📚 Year 11 CIE Psychology: A Comprehensive Syllabus Guide | Year 11 CIE 心理学课程大纲全面解析
The Cambridge IGCSE Psychology syllabus (0989) offers Year 11 students an exciting introduction to the scientific study of human behaviour and mental processes. Understanding exactly what the course covers—and how it is assessed—is the first step towards achieving a top grade. This guide breaks down every topic, core study, and skill you will need to master.
剑桥 IGCSE 心理学课程（0989）为 Year 11 学生提供了对人类行为和心理过程进行科学研究的精彩入门。准确了解课程内容和评估方式是取得高分的首要步骤。本指南将全面解析你需掌握的每个主题、核心研究和关键技能。
1. Syllabus Overview | 大纲总览
The CIE IGCSE Psychology syllabus is divided into six core content topics, which are examined in Paper 1, and a separate Research Methods paper (Paper 2).
CIE IGCSE 心理学课程大纲分为六个核心内容主题，在试卷一考查，以及一张独立的研究方法试卷（试卷二）。
Paper 1 contributes 70% of the total grade and covers all six topics, each featuring three specified core studies that every student must know in detail. You will need to describe, apply, and evaluate these studies using psychological theories and concepts.
试卷一占总成绩的70%，涵盖全部六个主题，每个主题包含三项指定的核心研究，所有学生都须深入掌握。你需要能够运用心理学理论和概念对这些研究进行描述、应用和评价。
Paper 2 accounts for the remaining 30% and focuses solely on research methodology, including designing studies, interpreting data, and evaluating psychological research. The two papers together build a comprehensive foundation for further study at A Level and beyond.
试卷二占剩余的30%，仅考查研究方法，包括研究设计、数据解读和心理学研究评价。两张试卷共同为进一步学习A Level及更高级别奠定全面基础。
2. Assessment Objectives | 评估目标
The syllabus defines three assessment objectives: AO1 Knowledge with understanding, AO2 Application, and AO3 Evaluation. Mastering these is crucial for scoring highly on both papers.
课程大纲定义了三个评估目标：AO1 知识与理解，AO2 应用，以及 AO3 评价。掌握这三个目标是两卷取得高分的关键。
AO1 requires you to demonstrate factual knowledge of psychological theories, studies, and terminology. For instance, you might be asked to outline the procedure of Peterson and Peterson (1959) or to define 'short-term memory duration'.
AO1 要求你展示对心理学理论、研究和术语的事实性知识。例如，你可能被要求概述 Peterson 和 Peterson（1959）的实验程序或定义“短时记忆持续时间”。
AO2 focuses on applying your knowledge to unfamiliar scenarios or data. You could be given a novel situation, such as a teacher trying to improve revision, and asked to explain how findings from memory research could help.
AO2 聚焦于将知识应用于陌生情境或数据。你可能获得一个新情境，如教师试图改进复习方法，并要求你解释记忆研究的发现如何提供帮助。
AO3 is all about evaluation—weighing strengths and weaknesses of studies, considering ethical issues, methodological flaws, and alternative explanations. This skill is particularly tested in the longer 9-mark questions on Paper 1.
AO3 完全关乎评价——权衡研究的优势与局限，考量伦理问题、方法学缺陷和其他解释。这一技能在试卷一较长的9分题中格外受考查。
3. Exam Structure: Paper 1 and Paper 2 | 考试结构：试卷一与试卷二
Paper 1 (Core Studies) lasts 2 hours and carries 140 marks. It is divided into six sections, each dedicated to one of the six content topics, with questions ranging from short 2-mark definitions to 9-mark discussion essays.
试卷一（核心研究）时长2小时，总分140分。分为六个部分，每部分对应一个内容主题，题型涵盖2分简答题到9分讨论论述题。
Paper 2 (Research Methods) lasts 1 hour 15 minutes and carries 60 marks. Its questions are based on a pre-released material booklet that describes a psychological investigation, allowing you to prepare some answers in advance. You will answer questions on study design, data handling, ethics, and evaluation of research.
试卷二（研究方法）时长1小时15分钟，总分60分。试题基于一份提前下发的材料小册子，描述了一项心理学调查，学生可提前准备部分答案。你将回答有关研究设计、数据处理、伦理和研究评价的问题。
Both papers require precise psychological language. The use of key terms like 'standardised procedure', 'operationalised variable', and 'ecological validity' is expected and rewarded.
两张试卷都要求使用准确的心理学语言。“标准化程序”、“操作化变量”和“生态效度”等关键术语的运用既是要求也会得到加分。
4. Topic 1: Memory | 主题一：记忆
The Memory topic explores the structure and function of human memory, including short-term and long-term memory, and factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Three core studies are specified.
