023) and £31,000 (2024); trade receivables £18,000 (2023) and £26,000 (2024); cash at bank £5,000 (2023) and £2,500 (2024); trade payables £15,000 (2023) and £24,000 (2024); bank overdraft £0 (2023) and £1,500 (2024); long-term loan £40,000 (2023) and £35,000 (2024). Equity at the start of 2023 was £75,000, and no drawings were made in either year.
汇总的财务信息如下：2023年收入为240,000英镑，2024年为300,000英镑。2023年销售成本为144,000英镑，2024年为195,000英镑。营业费用总额2023年为68,000英镑，2024年为74,000英镑。各年末的财务状况表显示：非流动资产账面净值85,000英镑（2023年）和92,000英镑（2024年）；存货22,000英镑（2023年）和31,000英镑（2024年）；应收账款18,000英镑（2023年）和26,000英镑（2024年）；银行存款5,000英镑（2023年）和2,500英镑（2024年）；应付账款15,000英镑（2023年）和24,000英镑（2024年）；银行透支0英镑（2023年）和1,500英镑（2024年）；长期贷款40,000英镑（2023年）和35,000英镑（2024年）。2023年初权益为75,000英镑，且两年内均无提款。
2. Adjustments and Key Accounting Policies | 调整与关键会计政策
Before preparing the income statements, you must consider these adjustments. Maria charges depreciation on non-current assets at 10% per annum on a straight-line basis. The depreciation charge for 2023 was £8,500, and for 2024 it is £9,200. There is no closing inventory misstatement, but a review shows that an accrual for utilities of £1,200 was omitted from operating expenses in 2024. In 2023, a prepayment of insurance of £800 was included in expenses but relates to 2024. All other figures are correctly stated.
在编制利润表之前，你必须考虑这些调整。Maria 对非流动资产按每年10%的直线法计提折旧。2023年的折旧费用为8,500英镑，2024年为9,200英镑。期末存货没有错报，但审查发现2024年漏记了一笔1,200英镑的水电费应计项目。2023年有一笔800英镑的保险费预付已计入费用，但实际归属于2024年。其他所有数字均正确列报。
After incorporating these adjustments, the revised operating expenses for 2023 become £67,200 (£68,000 - £800 prepayment), and for 2024 they become £75,200 (£74,000 + £1,200 accrual). The profit from operations will be affected accordingly. The business uses the historical cost convention and values inventory at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
将这些调整纳入后，2023年修正后的营业费用变为67,200英镑（68,000 - 800预付），2024年变为75,200英镑（74,000 + 1,200应计）。经营利润将受到相应影响。该企业采用历史成本惯例，并以成本与可变现净值孰低法对存货进行计价。
3. Income Statement Preparation | 利润表编制
Let's construct the income statements for both years. For 2023: Revenue £240,000, Cost of Sales £144,000, therefore gross profit = £96,000. Operating expenses (adjusted) £67,200, giving profit from operations of £00. There is no finance cost in the trial balance, but interest on the long-term loan is 5% per annum. In 2023, the loan was £40,000, so interest = £2,000. Profit before tax = £28,800 - £2,000 = £26,800.
我们来编制这两年的利润表。2023年：收入240,000英镑，销售成本144,000英镑，因此毛利=96,000英镑。营业费用（调整后）67,200英镑，得出经营利润28,800英镑。试算表中没有财务费用，但长期贷款年利率为5%。2023年贷款为40,000英镑，因此利息=2,000英镑。税前利润=28,800 - 2,000 = 26,800英镑。
For 2024: Revenue £300,000, Cost of Sales £195,000, gross profit = £105,000. Operating expenses (adjusted) £75,200, profit from operations = £29,800. Interest on loan £35,000 × 5% = £1,750. Profit before tax = £29,800 - £1,750 = £ to corporation tax in this simplified case, so profit after tax equals profit before tax.
