← 返回资讯屏轩教育 · 行业资讯

Year 10 AQA Philosophy: Quick Guide to Key Vocabulary & Terminology | AQA 哲学:词汇术语速记指南

2026-07-19 08:59 · 本文部分内容由AI辅助创作

📚 Year 10 AQA Philosophy: Quick Guide to Key Vocabulary & Terminology | AQA 哲学:词汇术语速记指南

Welcome to your essential revision companion for Year 10 AQA Philosophy. If you find yourself staring at a list of philosophical terms feeling utterly lost, you are not alone. Philosophy can often feel like learning a completely new language, and in many ways, it is. This guide is not a boring glossary to memorise; it is a carefully structured journey through the core vocabulary you need to master, designed to help these words stick in your long-term memory. We will explore the central concepts from epistemology, ethics, philosophy of mind, and the problem of evil, transforming complex terminology into ideas you can genuinely understand and recall with confidence in your exams.

欢迎来到 Year 10 AQA 哲学课程的核心复习伴侣。如果你曾经盯着满篇哲学术语感到完全摸不着头脑,你并不孤单。哲学学习常常感觉像是在学习一门全新的语言,而且某种程度上它确实如此。这份指南并不是让你死记硬背的枯燥词汇表,而是一趟精心设计的旅程,带你掌握必须精通的核心词汇,旨在帮助你把这些词牢牢印入长期记忆。我们将探索认识论、伦理学、心灵哲学和恶的问题中的核心概念,把复杂的术语转化为你能够真正理解并在考场上自信回忆的思想。


1. Epistemology: The Foundation | 认识论:地基

Every towering philosophical structure needs a solid foundation, and that foundation is epistemology. Break the word down to remember it: 'episteme' (knowledge) + 'logos' (study of). Epistemology is simply the branch of philosophy that investigates the nature, sources, and limits of human knowledge. The central question it asks is: 'How do I know what I know?'

每一座高耸的哲学大厦都需要坚实的地基,而这个地基就是认识论。拆解这个词来记忆:'episteme'(知识)+ 'logos'(研究)。认识论就是哲学中探究人类知识的本质、来源和局限性的分支。它提出的核心问题是:“我是如何知道我已知晓之事?”


2. Rationalism vs. Empiricism: The Great Debate | 理性主义与经验主义:终极思辩

This is the most fundamental clash in epistemology, and you must know the difference cold. A rationalist argues that the primary source of knowledge is reason itself, and we are born with innate ideas. The mind is not an empty bucket waiting to be filled. An empiricist, by stark contrast, claims that all knowledge ultimately comes from sensory experience. The mind at birth is a blank slate, a 'tabula rasa', and experience writes upon it. To memorise this, link rationalism to 'ratio' (calculation in the mind) and empiricism to 'empirical' (observable data in a science lab).

这是认识论中最根本的冲突点,你必须彻底掌握这个区别。理性主义者认为,知识的主要来源是理性本身,我们天生就拥有内在观念。心灵并非一只等待被填充的空桶。与之形成鲜明对比的是,经验主义者声称所有知识最终都来自于感官经验。心灵在出生时是一块白板,即'tabula rasa',是经验在上面书写痕迹。为了记住这点,把理性主义(rationalism)与“比率/运算”(ratio,脑海中的计算)联系起来,把经验主义(empiricism)与“实证的”(empirical,科学实验室里可观测的数据)联系起来。


3. A Priori and A Posteriori: The Two Gateways | 先天与后天:两种认知之门

These two Latin phrases describe how we justify a belief. An a priori statement is justified independently of experience; you can verify it just by thinking. 'All bachelors are unmarried men' is a classic example. An a posteriori statement, however, requires you to go and check the world. You cannot sit in a dark room and think your way to knowing the boiling point of water; you must measure it. A useful memory hack: 'A priori' is 'prior' to experience; 'A POSTeriori' is 'post' (after) experience.

这两个拉丁短语描述了我们证明一个信念的方式。先天陈述的论证独立于经验之外,你仅凭思考就能验证它。“所有单身汉都是未婚男性”就是一个经典例子。然而,后天陈述则需要你去观察和检验世界。你不可能坐在暗室里凭空想出水的沸点,你必须去测量它。一个有用的记忆技巧:'A priori' 在经验之“先”;'A POSTeriori' 则在经验之“后”。


4. Substance Dualism: Mind and Body Split | 实体二元论:心身分离

In philosophy of mind, this is the big idea most often linked to René Descartes. Substance dualism claims that the mind and the body are two fundamentally different kinds of substances. The mind is a non-physical, thinking substance, while the body is a physical, extended substance that occupies space. The critical problem is explaining how they interact. To remember this, picture a ghost (the non-physical mind) driving a machine (the physical body). This is Descartes's famous 'ghost in the machine' scenario, a phrase you should connect instantly to interaction problems.

