📚 Common Misconceptions in Year 8 WJEC Drama and How to Correct Them | 八年级 WJEC 戏剧常见误区与纠正方法
Year 8 WJEC Drama introduces students to the fundamentals of performance, collaboration, and creative expression. However, many learners bring unhelpful assumptions into the studio that can hold back their progress. Whether it is treating drama like a casual game, rushing through rehearsal, or relying on stereotypes instead of thoughtful character choices, these misconceptions are common but entirely fixable. This article identifies the most frequent errors seen in Year 8 drama classrooms and provides clear, practical methods to correct them. By recognising and replacing these habits early, students can develop stronger performance skills, deeper analytical thinking, and greater confidence on stage — exactly what the WJEC curriculum aims to build.
八年级 WJEC 戏剧课程引导学生掌握表演、协作与创造性表达的基础。然而，许多学生带着无益的假想走进排练室，这些假想会阻碍他们的进步。无论是把戏剧当作随意的游戏、匆忙完成排练，还是依赖刻板印象而非深思熟虑的角色选择，这些误区都很常见，但完全可以纠正。本文梳理了八年级戏剧课上最常出现的错误，并提供了清晰实用的纠正方法。尽早识别并替换这些习惯，学生就能发展出更强的表演技巧、更深层的分析思维和更大的舞台自信——这正是 WJEC 课程希望培养的能力。
1. Misconception: Drama Is Just About Being Loud and Funny | 误区：戏剧就是大声说话和搞笑
Many Year 8 students believe that a powerful performance relies on shouting lines or constantly trying to make the audience laugh. While projection and humour have their place, this narrow view ignores the full emotional range of drama. A student who only focuses on volume often loses nuance, missing the quiet moments where tension builds or sadness lingers. Similarly, forced comedy can break the dramatic illusion and reduce a serious scene to a string of unrelated jokes. In WJEC Drama, assessment values control, variety, and truthfulness of emotion far more than simple volume or cheap laughter.
许多八年级学生认为，一场有力的表演取决于大声喊出台词或不断让观众发笑。虽然声音传递和幽默有其作用，但这种狭隘的看法忽视了戏剧的全部情感幅度。只关注音量的学生常常失去细腻感，错过那些积蓄张力或流淌悲伤的安静时刻。同理，强加的搞笑会打破戏剧幻觉，将严肃的场景变成一串无关的笑话。在 WJEC 戏剧评估中，控制力、变化性和情感的真实度远比单纯的音量或廉价的笑声更重要。
To correct this, students should explore contrasting dynamics in simple exercises. Try delivering the same short line — for example, ‘I didn’t know you were there’ — at six different volume levels, from a whisper to a full-voice call. Then repeat the line while imagining six different emotional states: frightened, relieved, suspicious, amused, disappointed, and furious. Record these variations and notice how small shifts in breath, pace, and facial expression completely redefine the meaning. This practice builds awareness that effective acting lives in the space between extremes, not only at the loudest or funniest end.
为了纠正这一点，学生应该通过简单练习探索对比鲜明的动态变化。试着用六种不同的音量说出同一句简短台词，例如“我不知道你在那里”，从耳语到全声呼喊。然后重复这句台词，同时想象六种不同的情绪状态：惊恐、宽慰、怀疑、被逗乐、失望和愤怒。录下这些变化，注意呼吸、语速和面部表情的微小变化如何完全重新定义含义。这种练习建立了一种意识：有效的表演存在于极端之间的空间中，而不仅仅是最响亮或最搞笑的那一端。
2. Misconception: Rehearsal Means Simply Repeating the Scene | 误区：排练就是简单重复场景
It is common for Year 8 groups to assume that running a scene from start to finish over and over counts as good rehearsal. In reality, this often cements mistakes rather than fixing them. Without targeted focus, each repetition may reinforce poor blocking, mumbled lines, or weak character choices. The WJEC specification emphasises the process of development, not just the final product. Students need to learn how to break a scene down, isolate tricky sections, and experiment with different approaches.
