← 返回资讯屏轩教育 · 行业资讯

Year 8 CCEA Law: Unit Test Mock Paper Analysis | Year 8 CCEA 法律:单元测试模拟卷解析

2026-07-18 01:41 · 本文部分内容由AI辅助创作

📚 Year 8 CCEA Law: Unit Test Mock Paper Analysis | Year 8 CCEA 法律:单元测试模拟卷解析

This article walks you through a full mock paper for the Year 8 CCEA Law unit test. It covers every section in detail, explaining how to approach multiple-choice, short-answer, and scenario-based questions while reinforcing the fundamental legal knowledge you need to succeed. Read on to build confidence and sharpen your exam technique.

本文为你逐题梳理一份完整的 Year 8 CCEA 法律单元测试模拟卷。文章详细解析每一部分的答题思路,引导你理解选择题、简答题和情境分析题的应对方法,同时巩固你必备的法律基础知识。继续读下去,建立信心,提升你的考试技巧。


1. Defining Law – Why Do We Need Rules? | 定义法律——为什么我们需要规则?

The first section of the mock paper asks you to explain what law means and to list three reasons why societies create laws. A strong answer identifies law as a set of official rules made by a recognised authority that apply to everyone in a community and can be enforced by courts. It then links this definition to real purposes: keeping people safe, resolving disputes peacefully, and protecting individual rights and freedoms.

模拟卷的第一部分要求你解释法律的含义,并列出社会制定法律的三个理由。一份优质答案会把法律定义为由公认权威制定、适用于社区中每一个人、并可由法院强制执行的一套正式规则。接着,你需要将这个定义与实际目的联系起来:保障人身安全、和平解决争端、保护个人权利与自由。

Many students confuse laws with school rules or family rules. While all of these guide behaviour, only laws are created by Parliament or a devolved assembly, written down in statutes, and backed by formal punishments such as fines or imprisonment. In Northern Ireland, the Assembly can make laws on devolved matters like education and health, but some areas, such as national security, remain with Westminster.

许多学生容易将法律与校规或家规混淆。虽然这些都能引导行为,但只有法律是由议会或地方议会制定的,以成文法令形式记录下来,并由罚款或监禁等正式惩罚措施作为后盾。在北爱尔兰,地方议会有权就教育、卫生等权力下放事务制定法律,但国家安全等领域仍由威斯敏斯特议会负责。

When answering the 'give three reasons' part, think of concrete examples. Reason one: To protect people from harm - the law makes it a crime to assault someone. Reason two: To settle disagreements - if a neighbour damages your fence, civil law helps you claim compensation. Reason three: To uphold fairness - employment law stops an employer from discriminating because of your religion or gender.

回答“列出三个理由”的部分时,要想到具体的例子。理由一:保护人们免受伤害——法律规定袭击他人是犯罪。理由二:解决纠纷——如果邻居损坏了你的围栏,民法可以帮助你要求赔偿。理由三:维护公平——劳动法禁止雇主因宗教或性别而歧视你。

Use the P.E.E. structure (Point, Evidence, Explanation) even in short answers. A point alone is not enough; you must show the examiner you can connect the law to everyday life. This skill will be essential throughout the whole paper.

即便在简答题中,也要使用 P.E.E.(观点、证据、解释)的结构。仅仅提出观点是不够的;你必须向考官展示你能够将法律与日常生活联系起来。这一技能在整份试卷中都至关重要。


2. Criminal Law vs Civil Law – Spotting the Difference | 刑法与民法——找出区别

The next set of questions tests your ability to distinguish between criminal and civil law. You might be shown a short scenario such as 'David kicks a car and breaks the wing mirror' and asked to decide whether this belongs to criminal law, civil law, or both. The key is to look for an act that threatens public order (criminal) and a wrong that causes loss or injury to an individual (civil).

接下来的一组题目考查你区分刑法与民法的能力。你可能会看到一个简短的情境,例如“戴维踢了一辆汽车,损坏了后视镜”,并被要求判断这属于刑法、民法还是两者兼有。关键在于找出威胁公共秩序的行为(刑事),以及造成个人损失或伤害的不法行为(民事)。

In the mock paper, a clear multi-choice question asks: 'Which of the following is always true about a criminal case?' The options include 'The victim starts the case', 'The case is between two individuals', 'The state prosecutes the defendant', and 'The punishment is always a fine'. The correct answer is that the state prosecutes. In Northern Ireland, the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) decides whether to bring a case to court on behalf of the community.

