📚 OCR GCSE Philosophy: Rapid Vocabulary Memorisation Guide | OCR 哲学：词汇术语速记指南
Mastering philosophical terminology is essential for success in Year 10 OCR Philosophy. This guide breaks down the most important terms into clear definitions, memorable contrasts, and clever memory hooks to help you learn faster and recall them confidently in an exam. Each section pairs a cluster of key terms with straightforward examples, so you can see how they fit into arguments about God, evil, knowledge and morality.
掌握哲学术语是 Year 10 OCR 哲学考试成功的关键。本指南将最重要的术语拆解成清晰的定义、对比鲜明的搭配和巧妙的记忆挂钩，帮助你更快学习并在考试中自信回忆。每一节都将一组关键术语与直白的例子配对，让你看到它们如何嵌入关于上帝、恶、知识和道德的各种论证中。
1. Theism, Atheism and Agnosticism | 有神论、无神论与不可知论
Theism is the belief that at least one deity exists. A theist usually holds that God is a personal, omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good being who created the universe and can intervene in the world.
有神论是相信至少有一位神存在的观点。有神论者通常认为上帝是一个人格化的、全能、全知且全善的存在，他创造了宇宙并能干预世界。
Atheism stands in direct contrast: it is the absence of belief in any god or gods. A positive atheist claims there is no God, while a negative atheist merely lacks belief in God without making the positive claim that God does not exist.
无神论与之直接对立：它指不相信任何神的存在。积极无神论者声称上帝不存在，而消极无神论者只是不信仰上帝，但并不主动声称上帝不存在。
Agnosticism is the view that we cannot know whether God exists. Agnostics typically argue that human reason and evidence are insufficient to prove or disprove a deity. The term comes from the Greek 'a-' (without) and 'gnosis' (knowledge).
不可知论认为我们无法知道上帝是否存在。不可知论者通常主张，人类理性和证据不足以证明或否定神的存在。这个术语来自希腊语'a-'（没有）和'gnosis'（知识）。
Memory tip: Think of 'Theist = The is a God', 'Atheist = Away with God', and 'Agnostic = A gnome who says “I don't know”'.
记忆技巧：把'Theist'想成'The is a God'（有一个神），'Atheist'想成'Away with God'（远离上帝），'Agnostic'想成一只说'I don't know'的小矮妖。
2. Omnipotence, Omniscience and Omnibenevolence | 全能、全知与全善
Omnipotence means being all-powerful. When philosophers say God is omnipotent, they usually mean God can do anything that is logically possible. Descartes went further and argued God could even change the laws of logic, but most theists reject that extreme view.
全能意味着全能的。当哲学家说上帝是全能的时，他们通常指上帝能做任何逻辑上可能的事。笛卡尔更进一步主张上帝甚至可以改变逻辑规律，但多数有神论者拒绝这种极端观点。
Omniscience is the property of knowing everything that can be known. This includes past, present and future events, as well as the inner thoughts and free choices of humans. The challenge arises whether an omniscient God knows future free choices, which seems to threaten human freedom.
全知是指知道一切能被知道的事物的属性。这包括过去、现在和未来的事件，以及人类内心的思想和自由选择。挑战在于：一个全知的上帝是否知道未来自由的选择，这似乎威胁到人的自由。
Omnibenevolence means being perfectly good or all-loving. God's omnibenevolence is central to ethical monotheism; it grounds the claim that God desires the best for His creation. This attribute is crucial for the problem of evil: if God is all-good, why does evil exist?
全善意味着至善或完全慈爱。上帝的全善是伦理一神论的核心；它支撑着上帝期望创造物获得最好的这一主张。这一属性对恶的问题至关重要：如果上帝是全善的，为何还有恶存在？
Quick memory: 'Omni-' means 'all' nipotent = all-powerful, omniscient = all-knowing, omnibenevolent = all-good. Link them to omnivorous, which means eating everything.