2024年：收入300,000英镑，销售成本195,000英镑，毛利=105,000英镑。营业费用（调整后）75,200英镑，经营利润=29,800英镑。贷款利息35,000英镑×5%=1,750英镑。税前利润=29,800 - 1,750 = 28,050英镑。在此简化案例中企业不涉及公司所得税，因此税后利润等于税前利润。
In summary, net profit increased slightly from £26,800 to £28,050, a rise of 4.7%. However, gross profit grew by £9,000 (9.4%), while expenses grew at a faster rate, squeezing the operating margin.
综上，净利润从26,800英镑小幅增至28,050英镑，增幅4.7%。但毛利增长了9,000英镑（9.4%），而费用增长更快，挤压了营业利润率。
4. Statement of Financial Position | 财务状况表
We can now draft the statement of financial position as at 31 December for both years. Non-current assets are given at net book value: £85,000 (2023) and £92,000 (2024). Current assets: inventory £22,000 (2023), £31,000 (2024); trade receivables £18,000 (2023), £26,000 (2024); cash £5,000 (2023), £2,500 (2024). Total current assets: £45,000 (2023) and £59,500 (2024).
我们现在可以草拟各年12月31日的财务状况表。非流动资产按账面净值列示：85,000英镑（2023年）和92,000英镑（2024年）。流动资产：存货22,000英镑（2023年）、31,000英镑（2024年）；应收账款18,000英镑（2023年）、26,000英镑（2024年）；现金5,000英镑（2023年）、2,500英镑（2024年）。流动资产合计：45,000英镑（2023年）和59,500英镑（2024年）。
Current liabilities: trade payables £15,000 (2023), £24,000 (2024); bank overdraft £0 (2023), £1,500 (2024); accrued expense £0 (2023), £1,200 (2024). Total current liabilities: £15,000 (2023) and £26,700 (2024). Net current assets (working capital): £30,000 (2023) and £32,800 (2024). Non-current liabilities: long-term loan £40,000 (2023), £00 (2024). Net assets: Non-current assets + net current assets - non-current liabilities = £85,000 + £30,000 - £40,000 = £75,000 (2023). For 2024: £92,000 + £32,800 - £35,000 = £89,800.
流动负债：应付账款15,000英镑（2023年）、24,000英镑（2024年）；银行透支0英镑（2023年）、1,500英镑（2024年）；应计费用0英镑（2023年）、1,200英镑（2024年）。流动负债合计：15,000英镑（2023年）和26,700英镑（2024年）。净流动资产（营运资金）：30,000英镑（2023年）和32,800英镑（2024年）。非流动负债：长期贷款40,000英镑（2023年）、35,000英镑（2024年）。净资产：非流动资产+净流动资产-非流动负债 = 85,000 + 30,000 - 40,000 = 75,000英镑（2023年）。2024年：92,000 + 32,800 - 35,000 = 89,800英镑。
Equity can be reconciled: opening equity £75,000 (2023) plus profit £26,800 = £101,800, but we must have accounted for a balancing figure? Wait, let's recalculate: If the net assets at end of 2023 are £75,000, that equals equity. However, opening equity was £75,000 and profit was £26,800, which would suggest closing equity of £ t effect or other movements. To keep the exercise focused, we will use the net assets as equity: £75,000 in 2023 and £ ginal trial balance, but for ratio analysis we will rely on these stated year-end figures.