在模拟卷中,有一道直接的选择题问道:“关于刑事案件,以下哪项总是正确的?”选项包括“由受害者发起案件”、“案件发生在两个个人之间”、“由国家起诉被告”以及“惩罚永远是罚款”。正确答案是国家提起公诉。在北爱尔兰,公诉机关(PPS)代表社会决定是否将案件提交法庭。

To solidify this distinction, use a comparison table. The mock paper provides one and asks you to fill in the gaps. Below is a model answer that would gain full marks.

为了巩固这一区别,可以使用对比表格。模拟卷中提供了一张表格并要求你填空。以下是可获得满分的参考答案。

FeatureCriminal LawCivil Law
PurposeTo punish offenders and protect societyTo resolve disputes and provide a remedy
Who starts the case?The state (e.g., PPS in NI)An individual or organisation (claimant)
Burden of proofBeyond reasonable doubtOn the balance of probabilities
Possible outcomeFine, community service, imprisonmentCompensation, injunction, specific performance
ExampleTheft, assault, driving without insuranceBreach of contract, negligence, family disputes

Remember the standard of proof. In a criminal trial, the prosecution must make the magistrates or jury sure of the defendant's guilt; any reasonable doubt should lead to a not-guilty verdict. In a civil trial, the judge simply decides which side's story is more likely than not. A common exam error is mixing these two standards, so underline them in your revision notes.

要记住证明标准。在刑事审判中,控方必须让裁判官或陪审团确信被告有罪;任何合理怀疑都应导致无罪裁决。而在民事审判中,法官只需判断哪一方的说法更“有可能”。一个常见的考试错误是混淆这两种标准,因此要在你的复习笔记中用下划线突出它们。


3. Sources of Law – Where Do Our Rules Come From? | 法律的来源——我们的规则从哪里来?

A confident answer in the mock paper demonstrates that law does not drop out of the sky. It comes mainly from two sources: statutory law made by Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly, and common law developed by judges in courts. The exam may give you a list of laws—for example, the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 and the Offences Against the Person Act 1861—and ask you to identify whether each is a statute or a piece of case law.

模拟卷中一个自信的回答表明,法律并非凭空而降。它主要来自两个来源:由议会和北爱尔兰地方议会制定的成文法,以及由法官在法庭中发展出来的普通法。考试可能给你一份法律清单——例如《1995年儿童(北爱尔兰)法令》和《1861年侵害人身罪法》——并让你识别每一项是制定法还是判例法。

Key tip: if a law has a year in its title and the word 'Act' or 'Order', it is a statute. If the name includes two parties, like 'Donoghue v Stevenson' (1932), it is a judge-made precedent. This famous case, decided in the House of Lords, created the modern law of negligence. A question might ask, 'Explain how a single court case can change the law for everyone.' Your answer should mention the doctrine of precedent, where lower courts must follow decisions of higher courts in similar future cases.

关键提示:如果一部法律的标题包含年份和“法”或“法令”的字眼,它就是成文法。如果名称中包含双方当事人的名字,比如“Donoghue v Stevenson”(1932年),那就是法官确立的判例。这个由上议院裁决的著名案例创造了现代过失法。一道题目可能会问:“解释一个单一的法庭案件如何可以为每一个人改变法律。”你的答案应当提及先例原则,即下级法院在将来类似案件中必须遵循上级法院的裁决。

evolved competence. A simplified chain is: First Reading (introduction) → Second Reading (main debate) → Committee Stage (detailed examination) → Further Readings and a final vote → Royal Assent. The mock paper includes a sequencing exercise that many Year 8 students find tricky. Practise drawing a flowchart so the steps become second nature.

另一项可能出现的任务是描述一项法案如何在北爱尔兰地方议会成为法令。流程与威斯敏斯特类似,但只限于权力下放范围内的事务。简化的链条是:一读(引入) → 二读(主要辩论) → 委员会阶段(详细审查) → 进一步审议和最终投票 → 御准。模拟卷中包含了一个排序练习,许多 Year 8 学生觉得棘手。练习画流程图,让这些步骤成为你的第二天性。


4. The Court Structure in Northern Ireland | 北爱尔兰的法院结构

The mock paper includes a diagram of a courthouse with labels missing. You are expected to know the main courts that deal with criminal and civil matters. For criminal cases, start with the Magistrates' Court, which handles summary offences like speeding and can also conduct preliminary hearings for more serious either-way or indictable offences. These serious cases then move to the Crown Court, where a judge sits with a jury.

