← 返回资讯屏轩教育 · 行业资讯

How Children With Learning Disabilities or Autism Can Avoid Being Forcibly Restrained at School | 有学习障碍或自闭症的孩子在学校如何避免被强行约束

2026-10-15 13:00 · 本文部分内容由AI辅助创作

📚 How Children With Learning Disabilities or Autism Can Avoid Being Forcibly Restrained at School | 有学习障碍或自闭症的孩子在学校如何避免被强行约束

Every week in England, thousands of disabled children are physically held, dragged, pinned or shut in rooms at school. Most of these incidents involve pupils with learning disabilities, autism or speech, language and communication needs, and most of them happen without the child's parents being told on the day. Restraint is not a rare emergency measure for this group; for many families it is a routine part of the school week. This article sets out the legal baseline, the practical safeguards and the exact language that pupils, parents, carers, teaching assistants and tutors can use to reduce the risk of a forced hold - and to respond effectively when one happens anyway.

在英格兰,每周都有数千名残障儿童在学校被身体压制、拖拽、按倒在地或被关进小房间。这些事件中的大多数涉及有学习障碍、自闭症或言语沟通困难的学生,而且大多数情况下,孩子的家长当天并不知情。对这个群体而言,约束并非罕见的紧急手段,而是许多家庭学校生活中的常态。本文梳理法律底线、实务中的防护措施,以及学生、家长、照护者、助教和辅导老师可以使用的具体话术,用来降低被强行约束的风险,并在约束已经发生后有效应对。


1. Start With the Legal Baseline | 从法律底线说起

In England, the power to use force in schools comes from Section 93 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 and is explained in the DfE guidance 'Use of Reasonable Force' (2013). Staff may use reasonable force only to prevent a pupil from committing a criminal offence, injuring themselves or others, damaging property, or to maintain good order and discipline. Three words carry all the weight: reasonable, proportionate, last resort. Force must never be used as a punishment, and it must stop the moment the risk has passed.

在英格兰,学校使用武力的权力来自 2006 年《教育与督导法》第 93 条,具体说明见教育部 2013 年《合理武力使用》指导意见。教职员只能在以下情形使用合理武力:阻止学生犯罪、防止学生伤害自己或他人、防止损坏财物,或维持良好的秩序与纪律。其中三个词最关键:合理、相称、最后手段。武力绝不能作为惩罚,风险一旦解除就必须立即停止。

A useful first sentence to remember is this: restraint is a safety intervention, not a behaviour-management tool. If it is being used to make a child comply, it is already outside the law.

请记住第一句话:约束是安全干预,不是行为管理工具。如果它被用来让孩子"听话服从",那就已经越出了法律边界。


2. What Actually Counts as Restraint | 什么才算约束

Many schools describe only the most dramatic incidents as restraint, and therefore report very few. The definition used in national guidance is much wider, and it includes anything that restricts a child's freedom of movement or liberty. Recognising the full range is the first step to challenging it.

许多学校只把最激烈的事件认定为"约束",因此上报数量极低。但国家指导意见中的定义要宽得多,它涵盖任何限制儿童行动自由或人身自由的做法。识别完整范围,是提出质疑的第一步。

Type | 类型Example | 例子Key risk | 主要风险
Restrictive physical intervention | 限制性身体干预Holding arms, pinning to the floor, dragging, blocking a doorway | 抓手臂、按倒在地、拖拽、堵门
Seclusion | 隔离A child alone in a room they cannot leave | 孩子独自被关在无法离开的房间
Mechanical restraint | 器械约束Straps, lap belts, weighted furniture used to restrict | 束带、绑带、用于限制的加重座椅
Chemical restraint | 药物约束Sedation or PRN medication used to control behaviour | 用镇静剂或按需用药控制行为
Psychological restraint | 心理约束Threats, 'if you do not sit down we will hold you' | 威胁、"你再不坐下我们就按住你"

If a child is taken to a room and the door is held shut while they are alone, that can also amount to a deprivation of liberty, which is a far more serious legal matter than a brief hold.

如果孩子被带到一个房间,门被从外面把住、孩子独自在内,这也可能构成"剥夺自由",其法律严重程度远高于短暂的按住。


3. Why Restraint Happens, and Why It Harms | 约束为何发生,又为何有害

Restraint is rarely caused by a child's behaviour alone. It is usually the product of an environment that has already failed: too much noise, unclear instructions, unmet communication needs, unpredictable staffing, and staff who have been trained to intervene physically but not trained to prevent escalation. Fear plays a large part too - an adult who is frightened reaches for control rather than connection.

