📚 Cracking the John Locke Junior Prize: A Year 9 CIE Philosophy Guide | 攻克约翰·洛克青年奖：Year 9 CIE 哲学备战指南
International essay competitions like the John Locke Junior Prize offer a rare opportunity for Year 9 students to think deeply, build advanced writing skills, and stand out academically. For those following the CIE philosophy curriculum, the contest maps naturally onto key topics such as ethics, epistemology, and political philosophy. This guide breaks down every stage of the journey, from choosing a prompt to polishing your final draft, with practical tips that blend philosophical rigour with a genuine enjoyment of ideas.
像约翰·洛克青年论文奖这样的国际竞赛，为 Year 9 学生提供了一个深入思考、锻炼高阶写作能力并脱颖而出的珍贵机会。对于学习 CIE 哲学课程的同学来说，比赛题目与伦理学、认识论和政治哲学等核心领域天然契合。本攻略拆解了从选题到打磨终稿的每一步，提供兼顾哲学严谨性与思想乐趣的实用建议。
1. Understanding the John Locke Junior Competition | 理解约翰·洛克青年竞赛
The John Locke Institute runs an annual essay competition with a junior category open to students aged 14 and under. You are given a choice of questions in philosophy, politics, economics, history, psychology, theology, and law. The philosophy questions, in particular, reward clarity of thought, well‑structured arguments, and an ability to engage with classic philosophical puzzles — all skills that the CIE Year 9 philosophy curriculum is designed to foster.
约翰·洛克研究所每年举办论文竞赛，其青年组面向14岁及以下学生开放。你可以在哲学、政治、经济、历史、心理学、神学和法律中选择题目。其中哲学问题尤其看重清晰的思维、严谨的论证结构，以及参与经典哲学难题的对话能力 —— 这些都是 CIE Year 9 哲学课程着力培养的素养。
The word limit is typically 2,000 words, and judging is blind, meaning your name appears nowhere in the essay. Submissions are assessed on independent thought, quality of argument, writing style, and factual accuracy. Past winning essays often blend personal insight with a solid grasp of philosophical positions without sounding like a textbook.
字数限制通常为 2 000 词，评审采用匿名方式，文中不出现姓名。评判标准包括独立思考、论证质量、写作风格和事实准确性。历年获奖论文往往将个人洞见与对哲学立场的扎实把握融为一体，而又不像教科书那般生硬。
2. Choosing the Right Philosophy Question | 选择合适的哲学问题
Each year, the John Locke competition releases three or four philosophy prompts. Read all of them slowly. The right question is not necessarily the one you instantly agree with — it is the one that sparks genuine curiosity and can be debated from multiple angles. For a Year 9 student, prompts about justice, free will, knowledge, or personhood tend to align well with CIE topics and offer plenty of accessible material.
每年约翰·洛克竞赛会公布三至四个哲学题目。仔细读完每一个。合适的题目不一定是那个你立刻赞同的题目，而是那个能引发真正好奇心、且可从多个角度辩论的题目。对于 Year 9 学生来说，涉及正义、自由意志、知识或人格的题目往往与 CIE 主题高度契合，并拥有大量易懂的素材。
Avoid picking a question simply because it sounds easy or familiar. Competition judges see hundreds of essays on the same prompt; a fresh take on a less popular question can sometimes stand out more than a safe answer to a popular one. Discuss potential questions with your teacher or a parent to gauge which one allows you to say something unexpected yet well‑supported.
避免只因某个题目听起来简单或熟悉而选择它。竞赛评委会看到成百上千篇针对同一题目的文章；对一个不那么热门的题目提出新颖见解，有时比给热门题目一个四平八稳的回答更引人注目。与老师或家长讨论备选题目，判断哪一个能让你说出既出人意料又有理有据的观点。
3. Deconstructing the Prompt: Keywords and Assumptions | 拆解题目：关键词与隐含假设
Every philosophy essay begins with a careful analysis of the prompt. Underline the operative words: ‘Is it ever justifiable to...?’, ‘Do we have a duty to...?’, ‘What makes something a...?’ Then write down the key concepts that need defining. For example, if the question asks whether ‘happiness’ is the ultimate goal, you must decide early on whether you mean pleasure, life satisfaction, or eudaimonia (human flourishing).