模拟卷中包含了一张缺少标签的法院示意图。你要知道处理刑事和民事事务的主要法院。就刑事案件而言,起点是裁判法院,它处理超速等简易程序犯罪,还可以对更严重的可任意选择审判方式的犯罪或可公诉犯罪进行预审。这些严重案件随后会移交刑事法院,由一名法官与陪审团共同审理。

While the Magistrates' Court deals with less serious crime, the Crown Court has the power to impose heavier sentences. In Northern Ireland, the Crown Court also hears appeals from the Magistrates' Court. Be careful not to confuse this with the Court of Appeal, which handles appeals from the Crown Court and the High Court. The ultimate court for most UK-wide legal matters is the Supreme Court in London, but Year 8 students only need to recognise it as the final appeal stage.

虽然裁判法院处理较轻的犯罪,刑事法院则有权施加更重的刑罚。在北爱尔兰,刑事法院也审理来自裁判法院的上诉。注意不要将其与上诉法院混淆,后者处理来自刑事法院和高等法院的上诉。对大多数全英法律事务而言,最终审级是位于伦敦的最高法院,但 Year 8 学生只需知道它是最后的上诉阶段。

Civil matters start in the County Court or High Court depending on the value and complexity of the claim. A short-answer question may ask: 'Where would a person go to claim £3000 for a faulty laptop?' The correct route is the County Court because the claim falls within its financial limit. Using a table to summarise the jurisdiction helps memorisation.

民事案件则根据索赔金额和复杂性,从郡法院或高等法院开始。一道简答题可能会问:“一个人要为故障笔记本电脑索赔3000英镑,应当去哪个法院?”正确的途径是郡法院,因为这个金额在其审理权限之内。使用表格总结管辖范围有助于记忆。

CourtCriminal JurisdictionCivil Jurisdiction
Magistrates' CourtSummary offences, preliminary hearingsLimited family and licensing matters
Crown CourtIndictable and serious either-way offencesHandles appeals from Magistrates
County CourtRare criminal jurisdiction (e.g., appeals)Claims up to a set financial limit
High CourtHears serious criminal appealsHigh-value or complex civil claims

广告 / Sponsored

5. The Role of Juries – Decision Makers in the Crown Court | 陪审团的作用——刑事法院的决策者

One higher-mark question in the mock paper presents a diary entry from a nervous juror and asks you to explain what the juror's duties involve. You should mention that a jury in Northern Ireland consists of 12 randomly selected people aged between 18 and 75, registered on the electoral roll. Their task is to listen to the evidence, follow the judge's directions on the law, and reach a unanimous or majority verdict on the facts.

模拟卷中一道分值较高的题目给出一位紧张陪审员的日记摘录,要求你解释陪审员有哪些职责。你应当提到,北爱尔兰的陪审团由12名从选民登记册中随机选出、年龄在18至75岁之间的人组成。他们的任务是听取证据,遵循法官对法律问题的指示,并就事实达成一致裁决或多数裁决。

The diary might mention the judge's instruction that the burden of proof lies 'beyond reasonable doubt'. In your answer, link this to the jury's duty: they must be sure of guilt before they can convict. If any juror has a genuine reasonable doubt, the verdict must be 'not guilty'. The mock paper asks why it is important that jurors discuss the case in secret. Two key reasons are to protect jurors from outside pressure and to encourage open, honest debate without fear of public criticism.

日记中可能提到法官指示说证明责任必须达到“排除合理怀疑”。在你的答案中,要将此与陪审团的职责联系起来:他们必须在确信有罪之后才能定罪。如果任何一位陪审员怀有真正合理的怀疑,裁决就必须是“无罪”。模拟卷问为什么陪审团要秘密讨论案件很重要。两个关键理由是:保护陪审员免受外界压力,并鼓励他们在无需担心公开批评的情况下进行开放、诚实的讨论。

A frequently examined concept is jury eligibility and exemptions. The mock paper lists five people—a police officer, a 16-year-old student, a hospital consultant, a person with a recent criminal conviction, and a supermarket cashier—and asks you to circle those who cannot serve. The 16-year-old is disqualified because of age. The person with a recent conviction is also ineligible. In contrast, occupation alone rarely prevents service, though some professionals may be excused if they can prove a real conflict.

