📚 Which Qualifications Are Removed From School Performance Tables? The Withdrawal Rules Explained | 哪些资格会被移出学校绩效排名表 撤回规则明确
Every year the Department for Education (DfE) publishes lists of qualifications that count in school and college performance tables in England. Qualifications disappear from those lists for very specific reasons: an awarding organisation stops offering them, the Department withdraws approval, funding is removed, or a reform replaces a whole generation of qualifications. Understanding those withdrawal rules matters for A level Sociology and Politics students who study education policy, and for anyone advising students about which courses are safe to start.
英国教育部（DfE）每年都会公布计入英格兰学校与学院绩效排名表的资格清单。一项资格从清单上消失，原因十分具体：颁发机构停止提供、教育部撤回批准、资助被取消，或整代资格因改革被替换。理解这些撤回规则，对学习"教育政策"模块的 A Level 社会学与政治学考生很重要，对任何为学生选课提供建议的人也同样重要。
1. What Performance Tables Actually Measure | 绩效排名表到底衡量什么
School performance tables (often called league tables) are official DfE datasets rather than media rankings. At Key Stage 4 they report measures such as Progress 8, Attainment 8, EBacc entry and achievement, and the percentage of pupils achieving grade 9-5 or 9-4 in English and maths GCSEs. At 16-19 they report A level and other level 3 results, progress measures, retention and English and maths progress.
学校绩效排名表（常被称为"排行榜"）是教育部官方数据，而非媒体排名。在 Key Stage 4 阶段，它们报告 Progress 8、Attainment 8、EBacc 的选课率与达成率，以及学生在英语与数学 GCSE 中取得 9-5 或 9-4 的比例。在 16-19 阶段，则报告 A Level 及其他 Level 3 成绩、进步值、留存率以及英语数学进步情况。
The critical point is that only certain qualifications feed into these calculations. Every other qualification a pupil takes may still be taught, examined and certificated, but it will not move the school's published figures, and it earns the pupil no performance points.
关键在于：只有特定资格会进入这些计算。学生所修的其他资格依然可以教学、考试、发证，但不会影响学校公布的指标，也不会为学生带来"绩效分数"。
2. Who Decides What Counts | 谁来决定哪些资格计入
Three bodies interact. The DfE owns the performance table lists and sets the criteria for inclusion. Ofqual regulates awarding organisations and the qualifications themselves through the General Conditions of Recognition, and maintains the Register of Regulated Qualifications. The Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) decides which qualifications are publicly funded for 16-19 learners, and Section 96 of the Learning and Skills Act 2000 requires the Secretary of State to approve qualifications that can be funded for learners under 19.
有三方相互协作。教育部拥有绩效表清单并制定入选标准；Ofqual 通过《认可通用条件》监管颁发机构与资格本身，并维护"受监管资格登记册"；教育技能资助署（ESFA）决定哪些资格可为 16-19 学习者获得公共资助；而《2000 年学习与技能法》第 96 条要求，为 19 岁以下学习者提供资助的资格必须获得国务大臣批准。
Ofsted does not decide what counts; inspection judgements about curriculum breadth are separate from performance table rules, although the two influence each other in practice.
Ofsted 不决定哪些资格计入；关于课程广度的督察判断与绩效表规则是两回事，尽管在现实中二者相互影响。
3. The Gateway Criteria: How a Qualification Gets Listed | 入选门槛：资格如何进入清单
Before a qualification can be counted, it must clear a set of gateway conditions. The most commonly applied are listed below.
一项资格要能被计入，必须先通过一组门槛条件。以下是最常见的几项。
Regulation: the qualification must normally be regulated in England and appear on the Register of Regulated Qualifications, with a recognised awarding organisation behind it.
监管：该资格通常必须在英格兰受监管、出现在"受监管资格登记册"上，并由被认可的颁发机构提供。
Size and substance: threshold guided learning hours (GLH) ensure the qualification is a genuine programme of study, not a short add-on.
规模与实质：设定引导学习时数（GLH）门槛，确保这是真正的课程项目，而非短期附加内容。
External assessment: the criteria applied in recent approval rounds require a substantial externally assessed element, with the exact minimum proportion published for each round.
外部考评：近年审批轮次要求资格包含相当比例的外部考评，具体最低比例由每轮公布的规则确定。
Demand test: a qualification must show a minimum level of national uptake (the Department has used thresholds in the region of 100 entries) to stay on the list.
需求测试：资格必须显示达到最低的全国报考规模（教育部曾采用约 100 人次的门槛）才能保留在清单上。
Discounting and overlap: the Department assigns a discount code so that overlapping qualifications are not double counted in a pupil's score.
折抵与重叠：教育部为资格指定折抵代码，避免内容重叠的资格在学生成绩中被重复计算。
Progression and purpose: evidence that the qualification supports progression to further study, an apprenticeship or employment.
