芝加哥大学 补充文书 Extended Essay 选题

芝加哥大学 补充文书 Extended Essay 选题

芝加哥大学的补充材料里，Extended Essay 是唯一一道由申请者自己定题的空间。官网把这道题和 Why UChicago 分开列在 undergraduate admissions 的文书页面上，两篇都要交，读材料的是同一批人。区别在于，一篇看你怎么处理一个抽象的问题，另一篇看你为什么把四年放在这所学校。很多学生以为只要文笔好就能过，其实招办在两百词之内就能判断你有没有真的想过这个题。2026-27 申请季的题目清单已经在官网更新，篇幅与提交方式以当年申请系统页面为准。这篇把两篇文书的分工、选题判断和段落推进拆开讲，尽量写成可以直接动手的写法。

The University of Chicago supplement asks for two pieces of writing, and only one of them is a question you choose. Applicants either take a prompt from the official list or invent their own, then write a second essay on why this particular institution fits the way they think; readers see both in the same file, so the two pieces are judged against each other as much as on their own. What separates a strong set from a competent one is rarely the prose, it is whether the writer has an argument that could survive being questioned. The notes below work through topic selection, openings, and the middle of the essay, with the 2026-27 cycle in mind.

Extended Essay 与 Why UChicago 的分工

这两篇用的是同一份材料，考察的却是两种能力。前者给一个题目，让你自己决定从哪里切进去，写什么由你定。后者给了学校这个固定的对象，看你能不能说出具体的课程、具体的老师、具体的课堂。很多学生以为两篇可以共用一套素材，写完第一篇顺手改个结尾就交第二篇，招办一眼能看出来。常见的错误是把 Why UChicago 写成城市介绍加排名，芝加哥在地图上什么位置、冬天多冷，这些都不是学校想读的内容。分工定下来，写作顺序也就清楚了：先在 Extended Essay 里想清楚自己的思路长什么样，再去官网的课程目录里找能接上这个思路的三四门课。顺序反了，Why UChicago 就会变成一份选课清单。

The two essays are read by the same people in the same sitting, yet they test different things. One hands you a question and watches what you do with the freedom; the other fixes the object and asks whether you can name actual courses, actual seminars, actual professors. A recycled paragraph with a new final sentence is the most common way applicants waste the second essay, because the mismatch shows up in the first thirty seconds. Treat the order as fixed: settle the argument in the extended essay, then open the course catalogue and find the three or four classes that argument would land in.

题目清单怎么用，自拟题的风险在哪

官网的 prompt list 每年换一批，2026-27 申请季的清单在文书页面上单独列出，同一页也明确写着可以不用官方题目、自己出一题。自拟听起来自由，实际难度更高，因为出题和答题两件事都要你自己负责。很多学生以为自拟更容易拿分，动笔之后才发现题目太宽，三段之后没有东西可写。判断一题能不能写，有个笨办法：先不看题目，想一个你愿意讲三分钟的具体场景，再看这个场景能不能被题目接住。接不住就换题，不要硬写。题目选得对不对，几乎决定了后面两千字的上限。

Every cycle the university publishes a fresh list and, in the same place, says applicants may ignore it and write their own question. Inventing one sounds like freedom and behaves like extra work, since you are now responsible for both the question and the answer; the usual failure is a question so broad that the third paragraph has nothing left to say. A crude test works better than a clever one: before committing, describe a scene you could talk about for three minutes, then check whether the question can hold it. If it cannot, change the question, not the scene.

词语与翻译类题目落到具体场景

往年的清单里出现过和词语、翻译、句子有关的题目，这类题最容易写成语言学的展示。写作者会开始讨论词源、讨论不可译性，读起来很聪明，读完却不知道这个人经历过什么。招办想看的不是你知道几个术语，而是你对语言的敏感怎么落到一次具体的误会、一次说不清楚的对话、一次翻译失败上。举个常见的场景：家里人用一个方言词形容某种心情，你在英文里找不到对应，只能描述那个词出现时的场合与说话人的表情。这样的段落比引用一篇语言学论文有用得多。术语最多留两个，其余全部换成场景。

Word prompts attract a particular kind of showing off, where etymology and untranslatability get discussed at length and the reader finishes knowing nothing about the writer. The useful move is to drop the vocabulary and keep one scene: a dialect word in your family that has no English equivalent, the moment it gets used, the silence when you try to translate it for a friend. Two technical terms are enough; the rest should be occasions rather than definitions. Examiners of this kind of writing notice immediately when the abstraction has no floor under it.

奇数类逻辑题别写成数学证明

以奇数命题的那道题在往年清单里出现过，很多人第一反应是写数学。这道题要的不是证明，是一个关于分类的观察：奇数加奇数得偶数，这条规则本身就很奇怪，因为它描述的是两个东西合起来变成另一类。写好这类题，需要你承认自己一开始也觉得它无聊，然后说清楚是什么让它变得不无聊。常见的错误是把它写成科普，讲一堆数论知识，却没有一句是你自己的判断。招办读的是你的思路，不是你复述的课本。数字与逻辑在这里只是材料，真正被检验的是你能不能把一个形式问题翻译成日常经验。

Number prompts pull strong students toward mathematics, which is usually the wrong turn. The interesting content is not a proof but the oddness of a rule: two odd numbers add to an even one, so a category defined by what it is not produces something that belongs to the other side; that is a claim about classification, not arithmetic. Admit the initial boredom, then show what broke it, because a page of number theory with no personal judgement reads exactly like a textbook summary. What the reader wants is the moment the formality turned into something you could see.