八年级小组常会以为，从头到尾一遍又一遍地过场景就算是好的排练。实际上，这往往会固化错误而不是修正错误。没有针对性的重点练习，每一次重复都可能强化糟糕的走位、含糊的台词或单薄的角色选择。WJEC 课程强调发展的过程，而不仅仅是最终作品。学生需要学会如何拆分场景、隔离棘手段落，并尝试不同的处理方式。
A useful correction is the ‘Stop, Think, Try Again’ method. When something feels flat or unclear, the group pauses immediately and asks three questions: What specific moment isn’t working? Why might it feel weak? What one change can we test right now? This could mean altering eye contact, shifting the physical distance between characters, or changing the rhythm of a line. By making one adjustment and then running only that 30-second segment three times, progress becomes visible quickly. Students should keep a simple rehearsal log noting what was changed and why — a skill that directly supports the WJEC requirement to reflect on the creative process.
一个有用的纠正方法是“停止、思考、再试”法。当某个时刻显得平淡或不清晰时，小组立即停下来问三个问题：哪个具体瞬间不奏效？为什么它可能感觉无力？我们现在可以测试什么改变？这可能意味着改变目光接触、调整角色之间的身体距离，或者改变一句台词的节奏。做出一个调整，然后只将那个 30 秒的片段运行三遍，进步很快就会显现。学生应该保持简单的排练日志，记录改变了什么以及为什么——这一技能直接支持 WJEC 对反思创作过程的要求。
3. Misconception: Memorising Lines Is the Hardest Part | 误区：背台词是最难的部分
For many Year 8 performers, anxiety about forgetting lines dominates their preparation time. While precise recall is important, treating a script as a memorisation test drains the scene of spontaneity and connection. Actors who cling to exact words often fail to listen to their scene partners because their focus stays inward, mentally racing to their next cue. In WJEC Drama, students are assessed on their ability to respond in character, not just recite accurately. A performance that breathes with natural pauses and genuine reactions will always outshine one that is perfectly word-perfect but emotionally hollow.
对许多八年级演员来说，担心忘词会主导他们的准备时间。尽管准确记忆很重要，但把剧本当作记忆测试会抽走场景中的即兴感和连接。执着于精确字词的演员常常不能倾听他们的场景搭档，因为他们的注意力停留在内部，心里在冲向下一句提示。在 WJEC 戏剧中，学生的评估标准是能否以角色身份做出回应，而不仅仅是准确背诵。一场带有自然停顿和真实反应的表演，永远胜过一词不差却情感空洞的表演。
To shift this focus, try ‘impulse rehearsal’. Each actor holds their script but is allowed to glance at it only after genuinely feeling the impulse to speak, not before. They must first listen fully to the line before theirs, allow a real thought or feeling to arise, and then check the page only if the words truly escape them. Another correction is to paraphrase the scene in their own words for a couple of runs, capturing the intention behind every line. This builds a safety net: if a line slips, the actor can still stay in character and navigate the moment smoothly because they truly understand what their character wants to communicate.
为了转移这个焦点，尝试“冲动排练”。每个演员手持剧本，但只能在真正感到说话的冲动之后看一眼剧本，而不是在此之前。他们必须先充分倾听自己之前的那句台词，让真实的念头或感觉升起，然后只有在真的忘词时才看向页面。另一个纠正是用他们自己的话把场景意译几遍，抓住每一句台词背后的意图。这建立了一个安全网：如果一句词滑落，演员仍然可以留在角色中并平稳度过那一刻，因为他们真正理解角色想要传达什么。
4. Misconception: Big Gestures Make a Character Clear | 误区：大动作能让角色鲜明
A frequent habit among younger actors is to equate characterisation with oversized body language: arms waving wildly, exaggerated nodding, or continuous pacing. Such movement often comes from a desire to appear energetic but ends up distracting the audience and masking any subtlety. Year 8 students may believe that stillness equals lack of effort. The WJEC assessment, however, values precision and purpose: every gesture should be a choice that reveals something about the character’s inner state or intention, not simply filler between lines.
年轻演员中一个常见习惯，是把角色塑造等同于夸张的肢体语言：手臂狂挥、过度点头或不停地踱步。这类动作往往源自希望显得有活力，但结果却分散了观众的注意力并掩盖了任何细腻感。八年级学生可能相信静止等于不用功。然而，WJEC 评估看重精确性和目的性：每一个手势都应该是一个选择，揭示角色的内心状态或意图，而不仅仅是台词之间的填充。
A corrective exercise is ‘the economy of gesture’. Perform a short monologue while keeping both feet planted and allowing only one deliberate hand movement per two sentences. After each run, discuss what that single gesture communicated and whether it felt enough. Then gradually reintroduce movement, but only where a clear reason exists: perhaps a step forward signals a challenge, or a turning away reveals shame. Filming the performance without sound can also be revealing — students quickly notice when movement becomes repetitive or meaningless. This discipline trains the body as a storytelling tool, not a distraction machine.