经常考查的一个概念是陪审员资格与豁免。模拟卷列出了五个人——一名警察、一名16岁学生、一名医院会诊医生、一名近期有刑事定罪的人以及一名超市收银员——要求你圈出不能担任陪审员的人。16岁的学生因年龄而不具备资格。近期有刑事定罪的人也不合格。相比之下,仅凭职业一般不会阻止服务,不过有些专业人士如果能够证明存在真实的冲突,可能获准免除义务。


6. Age of Criminal Responsibility and Youth Justice | 刑事责任年龄与青少年司法

A thought-provoking past-paper question asks: 'In Northern Ireland, at what age can a child be prosecuted for a crime?' The answer is 10 years old. Below that age, a child is considered doli incapax—incapable of committing a legal wrong. The mock paper expects you not just to state the age but to explain why society sets this limit. Arguments often refer to brain development, moral understanding, and the need to protect childhood.

一道引人深思的往年试卷题目问:“在北爱尔兰,儿童从几岁起可以因犯罪而被起诉?”答案是10周岁。低于这个年龄的儿童被视为无犯罪能力,即不能构成法律上的不法行为。模拟卷不仅期望你说出年龄,还要解释社会为何设定这一界限。论点通常涉及大脑发育、道德认知以及保护童年的必要性。

The scenario section features a 14-year-old called Jamie who is caught vandalising a bus shelter. You are asked to describe the different ways the justice system could respond. Possible outcomes include a Youth Conference, a formal caution from the police, or prosecution in the Youth Court. A top-band answer would note that the system aims to balance punishment with rehabilitation and to avoid unnecessarily drawing young people into a cycle of offending.

情境题部分描述了一名14岁的杰米因破坏巴士候车亭被抓。题目要求你描述司法系统可能如何作出不同反应。可能的结果包括青年会议、警方的正式训诫,或在青少年法院起诉。一份高水平的答案会指出,这个系统旨在平衡惩罚与改造,并避免将青少年不必要地拖入犯罪循环。

The mock paper also tests your ability to compare the youth justice approach with the adult system. You might highlight that Youth Courts are less formal, parents or guardians must attend, and the media is not allowed to publish the child's name. These safeguards exist because the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), to which the UK is a signatory, insists that detention of children should be a last resort and for the shortest appropriate period.

模拟卷也考查你比较青少年司法方式与成人系统的能力。你可以强调青少年法院不那么正式,父母或监护人必须出席,并且媒体不得公布孩子的姓名。这些保障措施之所以存在,是因为英国签署的《联合国儿童权利公约》主张,对儿童的拘留应当作为最后手段,并且时间应尽可能短。


7. Children's Rights and the UNCRC | 儿童权利与《联合国儿童权利公约》

A dedicated knowledge-based question often appears: 'Name four rights that the UNCRC gives to children and young people.' Acceptable answers include the right to life, the right to education, the right to express your views freely in matters affecting you, and the right to be protected from violence, abuse, and neglect. Avoid vague phrases like 'the right to be happy'; instead refer to specific Articles of the Convention.

常常出现一道纯知识题:“列举《联合国儿童权利公约》赋予儿童及青少年的四项权利。”可接受的答案包括:生命权、受教育权、在本人的受影响事务上自由表达意见的权利,以及受保护免遭暴力、虐待和忽视的权利。避免使用像“快乐的权利”这样的模糊措辞;要指明公约的具体条款。

The mock paper contains an extract from Article 12: 'When adults are making decisions that affect children, children have the right to say what they think should happen and have their opinions taken into account.' You are then asked to give an example of how this right could be observed in a school. A strong example is a school council where pupils debate uniform policy and their recommendations are seriously considered by the board of governors.

模拟卷中包含《公约》第12条的摘录:“当成年人做出影响儿童的决定时,儿童有权就应当发生的事情提出自己的看法,并让他们的意见得到考虑。”然后要求你举出一个在学校里此权利得到遵守的例子。一个有力的例子是:学生会讨论校服政策,其建议受到校董会的认真考虑。

To gain marks, you need to explain why this right matters. It teaches young people that their voice counts, encourages responsible citizenship, and often leads to better decisions because those affected have contributed their lived experience. A follow-up question asks: 'Is the UNCRC law in Northern Ireland?' The answer requires nuance: the UK Government signed and ratified it, so it is binding under international law, but it has not been fully written into one single domestic Act. Instead, its principles appear in various laws such as the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995.

