📚 Year 8 Edexcel Philosophy: Case Study Practical Exercises | Year 8 Edexcel 哲学：案例分析实战演练
Welcome to your Year 8 Philosophy case study workshop. Philosophy isn't just about reading old books; it's about actively thinking through puzzles and dilemmas that challenge our deepest assumptions. Today, you will work with real-world and imaginary scenarios to sharpen your reasoning, identify hidden premises, and build balanced arguments. By the end, you'll be able to tackle ethical and conceptual problems with confidence.
欢迎来到八年级哲学案例分析工作坊。哲学不仅仅是读古书，更是通过思考那些挑战我们深层假设的谜题和困境来积极思维。今天，你将通过真实和虚构的情境来磨炼推理能力，识别隐藏的前提，构建平衡的论证。结束时，你将能够自信地处理伦理和概念问题。
1. Introduction to Case Studies in Philosophy | 哲学案例分析简介
In philosophy, we often explore concepts by thinking deeply about imagined scenarios. These are called thought experiments or case studies. They help us test our intuitions and clarify our moral and logical reasoning.
在哲学中，我们经常通过深入思考想象的情景来探索概念。这些情景被称为思想实验或案例分析。它们帮助我们检验直觉，澄清我们的道德和逻辑推理。
Today, you will work through several famous philosophical puzzles. For each one, you will identify arguments, evaluate evidence, and construct your own responses. This is a practical session to sharpen your critical thinking skills.
今天，你将练习几个著名的哲学难题。对于每一个，你将识别论证、评估证据，并构建自己的回应。这是一堂实践课，旨在磨练你的批判性思维能力。
2. The Trolley Problem: A Moral Dilemma | 电车难题：道德困境
A runaway trolley is speeding down a track toward five workers who cannot get out of the way. You are standing next to a lever. If you pull it, the trolley will switch to a side track where only one worker is standing. You can either do nothing and let five die, or pull the lever and be directly responsible for the death of one person. What should you do?
一辆失控的有轨电车正冲下轨道，前方五名工人无法躲避。你正站在一个拉杆旁边。如果你拉动拉杆，电车会转到旁边一条轨道上，那里只有一名工人。你可以什么都不做，让五个人死亡，或者拉动拉杆，直接导致一个人死亡。你应该怎么做？
Many people say you should pull the lever because saving five lives is better than saving one. This follows utilitarian ethics: the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number.
许多人说你应该拉动拉杆，因为挽救五条生命比挽救一条更好。这遵循功利主义伦理学：正确的行为是给最大多数人带来最大幸福的行为。
However, deontologists argue that pulling the lever would make you an active murderer. They believe certain actions (like directly killing) are always wrong, no matter how good the consequences. So you should not pull it.
然而，义务论者争辩说，拉动拉杆会让你成为一名主动杀人犯。他们认为某些行为（如直接杀人）无论后果多么好，都永远是错误的。所以你不应该拉动它。
This case forces us to question whether it is morally different to let harm happen by inaction or to cause harm by action. Your own instinctive answer reveals something about your ethical framework.
这个案例迫使我们质疑：通过不作为让伤害发生，与通过行为造成伤害，在道德上是否有区别。你自己的直觉回答揭示了你伦理框架的一些特点。
3. Identifying Arguments and Premises | 识别论证与前提
An argument in philosophy is a set of statements where some statements (premises) are offered as reasons to support another statement (the conclusion). To analyse a case study, you must first pinpoint the argument being made.
哲学中的论证是一组陈述，其中一些陈述（前提）被提供为支持另一个陈述（结论）的理由。要分析案例，你必须首先准确找出所提出的论证。
Consider this simple argument: 'Lying is wrong because it damages trust, and trust is essential for society to function.' Here, the premises are: (1) Lying damages trust; (2) Trust is essential for society. The conclusion is: Lying is wrong.
考虑这个简单的论证：“说谎是错误的，因为它损害信任，而信任对社会运转至关重要。”此处，前提是：（1）说谎损害信任；（2）信任对社会至关重要。结论是：说谎是错误的。
Practice: In the trolley problem, what is the argument from a utilitarian who says you should pull the lever? Identify the premises and conclusion.
练习：在电车难题中，一个功利主义者说你应该拉动拉杆，他的论证是什么？识别其前提和结论。
4. Evaluating Evidence: Is It Strong? | 评估证据：它有力吗？
Arguments rely on evidence or reasons. To evaluate a case study, ask yourself: Are the premises true or plausible? Is the reasoning valid? For example, someone might claim 'Animals cannot feel pain, therefore eating meat is acceptable.' The premise is scientifically false, so the argument collapses.
论证依赖于证据或理由。要评估一个案例，问自己：前提是真的还是合理的？推理是否有效？例如，有人可能声称“动物不会感到疼痛，因此吃肉是可以接受的。”这个前提在科学上是错误的，所以论证崩溃。
Examine this argument: 'The universe appears designed, like a watch, so there must be a designer (God).' What evidence is offered? Is the analogy strong? Could natural processes such as evolution provide an alternative explanation?
审视这个论证：“宇宙似乎是设计出来的，就像一块手表，因此必定有位设计者（神）。”提供了什么证据？这个类比有力吗？像进化这样的自然过程是否能提供另一种解释？
5. The Ship of Theseus: Identity and Change | 忒修斯之船：同一性与变化
The Ship of Theseus is an ancient puzzle. Over many years, every wooden plank of a sailing ship is replaced as it decays. Eventually, no original plank remains. Is it still the same ship? If we gather all the old, discarded planks and rebuild the ship, which one is the real Ship of Theseus?
忒修斯之船是一个古老谜题。经过许多年，一艘帆船的每一块木板都因腐烂而被逐渐替换。最终，没有一块原始木板剩下。它还是同一条船吗？如果我们把所有旧的、废弃的木板收集起来，重新建造这艘船，哪一艘才是真正的忒修斯之船？
This puzzle connects to questions of personal identity: your body's cells are constantly replaced, yet you consider yourself the same person. What makes you, you – your physical matter, your memories, your personality, or something else?
这个谜题联系到个人同一性问题：你身体的细胞不断更替，但你认为自己是同一个人。是什么让你成为你——你的物质实体、你的记忆、你的个性，还是其他什么？
6. Free Will vs. Determinism: The Robot Thought Experiment | 自由意志与决定论：机器人思想实验
Imagine a superintelligent scientist knows absolutely everything
Published by TutorHao | Year 8 哲学 Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图