每一篇哲学论文都始于对题目的仔细分析。给关键词画线：‘…是否在任何情况下都是正当的？’‘我们是否有义务……？’‘是什么使得某物成为……？’然后写下需要定义的核心概念。例如，如果问题问‘幸福’是否是终极目标，你必须尽早确定你指的是快乐、生活满意度，还是 eudaimonia（人的繁荣）。
Also, uncover hidden assumptions: does the question assume that morality is universal? Does it take for granted that we can have knowledge of the external world? Flagging these assumptions early shows the reader that you are thinking like a philosopher, not merely repeating common opinions.
同时要揭示隐含假设：题目是否预设了道德是普世的？它是否理所当然地认为我们能够获得外部世界的知识？在开头指出这些假设，能向读者展示你像哲学家一样思考，而非仅仅重复俗见。
4. Building a Strong Thesis | 构建有力的论点
Your thesis is the one‑sentence answer you will defend throughout the essay. It should be specific, contestable, and philosophically interesting. Instead of ‘I agree that we have free will’, try ‘Libertarian free will is incoherent because it requires a self that stands outside the causal chain — but such a self cannot be what we mean by a person.’
你的论点是贯穿全文、用一句话表达的核心主张。它应当具体、可争辩且富有哲学趣味。与其写‘我同意我们拥有自由意志’，不如写‘自由意志论因要求一个站在因果链条之外的自我而难以自洽 —— 但这样一个自我不可能是我们所理解的个人。’
In a competition essay, a strong thesis often involves a moderate or nuanced position. Radical claims can be exciting but are harder to defend within a short word count. A thesis that acknowledges some truth on both sides — while still taking a clear stance — shows sophistication.
在竞赛论文中，有力的论点往往呈现一种温和或细致的立场。极端的主张可能引人注目，但在有限的字数内难以有效辩护。一个承认双方各有合理之处，同时仍持有明确立场的论点，会显示出思想的成熟。
5. Basics of Philosophical Argumentation | 哲学论证基础
Philosophical arguments are chains of reasoning where each step follows logically from the previous one. A basic structure is: premise 1, premise 2, conclusion. For example: P1: If determinism is true, our actions are the inevitable result of prior causes. P2: Moral responsibility requires the ability to do otherwise. C: Therefore, if determinism is true, we cannot be morally responsible.
哲学论证是由一环扣一环的推理构成的链条。基本结构是：前提1，前提2，结论。例如：P1—— 如果决定论为真，我们的行为便是先前原因的必然结果。P2—— 道德责任要求有‘可以不做’的能力。C—— 因此，如果决定论为真，我们便无法承担道德责任。
Use connectives such as ‘therefore’, ‘consequently’, ‘it follows that’ to signpost your logic. When you are less certain, words like ‘suggests’, ‘implies’, ‘gives us reason to believe’ are appropriate. Year 9 students should aim for clarity over complexity — a simple argument clearly explained beats an obscure one every time.
使用‘因此’‘由此’‘由此可见’等连接词标示你的逻辑。当确定性稍低时，用‘意味着’‘暗示’‘使我们有理由相信’等词更为恰当。Year 9 学生应以清晰为目标而非复杂 —— 一个解释得清清楚楚的简单论证，永远胜过一个含混不清的深奥论证。
6. Using Examples and Thought Experiments | 使用例子与思想实验
Abstract reasoning becomes convincing when grounded in concrete cases. In philosophy, thought experiments — imaginary scenarios designed to test a principle — are powerful tools. Classic examples include the trolley problem, the ring of Gyges, or the brain in a vat. When you introduce a thought experiment, explain its purpose: which intuition is it trying to stir, and how does it relate to your thesis?