快速记忆：'Omni-'表示“所有”。因此omnipotent = 全能的，omniscient = 全知的，omnibenevolent = 全善的。将它们与omnivorous（杂食的）联系起来，后者表示吃一切东西。
3. Moral Evil and Natural Evil | 道德恶与自然恶
Philosophers distinguish two types of evil to refine the problem of evil. Moral evil refers to suffering caused by the free choices of human beings, such as murder, theft, war and cruelty. It raises the question of why a good God would give humans the freedom to cause such harm.
哲学家区分两种恶以细化恶的问题。道德恶指的是由人类自由选择造成的苦难，例如谋杀、盗窃、战争和残忍行为。这引发一个问题：为何一位良善的上帝会给予人类造成如此伤害的自由。
Natural evil is suffering that results from the operation of nature without any human agency, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, diseases and animal pain. This type of evil is often considered harder to reconcile with an omnibenevolent God because it appears built into creation itself.
自然恶是指在没有人类参与的情况下，由于自然界的运作而产生的苦难，例如地震、海啸、疾病和动物的痛苦。这类恶通常被认为更难与一位全善的上帝协调，因为它似乎内建于受造界本身。
To remember these, pair 'moral' with 'man-made' and 'natural' with 'nature'. You can visualise a thief (moral evil) standing in a hurricane (natural evil).
要记住这些，将“道德”与“人为”配对，将“自然”与“自然界”配对。你可以想象一个小偷（道德恶）站在飓风（自然恶）中。
| Type of Evil | 恶的类型 | Source | 来源 | Example | 例子 |
|---|---|---|
| Moral evil | Human free will | Genocide, bullying |
| Natural evil | Laws of nature | Volcanic eruption, cancer |
4. Free Will and Determinism | 自由意志与决定论
Free will is the ability of an agent to make choices that are genuinely open and for which they can be held morally responsible. Many theists argue that God gave humans free will because love and goodness require free choice to be meaningful.
自由意志是指行动者做出真正开放的、可以为其承担道德责任的选择的能力。许多有神论者认为，上帝赐予人类自由意志，因为爱与善需要自由选择才能有意义。
Determinism challenges this by claiming that every event, including human decisions, is the necessary result of prior causes. Hard determinism says free will is an illusion; soft determinism (compatibilism) holds that free will is compatible with some forms of determinism.
决定论对此提出挑战，它声称每一个事件，包括人类决定，都是先前原因的必然结果。硬决定论认为自由意志是幻觉；软决定论（相容论）则认为自由意志与某种形式的决定论可以相容。
In OCR philosophy, free will is especially important when discussing the free will defence. This argument says God is not to blame for moral evil because a world with significant free will is better than one with pre-programmed robots, even if that freedom leads to evil.
在OCR哲学中，当讨论自由意志辩护时，自由意志尤为重要。这一论证指出，上帝不应为道德恶负责，因为一个拥有重大自由意志的世界比一个装满预设程序机器人的世界更好，即便这种自由会导向恶。
Memory phrase: 'Determinism closes doors, free will opens windows.' Visualise a prisoner in chains (determined) next to a bird choosing a direction in the sky (free will).
记忆短语：“决定论关上门，自由意志打开窗。” 想象一个戴着锁链的囚犯（被决定的）在天空中选择方向的飞鸟（自由意志）。
5. General Revelation and Special Revelation | 普遍启示与特殊启示
Revelation refers to God making Himself known to human beings. General revelation is the indirect knowledge of God available to everyone through the natural world, conscience, and reason. The beauty and order of the universe, for example, can point to a designer.
启示指的是上帝向人类彰显自己。普遍启示是每个人通过自然界、良心和理性能够获得的关于上帝的间接知识。例如，宇宙的美和秩序可以指向一位设计者。
Special revelation is God's direct self-disclosure to particular people at specific times. This includes scripture (the Bible, Quran), miracles, the incarnation of Jesus, and prophetic visions. Special revelation is needed, some argue, because general revelation is not enough for salvation or a personal relationship with God.
