📚 EPQ Project Course: Your Pathway Into Top Universities | EPQ项目课程助你踏进名校
The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is one of the very few things a sixth-form student can do that looks almost exactly like real university work. You choose the question, you plan the project, you find the sources, you produce an outcome, and you defend it in front of an audience. For students aiming at competitive universities, that experience is worth far more than its face value.
EPQ（Extended Project Qualification，拓展项目资格）是高中阶段为数不多"看起来就像大学真实学术工作"的项目之一。你自己确定研究问题，自己规划项目，自己查找文献，自己产出成果，最后还要在听众面前完成展示与答辩。对于目标是名校的学生来说，这段经历的价值远高于它表面上的一纸证书。
1. What Exactly Is the EPQ? | EPQ 到底是什么？
The EPQ is a standalone Level 3 qualification taken alongside A-Levels, usually in Year 12 or across Years 12 and 13. It is not examined by a written paper. Instead, you complete a project of your own design, keep a production log of your decisions, and deliver a presentation. It is graded A* to E and is awarded UCAS tariff points.
EPQ 是一门独立于 A-Level 的 Level 3 资格课程，通常在 Year 12 或跨 Year 12 至 Year 13 完成。它没有笔试，而是由你自己设计并完成一个项目，全程记录决策过程的"过程日志"（Production Log），最后进行口头展示。成绩等级从 A* 到 E，并可折算为 UCAS 积分。
The core idea is student ownership. Your supervisor guides you, but does not tell you what to research or what to conclude. That single design feature is why admissions tutors recognise the EPQ immediately: it is the closest thing in the school system to an undergraduate dissertation or research project.
它的核心理念是"学生主导"。导师只提供指导，不会告诉你该研究什么、更不会告诉你该得出什么结论。正是这一设计，让招生官一眼就能识别 EPQ 的价值：它是中学体系中最接近大学本科论文或研究项目的形式。
EPQ grade A* → 28 UCAS points | A → 24 | B → 20 | C → 16 | D → 12 | E → 8
2. Why the EPQ Helps You Step Into Top Universities | 为什么 EPQ 能帮你踏进名校
First, it carries real tariff points. A strong EPQ grade adds up to 28 UCAS points, which can matter when your A-Level grades sit on a grade boundary. Second, many universities - including a number of Russell Group institutions - have historically made alternative or reduced offers to applicants with a good EPQ grade, for example an offer of AAB instead of AAA.
第一，它带来实打实的积分。EPQ 高分最多可折算 28 个 UCAS 积分，当你的 A-Level 成绩正好卡在等级边缘时，这些积分可能非常关键。第二，许多大学（包括不少罗素集团院校）历史上会为 EPQ 成绩优秀的申请者提供替代性或降分录取条件，例如把 AAA 的要求调整为 AAB。
Third, and most importantly, the EPQ gives you evidence of independent academic work that other applicants simply do not have. For competitive courses such as medicine, law, engineering, economics or natural sciences, tutors want to see that you can read beyond the syllabus, handle conflicting sources, and write a sustained argument. A well-executed EPQ proves exactly that.
第三点也是最重要的一点：EPQ 为你提供了其他申请者往往不具备的"独立学术研究"证据。对于医学、法律、工程、经济、自然科学等竞争激烈的专业，招生导师希望看到你能够跳出教学大纲阅读、能够处理相互冲突的文献、能够写出有持续论证能力的文章。一个执行到位的 EPQ，正好能证明这些能力。
3. The Four EPQ Routes | EPQ 的四种完成形式
You do not have to write an essay. The specification normally allows four routes, and the right choice depends on your subject and your strengths. All routes still require the production log and the presentation.
EPQ 并不一定要写论文。考试标准通常提供四种完成形式，选择哪一种取决于你的学科方向和个人优势。但无论选择哪种形式，过程日志和口头展示都是必备环节。
| Route | 形式 | What you produce | 需要产出什么 | Good for | 适合方向 |
|---|---|---|
| Dissertation | 论文 | A research essay of roughly 5,000 words | 约 5000 词的研究性论文 | History, law, economics, politics, English | 历史、法律、经济、政治、英语 |
| Investigation | 调查研究 | A field study, experiment or data-based inquiry plus a short report | 实地调查、实验或数据分析，加简短报告 | Biology, psychology, geography, sociology | 生物、心理、地理、社会学 |
| Artefact | 实物/作品 | A built object, model, code, design or artwork plus a short report (often around 1,000-1,500 words) | 实物、模型、代码、设计或艺术作品，加约 1000-1500 词报告 | Engineering, computer science, design, art | 工程、计算机、设计、艺术 |
| Performance | 表演 | A composition, recital or drama piece plus a short report | 作曲、演奏或戏剧作品，加简短报告 | Music, drama, performing arts | 音乐、戏剧、表演艺术 |
Choose the route that lets you do your best work, not the one that sounds most impressive. A brilliantly executed artefact with honest reflection can score higher than a rushed dissertation.