约束很少单纯由孩子的行为引起,它通常是环境已经失败的产物:噪音过大、指令不清、沟通需求未被满足、人员安排不稳定,以及只受过身体干预训练、却未受过预防升级训练的教职员。恐惧也占很大比重——被吓到的成年人会伸手去控制,而不是去连接。

The harm is cumulative. Physical holds cause bruising, joint injury and sometimes fractures, but the invisible damage matters more: trauma responses, school refusal, loss of trust in adults, learned helplessness, and a child who learns that their body is not theirs. Research on restraint consistently finds that it increases aggressive behaviour over time rather than reducing it.

伤害是累积的。身体压制会造成瘀伤、关节损伤甚至骨折,但看不见的伤害更重要:创伤反应、拒学、对成人的信任丧失、习得性无助,以及一个学会"我的身体不属于我"的孩子。关于约束的研究一致发现,长期来看它会增加攻击行为,而不是减少。


4. Communication Passports and Pre-Agreed Signals | 沟通护照与预先约定的信号

The single most effective protection is a written, child-led communication passport that travels with the pupil and is read by every adult who works with them, including supply teachers, lunchtime supervisors and taxi or bus escorts. It should be one page, positive in tone, and written with the child where possible.

最有效的单一保护措施,是一份由孩子主导、随学生流动的书面沟通护照,并且每位与他们接触的成人都读过它,包括代课教师、午休监管员和接送司机。它应当只有一页,语气积极,并尽可能与孩子一起撰写。

Agree a physical or visual signal - a card, a hand tap, a coloured token - that means 'I need to leave now' without the child having to speak. A child who can leave a room early is far less likely to be held in it later.

约定一个身体或视觉信号——一张卡、轻拍手、一个彩色令牌——表示"我现在需要离开",让孩子不必开口说话。能够提前离开房间的孩子,之后被按住的可能性会小得多。


5. Sensory Regulation and De-escalation | 感官调节与降级干预

Autistic pupils and pupils with learning disabilities often reach crisis because of sensory and cognitive overload rather than defiance. Proactive sensory regulation - a scheduled movement break, ear defenders, a chewy, a weighted lap pad, access to a low-stimulus space - reduces the frequency of crisis. The space must be genuinely available, unlocked and voluntary; a room used to shut children in is not a sensory room.

自闭症学生和有学习障碍的学生进入危机,往往源于感官与认知超载,而不是"违抗"。前置性的感官调节——安排好的活动休息、耳罩、咀嚼物、加重坐垫、可使用低刺激空间——能降低危机频率。这个空间必须真正可用、不锁门、且出于自愿;用来把孩子关起来的房间不是感官室。

The low-arousal approach works because it removes the audience, the demand and the confrontation. Useful micro-skills include: hands visible and low, body turned slightly sideways, one adult speaking only, sentences under six words, silence allowed, and no question that begins with 'why'.

低唤醒度方法有效,因为它移除了观众、要求和对抗。实用的微技能包括:双手可见且放低、身体略微侧向、只由一位成人说话、句子不超过六个词、允许沉默,以及不说任何以"为什么"开头的问题。

Overload → Anxiety → Defensive behaviour → Crisis → Tension reduction → Recovery → Repair


6. Behaviour Support Plans That Actually Protect | 真正起保护作用的行为支持计划

A behaviour support plan is only useful if it is built on a functional assessment of what the behaviour achieves for the child, not on a list of sanctions. Record antecedents, behaviour and consequences over at least two weeks, then identify the function: escape, attention, sensory feedback or access to an object or activity.

行为支持计划只有在建立在"行为对孩子达成了什么功能"的评估之上时才有用,而不是建立在一份惩罚清单上。至少用两周记录前因、行为与后果,然后判断功能:逃避、获得关注、感官反馈,或获得某物或某活动。

Antecedent (A) → Behaviour (B) → Consequence (C) → Function

From that assessment, the plan should specify a replacement behaviour that meets the same need, a graded set of staff responses, the names of the adults responsible, and the exact point at which staff must withdraw. If physical intervention is ever considered, it belongs in a separate positive handling plan signed by parents, with a review date.

基于这一评估,计划应明确:一个满足同样需求的替代行为、一套分级的教职员应对步骤、负责成人的姓名,以及教职员必须撤离的确切节点。如果确实考虑身体干预,它应单独列入一份由家长签署、并注明复审日期的正向处置计划中。


7. Reasonable Adjustments Under the Equality Act | 平等法下的合理调整

The Equality Act 2010 requires schools to make reasonable adjustments for disabled pupils, and it protects against indirect discrimination and discrimination arising from disability. A rule applied rigidly to a disabled child - 'no leaving the classroom', 'everyone must attend assembly' - can be unlawful if it puts that child at a substantial disadvantage and no adjustment is made.