特殊启示是上帝在特定时间向特定人物直接的自我彰显。这包括经文（圣经、古兰经）、神迹、耶稣的道成肉身和先知的异象。一些人认为，特殊启示是必要的，因为普遍启示不足以带来救赎或与上帝建立个人关系。
To recall the distinction, think of 'general' as 'general knowledge'—something everyone can access, like a museum open to all. 'Special' is an invite-only gallery where God reveals His specific plans.
要回忆这个区别，把“普遍”想成“常识”——每个人都可获取的东西，比如对所有人开放的博物馆。“特殊”则是仅限受邀进入的画廊，上帝在其中启示祂具体的计划。
6. Design Argument and First Cause Argument | 设计论证与第一因论证
The Design Argument (also called the Teleological Argument) reasons that the universe exhibits complex order and purpose, which is best explained by an intelligent designer. William Paley's watchmaker analogy compares a watch's intricate parts to the natural world: if you find a watch on a heath, you infer a watchmaker; similarly, the complexity of nature implies a divine Designer.
设计论证（也称目的论论证）推理说，宇宙展现出复杂的秩序和目的，这最好由一位智能设计者来解释。威廉·佩利的手表匠类比将手表的精密零件比作自然界：如果你在荒地发现一只手表，你会推断有一位制造者；同样，自然界的复杂性暗示了一位神圣设计者。
The First Cause Argument (Cosmological Argument) argues that everything that begins to exist has a cause; the universe began to exist, so it must have a cause. Thomas Aquinas' version uses the idea of an infinite regress of movers or causes being impossible, so there must be an unmoved first mover—God.
第一因论证（宇宙论论证）认为，凡是开始存在的事物都有一个原因；宇宙开始存在，因此它必须有一个原因。托马斯·阿奎那的版本运用了推动者或原因的无限回溯是不可能的这一观念，所以必定存在一个不动的第一推动者——上帝。
Remember the difference with a journey metaphor: The Design Argument looks at the pattern of footprints on a beach (intelligent arrangement), while the First Cause Argument asks what started the first footstep (uncaused cause).
用一个旅行隐喻来记忆区别：设计论证看的是海滩上脚印的图式（智能排列），而第一因论证则问什么是启动第一步脚印的（无因之因）。
7. Religious Experience: Corporate and Numinous | 宗教体验：团体性与努秘体验
A religious experience is a subjective encounter with the divine or a transcendent reality. OCR often highlights two types: corporate experiences and numinous experiences. A corporate religious experience occurs when a group shares a spiritual event simultaneously, such as the Toronto Blessing, where congregations report laughing, crying or speaking in tongues together.
宗教体验是个人与神圣者或超越实在的相遇，是主观的。OCR通常突出两种类型：团体性体验和努秘体验。团体性宗教体验发生在一群人同时共享一个属灵事件时，例如多伦多祝福，会众报告一起大笑、哭泣或说方言。
The numinous experience, described by Rudolf Otto, is a powerful, non-sensory awareness of a wholly other, majestic presence that evokes both awe and dread. Otto called it the mysterium tremendum et fascinans—a mystery that makes you tremble and yet fascinates you. Unlike a corporate experience, it is often deeply personal.
努秘体验，由鲁道夫·奥托描述，是一种强有力的、非感官性的对一个全然他者、威严临在的感知，它同时唤起敬畏与恐惧。奥托称之为mysterium tremendum et fascinans——一个让你战栗却又吸引你的奥秘。与团体体验不同，它往往是高度个人化的。
To pin down the contrast, label the corporate experience 'shared joy' and the numinous 'solo awe'. Imagine a stadium full of people feeling one spirit and a lone mountaineer overwhelmed by a silent, majestic presence.
要抓住对比，将团体体验标记为“共享的喜乐”，将努秘体验标记为“独自的敬畏”。想象坐满人的体育场感受到同一种灵，和一个孤独的登山者被无声的、威严的临在所淹没。
8. Conscience: God-given or Societal? | 良心：神赐的还是社会的？
Conscience is the inner sense of right and wrong that guides moral decisions. In religious thought, conscience is often understood as the voice of God within a person. St. Paul wrote of the law 'written on their hearts', and Cardinal Newman saw conscience as a direct messenger from God, not merely a psychological product.