一个纠偏练习是“手势的节约”。表演一段简短的独白，同时保持双脚不动，每两句台词只允许一个谨慎的手部动作。每次运行之后，讨论那一个手势表达了什么，以及它是否感觉足够。然后逐渐重新引入动作，但只是在有明确理由的地方：也许一步向前意味着挑战，或者转身离开揭示羞耻。无声录制表演也可能很有启发——学生很快会注意到动作何时变得重复或无意义。这种纪律训练让身体成为讲故事的工具，而不是分散注意力的机器。
5. Misconception: Stage Positioning Doesn’t Matter Much | 误区：舞台站位不太重要
It is tempting for Year 8 groups to scatter themselves randomly across the performance space, with little thought given to sightlines, audience focus, or spatial relationships between characters. Some students hide at the back, some drift too close together, and others accidentally block their peers. In WJEC Drama, the use of space is a key performance skill. Poor blocking can make a carefully rehearsed scene impossible to follow, no matter how strong the acting.
八年级小组很容易随意散布在表演空间中，很少考虑视线、观众焦点或角色之间的空间关系。有些学生躲在后面，有些靠得太近，还有些无意中挡住了同伴。在 WJEC 戏剧中，空间运用是一项关键表演技能。糟糕的走位会让精心排练的场景难以理解，无论表演多么有力。
To correct this, introduce the nine-stage grid — a simple division of the playing area into upstage, centre stage, and downstage, each split into left, centre, and right. Students can draw a plan before rehearsing, marking where each character stands at key moments and justifying why. For example, downstage centre conveys power and direct connection with the audience, while upstage right can suggest isolation or secrecy. Rehearse scene transitions with the ‘audience test’: a classmate sits at different angles and raises a hand whenever their view is blocked. Patterns quickly improve when students feel how much clarity depends on deliberate positioning.
为了纠正这一点，引入九宫舞台格——将表演区域简单划分为上舞台、中舞台和下舞台，每个再分为左、中、右。学生可以在排练前画出平面图，标记每个角色在关键时刻站在哪里并解释原因。例如，下舞台中央传达力量以及与观众的直接联系，而上舞台右侧则可以暗示孤立或隐秘。用“观众测试”排练场景转换：一位同学坐在不同角度，每当视线被挡就举手。当学生感受到清晰度在多大程度上取决于有意识的站位时，模式会迅速改善。
6. Misconception: A Character’s Voice Is Just an Accent | 误区：角色的声音只是一种口音
When asked to create a character’s voice, many Year 8 students immediately reach for an exaggerated accent — posh, Cockney, American, or something similar. While accent can be part of vocal characterisation, it is often applied inconsistently and distracts from more accessible vocal choices. Worse, an unstable accent can undermine credibility entirely. WJEC Drama encourages students to explore a wider vocal toolkit: pitch, pace, pause, tone, volume, and breath quality. These elements are often more expressive and easier to sustain than a borrowed accent.
当被要求创造角色声音时，许多八年级学生立刻伸手去拿一种夸张的口音——装腔作势的、伦敦腔、美国腔或类似的东西。虽然口音可以是声乐角色塑造的一部分，但它常常应用得不一致，并分散了对更易掌握的声乐选择的注意力。更糟的是，不稳的口音会完全破坏可信度。WJEC 戏剧鼓励学生探索更广泛的声乐工具箱：音高、语速、停顿、语调、音量和气息质感。这些元素通常比借来的口音更具表现力且更容易维持。
A practical correction is to build a character’s voice from physiology, not mimicry. Ask: How old is this character? How does their body feel — heavy, light, tense, relaxed? Where does their breath sit — high in the chest, low in the belly? Speak a line while imagining a tight throat, then a wide open one; with a slow, heavy tongue, then a quick, light one. Record the differences in tone and pace. Students soon realise that a teenager out of breath from running will sound distinct without any fake accent. Layering these physical decisions creates a voice that is organic and reliably repeatable.
