📚 OCR Law Year 10 Glossary & Memory Guide | OCR 法律十年级词汇术语速记指南
Mastering legal terminology is the first critical step for Year 10 students studying OCR Law. Without a firm grasp of the language, analysing cases and applying principles becomes nearly impossible. This guide provides clear definitions, simple memory tricks, and paired examples to help you lock these terms into your long-term memory. Use it alongside your class notes and past papers.
掌握法律术语是十年级学生学习 OCR 法律课程的第一个关键步骤。如果对专业语言没有牢固的理解，分析案例和运用原则几乎不可能。本指南提供了清晰的定义、简单的记忆技巧和配套示例，帮助你将术语牢牢印入长期记忆。建议配合课堂笔记和历年真题一起使用。
1. Actus Reus – The Guilty Act | 犯罪行为——有罪的行为
The phrase actus reus is Latin for 'guilty act'. It refers to the physical element of a crime. For most offences, the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed a voluntary act (or sometimes an omission) that caused the prohibited consequence. Think of the 'A' in Actus as the actual Action.
Actus reus 是拉丁语，意为“有罪的行为”。它指的是犯罪的客观要素。在大多数犯罪中，控方必须证明被告实施了一个自愿行为（有时也可以是不作为），并导致了被禁止的后果。可以把 Actus 中的“A”联想为实际的行动（Action）。
- Example: In a theft case, the actus reus is the physical taking of someone else's property.
- 示例：在盗窃案件中，犯罪行为就是实际取走他人财产。
Actus Reus = Action + Consequence
犯罪行为 = 行动 + 后果
2. Mens Rea – The Guilty Mind | 犯罪意图——有罪的心理
Mens rea means 'guilty mind'. It is the mental element of a crime, covering what the defendant intended or foresaw. The level of mens rea required varies: some crimes require intention (direct or oblique), while others only need recklessness. Link the 'M' in Mens to Mind to recall this term instantly.
Mens rea 意为“有罪的心理”。它是犯罪的主观要素，涉及被告的意图或预见。不同罪名要求的犯罪意图程度不同：有些需要故意（直接或间接故意），有些仅需轻率。将 Mens 中的“M”联想为头脑（Mind），就能立即回忆起这个术语。
- Direct intent: aiming to cause a result (e.g. punching someone).
- Oblique intent: the result was virtually certain, and the defendant realised this.
- Recklessness: knowingly taking an unjustifiable risk.
- 直接故意：旨在造成某种结果（如故意打人）。
- 间接故意：结果几乎是必然的，且被告意识到这一点。
- 轻率：明知有不合理的风险仍然冒险行事。
3. Strict Liability – No Mens Rea Required | 严格责任——无需犯罪意图
Some offences require no proof of mens rea for at least one element of the actus reus. These are called strict liability offences. Only the guilty act must be proved. The defendant's state of mind is irrelevant. Think of it as 'Strict = no excuses' – once the act is done, you are liable.
有些犯罪至少对于犯罪行为的一个要素不要求证明犯罪意图，这称为严格责任犯罪。只需证明有罪行为即可。被告的心理状态无关紧要。可以记作“严格 = 没有任何借口”——一旦实施了该行为，就要承担责任。
- Example: Selling alcohol to a minor is a strict liability offence. Even if you genuinely believed the person was over 18, you are guilty.
- 示例：向未成年人出售酒精饮料属于严格责任犯罪。即使你真诚地相信对方已年满十八岁，你仍然有罪。
| Offence Type | Required Elements |
| 常规犯罪 | Actus Reus + Mens Rea |
| 严格责任 | Actus Reus only (for certain elements) |
4. Causation – The Link Between Act and Consequence | 因果关系——行为与后果之间的纽带
For result crimes, the prosecution must prove causation: that the defendant's act was both the factual and legal cause of the consequence. Factual causation uses the 'but for' test: but for the defendant's conduct, would the result have happened? Legal causation requires the defendant's act to be a more than minimal cause.