良心是引导道德决定的内在是非感。在宗教思想中，良心常被理解为上帝在人里面的声音。圣保罗写到律法“刻在心上”，纽曼枢机主教则认为良心是直接来自上帝的使者，而不仅仅是心理产物。
Other thinkers, like Sigmund Freud, suggest conscience develops from social conditioning and the internalisation of parental and societal rules (super-ego). In this view, conscience is not transcendent but the result of upbringing and culture.
其他思想家，如西格蒙德·弗洛伊德，认为良心由社会条件作用以及父母和社会规则的内化（超我）发展而来。按照这种观点，良心并非超越的，而是教养和文化的产物。
ven or social, conscience is treated as a key source of moral authority. A quick mnemonic: 'Conscience = con + science', as in 'with knowledge'—it knows what you did!
在OCR考试中，总是将良心与道德决策和自由意志联系起来。无论是神赐的还是社会的，良心都被视为道德权威的关键来源。一个快速助记法：'Conscience = con + science'，即“带有知识”——它知道你做了什么！
9. Miracles: Intervention and Violation | 神迹：干预与违反
A miracle is typically defined as an extraordinary event brought about by God that goes beyond the ordinary laws of nature. David Hume defined a miracle as 'a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity', emphasising that it breaks the regular pattern of nature.
神迹通常被定义为由上帝造成的超越自然界常规法则的非凡事件。大卫·休谟将神迹定义为“由神祇特定意志对自然法则的违反”，强调它打破了自然界的常规模式。
Philosophers of religion debate whether miracles are violations (breaking natural laws) or transformative interventions that work through nature. For example, a miraculous healing could be seen as a divine acceleration of a natural process or a supernatural interruption. The key concept is that miracles reveal God's power and compassionate character.
宗教哲学家争论神迹究竟是违反自然规律（打破自然法则），还是贯穿自然的、转化性的干预。例如，一个神奇的医治可以被视为对自然过程的加速，或是一种超自然的打断。核心概念是神迹揭示了上帝的能力和慈爱性情。
Recall Hume's challenge: it is always more probable that the testimony of a miracle is mistaken than that a miracle actually occurred. Link this to the word 'hume' sounding like 'humour'—he was sceptical, but with a dry wit.
回忆休谟的挑战：神迹的证词出错的概率总是高于神迹实际发生的概率。将这一点联结：'Hume'听起来像'humour'（幽默）——他对此持怀疑态度，但带着一种冷幽默。
10. Theodicy and Defence | 神义论与辩护
A theodicy is an attempt to justify God's goodness in the face of evil. It aims to show that God has morally sufficient reasons for permitting evil. The most famous theodicy by Irenaeus suggests that evil and suffering are necessary for soul-making: through facing hardship, human beings grow into the likeness of God and develop virtues like courage and compassion.
神义论是一种在恶的存在面前为上帝的良善辩护的尝试。它旨在表明上帝有道德上充分的理由允许恶存在。爱任纽最著名的神义论提出，恶与苦难对于灵魂塑造是必需的：通过面对困境，人类成长为上帝的样式，并发展出勇气和同情心等美德。
Augustine's theodicy, in contrast, argues that evil is a privation—a lack of goodness—rather than a created thing. Evil entered the world through the misuse of free will by angels and humans, and all suffering is a just consequence of original sin. A soul-deciding emphasis rather than soul-making.
相反，奥古斯丁的神义论主张恶是一种缺乏——善的缺失——而不是被造之物。恶通过天使和人类对自由意志的滥用进入世界，所有苦难都是原罪的公正后果。这是一种灵魂抉择的侧重，而非灵魂塑造。
A defence is more modest: it does not claim to know God's actual reasons but merely shows that it is logically possible for a loving God and evil to coexist. Alvin Plantinga's free will defence argues that even an omnipotent God cannot guarantee that free beings always choose good, so it is possible that God created a world with free will and the resulting moral evil. Remember: a theodicy tells a plausible story; a defence simply removes a contradiction.
