← 返回资讯屏轩教育 · 行业资讯

School Mobile Phone Policies to Implement from September 2026 | 学校应从2026年9月起执行的手机管理政策

2026-10-15 08:37 · 本文部分内容由AI辅助创作

📚 School Mobile Phone Policies to Implement from September 2026 | 学校应从2026年9月起执行的手机管理政策

From September 2026, schools that still rely on goodwill, verbal reminders and the occasional confiscation will be out of step with a fast-hardening international consensus. England's guidance already states that mobile phones should not be used, seen or heard at any point during the school day; UNESCO has cautioned against unregulated smartphone use in classrooms; and a growing number of school groups have moved to fully phone-free days. This guide sets out a practical, evidence-informed package of measures that any secondary school, sixth form or international school can put in place and have fully running by the first day of the 2026 autumn term.

从2026年9月起,仍然依赖"学生自觉""口头提醒"和偶尔没收来管理手机的学校,将落后于迅速收紧的国际政策共识。英格兰的官方指导已经明确:手机在上学期间的任何时候都不应被使用、被看到或被听到;联合国教科文组织也呼吁审慎对待课堂上的智能手机;越来越多的学校集团已经开始实行"全天无手机"。本文提供一套务实、基于证据的措施组合,任何中学、高中部或国际学校都可以采用,并在2026年秋季学期开学第一天正式落地。


1. Policy Context and the September 2026 Deadline | 政策背景:为什么节点定在2026年9月

The direction of travel is unmistakable. In England, Department for Education guidance published in February 2024 sets out that mobile phones should be prohibited throughout the school day, including break and lunch times, and offers schools three broad models: a total ban on school premises, a requirement to hand phones in on arrival, or secure storage during the day. Other systems have gone further: France has legislated to restrict phone use in lower secondary schools, and several European education ministries have issued similar advice since 2023.

方向已经非常清楚。在英格兰,2024年2月发布的教育部指导文件明确规定:手机应在整个上学期间被禁止使用,包括课间和午休;并给出三种基本模式:校园内全面禁用、到校时统一上交、或在校期间使用安全存储柜。其他教育体系走得更远:法国已通过立法限制初中的手机使用,2023年以来多个欧洲国家的教育部门也发布了类似建议。

A September start date is not arbitrary. Term one is when routines, habits and expectations are established; a policy launched mid-year competes with existing culture and loses momentum within weeks. A fixed deadline also forces the practical work that schools most often skip: signage, secure storage, staff scripts, parent communication, and a review cycle with named owners.

把落地时间定在9月并非随意选择。第一学期是建立日常规范、习惯与期望的时段;若在学年中途推出,政策要与既有文化"抢地盘",往往几周内就失去势头。固定截止日期还会倒逼学校完成最容易忽略的实际工作:标识系统、安全存储、教职工话术模板、家长沟通方案,以及有明确责任人的复盘周期。

The reach of the policy matters as much as the rule itself. A serious policy covers:

政策的适用范围与规则本身同等重要。一项严谨的政策应覆盖:


2. The Evidence Base: What Research Actually Shows | 证据基础:研究究竟说明了什么

The strongest single piece of evidence comes from a widely cited study of English schools by Beland and Murphy, which found that banning mobile phones produced test score gains equivalent to an additional week of schooling per year for the average student, with the largest effects among lower-attaining and disadvantaged pupils. In other words, the academic case for a ban is strongest precisely where schools are most focused on closing gaps.

最有力的一项证据来自 Beland 与 Murphy 对英格兰学校的研究:禁用手机所带来的考试成绩提升,相当于普通学生每年多上一周课;而对成绩较低和处于弱势背景的学生,效果最为明显。换句话说,禁用的学业价值恰恰体现在学校最关注"缩小差距"的群体身上。

A second strand concerns attention rather than outcomes. Experimental work on smartphone presence suggests that the mere proximity of a phone can reduce available cognitive capacity, even when it is not being used, because part of the mind is monitoring it. Teachers recognise the behaviour: the lesson that restarts every four minutes, the pupil who cannot sustain a paragraph without checking a notification.

第二条证据线关注"注意力"而非"成绩"。关于手机在场效应的实验研究显示,即使并未使用手机,仅仅把它放在身边也会占用人的认知资源,因为大脑的一部分一直在"监控"它。老师们对这种行为再熟悉不过:一节课被反复打断,学生无法在不查看通知的情况下写完一段话。

Third, there is the sleep and wellbeing literature. The relationship between smartphone use and adolescent mental health is real but modest and hard to prove causally, so schools should resist overclaiming. What is better evidenced is disruption to sleep: late-night use, notifications and group chats displace sleep, and sleep loss in turn affects mood, attention and attendance.

第三是睡眠与身心健康的文献。智能手机使用与青少年心理健康之间的关系确实存在,但强度有限,且难以证明因果关系,因此学校不应对此过度宣称。更可靠的证据指向睡眠被打断:深夜使用、通知与群聊挤占睡眠,而睡眠不足又反过来影响情绪、注意力与出勤。

Finally, academic integrity. A phone in a pocket is a gateway to generative AI, answer-sharing and photographing of test papers. A clear, whole-school rule removes the ambiguity that makes fairness impossible to police.

