Edexcel GCSE History 史料题 16分题 时间分配

Edexcel GCSE History 史料题 16分题 时间分配

Edexcel GCSE History 1HI0 一共三张卷，2016 年开始施教，2018 年第一次认证，卷面总分 168 分。它考的不是背了多少年份，而是你能不能用史实回答一个具体问题。很多学生把复习时间全花在背时间线上，进考场发现题目问的是为什么，背下来的东西一半用不上。下面按题型拆开讲，每一类给一个可以照着套的答题结构，再点一个阅卷时最常见的错误。

Edexcel GCSE History (1HI0) is examined through three papers worth 168 raw marks in total, and the qualification was first taught in 2016 with first certification in 2018. Marks are lost far more often through poor structure than through missing facts, since a candidate who knows every date can still sit in Level 2. The sections below work through each question type with a usable shape for the answer and the mistake examiners see most often. Read them alongside the mark scheme for your own option rather than as general advice.

三张试卷的分值结构 52 分与 64 分的差别

Paper 1 是主题研究与历史环境，1 小时 20 分钟，52 分，占 30%。它分两节，A 节 16 分考历史环境，B 节 36 分考主题研究，其中 4 分给拼写标点语法。Paper 2 是分期研究与英国深度研究，1 小时 45 分钟，64 分，占 40%，两本答题册各 32 分。Paper 3 是现代深度研究，1 小时 20 分钟，52 分，占 30%，A 节 16 分，B 节 36 分，最后那道 16 分大题里含 4 分 SPaG。三张卷加起来 168 分，这些数字都写在 Pearson Edexcel 的 1HI0 specification 里，选课前先看清自己学校走哪条路线。很多学生以为历史是三张一样的卷，其实每张卷的题型分布完全不同。

The papers are not interchangeable in style. Paper 1 runs for 1 hour 20 minutes and carries 52 marks, split between a 16-mark historic environment section and a 36-mark thematic study that includes 4 marks for spelling, punctuation and grammar; Paper 2 is the longest at 1 hour 45 minutes with 64 marks across two booklets, and Paper 3 weighs 52 marks over a 16-mark source section and a 36-mark interpretations section. Because each option is assessed separately, the route your school enters you for decides which questions you will actually meet. Check the Pearson Edexcel 1HI0 specification before you buy a revision guide.

4 分推断题 一个特征加一个细节

4 分题看着最轻，丢分却不少。Describe two features 这类题要的是两个不同的特征，每个特征后面跟一个具体史实，比如城墙的厚度、守卫的人数、法令的名称。Give two things you can infer from Source A 则要求先说源材料暗示了什么，再指出材料里哪句话或哪个细节支持这个推断。两个推断必须真的不同，不能一个说城里有集市、另一个说城里有买卖。常见的错误是把源材料抄一遍，抄得再全也只给一分。阅卷时看到两条独立且各自有细节支撑的推断，才会给满分。这一题建议控制在 4 分钟以内。

Four-mark questions are the cheapest marks on the paper and the easiest to throw away. A strong answer gives two genuinely separate features, each anchored to one precise detail such as a named law, a stated number of guards or a described building; an inference question works the same way, pairing what the source suggests with the words that carry the suggestion. Copying the source earns a single mark however long the quotation, because description is not inference. Examiners look for two independent points, each supported, and nothing else.

8 分史料价值题 内容出处与用途三层

8 分的 How useful are Sources B and C 要先判断用途，再谈内容。用途指这则材料能帮我们回答什么问题，内容指它具体说了什么，出处指作者是谁、什么时候写的、写给谁看。三段都要有，缺一段就掉一个等级。材料有用不代表可靠，一份宣传海报对研究政府想让人相信什么非常有用，对研究真实生活水平就没那么有用。写的时候用这个句式：它有用，因为它显示了某件事；但它的用处有限，因为作者有立场。两个材料都要写到，只写一个最多拿一半分。时间给到 12 分钟左右。

Usefulness questions reward a clear sense of purpose before content. Decide what the enquiry is trying to establish, then show what the source contributes, who produced it and when; a propaganda poster is excellent evidence of what a government wanted people to believe and weak evidence of what daily life was actually like. The strongest answers state the limit as well as the value, because a source with an obvious bias is still useful for the right question. Cover both sources, since the marks are split between them.