辩护则更为谦虚：它不声称知道上帝的实际理由，仅表明一位慈爱的上帝与恶共存是逻辑上可能的。阿尔文·普兰丁格的自由意志辩护主张，即使全能的上帝也无法保证自由的存在者总是选择善，因此上帝创造了一个拥有自由意志并伴随道德恶的世界，这是可能的。记住：神义论讲述一个看似合理的故事；辩护仅仅是消除矛盾。
Final memory shortcut: 'Irenaeus = I raise us' (soul-making raises us), 'Augustine = A gust of sin' (evil came in like a gust through sin), 'Plantinga = Planting a free garden' (God plants a garden of free agents).
最终记忆捷径：'Irenaeus = I raise us'（灵魂塑造使我们提升），'Augustine = 一阵罪风'（恶像一阵风般通过罪进入），'Plantinga = 种植自由的花园'（上帝种植了一个自由行动者的花园）。
11. Dualism and Materialism | 二元论与唯物主义
When studying life after death and the soul, OCR introduces dualism and materialism. Dualism is the belief that a human being consists of two distinct substances: a physical body and a non-physical soul or mind. Plato and Descartes were dualists; they argued the soul can survive the death of the body.
在研究来世和灵魂时，OCR引入了二元论和唯物主义。二元论相信人由两种不同的实体构成：物质的身体和非物质的灵魂或心灵。柏拉图和笛卡尔是二元论者；他们主张灵魂在肉体死亡后可以继续存在。
Materialism, on the other hand, claims that a human being is entirely physical. Mental processes and consciousness are functions of the brain, and when the body dies, personal existence ends. Richard Dawkins and other atheists often support a materialist view, though some Christians argue bodily resurrection allows a material continuity after death.
另一方面，唯物主义声称人完全是物质的。心理过程和意识是大脑的功能，当身体死亡时，个人的存在也就结束。理查德·道金斯和其他无神论者通常支持唯物主义观点，尽管一些基督徒认为身体复活允许死后物质的连续性。
Link 'dualism' to 'dual carriageway'—two lanes, body and soul. Link 'materialism' to 'matter'—only matter matters. This distinction is vital for evaluating arguments about resurrection and immortality.
将“二元论”与“双车道”联系起来——两条道，身体和灵魂。将“唯物主义”与“物质”联系起来——只有物质是重要的。这一区分对于评估关于复活和不朽的论证至关重要。
12. Relativism and Absolutism in Ethics | 伦理中的相对主义与绝对主义
Many ethical issues in OCR philosophy hinge on whether moral values are absolute or relative. Moral absolutism is the view that certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of consequences or cultural norms. For example, absolutists might argue that torture is always wrong, in every circumstance.
OCR哲学中的许多伦理问题取决于道德价值是绝对的还是相对的。道德绝对主义认为某些行为本质上是正确或错误的，与后果或文化规范无关。例如，绝对主义者可能主张酷刑在任何情况下都永远是错误的。
Moral relativism, in contrast, claims that right and wrong depend on culture, situation, or individual choice. What is considered virtuous in one society may be condemned in another, and there is no overarching objective standard. This raises problems for religious ethics: if God's commands are absolute, can they be relative to context?
相反，道德相对主义声称对与错取决于文化、情境或个人选择。在一个社会中被视为美德的行为在另一个社会可能被谴责，没有总括性的客观标准。这给宗教伦理学带来问题：如果上帝的命令是绝对的，它们能否与情境相关？
To recall the core clash, think of absolutism as 'always the same answer' and relativism as 'it depends who you ask'. In exam responses, always link absolutism to divine command theory and relativism to situation ethics or cultural diversity arguments.
要记住核心冲突，把绝对主义想成“永远是同样的答案”，把相对主义想成“这取决于你问谁”。在考试回答中，总是将绝对主义与神圣命令理论联系，将相对主义与情境伦理学或文化多样性论证联系。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图