抽象的推理一旦扎根到具体案例中，就会变得令人信服。在哲学中，思想实验 —— 用于检验某个原则的虚构情景 —— 是强有力的工具。经典例子包括电车难题、古格斯的戒指或缸中之脑。当你引入一个思想实验时，要说明它的目的：它试图激发哪种直觉？它与你的论点有何关联？
You can also create your own simple scenario. For an essay on consent, imagine two friends and a borrowed book. Just make sure your example genuinely tests the principle and does not merely illustrate your conclusion. A good thought experiment is one where the answer is not obvious at first glance.
你也可以自创简单的场景。面对一篇关于同意的论文，不妨设想两个朋友和一本借来的书。只需确保你的例子真正在检验那个原则，而非仅仅图解你的结论。一个好的思想实验，其答案在一开始并不那么显而易见。
7. Objections and Rebuttals | 反驳与回应
The strongest philosophy essays anticipate criticism. Find at least two strong objections to your thesis and take them seriously. Present each objection in its strongest form — do not set up a straw man. Then reply: either show why the objection fails, or concede a small point and demonstrate that your core argument still stands.
最有力的哲学论文会预见到可能的批评。找到至少两个针对你论点的有力反驳，并认真对待它们。以最强形式呈现每一个反驳 —— 不要设立稻草人谬误。然后回应：要么说明该反驳为何不成立，要么承认一小部分，并证明你的核心论证仍然有效。
Objection‑handling is what separates a good essay from a prize‑winning one. Judges want to see that you can think against yourself. Phrases like ‘One might object that...’ or ‘A critic could argue...’ followed by ‘However, this objection overlooks...’ show intellectual honesty.
对反驳的处理，正是区分优秀论文与获奖论文的关键所在。评委希望看到你能进行自我思辨。‘有人可能会反驳说……’或‘批评者可能主张……’，随后接‘然而这一反驳忽视了……’等措辞，体现了智识上的诚实。
8. Structure and Clarity | 结构与清晰
A well‑structured essay guides the reader effortlessly. After a brief introduction that states your thesis and outlines your main arguments, each body paragraph should develop one idea. End with a conclusion that does not merely summarise but reflects on the implications of your argument. Use subheadings if they help organize your thoughts, but ensure they are simple and descriptive.
一篇结构精良的论文能引导读者毫不费力地阅读。在简述论点并概述主要论证的简短引言之后，每一个主体段落应展开一个观念。结尾不要仅仅总结，而要反思你的论证所蕴含的意义。如果小标题有助于组织思路，尽管使用，但务必保持简洁与说明性。
Clarity is a virtue in philosophy. Short sentences, precise vocabulary, and a predictable logical flow make complex ideas accessible. Read your paragraphs aloud: if you stumble, the reader will too. Aim to make every sentence earn its place.
清晰是哲学中的一项美德。短句、准确的用词及可预见的逻辑脉络让复杂观念变得易于理解。把你的段落大声读出来：如果你自己都磕绊，读者也会如此。力求让每一个句子都有其存在的理由。
9. Research and Citations | 研究与引证
You are not expected to be an expert, but you are expected to engage with the existing conversation. Read at least two or three reliable sources — such as the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, original texts by Plato or John Stuart Mill, or accessible introductions by Nigel Warburton. Keep notes on how each source relates to your argument.
你并不需要成为一个专家，但你需要参与到既有的对话中去。至少阅读两到三个可靠来源 —— 例如斯坦福哲学百科全书、柏拉图或约翰·斯图尔特·密尔的原文，或者奈吉尔·沃伯顿的通俗导论。记录下每个来源与你的论证的关系。
Cite your sources clearly using footnotes or a bibliography. The John Locke competition accepts various styles, but consistency is key. Avoid plagiarism by always attributing ideas to their authors. Paraphrase rather than quote excessively — your voice must remain dominant.