权益可以调节：2023年期初权益75,000英镑加上利润26,800英镑=101,800英镑，但我们必须有一个平衡数字？等一下，重新计算：如果2023年末净资产是75,000英镑，那等于权益。然而，期初权益为75,000英镑，利润为26,800英镑，这意味着如果没有提款，期末权益应为101,800英镑。这存在差异，因为给出的财务状况表数字可能省略了银行贷款偿还的影响或其他变动。为保持练习重点，我们将净资产视作权益：2023年为75,000英镑，2024年为89,800英镑。这假设利润被部分用于偿还贷款，且原试算表或许存在一些错误，但在比率分析中我们将依赖这些列报的年末数字。
5. Financial Ratio Analysis – Profitability | 财务比率分析 – 盈利能力
Profitability ratios measure a business' nd return on capital employed (ROCE). Gross profit margin = (Gross profit ÷ Revenue) × 100%. For 2023: (96,000 ÷ 240,000) × 100% = 40.0%. For 2024: (105,000 ÷ 300,000) × 100% = 35.0% ine in the trading margin, possibly due to higher cost of sales or reduced selling prices.
盈利能力比率衡量企业相对于销售额、资产和权益的盈利生成能力。我们将计算毛利率、营业利润率和运用资本回报率 (ROCE)。毛利率 = (毛利 ÷ 收入) × 100%。2023年：(96,000 ÷ 240,000) × 100% = 40.0%。2024年：(105,000 ÷ 300,000) × 100% = 35.0%。这表明销售利润率下降，可能由于销售成本上升或售价降低。
Operating profit margin = (Profit from operations ÷ Revenue) × 100%. 2023: (28,800 ÷ 240,000) = 12.0%. 2024: (29,800 ÷ 300,000) = 9.93% rtionally more than gross profit. ROCE = (Profit from operations ÷ Capital employed) × 100%. Capital employed = Equity + Non-current liabilities. 2023: Capital employed = £75,000 + £40,000 = £115,000; ROCE = (28,800 ÷ 115,000) × 100% = 25.04%. 2024: Capital employed = £89,800 + £35,000 = £124,800; ROCE = (29,800 ÷ 124,800) × 100% = 23.88%. Slight decrease, meaning less efficient use of long-term funds.
营业利润率 = (经营利润 ÷ 收入) × 100%。2023年：(28,800 ÷ 240,000) = 12.0%。2024年：(29,800 ÷ 300,000) = 9.93%。同样下降，表明费用增长的比例超过了毛利。运用资本回报率 = (经营利润 ÷ 运用资本) × 100%。运用资本 = 权益 + 非流动负债。2023年：运用资本 = 75,000 + 40,000 = 115,000英镑；ROCE = (28,800 ÷ 115,000) × 100% = 25.04%。2024年：运用资本 = 89,800 + 35,000 = 124,800英镑；ROCE = (29,800 ÷ 124,800) × 100% = 23.88%。略有下降，意味着长期资金的利用效率降低。
6. Financial Ratio Analysis – Liquidity | 财务比率分析 – 流动性
Liquidity ratios assess the business' et short-term obligations. The current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities. 2023: £45,000 ÷ £15,000 = 3.0 : 1. 2024: £59,500 ÷ £ y cited benchmark of 2:1, the ratio has declined, suggesting a tighter liquidity position.
流动性比率评估企业偿还短期债务的能力。流动比率 = 流动资产 ÷ 流动负债。2023年：45,000英镑 ÷ 15,000英镑 = 3.0 : 1。2024年：59,500英镑 ÷ 26,700英镑 = 2.23 : 1。虽然仍高于通常引用的2:1基准，但该比率有所下降，表明流动性状况趋紧。
The acid test (quick) ratio = (Current assets - Inventory) ÷ Current liabilities. 2023: (£45,000 - £22,000) ÷ £15,000 = £23,000 ÷ £15,000 = 1.53 : 1. 2024: (£59,500 - £31,000) ÷ £26,700 = £28,500 ÷ £ ow down, the business might struggle to pay its immediate debts without selling inventory.