一个实用的纠正是从生理而非模仿来构建角色的声音。问：这个角色多大年龄？他们的身体感觉如何——沉重、轻盈、紧张、放松？他们的气息位于何处——胸部高位，还是腹部低位？想象喉咙紧绷时念一句台词，然后再想象喉咙大开时念；用缓慢沉重的舌头，然后用快速轻盈的舌头。录制语调和节奏的差异。学生很快意识到，一个跑得上气不接下气的少年不用任何假口音就会听起来很独特。叠加这些身体决定能创造出自然且可靠重复的声音。
7. Misconception: Once a Scene Is Finished, the Work Is Done | 误区：场景一排完，工作就完成了
Year 8 students often treat the first complete run-through as the final product, resisting further changes because ‘it works’. This fixed mindset overlooks the iterative nature of theatre-making. WJEC Drama explicitly values the ability to refine and improve work in response to feedback and self-evaluation. A scene that runs smoothly is not necessarily effective; it may simply be safe and predictable. True growth occurs when students push beyond their first solution and ask what could be bolder, clearer, or more truthful.
八年级学生常把第一次完整排练当作最终成品，拒绝进一步修改，因为“它可行”。这种固定思维忽视了戏剧创作的迭代特性。WJEC 戏剧明确珍视根据反馈和自我评价改进作品的能力。运行顺畅的场景不一定有效；它可能只是安全和可预测的。真正的成长发生在学生推动自己超越第一个解决方案，并追问什么可以更大胆、更清晰或更真实。
A structured reflection routine can embed this habit. After any run-through, each student writes one sentence on a slip: ‘One thing I will change before the next rehearsal is…’ The slips are shared aloud, and the group picks two to implement immediately. Changes could involve lengthening a pause, re-blocking an awkward cross, or trying a different emotional tactic in a scene. Ten minutes of targeted refinement typically elevates the work more than another full stumble-through. This cycle of plan, try, reflect, and tweak aligns directly with the creative log requirement in the WJEC framework.
一个有结构的反思流程可以嵌入这一习惯。任何一次排练后，每个学生在一张纸条上写一句话：“下一次排练前我要改变的一件事是……”纸条公开朗读，小组选出两条立即实施。变化可能包括延长一处停顿、重新设计一个别扭的穿场，或在场景中尝试不同的情感策略。十分钟有针对性的打磨通常比再来一次磕磕绊绊的全套排练更能提升作品。这个计划、尝试、反思、调整的循环直接与 WJEC 框架中创造性日志的要求吻合。
8. Misconception: Group Work Means Everyone Must Agree | 误区：团队合作意味着每个人必须同意
In collaborative devising tasks, Year 8 students sometimes mistake harmony for effective teamwork. They avoid disagreement, nod along to the first idea suggested, and suppress their own creative instincts to keep the peace. The result is often a safe but bland piece of theatre that lacks layers. WJEC Drama expects students to contribute individually and negotiate ideas — not simply follow the loudest voice. Conflict, when handled respectfully, is a creative engine that pushes a piece beyond the obvious.
在协作创编任务中，八年级学生有时将一团和气误认为有效团队合作。他们避免分歧，对第一个提出的想法点头附和，压抑自己的创作直觉以维持和平。结果通常是一个安全却平淡的戏剧作品，缺乏层次。WJEC 戏剧期望学生个体贡献并协商想法——而不仅仅是跟随最大的声音。分歧，在得到尊重处理时，是推动作品超越平庸的创意引擎。
Teach a ‘Yes, and…’ negotiation protocol. When a group member shares an idea, the next person must build on it before offering an alternative: ‘Yes, and what if we also…’ or ‘Yes, and that makes me wonder whether…’ If someone genuinely disagrees, they frame it as a question: ‘What would happen if we tried the opposite?’ This keeps the process generative rather than combative. Groups can also appoint a rotating ‘devil’s advocate’ whose role is to test every suggestion by asking ‘Why this choice?’ Practising civil creative disagreement builds the collaborative maturity that underpins strong ensemble work.
