📚 AQA 9620 CH01 January 2023 Unit 1 Examiner Report: Key Lessons | AQA 9620 CH01 2023年1月第一单元考官报告：关键启示
This article summarises the main messages from the OxfordAQA International AS Chemistry 9620 Unit 1 (CH01) January 2023 examiner report. It highlights recurring errors, clarifies command-word expectations and shows how to turn common mistakes into marks.
本文总结 OxfordAQA 国际 AS 化学 9620 第一单元（CH01）2023年1月考官报告的主要信息，突出常见错误、澄清指令词要求，并说明如何把常见失分点转化为得分机会。
1. Paper structure and examiner impressions | 试卷结构与考官总体印象
The January 2023 CH01 paper assessed atomic structure, amount of substance, bonding, energetics and redox. Examiners noted that many marks were lost not through lack of knowledge, but through rushed reading and poorly selected command words.
2023 年 1 月 CH01 试卷考查了原子结构、物质的量、化学键、能量学和氧化还原。考官指出，许多失分并非因为知识欠缺，而是因为读题过快和指令词选择不当。
Candidates who wrote clear definitions, showed working and included units tended to score consistently across all sections.
定义清晰、写出计算过程并注明单位的考生往往在各部分得分稳定。
2. Command words and what they require | 指令词及其要求
The report stressed that 'define', 'explain', 'calculate' and 'suggest' require different responses. A definition must be exact, while an explanation must link cause and effect.
报告强调，define、explain、calculate 和 suggest 要求不同的作答方式。定义必须精确，解释则必须建立因果关系。
For example, writing 'electrostatic attraction' alone was often not enough for a definition of ionic bonding; examiners expected 'electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions'.
例如，仅写 '静电引力' 通常不足以定义离子键；考官期望写出 '带相反电荷离子之间的静电引力'。
In 'state and explain' questions, both parts must be answered: a trend alone did not earn the explanation mark.
在 'state and explain' 类题目中，两部分都要作答：只写出趋势不能获得解释分。
3. Atomic structure and isotope calculations | 原子结构与同位素计算
Isotope abundance calculations were a common source of error, especially when candidates used the weighted average formula in the wrong direction.
同位素丰度计算是常见失分点，尤其是考生将加权平均公式的方向用反。
relative atomic mass = Σ (isotopic mass × percentage abundance) ÷ 100
相对原子质量 = Σ（同位素质量 × 百分丰度）÷ 100。
Examiners advised using a clear table of isotope, percentage abundance and mass contribution before substituting into the expression.
考官建议先列出同位素、百分丰度和质量贡献的清晰表格，再代入表达式。
Electronic configuration questions required correct 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ notation; omissions of superscripts or use of capital letters in s, p, d orbitals lost marks.
电子组态题要求正确书写 1s² 2s² 2p⁶；省略上标或把 s、p、d 写成大写都会丢分。
4. Ionisation energy definitions and trends | 电离能定义与趋势
The first ionisation energy definition needed to mention one mole of gaseous atoms, losing one mole of electrons to form one mole of gaseous 1+ ions.
第一电离能的定义需要提及一摩尔气态原子失去一摩尔电子形成一摩尔气态 1+ 离子。
Many candidates reversed the definition or referred to 'solid state atoms', which examiners did not accept.
许多考生把定义写反，或写成 '固态原子'，考官不予接受。
When explaining the fall from Mg to Al, candidates had to compare the 3s and 3p sub-shells, not simply state that 'Al has more protons'.
解释 Mg 到 Al 电离能下降时，考生必须比较 3s 和 3p 亚层，而不能只说 'Al 的质子更多'。
For the drop from P to S, the key idea is spin-pair repulsion in the doubly occupied p orbital.
对于 P 到 S 的下降，关键点是双占据 p 轨道中的自旋成对排斥。
5. Bonding and intermolecular forces | 化学键与分子间作用力
Candidates often confused ionic, covalent and metallic bonding, especially when describing electrical conductivity in different states.
考生经常混淆离子键、共价键和金属键，特别是在描述不同状态下的导电性时。
A common mark-earning structure was: identify the particles, state their charges or delocalised electrons, then link to motion or fixed positions.
一个常见的得分结构是：指出微粒种类，说明其电荷或离域电子，然后联系到运动或固定位置。
For hydrogen bonding, examiners required the answer to specify hydrogen bonded to N, O or F and an attraction to a lone pair on a nearby molecule.
对于氢键，考官要求答案指明氢与 N、O 或 F 成键，并与邻近分子上的孤对电子之间有吸引。
Simple molecular substances were often incorrectly said to conduct electricity when molten; only mobile charged particles can carry current.
简单分子物质常被误认为熔融时能导电；只有可移动的带电粒子才能导电。
6. Shapes of molecules and bond angles | 分子形状与键角
Drawing Lewis structures before answering shape questions improved accuracy, but many candidates omitted lone pairs from diagrams and then predicted wrong shapes.