荒诞假设题先把规则立起来

假设类题目通常带一点玩笑，比如让你为某个荒唐的立场辩护。玩笑是入口，不是终点，写作者要自己把规则定下来：在什么条件下这个立场成立，在什么条件下它崩掉。设定边界这一步最容易被跳过，很多学生直接进入论证，写到一半发现自己在为一个自己也不信的结论找理由。可行的写法是先给一个明确的范围，再在这个范围里认真推，最后指出范围之外会发生什么。承认反例不会削弱文章，反而让读者相信你真的想过。荒诞题的分数通常不在创意上，而在你对创意的管理上。

Absurd premises are an invitation, not a licence. The writer has to build the rules first: under what conditions the position holds, and where it collapses; skipping that step is why so many of these essays stall halfway through an argument the writer does not believe. Set a narrow scope, argue it properly, then say what happens outside the scope. Naming the counterexample costs nothing and buys the reader's trust, which is worth more than another joke.

开头三句决定阅读速度

招办在申请季每天读几十篇补充文书，第一段决定了他用哪种速度往下读。开头不要铺垫时代背景，不要引用名人名言，也不要先解释题目有多重要。有效的开法通常很朴素：一个具体的时间、一个地点、一句别人说过的话，然后立刻出现矛盾。常见的错误是把最漂亮的句子放在第一行，后面接不上，读者会觉得整篇都在表演。写完第一段，隔一天再读，如果第一句可以删掉而意思不变，就删掉它。开头的任务是让人想读第二段，不是证明你会写。

Readers move through dozens of supplements a day, and the first paragraph sets the speed at which everything after it gets read. Skip the era-setting, the quotation, the explanation of why the question matters; open on a time, a place, or a line someone actually said, then put the contradiction on the table inside three sentences. If the opening sentence can be removed without loss, it was decoration. The only job of that paragraph is to make the second one unavoidable.

中段推进：一个说法加一个反例

中段的任务不是堆例子，是让一个概念往前挪一步。每段只做一件事：提出一个说法，给它一个反例，再修正这个说法。三段之后，读者应该能看到你的想法变过。很多学生以为例子越多越有说服力，结果四段讲了四件不相干的事，每件都停在表面。判断段落有没有推进，可以看每段第一句和上一段最后一句能不能接上，接不上就说明中间断了。写的时候不必追求漂亮，先把逻辑走完，句子可以后面再改。

The middle of the essay moves one idea forward, paragraph by paragraph, rather than collecting examples. Each paragraph should make a claim, meet the strongest objection to it, and come out with a revised claim; by the third move the reader ought to see that your position has changed. Four unrelated anecdotes signal a writer who is padding, and the tell is simple: read the first sentence of each paragraph against the last sentence of the one before, and check whether the hinge is there. Where it is missing, the fix is an argument, not a transition word.

结尾给出可以被反驳的判断

结尾不要总结全文，也不要升华。前面已经说过的东西再说一遍，只会让读者觉得篇幅不够。可行的收法有两种：把开头的场景重新拿出来，让它在新的理解下变一个意思；或者给出一个明确的判断，并且承认这个判断有边界。举一个具体的例子，比一句抽象的口号有用。写完结尾，把它单独读一遍，如果它放在任何一篇同题文章后面都成立，那它就不是你的结尾。判断的标准很实际：有没有一句话是只有你才写得出来的。

Endings that summarise are endings that waste space. Two shapes work: return to the opening scene and let it mean something else now, or state a judgement and mark its limits. Read the last paragraph on its own; if it would fit under any essay answering the same prompt, it is not yours yet. The practical test is whether one sentence in it could only have come from you.

Why UChicago 点名课程与教授

Why UChicago 的难点在于具体。Core curriculum 是这所学校绕不开的部分，人文与社会科学的核心课有固定的读本与讨论课，写的时候可以点到某一门具体的课、某位教授的研究方向、某个你读过的读本。点名的前提是你能说出为什么这门课接得上你的思路，而不是因为它听起来有名。常见的错误是把 Core 说成通识教育的好处，这种说法换到任何一所学校都成立。写之前去官网的课程目录里翻半小时，找到两门你真想上的课，比写三段赞美有用。学校要看的不是你喜欢它，而是你知道自己在喜欢什么。

Specificity is the whole job here. The Core is unavoidable, and a named course, a professor's current project, or a text you have actually read carries more weight than any amount of praise; the test is whether you can say why that course connects to the argument you made in the other essay. General statements about the value of a broad education could be pasted into any application, which is precisely why they persuade nobody. Half an hour in the official course catalogue, two courses you would genuinely take, and the paragraph writes itself.

最常见的四类失分点

创意压过论证是最常见的一种：题目写得漂亮，正文却在绕圈，读完不知道作者主张什么。引用过多是第二种，一段里塞三个名人，自己的声音被挤没了。翻译腔是第三种，中文思维直接翻成英文，句子结构别扭，读起来像机器。还有一种是把两篇文书写成同一篇，Why UChicago 里继续讲 Extended Essay 的主题。改稿的时候按这四条对一遍，比逐句润色有效。篇幅以当年申请系统里的提示为准，写超了先删例子，不要删论证。

Four failures account for most weak supplements: invention outrunning argument, quotation crowding out the writer's own voice, Chinese syntax carried straight into English, and two essays that turn out to be the same essay. Fixing those four is worth more than line editing. Length is settled by whatever the application system allows that year, and the rule when trimming is to cut examples before cutting reasoning.

学而思学习机X5Pro经典培优【256G内存翻倍 享两年只换不修】小初高全学科 焕新升级12.6英寸6+256GB¥3999.0📱 去京东购买京东精选

需要文书辅导？

16621398022同微信

aleveler.com 上有历年真题与学科讲义

关注公众号 tutorhao 获取更多学习资源

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）