follow up 与两个解释的主差异

Paper 1 的 Q2(b) 问你还可以怎么跟进这则材料，答案是提出一个可以查证的新问题，再说明去哪里查、查什么。比如材料提到某条法令，你可以问这条法令执行得怎样，然后去查地方法院的记录或同时期的报纸。不要回答我会再读一遍材料，那是零分答案。Paper 3 的 Q3(b) 问两个解释的主要差异，要写成一个对比句，一个认为原因是甲，另一个认为原因是乙，而不是分别复述两段。Q3(c) 问为什么两个解释会不同，可以从史家看到的史料不同、关注的时间段不同、或者写作时的处境不同去解释。两个小问加起来只有 8 分，很多学生在这里留空。

Two small questions test method rather than knowledge. The follow-up question wants a fresh enquiry you could actually run, together with the type of source that would answer it, such as court records or local newspapers for a question about how a law was enforced; repeating the source you already have scores nothing. The interpretations questions ask for a comparison, not two separate summaries, so state what each historian claims in one sentence and then name the difference. Explaining why they differ usually means pointing to different evidence, a different focus in time or the context in which each was written.

12 分解释原因题 因果链写到第三层

12 分题考因果，不是考描述。两条原因，每条写三层：先说原因是什么，再说它如何导致结果，最后给一个具体史实。比如经济危机让失业上升，失业的年轻人更容易被极端政党吸引，1932 年德国的失业人数超过六百万。只写第一层是叙述，写到第二层是概述，三层齐全才进高档。题目给的 stimulus points 可以用，但评分标准明确要求你在上面加上自己的史实。常见的错误是写三条只有第一层的原因，看起来内容饱满，实际一直停在低档。两道 12 分题加起来，值得留 20 分钟。

Twelve-mark explanations are marked on the chain of reasoning, not on the number of reasons. Two causes developed properly beat four that are merely named: for each one, state the cause, explain the mechanism that connects it to the outcome and then anchor it with a date, figure or named event. The stimulus points are a starting point and the mark scheme expects your own knowledge on top; a script that only expands the prompts rarely passes Level 3. Watch for answers that list causes in separate sentences without ever showing how one led to the next.

8 分叙事题 时间轴上的因果连接

Narrative account 是 Paper 2 分期研究特有的 8 分题，要的是一条有因果的叙述线。事件按时间顺序排，每一步之间用因此、于是、结果是这类词连起来，让读者看到一件事怎样引出下一件。只写三个事件各一句，是低档答案。写清第一个事件造成什么局面、这个局面又怎样促成第二个事件，才进高档。篇幅不用长，六到八句够用，覆盖开头、转折和结果三个节点。叙事题不需要下判断，也不要写我认为。这一题给 10 分钟比较合适。

The narrative account is the one question on Paper 2 that rewards chronology with causation attached. Three events in the right order are worth little on their own; the marks come from showing how the first created the circumstances for the second, so connectives such as as a result and this led to are doing real work here. Keep it tight, roughly six to eight sentences covering the opening position, the turning point and the outcome, and do not spend space on a judgement the question has not asked for.

16 分同意度题 正反两面加判断

16 分题要的是一个判断，不是两边都说一遍。开头两句就把立场说出来，我大体同意，但某个方面需要限定。然后写支持这个说法的一面，用两到三个史实；接着写不支持的一面，同样给史实；最后回扣开头，说明为什么你的判断站得住。两边的篇幅不要一边倒，只有一方有史实的答案会掉档。判断要贯穿全文，每一段结尾都回到题目那句话，而不是拖到最后一段才出现观点。常见的错误是把这道题写成两篇小作文，中间没有对话。这一题按分值该给 24 分钟。

A judgement question is marked on whether a line of argument runs through the whole answer. State a position in the opening lines, ideally a qualified one, then test it against evidence on both sides before returning to it in the conclusion; a script that describes one side fully and the other in a single sentence cannot reach the top level however accurate its facts are. Each paragraph should connect back to the statement in the question rather than saving the opinion for the end. Examiners describe the failure as two essays stapled together.