要获得分数,你需要解释这项权利为何重要。它让年轻人懂得自己的声音有价值,鼓励负责任的公民意识,并且常常能带来更好的决策,因为受影响者贡献了他们的亲身体验。一道后续问题问到:“《联合国儿童权利公约》在北爱尔兰具有法律效力吗?”答案需要细致的说明:英国政府签署并批准了该公约,因此在国际法下具有约束力,但它还没有被完全写入一部单一的国内法。相反,它的原则体现在多部法律中,比如《1995年儿童(北爱尔兰)法令》。


8. Scenario Analysis – Applying Law to a Real Situation | 情境分析——在真实情境中应用法律

The final section of the mock paper presents a narrative: Liam (13) steals a mobile phone from a shop. He is caught outside by a security guard and the phone is recovered. The shop owner wants to prosecute. You are asked to play the role of a legal adviser and write a report covering Liam's likely journey through the justice system, the relevant ages and laws, the role of the police, and what would be the most appropriate outcome for a first-time offender.

模拟卷的最后部分给出了一段叙述:利亚姆(13岁)从店铺偷了一部手机。他在店外被保安抓住,手机被寻回。店主想起诉。题目要求你扮演法律顾问,写一份涵盖利亚姆可能的司法程序历程、相关年龄和法律、警察的角色,以及对初犯者最合适处理结果的报告。

Start your report by confirming that Liam is above the age of criminal responsibility (10), so he can be charged with theft. The police would likely interview him in the presence of an appropriate adult, as required by the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989. Because the item was recovered and it is a first offence, a Youth Conference or restorative caution might be deemed the most proportionate response.

报告开头要确认利亚姆已过刑事责任年龄(10岁),所以他可以被指控盗窃。警方很可能在适当成人陪同下对他进行问话,这是《1989年警察与刑事证据(北爱尔兰)法令》的要求。由于物品已被追回且是初犯,青年会议或修复式训诫可能会被视为最合比例的应对方式。

A top mark answer explains the concept of proportionality. Under the youth justice principles, the aim is to prevent reoffending rather than simply to punish. A restorative justice approach could see Liam meeting the shop owner, apologising, and perhaps undertaking some unpaid community work that directly addresses the harm caused. This not only holds Liam accountable but also helps the victim feel heard. The report should state that a custodial sentence would be a last resort and highly disproportionate for a minor first theft.

一份高分的答案要解释合比例性的概念。根据青少年司法原则,目标是防止再犯,而不仅仅是惩罚。修复式正义方式可以让利亚姆会面店主、道歉,或许还可以承担一些直接回应所造成损害的无偿社区服务。这样不仅让利亚姆对自己的行为负责,也有助于让受害者的声音被听见。报告应指出,监禁刑应当是最后手段,并且对于轻微的初犯盗窃来说极度不相称。

In addition, you might reference the UNCRC Article 40, which states that children in conflict with the law have the right to legal help and to be treated in a way that promotes their reintegration into society. By weaving in a Convention article, you show the examiner that you can link national practice to international standards—exactly the skill that distinguishes a high-achieving student.

此外,你可以引用《联合国儿童权利公约》第40条,其中规定触法儿童有权获得法律援助,并应以促进其重新融入社会的方式受到对待。通过将公约条款融入其中,你向考官展示了你能够将本国实践与国际标准联系起来——这正是成就高分学生的关键技能。


9. Key Terminology and Command Words | 关键术语与指令词

The mock paper deliberately scatters command words like 'state', 'explain', 'compare', and 'to what extent'. Understanding what each word demands can save you from dropping easy marks. 'State' means give a brief, clear fact or definition. 'Explain' requires you to give reasons, usually using a because or therefore structure. 'Compare' needs you to point out both similarities and differences.

模拟卷故意散布了像“陈述”、“解释”、“比较”、“在多大程度上”等指令词。理解每个词的要求可以避免你丢掉容易获得的分数。“陈述”意味着给出简洁明了的事实或定义。“解释”要求你给出理由,通常使用“因为”或“因此”的结构。“比较”需要你指出相似之处和不同点。

The most challenging prompt is often 'to what extent'. Here you must make a judgement. For example, 'To what extent is the youth justice system in Northern Ireland focused on punishment?' A balanced answer would acknowledge that punishment exists through community orders and, in serious cases, custody, but argue that the system is predominantly rehabilitative, as shown by the preference for Youth Conferences and the involvement of social services.

