📚 Year 9 CIE Philosophy: Glossary & Terminology Quick-Memorisation Guide | CIE 9 年级哲学：词汇术语速记指南
Philosophy is a subject built on precise language. Without a solid grasp of key terms, even the most brilliant ideas can become muddled. This guide is designed to help Year 9 CIE students not just memorise philosophical vocabulary, but truly understand and retain it. We will break down essential terms across the core areas of the CIE syllabus — from epistemology to ethics — and provide proven memory techniques, etymological clues, and contextual examples that turn abstract jargon into accessible, exam-ready knowledge.
哲学是一门建立在精确语言基础上的学科。如果不扎实掌握关键术语，即使最出色的思想也会变得混乱不清。本指南专为 CIE 9 年级学生设计，不仅帮助记忆哲学词汇，更注重真正理解并持久掌握。我们将拆解 CIE 考纲核心领域的必备术语——从认识论到伦理学——并提供经过验证的记忆技巧、词源线索和语境示例，将抽象的术语转化为通俗易懂、能直接应对考试的知识。
1. Why Terminology Matters in Philosophy | 为什么哲学术语如此重要
In philosophy, a single word can carry centuries of debate. When you use the word 'valid', a philosopher immediately knows you mean a specific relationship between premises and conclusion — not just 'acceptable'. Mastering terminology is not about sounding clever; it is about thinking clearly. The CIE exam rewards students who can deploy terms with precision, not those who vaguely paraphrase. Each term is a tool that allows you to construct rigorous arguments and critically evaluate the arguments of others.
在哲学中，一个单词背后可能承载着几个世纪的辩论。当你使用 '有效' 这个词时，哲学家立刻明白你指的是前提与结论之间的特定关系——而非仅仅是'可接受的'。掌握术语不是为了听起来聪明，而是为了清晰地思考。CIE 考试奖励那些能精准使用术语的学生，而非含糊转述的学生。每个术语都是一件工具，让你能够构建严密的论证，并批判性地评估他人的论点。
2. Epistemology: The Vocabulary of Knowledge | 认识论：关于知识的词汇
Epistemology asks 'What can we know?' and 'How do we know it?'. The term itself comes from the Greek 'epistēmē' (knowledge) and 'logos' (study). A core term here is justified true belief (JTB), the classic definition of knowledge: you know something if you believe it, it is true, and you have good reasons (justification) for believing it. Another essential term is scepticism, the view that we cannot have certain knowledge. A global sceptic doubts all knowledge claims; a local sceptic doubts knowledge in a specific area, like the existence of other minds.
认识论追问'我们能知道什么？'以及'我们如何知道？'。这个术语本身源自希腊语 'epistēmē'（知识）和 'logos'（研究）。这里的核心术语是得到辩护的真信念（JTB），这是对知识的经典定义：如果你相信某事，它为真，并且你有充分的理由（辩护）相信它，那么你就知道了这件事。另一个核心术语是怀疑论，即认为我们无法获得确定知识的观点。全局怀疑论者怀疑一切知识主张；局部怀疑论者则怀疑特定领域的知识，比如他人心灵的存在。
3. Rationalism vs. Empiricism: The Two Great Schools | 理性主义与经验主义：两大流派
Rationalism is the view that reason is the primary source of knowledge, and that some ideas are innate — we are born with them. Think of Descartes and his cogito: 'I think, therefore I am', a truth he reached purely through reasoning. Empiricism counters that all knowledge comes from sensory experience; the mind at birth is a 'blank slate', or tabula rasa, a term from John Locke. Empiricists argue that even complex ideas are built from simple sensory impressions. Understanding this contrast helps you quickly categorise almost any epistemological argument.
理性主义认为理性是知识的主要来源，有些观念是天赋的——我们生来就拥有它们。想想笛卡尔和他的我思：'我思故我在'，这是他纯粹通过推理得出的真理。经验主义则反驳说，所有知识都来自感官经验；心灵出生时是一块'白板'，即tabula rasa，这个术语来自约翰·洛克。经验主义者认为，即使是复杂的思想也是由简单的感官印象构建而成的。理解这一对比有助于你快速归类几乎任何认识论论证。
4. Ethics: Core Concepts of Right and Wrong | 伦理学：对与错的核心概念
Ethical theory is full of precise terminology that can trip up beginners. Consequentialism judges actions solely by their outcomes: the right action is the one that produces the best overall consequences. Deontology, by contrast, holds that actions are right or wrong in themselves, regardless of consequences — Kant's categorical imperative is a classic deontological principle. Then there is virtue ethics, which focuses on the character of the moral agent rather than individual acts; the Greek term eudaimonia, often translated as 'flourishing' or 'the good life', is central here.
伦理学理论中充满了可能让初学者困惑的精确术语。后果论仅根据行为的结果来评判行为：正确的行为是能产生最佳总体后果的行为。与之相对，义务论认为行为本身就有对错，与后果无关——康德的绝对命令就是典型的本务论原则。此外还有德性伦理学，它关注道德行为者的品格，而非个别行为；希腊术语eudaimonia通常译为'繁荣'或'美好生活'，是这里的核心概念。
5. The Language of Logic: Arguments, Premises and Fallacies | 逻辑的语言：论证、前提与谬误
An argument in philosophy is not a heated quarrel; it is a set of statements where some (premises) are offered as reasons to support another (the conclusion). An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises — even if the premises are false. It is sound if it is valid and all its premises are actually true. Watch out for fallacies: common errors in reasoning. The ad hominem fallacy, for instance, attacks the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. These distinctions are critical for the CIE analysis questions.
在哲学中，论证不是激烈的争吵；它是一组陈述，其中一些（前提）被用作理由来支持另一个陈述（结论）。如果一个论证的结论能够从前提中逻辑地推出，它就是有效的——即使前提是假的。如果一个论证既有效，而且其所有前提实际上都为真，那么它就是可靠的。要提防谬误：推理中的常见错误。例如，人身攻击谬误攻击的是提出论证的人，而非论证本身。这些区分对 CIE 分析题至关重要。
6. Metaphysics: The Big Questions About Reality | 形而上学：关于实在的大问题
Metaphysics explores the fundamental nature of reality, and its vocabulary is rich. Dualism is the view that mind and body are two distinct substances, famously defended by Descartes. Materialism (or physicalism) holds that only physical matter exists — the mind is just the brain in action. Determinism claims that every event is causally necessitated by prior events, leaving no room for free will. Its opposite is libertarianism (in the metaphysical sense, not the political one), which asserts genuine free will exists. These terms often appear together in exam questions about the mind-body problem or free will.
形而上学探索实在的根本本质，其词汇极其丰富。二元论认为心灵和身体是两种不同的实体，由笛卡尔著名地辩护。唯物主义（或物理主义）则认为只有物质实体存在——心灵只是大脑的活动。决定论声称每个事件都由先前事件因果性地必然化，没有自由意志的空间。其对立面是自由意志主义（在形而上学意义上，而不是政治上），它断言真正的自由意志存在。这些术语常常在关于心身问题或自由意志的考试题目中一起出现。
7. Philosophy of Religion: God, Arguments and Evil | 宗教哲学：上帝、论证与恶
This area introduces several classic arguments, each with its own key terms. The teleological argument (or design argument) uses the Greek 'telos', meaning purpose — it infers a designer from the apparent order and purpose in nature. The cosmological argument argues from the existence of the universe to a first cause, or prime mover. The ontological argument is peculiar: it tries to prove God's existence purely from the concept of a perfect being. A counter-challenge is the problem of evil: if God is all-powerful and all-good, why does suffering exist? The term theodicy refers to any attempt to reconcile God's goodness with the reality of evil.
这个领域引入了几个经典论证，每个都有其关键术语。目的论论证（或设计论证）使用希腊语 'telos'，意为目的——它从自然界中明显的秩序和目的推论出设计者的存在。宇宙论论证从宇宙的存在论证到第一因，或称第一推动者。本体论论证很特别：它试图纯粹从完美存在的概念来证明上帝的存在。一个反诘是恶的问题：如果上帝全能和全善，为什么苦难存在？术语神义论指的是任何试图将上帝的善与恶的现实调和起来的尝试。
8. Memory Techniques: Etymology and Roots | 记忆技巧：词源和词根
A huge percentage of philosophical terms come from Greek and Latin. Learning these roots unlocks entire families of words. For example, 'a-' or 'an-' as a prefix means 'without': atheism (without god), amoral (without morality). 'Mono-' means one (monotheism), 'poly-' means many (polytheism). 'Omni-' means all: omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-knowing), omnibenevolent (all-good). By memorising just twenty or thirty such roots, you can decode hundreds of philosophical terms. Make flashcards with the root on one side and examples on the other — this active recall method is far more effective than passive re-reading.
很大一部分哲学术语来自希腊语和拉丁语。学习这些词根可以解开整个词族。例如，前缀 'a-' 或 'an-' 表示'无'：atheism（无神论）、amoral（非道德的）。'Mono-' 表示一（monotheism 一神论），'poly-' 表示多（polytheism 多神论）。'Omni-' 表示全部：omnipotent（全能的）、omniscient（全知的）、omnibenevolent（全善的）。只需记住二三十个这样的词根，你就能解码数百个哲学术语。制作抽认卡，一面写词根，另一面写例子——这种主动回忆法远比被动重读有效。
9. The Socratic Method and Key Ancient Terms | 苏格拉底方法与古希腊关键术语
The Socratic method is a form of cooperative argumentative dialogue, where a teacher asks probing questions to help a student discover underlying beliefs and assumptions. Elenchus, often translated as 'cross-examination', is the core technique Socrates used to test definitions and expose contradictions. Don't overlook aporia: the state of puzzlement or intellectual impasse reached when our beliefs are shown to be inconsistent. For Plato, this state was actually productive — it cleared the ground for genuine knowledge. In your exam essays, naming and explaining these specific techniques demonstrates far more depth than just saying 'Socrates asked questions'.
苏格拉底方法是一种合作性的论证对话形式，教师通过探究性的问题帮助学生发现潜藏的信念和假设。Elenchus通常译为'诘问'，是苏格拉底用来检验定义和揭露矛盾的核心技巧。不要忽视aporia：当我们的信念被证明不一致时达到的困惑或知识僵局的状态。在柏拉图看来，这种状态实际上是有益的——它为真正的知识扫清了障碍。在你的考试作文中，命名并解释这些具体技巧，远比仅仅说'苏格拉底提问题'更能体现深度。
10. Political Philosophy: Justice, Sovereignty and the State | 政治哲学：正义、主权与国家
Political philosophy has its own precise lexicon. The social contract is the implicit agreement among individuals to form a society and abide by its rules. Thomas Hobbes argued that without a sovereign authority, life would be 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short' — a state of nature that rational people would escape by consenting to be governed. Sovereignty refers to the supreme authority within a territory. John Stuart Mill's harm principle holds that the only legitimate reason to restrict an individual's liberty is to prevent harm to others. These concepts remain central to modern debates about freedom and state power.
政治哲学有其精确的词汇。社会契约是个人之间为形成社会并遵守其规则而达成的隐含协议。托马斯·霍布斯认为，没有主权权威，生活将是'孤独、贫穷、污秽、野蛮和短暂'的——这是一个自然状态，理性的人会通过同意被统治而逃离它。主权指领土内的最高权威。约翰·斯图尔特·密尔的伤害原则认为，限制个人自由的唯一正当理由是为了防止对他人的伤害。这些概念在现代关于自由和国家权力的辩论中仍然处于核心地位。
11. Common Pitfalls: Terms That Look Alike | 常见陷阱：看起来相似的术语
Beware of near-identical terms with vastly different meanings. Altruism (selfless concern for others) is not the same as autonomy (self-governance, the capacity to make one's own decisions). Utilitarianism (the ethical theory that maximises happiness) is often confused with pragmatism (a general philosophical approach that judges ideas by their practical consequences). Similarly, subjectivism (truth depends on individual attitudes) differs from relativism (truth depends on cultural or historical context). Create a dedicated 'confusable pairs' page in your notes. Write each pair side by side with a one-sentence definition that highlights the contrast — this active comparison prevents exam-day mix-ups.
警惕那些几乎相同但含义差异巨大的术语。利他主义（对他人的无私关怀）与自主性（自我治理，自己做决定的能力）不同。功利主义（最大化幸福的伦理理论）常常与实用主义（一种根据实际后果评判思想的一般哲学方法）混淆。同样，主观主义（真理取决于个人态度）不同于相对主义（真理取决于文化或历史语境）。在你的笔记中创建一个专门的'易混淆对子'页面。将每一对并排写下，配以一句突出对比的定义——这种主动比较可以防止考试时的混淆。
12. Putting It All Together: Active Recall for the Exam | 整合应用：考试中的主动回忆
The best way to lock in philosophical vocabulary is through active recall and contextual use. Each day, pick five terms from this guide and do three things: define them in your own words, use each in a sentence that could fit an exam paragraph, and explain how the term connects to at least one other term on the list. For instance, link 'justified true belief' to 'scepticism' by explaining how a global sceptic would deny that our beliefs can ever be adequately justified. This web of connections mimics the way CIE exam questions are designed — they rarely test an isolated definition; they test whether you can apply, compare, and critique concepts. Regularly practising this way transforms memorised vocabulary into flexible exam tools.
锁定哲学词汇的最佳方法是通过主动回忆和语境运用。每天从本指南中挑选五个术语，做三件事：用自己的话定义它们，在能融入考试段落的句子中使用每个术语，以及解释该术语如何与列表中的至少一个其他术语相关联。例如，将'得到辩护的真信念'与'怀疑论'联系起来，说明全局怀疑论者会如何否认我们的信念能够得到充分辩护。这种联系之网再现了 CIE 考试题目的设计方式——它们很少孤立地考查定义；它们考查的是你能否应用、比较和批判概念。定期以这种方式练习，可以将记住的词汇转化为灵活的考试工具。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图