《2010 年平等法》要求学校为残障学生作出合理调整,并禁止间接歧视和"由残障引起的歧视"。如果把规则僵硬地套用在残障儿童身上——"不许离开教室""所有人都必须参加集会"——而这让孩子处于实质不利地位且未作调整,就可能违法。

In practice, adjustments that reduce restraint include: a flexible start and finish time, a reduced timetable during recovery, permission to leave lessons without asking, exams access arrangements, a quiet alternative to the dining hall, and staff trained in autism and communication rather than in holds alone.

实务中能减少约束的调整包括:弹性上下学时间、恢复期减少课表、无需请示即可离开课堂、考试便利安排、餐厅的安静替代方案,以及接受过自闭症与沟通培训、而非只学过"压制"的教职员。

Where a pupil has an EHCP, provision is legally required. If it is not being delivered, the route is the annual review first, then the SEND Tribunal. Do not wait for a crisis to request a review.

若学生持有 EHCP,其中支持具有法律强制力。若未被落实,第一步是年度复审,之后可向 SEND 法庭提出。不要等到危机发生才申请复审。


8. Scripts for the Moment of Crisis | 危机当下的沟通话术

Language is a de-escalation tool. The sentences below are short, non-threatening and give the child control without giving up safety. Practise them before you need them, because nobody invents good wording while a child is on the floor.

语言是降级工具。下面这些句子简短、不具威胁性,既给孩子掌控感,又不放弃安全。请在需要之前练习它们,因为当孩子已被按在地上时,没有人还能临时想出好措辞。

Sentences to avoid: 'Calm down', 'Why did you do that?', 'If you do not stop, we will have to hold you', and anything beginning with 'You always'. Each of these raises arousal and makes a physical intervention more likely.

应避免的话:"冷静点""你为什么那样做""你再不停下我们就得按住你",以及任何以"你总是"开头的句子。这些都会提升唤醒度,让身体干预更可能发生。


9. Recording, Escalation and Complaint Routes | 记录、升级与投诉途径

You cannot challenge what has not been recorded. After any incident, request the post-incident report, the body map, the staff names and the review date. Parents and carers over 16, or pupils with capacity, can make a subject access request under UK GDPR for the full record, including internal emails. Schools must respond within one month.

没有被记录的事情无法质疑。任何事件之后,都要索取事件后报告、身体检查记录(body map)、涉事教职员姓名和复审日期。家长与照护者,或具备行为能力的 16 岁以上学生,可依据英国 GDPR 提出"主体查阅请求",获取完整记录,包括内部邮件。学校必须在一个月内回复。

The escalation ladder is usually: class teacher, SENCO, headteacher, governing body complaint, local authority, then the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. Where disability discrimination is involved, the Equality and Human Rights Commission can advise. Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission consider safeguarding information during inspection, so reporting to them is not wasted effort.

升级路径通常是:班主任、SENCO(特殊教育需求协调员)、校长、校董会投诉、地方教育局,再到地方政府与社会照护监察专员。若涉及残障歧视,可咨询平等与人权委员会。Ofsted 与护理质量委员会在检查时会考量安全保护方面的信息,因此向他们报告并非白费力气。


10. Partnering With Parents and Carers | 与家长和照护者成为伙伴

Parents are the experts on their own child. A school that treats them as partners gets better information, earlier warning signs and a calmer child. A home-school communication book, a weekly ten-minute call and a shared 'what worked today' note cost almost nothing and prevent a great many holds.

家长是最了解自己孩子的人。把孩子家长当作伙伴的学校,能得到更好的信息、更早的预警信号,以及一个更平静的孩子

Published by TutorHao | Exam Prep Revision Series | aleveler.com

广告 / Sponsored
商品图片
Cambridge IGCSE Chemistry 4th Edition 剑桥IGCSE化学教材 第4版 英文原版进…
¥375
到手价 · 以淘宝页面为准
化学 备考教辅 · 正版现货 · 学习备考通用
查看详情 / View on Taobao
广告 / Sponsored
商品图片
Cambridge International AS ALevel Business Coursebook 剑桥经管类…
券减¥128.0¥480原价 ¥692
券后价 · 以淘宝页面为准
商科 备考教辅 · 正版现货 · 学习备考通用
查看详情 / View on Taobao

更多咨询请联系16621398022(同微信)

备考资讯每日更新,关注不错过
考纲变化 · 科目分析 · 学习方法
扫码关注公众号 tutorhao
在微信里长按二维码识别关注
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图
公众号:tutorhao