最棘手的提示往往是“在多大程度上”。此时你必须做出判断。例如,“北爱尔兰的青年司法系统在多大程度上关注惩罚?”一份平衡的答案会承认通过社区令以及严重案件中拘留等惩罚形式的存在,但同时论证这个系统主要以改造为核心,正如倾向于召开青年会议和引入社会服务机构所表明的那样。

Also, ensure you know the precise meaning of terms like 'claimant', 'defendant', 'prosecution', and 'appeal'. Mixing up 'claimant' (civil) and 'prosecutor' (criminal) is a frequent slip. Dedicate a page of your revision notebook to legal vocabulary and write a sentence for each word in a Northern Ireland context.

同时,确保你知道像“原告”、“被告”、“控方”、“上诉”等术语的准确含义。将“原告”(民事)和“检察官”(刑事)混淆是一个常见的失误。在你的复习笔记本中专门用一页记下法律词汇,并在北爱尔兰语境下为每个词造一个句子。


10. Mark Scheme Insights – What Examiners Look For | 评分方案剖析——考官看重什么

Walking through the mark scheme reveals a pattern: examiners reward application over pure recall. The mock paper allocates around 30% of marks for knowledge, 40% for understanding and application, and 30% for evaluation and analysis. This means that even if you can recite definitions perfectly, you must also show how they operate in a scenario to reach the higher grade boundaries.

剖析评分方案揭示了一个模式:考官更看重应用而非纯粹的回忆。模拟卷中知识部分约占30%分值,理解与应用约占40%,评估与分析占30%。这意味着,即使你能完美背诵定义,你也必须在情境中展示它们如何运作,才能达到较高的等级边界。

For example, a 6-mark question on the role of a solicitor in a Youth Court might award 2 marks for stating that a solicitor provides legal advice and representation. It then awards a further 2 marks for explaining why this matters—to ensure the young person understands the charges and can participate effectively. The final 2 marks would be reserved for linking this to a broader principle, such as the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

例如,一道关于律师在青少年法院作用的6分题目,可能会给2分用于陈述律师提供法律建议和代理。然后再给2分用于解释这为什么重要——确保青少年理解指控并能有效参与。最后2分会留给将其与更广泛的原则联系起来,例如根据《1998年人权法》第6条获得公正审判的权利。

Use this paragraph structure in your own answers: state the legal fact, explain the reason behind it, and connect it to a real impact or a bigger idea. When practising at home, time yourself strictly. The mock paper takes 50 minutes. Aim to spend roughly 1 minute per mark, leaving 5 minutes at the end to check your spelling of key terms and to ensure you have not missed a command word.

在你自己的答案中请使用这个段落结构:陈述法律事实,解释其背后的原因,并将其与真实影响或更大的理念联系起来。在家练习时要严格计时。模拟卷时长50分钟。争取每分钟拿到1分,最后留出5分钟检查关键术语的拼写,并确保你没有遗漏任何指令词。


11. Reflection and Self-Assessment Checklist | 反思与自我评估清单

After completing the mock paper, use a traffic-light system to identify areas for revision. Green means you are confident, amber means you need a little more practice, and red means you should revisit the topic from scratch. Topics that commonly appear red include the difference between summary and indictable offences, the hierarchy of courts, and remembering the difference between criminal and civil remedies.

完成模拟卷后,使用交通信号灯系统来确定需要复习的领域。绿色表示你很有信心,黄色表示还需要一些练习,红色表示你应该从头重学该主题。经常被标为红色的主题包括:简易程序犯罪与可公诉犯罪的区别、法院层级,以及记住刑事与民事法律救济的不同。

Write down three specific actions you will take before the real test. Example actions: 'I will draw a court

Published by TutorHao | Year 8 法律 Revision Series | aleveler.com

广告 / Sponsored
Linux高级程序设计(高等院校计算机技术十二五规划教材)/刘加海/季江民/浙江大学出版社
计算机 备考教辅 · 正版现货 · 与本文内容相关
查看详情 / View on Taobao参考价 ¥55.6

更多咨询请联系16621398022(同微信)

备考资讯每日更新,关注不错过
考纲变化 · 科目分析 · 学习方法
扫码关注公众号 tutorhao
在微信里长按二维码识别关注
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图
公众号:tutorhao