请选择最能让你发挥出最佳水平的形式，而不是听起来最"高端"的形式。一个完成度极高、反思真实的实物项目，完全可能比一篇仓促写成的论文拿到更高的分数。
4. How the EPQ Is Assessed | EPQ 的评分维度
EPQ assessment is built around four objectives, and they are weighted differently. Notice that only part of the marks relate to the final product; a large share rewards how you managed the process and reviewed your own work.
EPQ 的评估围绕四个目标（Assessment Objectives）展开，且权重各不相同。请注意：只有一部分分数来自最终成品，相当大的比例是奖励你如何管理项目过程、如何反思和评价自己的工作的。
| Objective | 目标 | What it rewards | 考察内容 | Evidence you need | 需要的证据 |
|---|---|---|
| A01 Manage | 项目管理 | Planning, organisation, risk handling | 规划、组织与风险应对 | Timeline, milestones, dated log entries | 时间表、里程碑、带日期的日志 |
| A02 Use resources | 资源使用 | Finding, evaluating and citing sources | 查找、评估与引用文献 | Bibliography, source evaluation notes | 参考文献表、来源评估笔记 |
| A03 Develop and realise | 发展与实现 | Turning research into a finished outcome | 把研究转化为最终成果 | Drafts, prototype versions, final product | 草稿、原型版本、最终成品 |
| A04 Review | 回顾评价 | Honest evaluation of strengths and limits | 对优点与不足的诚实评价 | Reflective log entries, presentation conclusion | 反思性日志、展示的总结部分 |
Two practical consequences follow. First, the production log is not optional paperwork - it is where a large part of the credit lives. Second, the presentation must normally be completed for the project to be awarded at all, so never leave it to the last week.
由此得出两个实用结论：第一，过程日志不是可有可无的"表格作业"，很大一部分分数就藏在里面；第二，通常必须完成口头展示才能获得成绩认证，所以千万不要把它拖到最后一星期。
5. Choosing a Topic Admissions Tutors Remember | 如何选出招生官记得住的课题
A strong EPQ topic passes four tests at once. It connects to the degree you want to study; it can be answered with sources you can actually access; it is narrow enough to finish in the time available; and it has a genuine "so what?" behind it.
一个好的 EPQ 课题需要同时通过四道检验：它与你想申请的专业相关；用你真正能获取的文献就能回答；范围足够窄，能在规定时间内完成；并且背后有一个真正的"那又怎样？"（so what）的价值追问。
Strong topic = Intended degree + Genuine question + Available sources + Manageable scope
Compare these two examples. "A study of World War II" is far too broad and will read like a school essay. "To what extent did wartime cryptography research at Bletchley Park shape post-1945 British computing policy?" is specific, arguable, and gives an admissions tutor something to talk about at interview.
对比两个例子："第二次世界大战研究"过于宽泛，读起来仍像一篇中学作文；"战时布莱切利园的密码学研究在多大程度上塑造了 1945 年后英国的计算机政策？"则具体、可争论，并且给招生官在面试时提供了可以深入交流的抓手。
Also avoid topics that are simply a summary of what you already learned in class. The EPQ rewards moving beyond the syllabus, not re-telling it in longer form.
同时要避免把课题做成"课堂内容的加长版总结"。EPQ 奖励的是走出教学大纲的探索，而不是用更长篇幅把已经学过的东西再讲一遍。
6. Research and Referencing Like an Undergraduate | 像本科生一样做研究与引用
Distinguish primary and secondary sources, and use both deliberately. Primary sources include raw data, interviews, experiments, archives, legislation and original documents; secondary sources include textbooks, review articles and scholarly monographs that interpret the primary material.
要区分一手资料与二手资料，并有意识地同时使用二者。一手资料包括原始数据、访谈、实验、档案、法律文本和原始文件；二手资料则包括教科书、综述文章以及对原始材料进行解释的学术专著。
Judge every source before you use it. A practical checklist is CRAAP: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose. Ask who wrote it, when, for whom, and with what agenda. A well-designed EPQ bibliography mixes textbooks with peer-reviewed journal articles and, where relevant, primary evidence.