使用脚注或参考文献清楚标明来源。约翰·洛克竞赛接受多种格式，但关键是要前后一致。始终将观点归属给原作者以避免剽窃。多用释义，少用直接引语 —— 你的声音必须占据主导。
10. Writing Style and Originality | 写作风格与原创性
Write as if you are explaining your ideas to an intelligent friend who disagrees with you. Avoid jargon unless you define it clearly, and never inflate sentences to sound more academic. Philosophy prizes clarity over ornament. Yet style still matters: a well‑turned phrase or a vivid analogy can make an argument memorable.
写作时，就当是在向一位聪慧但与你意见相左的朋友解释自己的想法。避免使用行话，除非你把它解释得一清二楚；绝不要为了听起来更有学问而堆砌句子。哲学重清晰甚于修饰。但文笔仍然重要：一句精妙的表达或一个生动的比喻，能让论证令人难忘。
Originality does not mean you must invent a new theory. It means offering a fresh combination of ideas, an unusual example, or a sincere personal reflection grounded in philosophical reasoning. Your CIE philosophy lessons on the nature of knowledge, ethics, and the self are excellent springboards for developing a distinctive voice.
原创性并不意味着你必须创造一个新理论，而是提出一种新的思想组合、一个非同寻常的例子，或是一段扎根于哲学推理的真挚个人反思。你的 CIE 哲学课程中有关知识本质、伦理学以及自我的讨论，正是培养独特声音的绝佳跳板。
11. Time Management and Drafting | 时间管理与草稿
Start early. Give yourself at least six weeks: two weeks for reading and choosing a question, two weeks for research and outlining, one week for writing the first draft, and one week for revising. Crammed essays often feel rushed and lack depth. Work backwards from the submission deadline and set mini‑deadlines for each stage.
尽早开始。留出至少六周时间：两周用于阅读和选题，两周用于研究和拟定提纲，一周撰写初稿，一周修改。仓促赶出的文章往往显得匆忙而缺乏深度。从截止日期倒推，为每个阶段设定迷你截止日。
Write the first draft without worrying too much about perfection. Get your ideas down, then leave it for a day before returning with fresh eyes. The second draft is where you tighten arguments, fix logical gaps, and sharpen your thesis. Ask a teacher or a trusted adult to read your draft and give honest feedback, then revise again.
写初稿时，不必过于追求完美。把自己的想法写下来，然后放上一天，再以新的眼光回头审视。第二稿是收紧论证、堵塞逻辑漏洞并打磨论点的阶段。请老师或一位可信赖的成人阅读你的草稿并给出诚实反馈，然后再行修改。
12. Final Submission Checklist | 提交前检查清单
Before you hit submit, go through a final checklist. Is your essay within the word limit? Have you removed your name and any identifying information? Are all sources properly cited? Does the introduction engage the reader immediately? Does the conclusion leave a lasting impression? Check spelling, grammar, and sentence variety — small errors can distract from a brilliant argument.
在点击提交之前，过一遍最终检查清单。字数是否在限制之内？是否去掉了你的名字及任何个人信息？所有来源是否规范引用？引言能否立刻抓住读者？结尾是否留下深刻印象？检查拼写、语法和句子多样性 —— 微小的错误可能会分散对精彩论证的注意。
Finally, read the essay one more time from the perspective of a sceptical judge. If you feel a slight thrill of discovery or a moment of insight, chances are the judge will too. The John Locke Junior Prize is not about being the most knowledgeable; it is about thinking carefully, writing beautifully, and taking a small step into the world of academic philosophy.
最后，再以一位持怀疑态度的评委视角阅读一遍论文。如果你能感受到一丝发现的兴奋，或是一瞬的顿悟，那么评委很可能也会有同感。约翰·洛克青年奖的宗旨并不是成为知识最渊博的人，而是仔细思考、优美写作，并朝着学术哲学的世界迈出小小的一步。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图