酸性测试（速动）比率 = (流动资产 - 存货) ÷ 流动负债。2023年：(45,000 - 22,000) ÷ 15,000 = 23,000 ÷ 15,000 = 1.53 : 1。2024年：(59,500 - 31,000) ÷ 26,700 = 28,500 ÷ 26,700 = 1.07 : 1。该比率已危险地接近1，表明如果销售放缓，企业可能在不卖掉存货的情况下难以支付即期债务。
7. Financial Ratio Analysis – Efficiency | 财务比率分析 – 效率
Since we only have year-end figures, we will use closing inventory as an approximation. 2023: £144,000 ÷ £22,000 = 6.55 times. 2024: £195,000 ÷ £31,000 = 6.29 times. Inventory is turning over slightly slower, which may tie up cash.
效率比率显示企业运用资产和管理应付账款的情况。存货周转次数 = 销售成本 ÷ 平均存货。由于我们仅有年末数字，将使用期末存货作为近似值。2023年：144,000 ÷ 22,000 = 6.55次。2024年：195,000 ÷ 31,000 = 6.29次。存货周转速度略微减慢，这可能占用现金。
s. Customers are taking about 4 days longer to pay, which worsens cash flow. Trade payables days = (Trade payables ÷ Cost of sales) × 365. 2023: (15,000 ÷ 144,000) × 365 = 38.0 days. 2024: (24,000 ÷ 195,000) × 365 = 44.9 days. The business is taking longer to pay suppliers, which helps conserve cash but may strain supplier relationships.
应收账款周转天数 = (应收账款 ÷ 收入) × 365天。2023年：(18,000 ÷ 240,000) × 365 = 27.4天。2024年：(26,000 ÷ 300,000) × 365 = 31.6天。客户付款时间延长了约4天，这恶化了现金流。应付账款周转天数 = (应付账款 ÷ 销售成本) × 365。2023年：(15,000 ÷ 144,000) × 365 = 38.0天。2024年：(24,000 ÷ 195,000) × 365 = 44.9天。企业向供应商付款的时间延长了，这有助于节省现金，但可能使供应商关系紧张。
8. Investment Ratios | 投资比率
n on equity (ROE) to show the return to the owner. ROE = (Profit after tax ÷ Equity) × 100%. 2023: £26,800 ÷ £75,000 = 35.7%. 2024: £28,050 ÷ £89,800 = 31.2% portional profit growth. While still healthy, it may concern Maria if the trend continues.
由于 Greenfield Traders 并非上市公司，我们可以计算权益回报率 (ROE) 来反映所有者的回报。ROE = (税后利润 ÷ 权益) × 100%。2023年：26,800 ÷ 75,000 = 35.7%。2024年：28,050 ÷ 89,800 = 31.2%。下降表明权益基数的增长未能与利润的成比例增长相匹配。尽管仍属健康，但若趋势持续，可能会引起Maria的担忧。
other useful measure is the interest cover = Profit from operations ÷ Finance costs. 2023: £28,800 ÷ £2,000 = 14.4 times. 2024: £29,800 ÷ £ The coverage has improved because of lower loan interest, indicating less financial risk.
另一个有用的指标是利息保障倍数 = 经营利润 ÷ 财务费用。2023年：28,800 ÷ 2,000 = 14.4倍。2024年：29,800 ÷ 1,750 = 17.0倍。由于贷款利息降低，保障倍数有所改善，表明财务风险减小。
9. Interpretation and Business Performance | 解释与经营业绩
Overall, Greenfield Traders has grown its revenue by 25%, which is impressive. However, profitability margins have slipped, partly because the cost of sales increased from 60% to 65% of revenue. This could be due to rising supplier prices not fully passed on to customers, or a deliberate strategy of discounting to gain market share. The growth in operating expenses also outpaced gross profit growth, eroding the bottom line.
总体而言，Greenfield Traders 的收入增长了25%，令人印象深刻。然而，盈利利润率有所下滑，部分原因是销售成本占收入的比重从60%上升至65%。这可能是由于供应商价格上涨未完全转嫁给客户，或是采取了打折以获取市场份额的战略。营业费用的增长速度也超过了毛利增长，侵蚀了底线利润。
The liquidity position has weakened, and the acid test ratio is now only marginally above 1. The sharp increase in trade receivables days signals a potential collection issue. On the positive side, the loan repayment of £5,000 reduces long-term financial risk, and interest cover is very strong. The overall return to the owner remains above 30%, which is high compared to typical savings rates, but the downward trend is a warning.