在心灵哲学中,这是最常与笛卡尔联系在一起的宏大构想。实体二元论声称,心灵与身体是两种根本不同的实体类型。心灵是非物质的、会思考的实体,而身体则是物质的、具有空间广延性的实体。关键问题在于解释它们是如何相互作用的。为了记住这点,可以想象一个幽灵(非物质的心灵)在操控一台机器(物质的身体)。这就是笛卡尔著名的“机器中的幽灵”情境,你应该立即将这个词与交互作用难题联系起来。


5. Materialism: The Physical Answer | 唯物论:物理主义的回应

Materialism, often used interchangeably with physicalism, sweeps away the ghost entirely. The materialist view states that the mind is not a separate substance; mental states are entirely identical to, or supervenient upon, physical brain states. There is only one kind of stuff in the universe: matter. A memory anchor for this is the phrase 'You are your brain'. Every thought, every emotion, is just a neural process. When your brain ceases to function, your mind ceases to exist.

唯物论,常与物理主义交替使用,彻底驱散了幽灵。唯物主义观点认为,心灵并非独立的实体;心理状态完全等同于或随附于物理的大脑状态。宇宙中只存在一种东西:物质。一个记忆锚点是短语“你就是你的大脑”。每一个想法、每一种情绪,都不过是神经生物过程。当你的大脑停止运作时,你的心智也就不复存在了。


6. Utilitarianism: The Greatest Happiness | 功利主义:最大幸福原则

Shift into ethics with this heavyweight theory created by Jeremy Bentham and later refined by John Stuart Mill. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning the moral rightness of an action is judged solely by its consequences. Its core principle is the Greatest Happiness Principle: the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. To lock this in, think of a giant happiness calculator. Hedonic Calculus in, right answer out. A short-hand mantra: 'Maximise pleasure, minimise pain for everyone affected'.

现在进入伦理学,这是由边沁首创、后经密尔完善的重磅理论。功利主义是一种后果论理论,意味着一个行为在道德上的对错仅仅由其后果来判明。其核心原则是最大幸福原则:正确的行为就是能为最大多数人创造出最大幸福总量的那个行为。要深刻记住这点,可以想象一个巨大的幸福计算器。输入快乐微积分,输出正确答案。一个简短的记忆口诀:“让所有相关之人的快乐最大化,痛苦最小化”。


广告 / Sponsored

7. Deontology: The Duty-Based Challenge | 义务论:基于责任的挑战

Immanuel Kant's deontology is the arch-rival of utilitarianism. Deontology comes from the Greek 'deon' (duty). Kant argues that consequences are irrelevant to the moral value of an action. What matters is that you act out of a sense of duty, following moral rules. The core test is the Categorical Imperative, which demands that you only act according to a rule that you could rationally will to become a universal law for everyone. Never treat people merely as a means to an end. The quick definition: Rule-worship based on reason alone.

康德的义务论是功利主义的头号劲敌。义务论一词源于希腊语'deon'(责任)。康德认为,后果与一个行为的道德价值完全无关。重要的是你出于责任感而行事,遵循道德规则。核心检验标准是定言命令,它要求你只依照你能够理性地希望其成为普遍法则的规则来行动。永远不要把他人仅仅当作达成目的的工具。简便定义:纯粹基于理性的规则至上主义。


8. The Problem of Evil: The Logical and Evidential Challenges | 恶的问题:逻辑与证据的双重挑战

idential problem. The logical version claims a direct inconsistency: a God who is all-loving (omnibenevolent), all-powerful (omnipotent), and all-knowing (omniscient) cannot logically coexist with the existence of evil. The evidential version accepts that God' nce highly improbable. A tip for recall: Logical = rules of logic broken. Evidential = weight of evidence against.

这是反对古典有神论之上帝存在的最有力论证。你必须区分逻辑版本与证据版本。逻辑版本声称存在直接的逻辑矛盾:一个全爱(全善)、全能且全知的上帝,在逻辑上不可能与恶的存在同时为真。证据版本则接受上帝的存在在逻辑上是可能的,但声称世界上存在如此大量且分布广泛的无端苦难,使得上帝的存在变得极为不可能。回忆提示:逻辑问题 = 逻辑规则被破坏;证据问题 = 证据的份量压倒性地反对。


9. Theodicies: Defending the Divine | 神正论:为神辩护

A theodicy is an attempt to justify God's permission of evil. You will study the central ones, like the Free Will Defence. This argument claims that God wanted to create a world with genuine free beings capable of moral choice. Genuine freedom necessarily entails the possibility of choosing evil, making God not responsible for moral evil. For natural evil, the soul-making theodicy (often linked to Irenaeus and Hicks) suggests that suffering is necessary for spiritual growth, helping us develop virtues like compassion and courage. A mnemonic: 'Evil is the gym for the soul'.