在回答形状题之前先画路易斯结构可提高准确性，但许多考生在图中漏画孤对电子，导致形状预测错误。
Exam questions often expected NH₃ (trigonal pyramidal, 107°) and H₂O (bent, 104.5°) with the lone pairs explicitly stated as the reason for bond angle reduction.
考题通常要求写出 NH₃（三角锥形，107°）和 H₂O（角形，104.5°），并明确指出孤对电子是键角减小的原因。
A common error was giving 109.5° for NH₃ or H₂O, ignoring the increased repulsion from lone pairs.
常见错误是将 NH₃ 或 H₂O 的键角写成 109.5°，忽略了孤对电子排斥力的增加。
For ions such as NH₄⁺, candidates needed to consider all four bonding pairs and no lone pairs to justify the tetrahedral shape.
对于 NH₄⁺ 等离子，考生需要考虑四对成键电子且无孤对电子，从而证明正四面体形状。
7. Energetics: Hess's law and calorimetry | 能量学：盖斯定律与量热法
Hess's law calculations required correct sign convention and careful treatment of multiplication directions. A common error was failing to reverse the sign when reversing an equation.
盖斯定律计算要求正确的符号规则并仔细处理乘加方向。常见错误是在反转方程时未改变符号。
ΔH = ΣΔHf(products) − ΣΔHf(reactants)
ΔH = ΣΔHf（生成物）− ΣΔHf（反应物）。
= mcΔT must be converted to J, and that ΔH is then divided by moles of limiting reactant.
在量热法中，考生经常忘记 q = mcΔT 必须换算为焦耳，并且 ΔH 随后要除以限制反应物的物质的量。
Examiners rewarded clear steps: calculate heat change, calculate moles, then calculate enthalpy change with sign and unit.
考官奖励清晰的步骤：先计算热量变化，再计算物质的量，最后计算带符号和单位的焓变。
Using specific heat capacity of water as 4.18 J g⁻¹ K⁻¹ and converting °C to K correctly were essential.
使用水的比热容 4.18 J g⁻¹ K⁻¹ 并正确将 °C 转换为 K 至关重要。
8. Redox and oxidation states | 氧化还原与氧化态
Assigning oxidation states was tackled well in simple compounds, but errors appeared in complex ions such as MnO₄⁻ and Cr₂O₇²⁻.
简单化合物中氧化态的判断大多不错，但 MnO₄⁻ 和 Cr₂O₇²⁻ 等复杂离子中的错误较常见。
Candidates had to recall that oxygen is usually −2 and hydrogen is +1, then solve algebraically for the central atom.
考生需要记住氧通常为 −2、氢为 +1，然后通过代数方法求出中心原子的氧化态。
Oxidation was often defined as gain of oxygen or loss of electrons, but the report reminded candidates to use the electron definition in half-equations.
氧化常被定义为得到氧或失去电子，但报告提醒考生在半方程中使用电子定义。
Balancing half-equations in acidic solution required adding H⁺ and H₂O systematically, but many candidates forgot to balance charge at the end.
在酸性溶液中配平半方程需要系统地添加 H⁺ 和 H₂O，但许多考生最后忘记配平电荷。
9. Amount of substance and significant figures | 物质的量与有效数字
The January 2023 report noted that significant figure errors were repeatedly penalised. Candidates should give final answers to the same number of significant figures as the least precise data.
2023 年 1 月报告指出，有效数字错误被反复扣分。考生最终答案的有效数字应与最不精确的数据一致。
In titrations, the concordant results should be averaged, and only concordant titres should be used. Rough titres must be excluded.
在滴定中，只应使用一致的读数计算平均值，初滴液必须剔除。
The unit g mol⁻¹ was often missed when writing molar mass, and mol dm⁻³ was confused with g dm⁻³.
写摩尔质量时经常漏掉单位 g mol⁻¹，并把 mol dm⁻³ 与 g dm⁻³ 混淆。
Examiners advised checking that the final answer is chemically sensible; a concentration of 1500 mol dm⁻³ almost always signals a unit or conversion error.
考官建议检查最终答案是否符合化学常识；1500 mol dm⁻³ 的浓度几乎总是意味着单位或换算错误。
10. Common presentation errors | 常见表述错误
A frequent issue was giving arrows without states, or charge imbalance when writing equations.
常见问题是方程没有标状态或电荷不守恒。
The report emphasised that state symbols, (s), (l), (g), (aq), must be included when equations ask for them; otherwise the mark may be lost.
报告强调，当题目要求时，必须标注状态符号 (s)、(l)、(g)、(aq)，否则可能丢分。
Definitions copied from formulae booklets without adaptation also lost marks, because examiners required wording specific to the question.
直接从公式手册中抄写而不加改编的定义也会丢分
Published by TutorHao | Exam Prep Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图