对于结果犯，控方必须证明因果关系：被告的行为既是结果的事实原因，也是法律原因。事实因果关系采用“若无法则”检验：如果没有被告的行为，结果还会发生吗？法律因果关系要求被告的行为是结果的实质性原因（不仅仅是微小原因）。
- Factual: 'But for' the defendant's action, the victim would not have died.
- Legal: The defendant's act was the operating and substantial cause.
- 事实因果关系：若无被告的行为，受害人本不会死亡。
- 法律因果关系：被告的行为是有效和实质性的原因。
5. Precedent – Following Past Decisions | 判例——遵循先前的判决
Precedent is the doctrine that lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts in later cases with similar material facts. This brings consistency to the law. The key Latin phrase is stare decisis – 'stand by things decided'. Visualise previous cases as stepping stones a judge must follow, unless they can distinguish the facts.
判例原则是指下级法院在后来类似重要事实的案件中必须遵循上级法院的判决。这使得法律具有一致性。关键的拉丁短语是 stare decisis——“遵循先例判断”。想象以前的案例是法官必须踏上的垫脚石，除非他们能区分事实。
- Binding precedent: a court must follow it.
- Persuasive precedent: a court may choose to follow it, but is not obliged.
- 有约束力的判例：法院必须遵循。
- 有说服力的判例：法院可以选择遵循，但没有义务。
6. Ratio Decidendi – The Binding Reason | 判决理由——具有约束力的理由
The ratio decidendi is 'the reason for deciding'. It is the legal principle or rule on which a court's decision is based. Only the ratio forms binding precedent. When reading a case, imagine extracting the golden nugget of law – that's the ratio. Everything else is background comment.
判决理由 就是“判决的原因”。它是法院作出决定所依据的法律原则或规则。只有判决理由才构成有约束力的判例。阅读案例时，想象提取出法律金块——那就是判决理由。其余的都是附带评论。
- How to find it: look for the statement of law that was necessary to reach the verdict.
- 如何寻找：寻找为达成裁决所必需的法律陈述。
7. Obiter Dicta – Things Said By The Way | 附带意见——判决中的旁论
Obiter dicta (singular: obiter dictum) are remarks made by a judge that are not essential to the decision. They are not binding but can be highly persuasive in future cases. Think of them as wise asides that later courts might respect, especially if delivered by a senior judge.
附带意见（单数：obiter dictum）是法官作出的对判决并非必要的评论。它们不具有约束力，但在未来案件中可能具有很强的说服力。可以把它们想象成睿智的旁白，后来的法院可能会予以尊重，尤其是由资深法官作出时。
- Example: hypothetical situations discussed by the judge.
- 示例：法官讨论的假设性情形。
| Latin Term | Meaning | Binding? |
| Ratio decidendi | 判决理由 | Yes |
| Obiter dicta | 附带意见 | No, but persuasive |
8. Statutory Interpretation – Reading the Words of Parliament | 法律解释——解读议会的文字
Statutory interpretation is how judges work out the meaning of words in Acts of Parliament. Since statutes are not always perfectly clear, courts use three main rules: the literal rule (ordinary dictionary meaning), the golden rule (avoiding absurdity), and the mischief rule (looking at the gap the statute aimed to fill). Remember the acronym LGM: Literal, Golden, Mischief.
法律解释 是指法官如何解读议会法案中词语的含义。由于成文法并不总是完全清晰，法院采用三种主要规则：文义规则（普通字典含义）、黄金规则（避免荒谬结果）和弊端规则（考察该法旨在填补的漏洞）。记住缩写 LGM：文义（Literal）、黄金（Golden）、弊端（Mischief）。
- Literal rule: follow the exact wording, even if harsh.
- Golden rule: modify the literal meaning to avoid repugnant results.
- Mischief rule: identify the 'mischief' the statute intended to remedy.
- 文义规则：严格遵循字面意思，即使结果严苛。
- 黄金规则：为避免明显荒谬的结果而调整字面含义。
- 弊端规则：识别该法旨在纠正的“弊端”。
9. Delegated Legislation – Law Made by Others | 授权立法——由他人制定的法律
Delegated legislation is law made by a person or body other than Parliament, but authorised by a parent Act. It includes statutory instruments, bylaws, and Orders in Council. This allows detailed rules to be made quickly by experts. Think 'Parliament delegates power to the minister, and they legislate'.
授权立法 是由议会以外的人或机构根据授权法案制定的法律。它包括法定文件、地方法规和枢密院令。这允许专家迅速制定详细规则。可以这样想：“议会将权力授予部长，由部长进行立法”。
- Statutory Instruments: made by government ministers.
- Bylaws: made by local councils or public bodies.
- Orders in Council: made by the Privy Council at times of emergency.
- 法定文件：由政府部长制定。
- 地方法规：由地方议会或公共机构制定。
- 枢密院令：在紧急时期由枢密院制定。
10. Civil vs Criminal Law – Two Branches of the System | 民法与刑法——法律体系的两大分支
It is vital to distinguish between civil law and criminal law tes between individuals or organisations, where the claimant sues the defendant. The outcome is usually a remedy, such as damages. Remember: Criminal = Crime, Punishment; Civil = Compensation, Disputes.
区分民法和刑法至关重要。刑法处理对社会有害的行为，由国家起诉被告，结果是惩罚。民法处理个人或组织之间的纠纷，由原告起诉被告，结果通常是救济，如损害赔偿。记住：刑事 = 犯罪与惩罚；民事 = 赔偿与纠纷。
| 特征 | Criminal Law | Civil Law |
| Parties | State v Defendant | Claimant v Defendant |
| Purpose | Punishment, deterrence | Compensation, remedy |
| Standard of proof | Beyond reasonable doubt | Balance of probabilities |
| Example | R v Smith | Jones v Brown |
11. Tort Law – Civil Wrongs | 侵权法——民事过错
Tort law is a major area of civil law that deals with wrongs (other than breach of contract) causing harm or loss. The most common tort is negligence, which requires duty of care, breach of that duty, and resultant damage. Think of tort as 'twisted' – someone's actions twisted out of shape, causing harm that must be put right.
侵权法是民法的一个重要领域，处理除违约之外造成损害或损失的过错行为。最常见的侵权是过失侵权，它要求有注意义务、违反了该义务并造成了损害。可以把侵权（tort）想象成“扭曲”——某人的行为扭曲变形，造成了必须纠正的损害。
- Negligence: a failure to take reasonable care.
- Trespass: direct interference with a person, land, or goods.
- Nuisance: interference with the enjoyment of land.
- 过失：未能尽到合理注意义务。
- 侵入：直接干涉他人人身、土地或财物。
- 妨扰：干预他人对土地的享用。
12. Legal Memory Techniques – Making Terms Stick | 法律记忆术——让术语扎根
Use the following strategies to embed these terms permanently. Acronyms: AR + MR = Crime (Actus Reus + Mens Rea). Visual links: picture a guilty mind (mens rea) hovering over a guilty hand (actus reus). Chunking: group terms by topic (crime, precedent, interpretation). Active recall: cover definitions and test yourself, then flip. Write your own silly sentences mixing Latin and English – the more absurd, the better it sticks.
使用以下策略将这些术语永久牢记。首字母缩略词：AR + MR = 犯罪。 视觉联想：想象一个有罪的心理（mens rea）悬浮在有罪的手（actus reus）上方。分块记忆：按主题（犯罪、判例、解释）对术语进行分组。主动回忆：遮住定义自我测验，然后翻转查看。自己写一些混合拉丁语和英语的滑稽句子——越荒谬，记得越牢。
- Mind map: draw a central 'Law Year 10' bubble and branch out.
- Flashcards: write the term on one side, definition and example on the other.
- 思维导图：绘制一个中心气泡“十年级法律”，然后向外分支。
- 抽认卡：一面写术语，另一面写定义和示例。
Published by TutorHao | OCR Law Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图