什么是TOK Exhibition | What Is the TOK Exhibition?

IB TOK Exhibition选题分析框架指南

什么是TOK Exhibition

IB TOK Exhibition是IB文凭课程知识论（Theory of Knowledge）课程的内部评估，占TOK总分的三分之一。学生需从IB官方35个IA提示词中选择一个，围绕该提示词选择三个物件，并为每个物件撰写约950字评论，展示该物件如何体现知识论问题。Exhibition于2020年取代TOK Presentation，不需要现场展示，以书面评论加实物图片形式提交。

35个IA提示词分类与选择

IB官方35个提示词围绕知识论核心主题展开。理解分类有助快速锁定方向：

知识与技术——技术如何改变知识获取。代表题："What role does imagination play in producing knowledge about the world?"

知识与文化——知识如何受文化影响。例："To what extent is knowledge shaped by the culture in which it is produced?"

知识与方法——不同知识领域的方法论差异。例："What counts as good evidence for a claim?"

伦理维度——知识追求的伦理约束。例："What ethical constraints should limit the pursuit of knowledge?"

知识的本质——知识确定性问题。例："What is the relationship between knowledge and certainty?"

选题三步法

第一步：通读35个提示词，标注5-7个感兴趣、能立刻想到具体物件的方向。第二步：每个候选提示词列出3-5个可能物件——书籍、艺术品、科学仪器、音乐或日常用品均可。第三步：评估可行性——能否为每个物件写出950字深度评论？思路不足则果断放弃。

物件选择原则

具体性——物件必须是真实存在的具体实体，不能选抽象概念或一般类别。你不能选"智能手机"，但可选"iPhone 4"。不能选"教科书"，但可选你正用的IB生物课本。个人关联性——物件应与你的经历或学习过程关联，评分要求展示物件在真实世界中的具体语境。多样性——三个物件来自不同知识领域，如一个自然科学、一个艺术、一个日常生活。分析深度——每个物件必须支撑950字深度分析，避免浅薄选择。

PEC分析框架

撰写每个物件评论时推荐PEC框架：P — Personal Connection：描述你与该物件的个人联系，约150-200字。E — Exhibition Context：将物件置于TOK主题框架，说明与IA提示词的关联及其实世界语境，约200-250字。C — Conceptual Analysis：核心部分，深入分析物件如何揭示知识论问题，讨论证据、解释、确定性等TOK概念，展示批判性思维，约500-550字。

高分策略与常见误区

高分策略：一、三个物件形散神聚——虽来自不同领域但围绕同一提示词。二、每个评论引用TOK概念术语。三、评论间建立呼应——物件一提出问题，物件二从另一角度回应，物件三提供新视角。

常见误区：一、物件过于宽泛（如选"互联网"或"AI"）。二、评论变成物件描述而非知识论分析。三、三个评论相互孤立缺乏整体性。四、忽略提示词关键词——仔细分析措辞确保回应全部要求。

IB TOK Exhibition: Prompt Selection and Analysis Framework

What is the TOK Exhibition

The IB TOK Exhibition is the Internal Assessment for Theory of Knowledge, worth one-third of the TOK grade. Students select one of 35 IA prompts, choose three objects connected to that prompt, and write 950-word commentaries per object. Introduced in 2020 to replace the TOK Presentation, the Exhibition requires no live delivery — commentaries are submitted with images of the objects, allowing more time for deep reflection and revision.

The 35 IA Prompts: Categories and Strategy

The 35 IA prompts center on core TOK themes. Understanding their categories helps target suitable directions:Knowledge and Technology — how technology transforms knowledge access (e.g., "What role does imagination play in producing knowledge about the world?"). Knowledge and Culture — how culture shapes knowledge (e.g., "To what extent is knowledge shaped by the culture in which it is produced?"). Knowledge and Methodology — methodological differences across Areas of Knowledge (e.g., "What counts as good evidence for a claim?"). Ethical Dimensions — ethical constraints on knowledge pursuit (e.g., "What ethical constraints should limit the pursuit of knowledge?"). Nature of Knowledge — questions of certainty (e.g., "What is the relationship between knowledge and certainty?").

Three-Step Selection

Step 1: Read all 35 prompts, mark 5-7 that spark immediate object ideas. Step 2: Brainstorm 3-5 possible objects per candidate — books, artworks, instruments, music, or everyday items. Step 3: Assess whether you can write 950 insightful words per object. If a prompt yields insufficient material, move on.

Object Selection Principles

Specificity — objects must be concrete entities, not abstract categories. Choose "iPhone 4," not "smartphones." Choose your IB Biology textbook, not "textbooks." Personal Connection — objects should relate to your experiences; the rubric requires demonstrating real-world context. Diversity — select from different domains (e.g., natural sciences, arts, daily life). Analytical Depth — each object must sustain 950 words of analysis.

The PEC Framework

P — Personal Connection (~200 words): Your personal link to the object and why you chose it. E — Exhibition Context (~250 words): Situate the object within the TOK framework and IA prompt. C — Conceptual Analysis (~500 words): The core — analyze how the object illuminates knowledge questions, referencing TOK concepts like evidence, certainty, and value judgment to demonstrate critical thinking.

High Scores and Pitfalls

Strategies: Ensure unity across diverse objects; reference TOK concepts explicitly; create dialogue between commentaries. Pitfalls: Overly broad objects (e.g., "the Internet"); descriptive rather than analytical commentaries; isolated commentaries lacking coherence; ignoring specific wording of the prompt.

IB / A-Level课程及升学规划咨询

电话：16621398022（同微信）

了解更多课程信息，请访问 aleveler.com

更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）