最后是学术诚信问题。口袋里的手机是通往生成式人工智能、答案互传、试题拍照的入口。全校统一、清晰明确的规则,可以消除那种让"公平"根本无法维护的模糊地带。

Students gaining time + attention > Students gaining restrictions


3. Core Design Principles and a Ten-Clause Model Policy | 核心设计原则与十条示范条款

Six principles should govern the design of any policy that will survive contact with 1,200 teenagers.

任何要经受住一千多名青少年"现实检验"的政策,都应遵循六条设计原则。

A workable policy usually contains ten clauses. Schools writing for September 2026 can treat these as their starting template.

一份可执行的政策通常包含十条条款。准备在2026年9月落地的学校,可直接以此为模板起点。

Clause / 条款 Content / 内容要点
1. Purpose / 目的 Protect learning time, sleep, wellbeing and fairness. / 保护学习时间、睡眠、身心健康与公平。
2. Scope / 范围 On site, on trips, on transport arranged by school, during remote learning. / 校园内、校外活动中、学校安排的交通途中、线上学习期间。
3. Definition / 定义 Phones, smartwatches with cellular connection, tablets, earbuds, any internet-connected personal device. / 手机、可独立联网的智能手表、平板、无线耳机及任何可联网的个人设备。
4. Core rule / 核心规则 Not used, seen or heard from the gate to the final bell. / 从进校门到放学铃响,不得使用、不得出现、不得发出声响。
5. Storage / 存放 Switched off in bags or lockers; no charging on site. / 关机后放入书包或储物柜;校内不提供充电。
6. Exemptions / 豁免 Medical, SEND, young carers; named staff contact; termly review. / 医疗需求、特殊教育需要、照顾家人;指定负责教师;每学期复核。
7. Sixth form / 高中部 Designated zones or earned privileges, reviewed each half term. / 划定使用区或以表现换取权限,每半学期复核。
8. Consequences / 后果 Graduated, logged, applied consistently by all staff. / 分级处理、全程记录、全体教职工一致执行。
9. Searches / 检查 Only in line with national guidance and data protection law. / 仅依据国家指导文件与数据保护法进行。
10. Review / 复盘 Termly data review, annual policy review, report to governors. / 每学期数据复盘、年度政策审查、向校董会报告。

4. Phone-Free from Arrival to Dismissal | 从入校到放学:全天管理的时间带

A policy that only covers lessons leaves the hardest moments uncovered. Break, lunch, corridors and the school gate are where most incidents, filming and conflict actually happen. The table below maps a full day.

只覆盖课堂的政策,恰恰漏掉了最难管理的时段。课间、午休、走廊和校门口,才是大多数冲突、拍摄和纠纷真正发生的地方。下表把一整天拆解清楚。

Time band / 时段 Rule / 规则 Staff action / 教职工动作
Before the gate / 入校前 Use permitted outside the gate line only. / 仅允许在校门线以外使用。 Duty staff at the gate give a quiet reminder. / 值勤教师在校门口轻声提醒。
Arrival to registration / 入校至点名 Phone off, in bag or locker. / 手机关机,放入书包或储物柜。 Tutors check visually, no searching of bags. / 班主任目视检查,不翻查书包。
Lessons / 课堂 Not used, seen or heard. / 不得使用、不得出现、不得出声。 One standard script, no negotiation. / 使用统一话术,不进行辩论。
Break and lunch / 课间与午休 Same rule applies; social time is phone-free. / 规则不变;社交时间同样无手机。 Duty staff patrol key zones; log incidents. / 值勤教师巡查重点区域并记录。
PE and changing / 体育与更衣 Phones stored before entering changing rooms. / 进入更衣室前先存放手机。 Supervise storage; camera concerns are safeguarding matters. / 监管存放;涉及拍摄的问题按安全保护流程处理。
Trips and fixtures / 外出与比赛 Policy travels with the group; leader decides exceptions. / 政策随队执行,例外由带队教师决定。 Brief parents in advance in writing. / 提前以书面形式告知家长。
After-school clubs / 课后活动 Same rule during supervised activity. / 有教师监管的活动中规则不变。 Club leaders follow the school line. / 社团负责人遵循同一标准。
Final bell / 放学铃 Phones may be switched on after leaving the gate. / 离开校门后方可开机使用。 Gate duty monitors the first ten minutes. / 校门值勤关注放学后前十分钟。

5. Classroom Practice and A-Level Study Periods | 课堂操作与高中自习时段

The policy lives or dies in the classroom. Teachers need one consistent script, delivered calmly and identically by everyone, so that pupils cannot shop for a lenient adult. A workable version is: "Phone in your bag, switched off, thank you." Then move on with the lesson immediately. Any discussion about fairness happens later, privately, and never in front of the class.

政策成败在课堂。教师需要一套统一话术,由所有人平静、一致地使用,让学生无法"货比三家"寻找宽松的老师。可行版本是:"手机收进书包,关机,谢谢。"随后立刻继续上课。关于是否公平的讨论放到课后、私下进行,绝不在全班面前展开。

For A-Level and IB students, the pedagogical argument is more subtle. Sixth formers legitimately need devices for research, revision platforms, past-paper marking apps and university applications. The solution is not to pretend otherwise, but to separate two things that are often confused:

对 A-Level 与 IB 学生而言,教学上的理由更微妙。高中生确实需要用设备做研究、使用复习平台、用真题批改应用、处理大学申请。解决办法不是假装他们不需要,而是把常被混为一谈的两件事分开: