📚 Year 8 Cambridge English: Common Mistakes and How to Fix Them | Year 8 Cambridge 英语：常见误区与纠正方法
Year 8 is a formative stage in the Cambridge Lower Secondary English curriculum, where students begin to refine their writing, comprehension, and analytical skills in preparation for the Checkpoint assessment and beyond. However, many learners repeatedly fall into a set of predictable traps that hold back their progress. These errors are not simply slip-ups; they often stem from misunderstandings about fundamental rules or a lack of targeted practice. This article identifies the most common mistakes made by Year 8 Cambridge English students and provides clear, actionable correction strategies to help build accuracy and confidence.
八年级是剑桥初中英语课程的关键塑造期，学生开始精进写作、阅读理解和分析技能，为 Checkpoint 评估及更高阶段做好准备。然而，许多学习者会反复陷入一系列可预见的陷阱，阻碍他们的进步。这些错误不仅仅是小疏忽；它们往往源于对基本规则的理解偏差或缺乏有针对性的练习。本文指出了八年级剑桥英语学生最常见的误区，并提供清晰、可操作的纠正方法，帮助提升准确度和自信心。
1. Confusing Homophones | 混淆同音异义词
One of the most persistent errors in Year 8 writing involves homophones—words that sound identical but have different spellings and meanings. Pairs such as 'there', 'their', and 'they're', or 'your' and 'you're' frequently appear in student work, and misusing them creates an impression of carelessness. Because spell-checkers often cannot distinguish the intended word in context, the learner must internalise the differences. For instance, 'your' is a possessive determiner, while 'you're' is a contraction of 'you are'. Failing to differentiate them can change the meaning of a sentence entirely and lower the grammar score in Cambridge-marked tasks.
八年级写作中最顽固的错误之一涉及同音异义词——发音相同但拼写和意义不同的词语。像 “there”、“their” 和 “they‘re”，或者 “your” 和 “you’re” 这样的成对词经常出现在学生作业中，误用它们会给人留下粗心的印象。由于拼写检查器通常无法根据语境识别目标词，学习者必须内化这些区别。例如，“your” 是物主限定词，而 “you‘re” 是 “you are” 的缩写。未能区分它们可能完全改变句子的意思，并降低剑桥评分任务中的语法分数。
The single most effective correction method is to use substitution tests every time you write. If you can replace the word with 'you are', then 'you’re' is correct; if the sentence still makes sense with 'our' but with a different focus, 'your' is likely needed. Teachers should encourage students to proofread specifically for homophones after completing a draft, reading aloud to catch auditory clues. Creating a personal table of commonly confused homophones with brief definitions in a notebook also serves as a quick reference during revision.
唯一最有效的纠正方法是每次写作时使用替换检验。如果能把该词替换为 “you are”，那么 “you're” 就是正确的；如果句子用 “our” 替换后意思仍然通顺但侧重不同，那么很可能需要 “your”。教师应鼓励学生在完成草稿后专门校对同音异义词，通过大声朗读来捕捉听觉线索。在笔记本中创建一张常见混淆同音词的个人表格，附上简要释义，也可以作为复习时的快速参考。
| Common Homophone Set | Meaning and Example |
|---|---|
| they're / their / there | they're = they are; their = belongs to them; there = location |
| your / you're | your = belonging to you; you're = you are |
| its / it's | its = belonging to it; it's = it is or it has |
| to / too / two | to = direction/preposition; too = also/excess; two = 2 |
2. Misusing Apostrophes | 误用撇号
Apostrophe errors are among the most visible grammar mistakes in Cambridge English scripts. Many Year 8 students either place apostrophes where they do not belong, or they omit them when required. The two core functions—showing possession (the girl's book) and indicating contraction (don't)—are often blurred. A classic error is adding an apostrophe before a final 's' in simple plurals, such as writing 'banana's' for the fruit in general, which is entirely incorrect. This suggests that the writer does not yet view the apostrophe as a meaning-changing mark.
撇号错误是剑桥英语答卷中最显而易见的语法错误之一。许多八年级学生要么在不该用撇号的地方加了撇号，要么在该用时遗漏了。撇号的两大核心功能——表示所有关系（the girl’s book）和表示缩写（don’t）——经常被混淆。一个典型错误是在普通复数词尾的 's' 前加撇号，比如泛指水果时写成 “banana’s”，这完全是错误的。这表明写作者尚未将撇号视为一个可以改变语义的符号。
A powerful way to unlearn this mistake is to articulate the rule before writing any apostrophe. Ask: 'Does this word show that something belongs to someone or something?' If yes, place the apostrophe before the 's' for singular possessors (the student’s pen) and after the 's' for plural possessors (the students' classroom). If the word is a contracted form, check the full version: 'does not' becomes 'doesn't', with the apostrophe standing in for the missing letter 'o'. Systematic drill exercises where students convert phrases from full forms to contracted forms, and vice versa, help build automaticity.
戒除这一错误的有效方法是，在写下任何撇号之前明确规则。问自己：“这个词是否表示某物属于某人或某物？” 如果是，单数所有者在 's' 前加撇号（the student’s pen），复数所有者在 's' 后加撇号（the students' classroom）。如果这个词是缩写形式，则检查完整形式：“does not” 变成 “doesn’t”，撇号代替了被省略的字母 “o”。系统的训练练习，让学生将短语从完整形式转换为缩写形式，反之亦然，有助于培养自动性。
Another specific trouble spot is 'its' versus 'it's'. In Cambridge Lower Secondary, students are expected to differentiate them reliably. 'It's' always means 'it is' or 'it has', never possession. 'Its', without an apostrophe, is possessive, just like 'his' or 'her'. A helpful memory trick is: if you can expand it to 'it is', use the apostrophe; if not, don't.
另一个具体的困难点在于 “its” 与 “it's” 的区别。在剑桥初中阶段，要求学生能可靠地区分它们。“It’s” 总是表示 “it is” 或 “it has”，从不用来表示所有关系。没有撇号的 “its” 是物主代词，就像 “his” 或 “her” 一样。一个有用的记忆技巧是：如果能够将其扩展为 “it is”，就使用撇号；如果不能，就不要用。
3. Subject-Verb Agreement Errors | 主谓一致错误
Inconsistent subject-verb agreement is a common weakness that surfaces in both narrative and discursive writing. Year 8 students sometimes write sentences such as 'The group of students were excited' instead of 'The group of students was excited'. The confusion often arises when a prepositional phrase sits between the subject and the verb, making the noun nearest the verb appear to be the subject. Similarly, indefinite pronouns like 'everyone', 'somebody', and 'each' are singular and require singular verbs, yet students frequently pair them with plural verbs.
主谓不一致是叙事文和议论文写作中常见的薄弱环节。八年级学生有时会写出像 “The group of students were excited” 这样的句子，而不是 “The group of students was excited”。当介词短语位于主语和动词之间时，容易产生混淆，使动词最邻近的名词看起来像是主语。同样，像 “everyone”、“somebody” 和 “each” 这样的不定代词是单数形式，需要搭配单数动词，但学生经常将它们与复数动词连用。
To correct this, students should learn to identify the true head noun of the subject, mentally stripping away any intervening phrases. For example, in 'The box of chocolates is on the table', the subject is 'box', not 'chocolates'. A reliable technique is to underline the simple subject in every sentence and then check the verb. Practice with subject-verb inversion in questions ('Does she like tea?' not 'Do she like tea?') also reinforces the skill. Cambridge Checkpoint-style editing tasks often contain embedded subject-verb errors, so timed practice under exam conditions is recommended.
为了纠正这一点，学生应学会识别主语的真正核心名词，在脑中剥离掉所有插入语。例如，在 “The box of chocolates is on the table” 中，主语是 “box”，而不是 “chocolates”。一个可靠的方法是划出每个句子中的简单主语，然后检查动词。疑问句中主语-动词倒装的练习（是 “Does she like tea?”，而不是 “Do she like tea?”）也能强化这一技能。剑桥 Checkpoint 风格的编辑型题目经常包含嵌入的主谓一致错误，因此建议在考试条件下进行限时练习。
Collective nouns such as 'team', 'family', and 'government' present an additional challenge. In British English, these can take either a singular or plural verb depending on whether the group is being thought of as a single unit or as individuals. Year 8 students should be taught to decide consciously and remain consistent within a paragraph. A singular verb ('The team is playing well') emphasises unity, while a plural verb ('The team are arguing among themselves') highlights individual actions. Being aware of this choice adds depth to writing.
集合名词如 “team”、“family” 和 “government” 带来了额外的挑战。在英式英语中，这些词既可用单数动词也可用复数动词，取决于该群体被视为一个整体还是多个个体。应教导八年级学生有意识地做出决定，并在一个段落内保持一致。单数动词 (“The team is playing well”) 强调统一性，而复数动词 (“The team are arguing among themselves”) 突显个体行为。意识到这种选择可以为写作增加深度。
4. Inconsistent Verb Tenses | 时态不一致
Shifting tenses without a clear reason is a habit that weakens narrative flow and analytical writing alike. A student might start a story in the past tense and then slip into the present: 'She walked into the room and sees her friend.' In literary essays, when discussing events in a novel, the convention is to use the literary present tense ('Shakespeare portrays Macbeth as...'), yet many Year 8 writers drift between present and past. This inconsistency confuses the reader and suggests an uncertain grasp of timeline.
没有明确理由地切换时态，是一种既损害叙事流畅性又损害分析性写作的习惯。学生可能会以过去时开始一个故事，然后滑入现在时：“She walked into the room and sees her friend.” 在文学论文中，讨论小说事件时，惯例是使用文学现在时（“Shakespeare portrays Macbeth as...”），然而许多八年级写作者会在现在时和过去时之间游移。这种不一致会让读者感到困惑，并表明对时间线的掌握不够扎实。
The most direct fix is to teach students to identify the anchor tense before they begin writing. Before each paragraph, they can jot down the target tense (e.g., 'past simple' or 'present perfect') in the margin. During proofreading, a tense audit can be performed: read the paragraph backwards, sentence by sentence, checking each verb form. This disrupts the flow of meaning and makes it easier to spot rogue tense shifts. In Cambridge narrative tasks, learners should also be aware that dialogue can contain present or future forms even when the narration is in past tense, but the shift must be intentional and properly punctuated.
最直接的纠正方法是教导学生在开始写作前确定基准时态。在每段之前，他们可以在页边空白处记下目标时态（例如，“一般过去时”或“现在完成时”）。在校对时，可以进行时态审核：一句一句地倒读段落，检查每一个动词形式。这会打断意义的流动，更容易发现异常的时态转换。在剑桥的叙事任务中，学习者还应意识到，即使叙述使用过去时，对话中也可以包含现在时或将来时，但这种转换必须是有意为之，并且标点正确。
In Cambridge Checkpoint writing, consistent tense use is one of the sub-skills assessed under grammar and punctuation. A helpful exercise is to take a mixed-tense paragraph and correct it, then explain why each change was made. This metacognitive approach builds deeper understanding and makes the rule transferable to new writing contexts.
在剑桥 Checkpoint 写作中，时态的一致使用是语法和标点部分评估的次级技能之一。一个有用的练习是，取一段混合时态的段落进行修改，然后解释每次修改的理由。这种元认知方法能建立更深层的理解，并使规则能够迁移到新的写作情境中。
5. Run-on Sentences and Comma Splices | 连写句与逗号拼接
Run-on sentences occur when two independent clauses are joined without appropriate punctuation or a conjunction. A comma splice is a specific type in which a comma alone attempts to link two complete ideas: 'It was raining, I took my umbrella.' This sentence is grammatically incorrect because a comma is not strong enough to connect independent clauses. Year 8 students often produce such sentences when they are writing quickly, especially in extended responses under time pressure.
当两个独立分句在没有适当标点或连词的情况下被连接时，就会出现连写句。逗号拼接是一种特殊类型，仅用逗号就试图连接两个完整意思：“It was raining, I took my umbrella.” 这个句子在语法上是错误的，因为逗号的力度不足以连接独立分句。八年级学生在快速写作时，尤其是在限时的详细回答中，经常写出此类句子。
The remedy involves teaching three correct strategies: use a full stop to create two separate sentences; use a semicolon if the ideas are closely related ('It was raining; I took my umbrella.'); or insert a coordinating conjunction after the comma (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so). Cambridge examiners look for sentence variety, so mastering the semicolon and the appropriate use of conjunctions can elevate a student's style. A common classroom drill is to provide sentence strips that students must combine correctly, first with a semicolon and then with a coordinating conjunction, to see how nuance shifts.
纠正方法包括教授三种正确的策略：使用句号创建两个独立的句子；如果意思紧密相关，使用分号（“It was raining; I took my umbrella.”）；或在逗号后插入并列连词（for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so）。剑桥考官看重句式的多样性，因此掌握分号和连词的正确使用可以提升学生的文采。一个常见的课堂练习是提供句子条，学生必须先用分号再用并列连词正确组合，以观察语义的细微差别如何变化。
It is also important for students to recognise that not all long sentences are run-ons. A beautifully crafted complex sentence with subordinating conjunctions (although, because, while) is perfectly acceptable and demonstrates sophisticated control. The error is not length but boundary confusion. Practice in identifying independent clauses by locating the main verb and subject in each part of a sentence will help students learn where breaks are needed.
同样重要的是，学生要认识到并非所有长句都是连写句。一个精心构建的含有从属连词（although, because, while）的复合句是完全可接受的，并能展示成熟的掌控力。错误不在于长度，而在于边界混淆。通过定位每个部分的主语和主动词来识别独立分句的练习，将帮助学生学会何处需要断句。
6. Weak Paragraph Structure | 薄弱的段落结构
Many Year 8 students view paragraphs as an arbitrary break in the text rather than as a unit of thought. Consequently, their writing often lacks clear topic sentences, supporting details, and concluding links. In Cambridge Checkpoint, both the reading and writing tasks reward well-organised paragraphs that follow a logical pattern, such as PEEL (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link) or a similar framework. Without this, an essay can feel disjointed, even if individual sentences are grammatically sound.
许多八年级学生将段落视为文本中的随意分割，而不是思想的单元。因此，他们的写作常常缺乏清晰的主题句、支撑细节和总结性衔接。在剑桥 Checkpoint 中，无论是阅读还是写作任务，都青睐于遵循逻辑模式（如 PEEL：论点、证据、解释、衔接）或类似框架的结构良好的段落。如果没有这一点，即使单个句子语法无误，文章也可能显得支离破碎。
To fix this, direct instruction on paragraph anatomy is necessary. A strong paragraph in discursive or analytical writing should open with a topic sentence that states the main idea. The next sentences provide specific evidence—a quotation, a fact, or an example. Then comes explanation, where the writer interprets the evidence and connects it to the overall argument. Finally, a linking sentence either concludes or transitions smoothly. In narrative writing, a new paragraph typically marks a change in time, place, topic, or speaker. Model paragraphs with colour-coded elements help visual learners internalise the structure.
要解决此问题，需要对段落结构进行直接指导。在议论文或分析性写作中，一个有力的段落应以陈述主旨的主题句开头。接下来的句子提供具体证据——引文、事实或例子。然后是解释，写作者在此解读证据，并将其与整体论点联系起来。最后，一个衔接句要么总结观点，要么平滑过渡。在叙事文写作中，新段落通常标示时间、地点、话题或说话者的变化。使用颜色标记要素的示范段落，有助于视觉型学习者内化结构。
Peer review sessions where students exchange work and label the parts of each paragraph are particularly effective. When a peer cannot find a clear topic sentence, the writer realises something is missing. Cambridge resources often include exemplar material with annotations showing how well-structured responses achieve higher bands. Consistent use of paragraph planners before writing can considerably reduce disorganisation.
学生交换作业并为每个段落的各部分贴上标签的同伴互评活动，尤为有效。当同伴找不到清晰的主题句时，写作者就会意识到缺少了一些东西。剑桥资源经常包含带有批注的范文，展示结构清晰的回答如何获得更高的评分等级。写作前持续使用段落规划表，可以显著减少条理不清的情况。
7. Overuse of Simplistic Vocabulary | 词汇过于简单
Year 8 learners frequently rely on a core set of basic adjectives and verbs—'good', 'bad', 'nice', 'went', 'said'—rather than selecting precise, vivid vocabulary. While these words are not incorrect, overusing them makes writing flat and fails to demonstrate the range expected at the Cambridge Lower Secondary level. In both creative and transactional writing, precise vocabulary choices can communicate tone, mood, and nuance more effectively and are directly rewarded in the assessment criteria for 'composition and effect'.
八年级学习者经常依赖一组核心的基础形容词和动词——如 “good”、“bad”、“nice”、“went”、“said”——而不是选择准确、生动的词汇。这些词本身没错，但过度使用会使文章平淡无奇，并且无法展示剑桥初中阶段所期望的词汇广度。在创意写作和事务性写作中，精准的选词能更有效地传达语气、氛围和细微差别，并在“作文与效果”的评分标准中直接获得加分。
An effective correction strategy is to maintain a 'shades of meaning' journal. Instead of 'walked', a student might collect alternatives: strolled, trudged, tiptoed, marched. Each word carries a different connotation, which can be matched to the character's emotion or the scene's mood. Teachers can run daily warm-ups where students take a weak sentence like 'He was tired' and upgrade it to 'Exhausted, he slumped against the wall, his eyelids heavy.' The process of expansion must be deliberate, and students should be cautioned against over-stuffing sentences with thesaurus words that distort meaning. Precision matters more than complexity.
一个有效的纠正策略是制作一本“词义深浅”日志。替代 “walked”，学生可以收集备选词：strolled, trudged, tiptoed, marched。每个词都带有不同的内涵，可以与角色的情绪或场景的氛围相匹配。教师可以每日进行热身练习，让学生将一个平淡的句子如 “He was tired” 升级为 “Exhausted, he slumped against the wall, his eyelids heavy.” 这种扩充过程必须是有意为之的，同时应提醒学生不要用词典生僻词过度堆砌句子，导致语义扭曲。精准比复杂更重要。
In Cambridge Checkpoint reading comprehension, vocabulary questions often ask for the meaning of words in context. Building a strong vocabulary not only improves writing but also directly boosts reading performance. Students can use personal word banks organised by theme (e.g., 'words for showing anger', 'words for describing landscapes') and draw upon them when drafting. Over time, the active vocabulary expands beyond the tired defaults.
在剑桥 Checkpoint 阅读理解中，词汇题经常要求解释词在上下文中的意思。积累强大的词汇量不仅能改善写作，还能直接提高阅读成绩。学生可以使用按主题组织的个人单词库（例如，“表示愤怒的词”、“描写风景的词”），并在拟草稿时从中选用。久而久之，活跃词汇量将会超越那些陈旧的默认词。
8. Misreading Inferences in Comprehension | 阅读理解中误解推理
Many Year 8 comprehension errors stem not from an inability to decode words, but from delivering answers that are too literal. When a text passage implies a character's emotion through action—for example, 'She stared at the floor and said nothing'—students may fail to infer that the character feels embarrassed or upset. Instead, they paraphrase the visible action. Cambridge exam questions are designed with a mix of literal, inferential, and evaluative layers, and inferential questions carry significant weight.
许多八年级阅读理解错误的根源并不是文字解码能力不足，而是给出的答案过于字面化。当文本段落通过动作暗示角色的情绪——例如，“她盯着地板，一言不发”——学生可能无法推断出角色感到尴尬或沮丧，而只是复述可见的动作。剑桥考试题目设计了字面、推断和评价等混合层次，推断性问题占有相当大的分值。
To correct this, students need explicit practice with the 'read between the lines' technique. After reading a short passage, they should be guided to ask: What is the character thinking? What do their actions suggest about their relationship with others? How does the setting contribute to the mood? Sentence starters such as 'I can infer that... because the text says...' scaffold this thinking. Teachers can use paired texts where the same event is described literally and then through implication, to highlight the difference. Cambridge past papers are full of inferential follow-up questions, making targeted revision essential.
要纠正这一点，学生需要明确练习“字里行间读出深意”的技巧。在阅读完一个短篇后，应引导他们提问：角色在想什么？他们的行为暗示了与他人的什么关系？环境如何营造了氛围？诸如 “I can infer that... because the text says...” 这样的句子开头为这种思维提供了支架。教师可以使用配对文本，将同一事件分别用字面方式和隐含方式进行描述，以突显差异。剑桥历年真题充满了推断性跟进问题，因此有针对性的复习至关重要。
Another typical pitfall is ignoring the context of a word when answering vocabulary-in-context items. A student may know a dictionary definition but choose a meaning that does not fit the surrounding sentences. The correction is to teach the 'replace and check' method: substitute your suggested meaning into the sentence and see if it makes sense in that specific passage. If it does not, it is probably the wrong inference. This technique reinforces the importance of textual evidence over guessing.
另一个常见的陷阱是，在回答语境中的词汇题时忽略词汇的上下文。学生可能知道字典释义，但选择一个不切合前后句子的意思。纠正方法是教授“替换并检验”方法：将你建议的释义替换到句中，看它是否在该特定段落中说得通。如果说不同，很可能是错误的推断。这一技巧强化了文本证据相对于猜测的重要性。
9. Misidentifying Poetic Devices | 错误辨识诗歌手法
In Cambridge English, students are expected to comment on a writer's use of language, including figurative devices. A frequent mistake is confusing similes with metaphors, or mislabelling personification as just 'description'. A simile states a comparison using 'like' or 'as' ('as brave as a lion'), while a metaphor makes an implied comparison without those words ('he was a lion in battle'). Personification gives human qualities to non-human things ('the wind whispered'). When students cannot name the device correctly, their analysis remains superficial and loses marks under the 'reading and interpreting' criterion.
在剑桥英语中，要求学生能够评论作者的语言运用，包括各种修辞手法。一个常见错误是混淆明喻和暗喻，或者将拟人错误地标记为单纯的“描写”。明喻使用 “like” 或 “as” 进行比喻（“as brave as a lion”），而暗喻则无需这些词语，直接进行隐含的对比（“he was a lion in battle”）。拟人则是赋予非人类事物以人类特质（“the wind whispered”）。当学生无法正确命名这些手法时，他们的分析就会流于表面，并在“阅读与阐释”标准下失分。
Building a reliable poetic device toolkit is the answer. Students should create flashcards with the term on one side, the definition, and two clear examples on the other. They need to practice not only identification but also explaining the effect. For instance, saying 'The simile "as brave as a lion" shows the character's courage' is far more impactful than simply stating 'There is a simile.' Cambridge mark schemes reward the effect, so linking device to purpose is key. Short, daily 'device of the day' exercises where students find an example in a poem or a song lyric build recognition speed.
建立一个可靠的诗歌手法工具箱就是答案。学生应制作抽认卡，一面写上术语，另一面写上定义和两个清晰例子。他们不仅需要练习辨识，还要练习解释其效果。例如，说出 “The simile ‘as brave as a lion’ shows the character’s courage”，远比仅仅说 “There is a simile” 更有力。剑桥评分方案奖励对效果的阐释，因此将手法与写作目的联系起来是关键。每天进行一项“每日一手法”短练习，让学生在诗歌或歌词中找出例子，可以提高辨识速度。
Onomatopoeia, alliteration, and sibilance are also frequently misidentified in Year 8 responses. Alliteration is the repetition of initial consonant sounds, while sibilance specifically refers to the repetition of 's', 'sh', or 'ch' sounds, creating a hissing effect. Onomatopoeia is a word that mimics a sound ('buzz', 'crash'). When studying a poem, a good habit is to annotate lines with the appropriate labels and then ask: why has the poet chosen this sound or comparison at this point? This transforms labelling into genuine literary analysis.
拟声、头韵和咝音在八年级的答题中也经常被错误辨识。头韵是词首辅音的重复，而咝音特指 's'、'sh' 或 'ch' 音的重复，产生咝咝声效果。拟声则是模拟声音的词语（“buzz”、“crash”）。在学习诗歌时，一个好习惯是用适当的标签给诗行做注释，然后提问：为什么诗人会在此时选用这个声音或比较？这样做可以将贴标签转变为真正的文学分析。
10. Common Spelling Errors and Patterns | 常见拼写错误与规律
Even at Year 8, spelling mistakes can undermine the credibility of an otherwise thoughtful piece of writing. Certain error patterns appear year after year: confusing 'ie' and 'ei' (believe vs. receive), doubling consonants incorrectly (writing 'writing' as 'writting'), and mishandling suffixes (adding '-ly' to words ending in 'ic' to produce 'publicly' not 'publically'). The Cambridge Curriculum notes that spelling should be largely accurate by this stage, so persistent errors are a signal that intervention is needed.
即使到了八年级，拼写错误也可能削弱一篇原本有思想深度的文章的可信度。某些错误模式年复一年地出现：混淆 “ie” 和 “ei”（believe 与
Published by TutorHao | Year 8 English Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图