流动性状况有所减弱，速动比率目前仅略高于1。应收账款周转天数的大幅增加预示着潜在的收款问题。从积极方面看，偿还5,000英镑贷款降低了长期财务风险，且利息保障倍数非常强劲。对所有者的总体回报率仍保持在30%以上，与典型储蓄利率相比很高，但下降趋势是一个警示。
10. Limitations of Ratio Analysis | 比率分析的局限性
While ratios provide valuable insights, they have limitations. First, ratios are based on historical financial data and may not reflect current market conditions. Second, the use of year-end figures for assets and liabilities may not represent typical levels throughout the year, especially for a seasonal business. Third, different accounting policies (e.g., depreciation method, inventory valuation) can affect comparability.
尽管比率提供了有价值的见解，但它们也存在局限性。首先，比率基于历史财务数据，可能无法反映当前市场状况。其次，使用年末的资产和负债数字可能无法代表全年中的典型水平，尤其是对于季节性业务。第三，不同的会计政策（如折旧方法、存货计价）会影响可比性。
Additionally, ratios do not consider non-financial factors such as customer satisfaction, employee morale, or market share trends. Greenfield's ratios should be compared with industry averages and past years, but such benchmarks may not always be available or perfectly suitable. A single ratio in isolation can be misleading; a holistic assessment is necessary.
此外，比率未考虑非财务因素，如客户满意度、员工士气或市场份额趋势。Greenfield 的比率应与行业平均及以往年度进行比较，但此类基准可能并非总能获取或完全适用。孤立的单一比率可能产生误导，必须进行全面评估。
11. Recommendations for Improvement | 改进建议
Based on the analysis, Maria should consider negotiating better terms with suppliers to improve the gross margin. Tightening credit control procedures, such as offering early settlement discounts or sending prompt reminders, can reduce trade receivables days and improve cash flow. Holding excessive inventory should be monitored; a just-in-time ordering system might help reduce holding costs.
基于分析，Maria 应考虑与供应商协商更有利的条款以提升毛利率。收紧信用控制程序，例如提供提前付款折扣或发送及时提醒，可以缩短应收账款周转天数并改善现金流。同时应监控过高的存货水平；采用准时制订货系统可能有助于降低持有成本。
To enhance profitability, the business could review operating expenses and eliminate non-essential costs. The strong interest cover suggests room for strategic borrowing to invest in expansion, but only if ROCE remains above the cost of debt. Maintaining a healthy acid test ratio above 1 is crucial; Maria might consider arranging a more flexible bank overdraft facility as a safety buffer.
为提升盈利能力，企业可审查营业费用并削减非必要成本。强劲的利息保障倍数表明存在借入资金进行战略性扩张的空间，但前提是ROCE持续高于债务成本。维持健康的速动比率高于1至关重要；Maria 可考虑安排更灵活的银行透支额度作为安全缓冲。
12. Conclusion | 结论
This case study demonstrates how a systematic ratio analysis can reveal strengths and weaknesses in a business. Greenfield Traders is growing rapidly but must guard against declining margins and tightening liquidity. By applying these techniques to past paper questions and practice scenarios, you will build confidence for your Eduqas examination. Remember to always support your analysis with clear calculations and reasoned interpretations.
本案例研究展示了系统的比率分析如何揭示企业的优势与劣势。Greenfield Traders 正在快速增长，但必须警惕利润率下降和流动性收紧。通过将这些技巧应用于历年真题和练习场景，你将为Eduqas考试树立信心。请记住，始终要用清晰的计算和合理的解释来支持你的分析。
Published by TutorHao | Accounting Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图