Paper 3 两个解释都要用上

Paper 3 的 16 分题给两个 interpretation，题目明确要求两边都用。很多人只挑自己同意的那一个展开，另一个提一句就放过，这样最高只能到中间档。正确做法是把两个解释摆在一起，解释一的依据是什么，解释二怎么看同一批史料，两者在哪个判断上分歧最大。然后用自己的历史知识说明哪一边更有说服力，注意是有说服力，不是正确。史料和解释要分开，史料是当时的材料，解释是后来史家的观点，这两者混用是这道题最常见的失分点。这道题另给 4 分 SPaG，写完整句子、用历史术语、段落分明，这 4 分基本是白送的。

The interpretations question on Paper 3 insists on both views, and the rubric is not decorative. Candidates who develop only the interpretation they prefer cap themselves in the middle levels, because the mark scheme rewards analysis of the material provided and the interplay between the two readings. Use contextual knowledge to argue which reading is better supported, remembering that better supported is not the same as correct, and keep sources (produced at the time) distinct from interpretations (written later by historians). Four marks of SPaG sit on this question, so full sentences, paragraphing and accurate specialist vocabulary are free marks.

后果题与重要性题 4 加 4 与 8 加 8

Paper 2 分期研究那本册子里的两道小题常被低估。Explain two consequences 是 4 加 4，每个后果写清直接结果和后来的影响，两个后果不能是同一件事的两种说法。Explain two of the following 是 8 加 8，问的是某件事对某人或某个局面的重要性，答案要说明它改变了什么，而不是把这件事再描述一遍。重要性和后果听起来像，实际不同，后果是之后发生的事，重要性是它在整段历史里的分量。选做两题时挑史实最熟的两个，不必按题号顺序。这两组题按分值算大约 20 分钟。

The period study booklet hides two questions that reward precision about wording. Consequences ask what followed an event, so each answer needs the immediate result and the later effect, and the two consequences must be genuinely distinct rather than one point restated. Importance questions ask how much an event mattered within a longer story, which means saying what changed because of it rather than narrating it again. Choose the two options you know best, not the first two you read.

时间分配 每分约一分半

时间按分值分配最稳妥。Paper 1 共 80 分钟 52 分，大约每分 1.5 分钟，A 节 16 分留 25 分钟，B 节 36 分留 55 分钟。Paper 2 共 105 分钟 64 分，两本册子各留 50 分钟，剩下 5 分钟检查。Paper 3 80 分钟 52 分，A 节 16 分 25 分钟，B 节 36 分 50 分钟，最后 5 分钟留给 SPaG 检查。带一块手表进考场，考场挂钟不一定每个座位都看得清。超时是历史卷常见的失分原因，最后那道 16 分题写不完，前面写得再好也补不回来。做完一道大题就看一次时间，比最后才发现超时要好。

Budget by marks rather than by question count. On Paper 1 the 80 minutes against 52 marks works out at roughly a minute and a half per mark, which means about 25 minutes for the 16-mark source section and 55 for the thematic section; Paper 2 gives 105 minutes for 64 marks and Paper 3 gives 80 minutes for 52. Leave the final five minutes for checking and for the SPaG marks on the interpretations question. Wear a watch, because wall clocks are not always visible from every desk.

SPaG 与反复出现的扣分点

4 分 SPaG 只看拼写、标点、语法和历史术语，跟观点对错无关。写的时候把关键术语拼对，Weimar、Bolshevik、armistice 这类词平时就要练，用完整句子而不是要点罗列，段落之间空一行。反复出现的扣分点有三个，把史料当解释用、答案里没有日期、把题目里的引文抄进答案却不解释。复习时把错题按题型归类，比重做整卷有用。考前一周只做两件事，看自己整理的题型结构，把常年写错的专有名词抄三遍。按 Pearson Edexcel 的评分标准，同一道题里术语拼错会直接拉低 SPaG 档次，但不会影响历史内容的给分。

Spelling, punctuation, grammar and terminology carry four marks on the interpretations question and they are awarded independently of the argument, which makes them the cheapest marks on the paper. Learn the spellings that trip people up, write in full sentences with paragraph breaks, and avoid bullet points entirely. The other repeated losses are treating a source as if it were an interpretation, writing answers with no dates in them, and quoting the question without explaining it. Sort past mistakes by question type when revising; it is more useful than redoing whole papers.

海外直订AQA GCSE History: Power and the People AQA GCSE历史:权力与人民¥359.0📱 去京东购买京东精选

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）

需要一对一辅导？Need One-on-One Tutoring?

A-Level / GCSE / IB / KS2-KS3 全科辅导

16621398022 同微信

Visit aleveler.com