记忆主题探索人类记忆的结构与功能，包括短时记忆和长时记忆，以及影响目击者证词的因素。大纲指定了三项核心研究。
Peterson and Peterson (1959) investigated the duration of short-term memory by asking participants to recall trigrams after counting backwards for intervals of 3-18 seconds. They found that memory decayed rapidly without rehearsal, suggesting a short-term memory span of approximately 18 seconds.
Peterson 和 Peterson（1959）通过让参与者在倒计数3至18秒后回忆三字母串，研究了短时记忆的持续时间。他们发现无复述时记忆迅速消退，表明短时记忆保持时间约18秒。
Bahrick et al. (1975) studied very long-term memories by testing recall and recognition of high school classmates' names and faces over a 50-year period. Recognition was remarkably durable, supporting the idea that some long-term memories are nearly permanent while recall declines over time.
Bahrick 等人（1975）通过测试对高中同学姓名与面孔长达50年的回忆与再认，研究长期记忆。再认表现出惊人的持久性，支持某些长时记忆近乎永久而回忆随时间衰退的观点。
Loftus and Palmer (1974) demonstrated how leading questions can distort memory. They showed participants filmed car accidents and used different verbs ('smashed' vs 'hit') to alter estimates of speed. This highlighted the reconstructive nature of memory and its implications for eyewitness testimony.
Loftus 和 Palmer（1974）演示了引导性问题如何扭曲记忆。他们向参与者播放车祸影片并用不同动词（“撞碎”与“碰撞”）改变速度估计，凸显了记忆的重构性及其对目击者证词的影响。
5. Topic 2: Perception | 主题二：感知
Perception examines how we interpret sensory information to form our experience of the world. The core studies explore the roles of innate factors and learning.
感知主题检验我们如何解读感觉信息以形成对世界的体验。核心研究探讨了先天因素与学习的作用。
Blakemore and Cooper (1970) reared kittens in a visual environment consisting only of horizontal or vertical stripes. This early visual restriction led to permanent perceptual deficits, demonstrating that normal visual experience is necessary for developing certain perceptual abilities.
Blakemore 和 Cooper（1970）将小猫饲养在只有水平或垂直条纹的视觉环境中。这种早期视觉限制导致了永久性的知觉缺陷，说明正常视觉经验对发展特定感知能力是必要的。
Fantz (1961) used a 'looking chamber' to measure how long infants looked at different visual stimuli. Infants showed a preference for complex patterns and faces, suggesting that some perceptual abilities are innate and not solely learned.
Fantz（1961）使用“观察箱”测量婴儿注视不同视觉刺激的时间。婴儿对复杂图案和人脸表现出偏好，说明某些感知能力是天生的，并非完全习得。
Gibson and Walk (1960) devised the 'visual cliff' experiment to test depth perception in infants and young animals. Most infants refused to cross the apparent drop, indicating that depth perception emerges early and likely has an innate component.
Gibson 和 Walk（1960）设计了“视崖”实验来检测婴儿和幼小动物的深度知觉。多数婴儿拒绝爬过表面上的“悬崖”，表明深度知觉出现很早且可能具有先天成分。
6. Topic 3: Development | 主题三：发展
The Development topic focuses on cognitive development in children, particularly the acquisition of logical thinking and perspective-taking.
发展主题关注儿童的认知发展，尤其是逻辑思维和观点采择能力的获得。
Piaget's conservation experiments investigated whether children understand that certain properties of objects remain the same despite changes in appearance. Pre-operational children typically fail conservation tasks, supporting Piaget's stage theory of cognitive development.
皮亚杰的守恒实验探究儿童是否理解物体的某些属性在外观改变时仍保持不变。前运算阶段的儿童通常不能通过守恒任务，支持了皮亚杰的认知发展阶段论。
Baillargeon et al. (1985) challenged Piaget using the 'violation of expectation' method. They showed that very young infants looked longer at impossible events, suggesting some understanding of object permanence emerges earlier than Piaget proposed.
Baillargeon 等人（1985）用“预期违背”方法挑战了皮亚杰。他们表明幼小婴儿对不可能事件注视更久，暗示客体永久性的理解比皮亚杰提出的更早出现。
Hughes' 'Policeman Doll' study (1975) tested perspective-taking in children aged 3 and a half to 5 years. Using a task where a boy doll must hide from policemen, Hughes found that 90% of children could successfully take another's viewpoint, questioning Piaget's claims about egocentrism.