神正论是为神允许恶存在提供合理辩护的尝试。你会学习到其中几个核心理论,比如自由意志辩护。这个论证声称,上帝想要创造一个拥有真正自由、能够做出道德选择的世界。真正的自由必然蕴含着选择恶的可能性,因此上帝不对道德之恶负责。对于自然之恶,塑造灵魂的神正论(常与爱任纽和希克联系在一起)认为,苦难对于灵性成长是必要的,它能帮助我们发展出同情心与勇气等美德。记忆口诀:“恶是灵魂的健身房”。


10. Natural Moral Law: The Blueprint Within | 自然道德律:内在的蓝图

A key theory you may also touch on, heavily linked to Thomas Aquinas. Natural moral law is the idea that morality is built into the very structure of the natural world and human nature. By using our reason to examine human nature, we can discover the primary precepts—such as preserving life, reproduction, and living in an ordered society—that are the absolute, universal moral rules. The big phrase here is 'Do good, avoid evil', and the principle of double effect emerges from this tradition. Remember: Reason reads the moral blueprints God placed in creation.

你可能会接触到的另一个关键理论,与托马斯·阿奎那紧密相连。自然道德律认为,道德被内置于自然世界和人类本性的结构之中。通过运用理性审视人性,我们能够发现首要诫命——比如保全生命、繁衍后代、生活在有序的社会中——这些是绝对的、普遍适用的道德规则。这里的关键语句是“行善避恶”,而双重效应原则也源于这一传统。请记住:理性阅读上帝置入造物中的道德蓝图。


11. Meta-Ethics: The Meaning of 'Good' | 元伦理学:“善”的含义

s right, meta-ethics asks a deeper question: What do we even mean when we say something is 'good'? If I say 'Murder is wrong', what kind of statement is that? l properties exist as objective facts in the world. What I am saying when I call something 'good' mands, not objective facts. Boiling it down: Realism = good is a discoverable fact, like a scientific truth. Anti-realism = good is a human projection.

在我们争论什么是对是错之前,元伦理学提出了一个更深层的问题:当我们说某事是“善”的时候,我们到底在表达什么意思?如果我说“谋杀是错的”,那是一种什么样的陈述?你需要把握道德实在论与反实在论之间的区别。道德实在论者声称,道德属性作为客观事实存在于世界之中。当我称某行为为“善”时,我是在陈述一个关于现实的真实命题。反实在论者则否认这一点,他们论证说,道德陈述表达的是主观感受、文化规范或命令,而非客观事实。精炼一下:实在论 = 善是一个可被发现的事实,如同科学真理一般。反实在论 = 善是人类的一种主观投射。


12. Exam Command Words: Unlock the Marks | 考试指令词:解锁分数

Knowing the terminology is only half the battle; you must know what the question is asking you to do. The AQA examiners use specific command words. 'Explain' means you must state precisely what the theory or concept means, using examples or context to set out the ideas clearly. 'Outline' asks for a snappier, structured summary of the main points without going into excessive depth. 'Evaluate' or 'Discuss' is the big one for higher marks. Here, you must not just explain but critically analyze the strengths and weaknesses of an argument, reaching a reasoned and justified conclusion. A phrase to scribble in your revision notes: 'For every proposition, an objection; for every objection, a response.'

掌握术语只是成功的一半,你必须清楚题目要求你做什么。AQA 考官会使用特定的指令词。'Explain'(解释)意味着你必须精确陈述理论或概念的含义,使用例子或背景来清晰地阐述观点。'Outline'(概述)要求你给出一个更精炼、结构化的要点总结,无需过分深入。'Evaluate'(评估)或'Discuss'(讨论)则是获取高分的关键指令词。在这种情况下,你不仅要解释,还必须批判性地分析一个论证的优点与弱点,最终得出一个有理有据的结论。在你的复习笔记中记下这句话:“对每一个命题,都要提出异议;对每一个异议,都要做出回应。”


Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com

广告 / Sponsored
现货正版:仓储与配送管理(微课版)(高职高专新商科系列教材)9787302615774清华大学出版社
商科 备考教辅 · 正版现货 · 学习备考通用
查看详情 / View on Taobao参考价 ¥18.24
广告 / Sponsored
原版进口剑桥国际Alevel 商业商务经管类教材 Cambridge International AS & A Lev…
商科 备考教辅 · 正版现货 · 学习备考通用
查看详情 / View on Taobao参考价 ¥208.0

更多咨询请联系16621398022(同微信)

备考资讯每日更新,关注不错过
考纲变化 · 科目分析 · 学习方法
扫码关注公众号 tutorhao
在微信里长按二维码识别关注
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图
公众号:tutorhao