使用任何来源之前都要先做判断。一个实用的检查清单是 CRAAP：时效性（Currency）、相关性（Relevance）、权威性（Authority）、准确性（Accuracy）、目的性（Purpose）。要问：谁写的？什么时候写的？写给谁看？背后有什么立场？一份高质量的参考文献表，应该把教科书、同行评审期刊论文以及在需要时的一手证据混合起来。
Referencing must be consistent and complete. Many centres expect Harvard style: author, year, title, publisher or journal, and page numbers for direct quotations. Keep a running bibliography from day one - reconstructing it at the end is where plagiarism accusations and lost marks begin.
引用必须一致且完整。许多学校要求使用 Harvard 格式：作者、年份、标题、出版社或期刊，直接引用还需标注页码。从第一天起就要维护一份持续更新的参考文献表——等到最后才回头补，正是抄袭嫌疑与失分的开始。
One more discipline: never paste text you have not paraphrased and cited. Even accidental copying is treated as malpractice. Write your notes in your own words and keep the source link beside every note you take.
还有一条纪律：绝不要粘贴没有改写、没有标注来源的文字。即便是无意复制，也会被认定为学术不端。做笔记时就用自己的话改写，并在每条笔记旁边保留来源信息。
7. The Production Log: Your Most Important Document | 过程日志：最重要的一份文件
The production log records the story of the project: what you planned, what you decided, what went wrong, and what you did about it. It should be written as you go, dated, and specific. A log filled in during the final week always reads like one.
过程日志记录的是整个项目的"故事"：你计划了什么、做了什么决定、哪里出了问题、你又是如何处理的。它应当边做边写、注明日期、具体明确。等到最后一周才补写的日志，一眼就能看出来。
Show your thinking, not just your activity. Instead of writing "I read three articles today", write "I read Smith (2021), which argued X; this contradicts Jones (2019), so I need to find data that distinguishes the two claims". Supervisors and moderators reward that kind of reasoning.
要展示"思考过程"，而不只是"活动记录"。不要写"今天读了三篇文章"，而要写"我读了 Smith（2021），其观点是 X；这与 Jones（2019）相矛盾，因此我需要找到能够区分这两种说法的数据"。导师和审核员最看重的正是这种推理痕迹。
Record problems honestly. A change of direction, a failed experiment or a rejected design idea is not a weakness - it is material for the review objective, provided you explain why you changed course and what you learned.
要诚实地记录问题。方向调整、实验失败、设计被否定都不是缺点，反而是"回顾评价"这一评分目标的重要素材——前提是你要说明为什么调整，以及从中得到了什么。
8. Writing the Report or Dissertation | 撰写报告或论文
Most written EPQ outcomes follow a recognisable academic shape: title and aims, introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, conclusion, bibliography and appendices. Check your specification's word limit and stay inside it - going over can trigger a penalty.
大多数书面成果都遵循可辨识的学术结构：标题与研究目的、引言、文献综述、研究方法、研究结果、讨论、结论、参考文献与附录。请务必核对你所在考试局规定的字数上限并严格遵守，超字数可能被扣分。
Write in a formal, third-person register and keep the argument moving forward. Each paragraph should do one job: state a claim, present evidence, explain the link. Avoid long descriptive passages that only summarise a source without evaluating it.
使用正式的第三人称学术语体，并让论证持续向前推进。每一段只做一件事：提出观点、给出证据、解释联系。要避免大段描述性文字——只复述文献而不做评价，是 EPQ 中最常见的写作问题。
Draft in stages and keep every version. Feedback from your supervisor is meant to improve your thinking, so leave time for at least two full redrafts before the final submission.
要分阶段起草，并保留每一版稿件。导师的反馈是为了提升你的思考质量，因此至少要留出两轮完整修改的时间，再提交终稿。
9. The Presentation and Q&A | 展示与答辩
The presentation normally lasts around 10 to 15 minutes and is followed by questions from your audience or supervisor. It is not a summary of your whole report; it is an account of your project journey, your key findings and your evaluation of the process.
展示通常持续约 10 至 15 分钟，之后由听众或导师提问。它不是你整篇报告的内容摘要，而应该是项目历程的讲述：你的关键发现，以及对整个研究过程的评估。
Prepare for challenge questions. Expect to be asked why you chose your method, why you rejected an alternative source, what the main limitation of your conclusion is, and what you would do differently with six more months. Rehearse your answers aloud, not silently.
要为
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图