Hughes 的“警察娃娃”研究（1975）测试了3岁半至5岁儿童的观点采择。通过一个男孩娃娃必须躲避警察的任务，Hughes发现90%的儿童能成功采择他人视角，质疑了皮亚杰关于自我中心的论断。
7. Topic 4: Social Influence | 主题四：社会影响
Social influence covers how the presence or behaviour of other people affects an individual's actions, including conformity, obedience, and social eating habits.
社会影响涵盖他人的存在或行为如何影响个体行为，包括从众、服从和社会饮食行为。
Asch (1955) studied conformity by asking participants to judge the length of lines in a group where confederates deliberately gave wrong answers. About 37% of responses conformed, showing that group pressure can lead individuals to give answers they know are incorrect.
Asch（1955）通过让参与者在同谋者故意给出错误答案的群体中判断线条长度来研究从众。约37%的反应从众，表明群体压力可使个体给出明知错误的答案。
Milgram (1963) investigated obedience to authority by having participants administer what they believed were electric shocks to a learner. 65% of participants continued to the maximum 450-volt level, revealing the powerful influence of authority figures.
Milgram（1963）通过让参与者对学习者施加他们以为是真实电击的方式研究服从权威。65%的参与者继续施加到最大450伏特电压，揭示了权威人物的强大影响力。
Becker et al. (2002) explored social influence on eating behaviour by looking at how the presence of others affects food intake, e.g., modelling of eating in adolescent girls. The study demonstrated that peers can significantly shape eating habits, an important finding for understanding eating disorders.
Becker 等人（2002）考察了他人存在如何影响进食量，如青少年女孩的进食模仿，探讨社会对饮食行为的影响。该研究表明同伴能显著塑造饮食习惯，对理解进食障碍有重要意义。
8. Topic 5: Sleep and Dreams | 主题五：睡眠与梦
This topic covers biological rhythms, the stages of sleep, and theories explaining why we dream.
该主题涵盖生物节律、睡眠阶段以及解释我们为何做梦的理论。
Dement and Kleitman (1957) monitored participants' sleep in a lab using EEG and observed rapid eye movements (REM). They found that participants awakened during REM reported dreaming more often (80%) than those awakened in non-REM, linking REM sleep to dreaming.
Dement 和 Kleitman（1957）在实验室用脑电图监测参与者的睡眠并观察快速眼动（REM）。他们发现REM期被唤醒的参与者报告做梦频率（80%）高于non-REM期被唤醒者，将REM睡眠与做梦联系起来。
Rechtschaffen (1975) studied the effects of sleep deprivation. Rats deprived of sleep for extended periods lost weight, developed health problems, and eventually died, underscoring the vital restorative function of sleep.
Rechtschaffen（1975）研究了睡眠剥夺的影响。大鼠被长时间剥夺睡眠后体重下降、出现健康问题并最终死亡，凸显了睡眠至关重要的恢复功能。
Hobson and McCarley (1977) proposed the activation-synthesis theory, arguing that dreams result from the brain's attempt to make sense of random neural signals generated in the brainstem during REM sleep. This theory challenged Freudian wish-fulfilment ideas.
Hobson 和 McCarley（1977）提出激活整合理论，认为梦是大脑试图将REM睡眠期间脑干产生的随机神经信号加以整合理解的结果。该理论挑战了弗洛伊德的愿望实现说。
9. Topic 6: Psychological Problems | 主题六：心理问题
The Psychological Problems topic examines definitions of abnormality, causes of disorders such as schizophrenia and depression, and their treatments.
心理问题主题考查异常的定义、精神分裂症和抑郁症等障碍的原因及其治疗。
Rosenhan (1973) sent 'pseudopatients' reporting a single false symptom into psychiatric hospitals. Once admitted, they acted normally but remained hospitalised for an average of 19 days, highlighting the unreliability of psychiatric diagnosis and the danger of labelling.
Rosenhan（1973）派“假病人”报告一项假性症状入住精神病院。入院后他们行为正常却被平均住院19天，揭示了精神病诊断的不可靠性和标签化的危险。
Gottesman et al. (2010) studied national registry data in Denmark and found that children of two parents with schizophrenia had a significantly higher risk of developing the disorder compared with the general population, supporting a strong genetic component.
Gottesman 等人（2010）研究了丹麦国家登记数据，发现双亲均患有精神分裂症的子女患病风险远高于一般人群，支持了强烈的遗传因素。
Mendel et al. (2011) investigated the effectiveness of combining cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with antidepressants for treating depression. The combined treatment often led to better outcomes than medication alone, highlighting the value of psychological therapy.
Mendel 等人（2011）研究了认知行为治疗（CBT）联合抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的效果。联合治疗通常比单纯用药效果更好，突显了心理治疗的价值。
10. Research Methods (Paper 2) | 研究方法（试卷二）
Paper 2 requires a thorough understanding of how psychological research is designed, conducted, and analysed. You must be familiar with experimental methods, observational studies, questionnaires, interviews, and case studies.
试卷二要求透彻理解心理学研究如何设计、实施和分析。你必须熟悉实验法、观察研究、问卷、访谈和个案研究。
Key concepts include independent and dependent variables, operationalisation, extraneous and confounding variables, and controls. You should be able to write a fully operationalised hypothesis and identify suitable research designs such as independent groups or repeated measures.
关键概念包括自变量与因变量、操作化、额外变量与混淆变量及控制。你应能写出完整操作化的假设，并能确定合适的研究设计，如独立组或重复测量设计。
Ethical guidelines based on the BPS (British Psychological Society) are examinable. You need to know how to ensure informed consent, avoid deception, maintain confidentiality, protect participants from harm, and provide debriefing.
基于英国心理学会（BPS）的伦理准则属于考查范围。你需要知道如何确保知情同意、避免欺骗、维护保密性、保护参与者免受伤害并提供事后解释。
Data analysis in Paper 2 covers descriptive statistics (mean, median, mode, range), graphical representation (bar charts, histograms, scatter diagrams), and interpretation of findings. You will also be expected to comment on reliability and validity of procedures.
试卷二的数据分析涵盖描述统计（平均数、中位数、众数、全距）、图表表示（条形图、直方图、散点图）以及对结果的解读。你还须对研究程序的信度和效度作出评论。
11. Study Tips and Exam Preparation | 学习技巧与备考策略
Create a study timetable that allocates equal time to each of the six topics and to research methods. Start by learning the core studies thoroughly: the aim, procedure, findings, and conclusions in your own words.
制订学习时间表，给每个主题和研究方法分配均等时间。首先吃透核心研究：用自己的话掌握研究目的、程序、结果和结论。
Practice past papers under timed conditions regularly. For Paper 1, learn to link theories to studies and to write structured evaluation paragraphs using the 'point, evidence, explanation, link back' format. For 9-mark questions, aim for two well-developed evaluation points.
定期进行限时的历年试卷练习。针对试卷一，学会将理论与研究联系起来，用“论点-证据-解释-回扣”结构撰写评价段落。对于9分题，力求写出两个充分展开的评价点。
For Paper 2, use the pre-released booklet to predict questions. Design your own mini-research proposal and anticipate ethical and methodological critiques. Make a glossary of key terms and test yourself on definitions.
对于试卷二，利用预发材料预测题目。设计你自己的小型研究方案并预判伦理和方法学批评。制作关键术语词汇表并自测定义。
Active recall techniques, such as flashcards and teaching the content to a study partner, are more effective than simple re-reading. Always evaluate studies from multiple angles, including ethics, ecological validity, and sample generalisability.
主动回忆技巧（如闪卡和向学习伙伴讲解内容）比简单重读更有效。务必从多角度评价研究，包括伦理、生态效度和样本普遍性。
12. Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them | 常见误区及回避方法
One frequent mistake is confusing the aim of a study with its hypothesis. The aim is a general statement, whereas the hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction. Always distinguish them clearly.
一个常见错误是混淆研究目的与假设。目的是概括陈述，而假设是可检验的具体预测。务必清楚区分两者。
Students often describe a study in great detail but fail to link it to the question. When writing about a core study, explicitly state how it supports or challenges a theory and why that matters for the given scenario.
学生常详细描述研究，却未能与问题挂钩。在谈论核心研究时，要明确指出它如何支持或挑战某个理论，以及为何对所给情境重要。
In evaluation, avoid simple lists of strengths and weaknesses without justification. Instead, explain the consequences of a methodological weakness, e.g., low ecological validity reduces the study's applicability to real life.
在评价时，避免仅列出优缺点而不作解释。相反，要解释方法学弱点带来的后果，例如低生态效度会降低研究对现实生活的适用性。
For Paper 2, many candidates lose marks by not fully operationalising variables or by proposing unethical designs. Always check that your IV and DV are measurable and that your proposal meets BPS ethical standards.
就试卷二而言，许多考生因未充分操作化变量或提出不道德的设计而失分。务必检查自变量与因变量是否可测量，且方案符合BPS伦理标准。
Finally, time management in the exam is critical. Allocate roughly one minute per mark, and leave time to check your answers, especially for the longer essay questions that carry the heaviest weighting.
最后，考试中的时间管理至关重要。大致按每分钟一分来分配，并留出时间检查答案，尤其是分值最高的长作文题。
Published by TutorHao | Psychology Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图