升学与用途：需有证据表明该资格支持升学、学徒制或就业。
Continued intent: the awarding organisation must confirm by a published deadline that it intends to keep offering the qualification.
继续提供意向：颁发机构必须在公布的截止日期前确认将继续提供该资格。
4. The Characteristics Tests: Key Stage 4 and 16-19 | 特性标准：Key Stage 4 与 16-19
At Key Stage 4, non-GCSE qualifications that count are grouped as Technical Awards. They must be level 1 or level 2, meet the Department's characteristics on size and assessment, and be re-approved periodically. GCSEs, AS and A levels follow a different route: their subject content is set by the DfE and their assessment arrangements by Ofqual, so they are counted as a category rather than individually approved year by year.
在 Key Stage 4 阶段，可计入的非 GCSE 资格统称为"技术奖"（Technical Awards）。它们必须处于 Level 1 或 Level 2，满足教育部关于规模与考评的"特性"要求，并定期重新审批。GCSE、AS 与 A Level 走的是另一条路径：学科内容由教育部确定、考评安排由 Ofqual 制定，因此它们以类别形式计入，而非逐年逐一批准。
At 16-19, the Department distinguishes A levels, Applied Generals, Technical Certificates and Technical Level qualifications. The criteria applied in recent years have required level 3 status, a minimum of around 300 GLH for substantial qualifications, and a prescribed minimum proportion of external assessment.
在 16-19 阶段，教育部区分 A Level、应用通用资格（Applied General）、技术证书与技术层级资格。近年适用的标准要求达到 Level 3、具实质规模的资格至少约 300 GLH，并满足规定的最低外部考评比例。
Counted in tables ⇌ Meets regulation + size + external assessment + demand + funding + continued intent
Note the two-way arrow: losing any one condition can break the chain, even if the qualification itself remains perfectly valid and regulated.
请注意双向箭头：只要失去其中任一条件，链条就会断裂，即便该资格本身依然有效且受监管。
5. Grounds for Removal: The Withdrawal Rules | 移出的依据：撤回规则
The withdrawal rules become clear when you separate the trigger from the effect. The table below sets out the main routes off the list.
把"触发方"与"结果"分开看，撤回规则就清楚了。下表列出离开清单的主要路径。
| Ground | 情形 | Triggered by | 触发方 | Effect | 结果 |
| Awarding organisation withdraws the qualification | 颁发机构撤回资格 | Awarding organisation | 颁发机构 | Final award runs for existing cohorts | 现有年级获得最后一次颁证 |
| Failure to confirm continued intent by the deadline | 未在截止日前确认继续提供意向 | DfE process | 教育部流程 | Automatic removal from future lists | 自动从未来清单移除 |
| Uptake falls below the demand threshold | 报考规模低于需求门槛 | DfE review | 教育部审查 | Removed as no longer viable | 因不再具规模而被移除 |
| Qualification no longer meets the characteristics | 不再符合特性标准 | DfE re-approval | 教育部重新审批 | Removed unless redesigned | 未重新设计即移除 |
| Regulatory sanctions, special conditions or loss of recognition | 监管制裁、附加条件或丧失认可 | Ofqual | Ofqual | Immediate risk to counting status | 计入资格立即受威胁 |
| Loss of Section 96 approval or funding removal | 失去第 96 条批准或资助被取消 | DfE / ESFA | 教育部／ESFA | No public funding for under-19s | 19 岁以下学习者无法获公共资助 |
| Subject-level reform replaces the qualification | 学科层面改革替换资格 | DfE and Ofqual | 教育部与 Ofqual | Legacy qualification removed after final award | 旧资格在最后颁证后移除 |
| No discount code or double counting risk | 无折抵代码或存在重复计算风险 | DfE technical review | 教育部技术审查 | Not counted even if taught | 即使开设也不计入 |
The pattern is consistent: withdrawal from performance tables is about accountability and funding, not about whether a qualification is legally valid or academically worthwhile.
规律是一致的：从绩效表撤回关乎问责与资助，而不是该资格在法律上是否有效、在学术上是否有价值。
6. The Annual Review Cycle and Its Deadlines | 年度审查周期与截止日期
Removal is normally managed through an annual cycle. Awarding organisations submit new qualifications for approval by a published deadline, usually in the autumn term. Existing qualifications are then checked, including the confirmation of continued intent and a review of uptake data from the previous examination series.
移除通常通过年度周期管理。颁发机构须在公布的截止日期前提交新资格申请，一般是在秋季学期。随后对现有资格进行核查，包括"继续提供意向"确认，以及依据上一考试季的报考数据进行的复核。
The Department then publishes the approved list for the following academic year,
Published by TutorHao | Exam Prep Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图