教授一种“是的，而且……”协商协议。当小组成员分享一个想法时，下一个人必须先在其基础上构建，再提供替代方案：“是的，而且如果我们还……”或者“是的，而且这让我想知道是否……”。如果有人确实不同意，他们将之框定为问题：“如果我们尝试相反的做法会怎样？”这保持过程富有建设性而非对抗性。小组也可以指定一个轮值的“故意唱反调者”，其角色是通过提问“为什么选择这个？”来检验每个建议。练习文明的创意分歧能培养支撑强大集体作品的合作成熟度。
9. Misconception: Costume and Props Are Unimportant Extras | 误区：服装和道具是不重要的额外之物
Students often view costume and prop choices as decorative afterthoughts, something to grab from the cupboard five minutes before a sharing. In WJEC Drama, however, these elements are part of the overall design concept and can profoundly affect character, time period, status, and mood. A badly chosen prop — such as a mobile phone in a historical scene — can instantly destroy the world of the play. More subtly, a character’s handling of an object can reveal inner tension: a polished shoe held tightly, a book clutched to the chest, or a letter folded too many times.
学生经常把服装和道具选择看作装饰性的马后炮，演出前五分钟从柜子里抓取的东西。然而在 WJEC 戏剧中，这些元素是整体设计概念的一部分，能深刻影响角色、时代、身份地位和情绪。一件糟糕选择的道具——比如在历史场景中的手机——能瞬间摧毁戏剧的世界。更微妙的是，角色对物品的处理方式能揭示内心张力：一只被紧紧握住的擦亮的鞋、一本抱在胸口的书，或一封折叠过多次的信。
Make costume and prop selection a conscious step in the rehearsal process. For each character, ask three design questions: What one item would this person never be without? What texture or colour reflects their emotional state? How do they interact with the object — carelessly, reverently, nervously? Even with a limited school stock, these questions spark creativity. A scarf can become a symbol of protection; a chair can be treated not just as furniture but as a barrier, a throne, or a hiding place. By exploring objects early, students integrate design thinking into their performance, exactly as the WJEC curriculum intends.
让服装和道具选择成为排练过程中一个有意识的步骤。为每个角色问三个设计问题：这个人永远不能离手的一件物品是什么？什么质感或颜色反映他们的情绪状态？他们如何与物品互动——满不在乎地、虔敬地、紧张地？即使学校库存有限，这些问题也能激发创意。一条围巾可以成为保护的象征；一把椅子不仅可当作家具，还能当作屏障、宝座或藏身之处。通过早期探索物品，学生将设计思维融入表演，这正是 WJEC 课程的本意。
10. Misconception: Feedback Is Only About What Went Wrong | 误区：反馈只是说哪里做错了
When invited to give peer feedback, Year 8 students often default to a list of problems: ‘You forgot your lines’, ‘You were too quiet’, ‘Your back was to the audience’. While spotting room for improvement is valuable, an exclusively critical lens can deflate confidence and miss what is genuinely working. WJEC Drama expects students to identify strengths with the same clarity as weaknesses, because consolidation of good habits is just as vital as fixing errors.
当被邀请给出同伴反馈时，八年级学生常常默认列出一串问题：“你忘词了”“你太小声了”“你背对观众了”。虽然发现改进空间很有价值，但纯批判的眼光会打击信心，并错过真正奏效的地方。WJEC 戏剧期望学生以与弱点同等的清晰度识别长处，因为巩固好习惯与修正错误同等重要。
Implement a ‘Two Stars and a Step’ feedback structure. After any performance, each observer shares two specific things that were effective (stars) and one actionable suggestion for improvement (step). The stars must be concrete: ‘The pause before you answered really built suspense’ rather than ‘It was good’. The step should be framed positively: ‘Next time, experiment with using a lower pitch when the character gets angry’ rather than ‘Your voice was too high’. This routine trains students to analyse theatre constructively, building a supportive studio culture where everyone feels safe to take risks — a core aim of the WJEC approach to drama education.
实施“两颗星和一步走”的反馈结构。任何表演后，每个观察者分享两点具体有效的地方（星）和一条可操作的改进建议（步）。星必须是具体的：“你回答前的停顿真的制造了悬念”而不是“很好”。步应以积极方式表述：“下次，尝试在角色发怒时用更低的音高”而不是“你的声音太尖了”。这个常规训练学生建设性地分析戏剧，建立一种支持的排演室文化，让每个人都感到安全去冒险——这是 WJEC 戏剧教育方法的核心目标。
11. Misconception: Warm-ups Are a Waste of Time | 误区：热身是浪费时间
Some Year 8 students see physical and vocal warm-ups as silly games that delay the ‘real’ work. They go through the motions half-heartedly or try to skip them entirely. This view ignores the physiological and psychological purpose of warming up: focusing the brain, preparing the voice for projection without strain, and tuning the body for expressive movement. Jumping cold into a demanding scene increases the risk of vocal fatigue, physical stiffness, and disconnected performances.
一些八年级学生将身体和声音热身视为愚蠢的游戏，拖延了“真正的”工作。他们半心半意地走过场，或试图完全跳过。这种观点忽略了热身的生理学和心理学目的：让大脑专注，让声音为无负担的投射做好准备，让身体为富有表现力的动作调校。猛然跳进要求高的场景会增加声音疲劳、身体僵硬和表演脱节的风险。
To shift this attitude, link every warm-up directly to the day’s rehearsal goals. If the scene involves intense stillness, warm up with slow, controlled breathing and sustained balance poses. If the scene requires rapid emotional shifts, use a vocal game that demands instant changes in pitch and pace. Explain the ‘why’ briefly: ‘We’re shaking out our hands to release excess tension so our gestures look natural, not wooden.’ When students feel the tangible difference a proper warm-up makes — clearer voice, sharper focus, braver choices — they soon stop seeing it as optional. A five-minute focused warm-up habit is a small investment that yields a large return in performance quality.
为了转变这种态度，将每次热身与当天的排练目标直接关联。如果场景涉及强烈的静止，就用缓慢、有控制的呼吸和持续的平衡姿势热身。如果场景需要快速的情感转换，就使用要求即刻改变音高和节奏的声音游戏。简要解释“为什么”：“我们甩手是为了释放多余紧张，让手势看起来自然，不僵硬。”当学生感受到一次恰当热身带来的切实差异——更清晰的声音、更敏锐的专注、更勇敢的选择——他们很快就不再视之为可有可无。一个五分钟的专注热身习惯是小投入，却能在表演质量上产生大回报。
12. Misconception: There Is Only One Right Way to Interpret a Scene | 误区：诠释场景只有一种正确方式
A final common blockage in Year 8 drama is the belief that every scene has a fixed meaning that the teacher holds, and the task is to guess it. This leads to hesitant, copycat performances where students suppress their own ideas for fear of being ‘wrong’. In truth, the WJEC syllabus rewards original, justified interpretation. The same short script can be played as a bitter argument, a heartbreaking farewell, or a teasing sibling exchange — all valid if supported by consistent choices.
八年级戏剧中最后一个常见障碍是，相信每个场景都有固定含义且掌握在老师手中，任务就是猜出它。这导致犹豫、模仿式的表演，学生因害怕“错误”而压抑自己的想法。实际上，WJEC 课程大纲奖励有根据的原创诠释。同一段简短剧本可以演成苦涩的争吵、令人心碎的告别，或戏谑的兄妹交锋——只要有连贯的选择作为支撑，全部都是有效的。
An effective correction is the ‘Three-Way Scene’ exercise. Pairs prepare the same 30-second scene three different ways: first, with maximum tension and underlying anger; second, with deep sadness and reluctance; third, with playful mischief. They perform all three versions for the class, who then discuss which was clearest and why. This demonstrates that the text is a blueprint, not a cage. It builds interpretive courage and shows students that their creative ideas are not obstacles to the ‘correct’ answer — they are the heart of what makes drama an art. This aligns perfectly with WJEC’s emphasis on creative intention and the ability to articulate why choices were made.
一个有效的纠正是“三向场景”练习。两人一组用三种不同方式准备同一段 30 秒的场景：第一种，带着最大张力和潜在的愤怒；第二种，带着深深的悲伤和不情愿；第三种，带着调皮的恶作剧。他们为全班表演三种版本，然后讨论哪个最清晰以及为什么。这证明文本是蓝图，而非牢笼。它建立了诠释的勇气，并向学生表明他们的创意想法不是通往“正确”答案的障碍——它们是让戏剧成为艺术的核心。这完全符合 WJEC 对创作意图和阐明选择原因的能力的重视。
Published by TutorHao | WJEC Drama Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图