📚 AS AQA Chemistry CH01 (Paper 1) June 2022 Examiner Report | 2022年6月AQA AS化学CH01考情报告
The June 2022 AQA AS Chemistry Paper 1 (CH01) examiner report gives a detailed review of candidate performance across physical and inorganic chemistry. It highlights where students gained marks easily, where common errors reduced credit, and which skills need sharper exam technique.
2022年6月AQA AS化学Paper 1（CH01）考官报告详细回顾了物理化学与无机化学部分的考生表现，指出容易得分的环节、常见失分点以及需要加强的应试技能。
1. Overall Performance and Grade Boundaries | 总体表现与分数线背景
The report shows that many candidates handled straightforward recall questions well, particularly definitions of relative atomic mass and first ionisation energy. However, multi-step calculations and explanations requiring precise scientific language separated higher-scoring candidates from the rest.
报告显示，许多考生在直接回忆类题目上表现良好，尤其是相对原子质量和第一电离能的定义。但多步计算以及需要严谨科学表述的解释题拉开了高分考生与其余考生的差距。
Grade boundaries for AS Chemistry reflect the demand of the paper. A common examiner comment was that candidates often left too little time for the final contextual question, which required linking several topics.
AS化学的分数线反映了试卷的整体难度。考官常提到，考生往往留给最后一道综合情境题的时间太少，而该题需要联系多个主题。
2. Mathematical Demands: Mole Calculations and Significant Figures | 数学要求：摩尔计算与有效数字
andidates who converted units before substituting into equations made fewer errors than those who tried to adjust units at the end.
摩尔计算是考查重点，包括 n = m ÷ M、n = c × V 以及理想气体状态方程 pV = nRT。先换算单位再代入公式的考生比最后才调整单位的考生出错更少。
Examiners emphasised that final answers should be given to the same number of significant figures as the least precise data provided, usually three significant figures in this paper.
考官强调，最终答案的有效数字位数应与题目所给数据中最不精确的一项一致，本卷中通常为三位有效数字。
A common mistake was confusing the units of concentration: students often multiplied cm³ by mol/dm³ without dividing by 1000, giving answers 1000 times too large.
一个常见错误是混淆浓度单位：考生常将 cm³ 直接乘以 mol/dm³ 而未除以 1000，导致答案扩大 1000 倍。
orgot to convert temperature from °C to K, or to use volume in m³ when pressure was in Pa.
在 pV = nRT 中，考生常忘记将温度从 °C 换算为 K，或者当压强用 Pa 时未将体积换算为 m³。
3. Atomic Structure and Ionisation Energies | 原子结构与电离能
Questions on first ionisation energy required a definition in terms of one mole of gaseous atoms losing one mole of electrons to form one mole of gaseous 1+ ions. Many candidates lost marks by omitting 'gaseous' or 'one mole'.
第一电离能题目要求用“一摩尔气态原子失去一摩尔电子形成一摩尔气态+1离子”来定义。许多考生因漏写“气态”或“一摩尔”而失分。
Explaining the drop between group 2 and group 3 ionisation energies required reference to electron removal from a p subshell at higher energy than an s subshell. Vague answers such as 'more shielding' without specifying subshell were not credited.
解释第2族与第3族电离能下降需要指出电子从能量高于 s 亚层的 p 亚层中移出。只写“屏蔽更多”而不指明亚层的模糊答案不给分。
Examiners also noted that the drop from nitrogen to oxygen must mention spin-pair repulsion in the p subshell, not just electron repulsion.
考官还指出，氮到氧的电离能下降必须提及 p 亚层中的自旋配对排斥，而不仅仅是电子排斥。
When explaining successive ionisation energy jumps, candidates frequently failed to link the large increase to a change from valence electrons to inner-shell electrons.
在解释逐级电离能的突增时，考生常未能将大幅增加与从价电子到内层电子的变化联系起来。
4. Bonding and Structure | 化学键与结构
Candidates generally identified types of bonding well, but struggled to compare electrical conductivity of sodium, graphite, and diamond using delocalised electrons or mobile ions.
考生通常能正确判断化学键类型，但在比较钠、石墨和金刚石的导电性时，难以运用离域电子或可移动离子来解释。
In questions about shapes of molecules, many students gave correct electron-pair repulsion names but did not justify the shape from the number of bonding pairs and lone pairs.
在分子形状题中，许多学生给出了正确的电子对互斥名称，但没有根据键对和孤对电子数来说明形状。
The report noted that 'bent' or 'non-linear' should be used consistently, and that bond angles must be justified by repulsion: lone pair-lone pair > lone pair-bond pair > bond pair-bond pair.
报告指出，“弯曲形”或“非直线形”应统一使用，且键角必须用排斥力解释：孤对-孤对 > 孤对-键对 > 键对-键对。
Comparing melting points of sodium chloride and magnesium oxide required candidates to mention the higher ionic charge and smaller ionic radius in MgO, leading to stronger electrostatic attraction.
比较氯化钠和氧化镁的熔点需要考生指出 MgO 中离子电荷更高、离子半径更小，因此静电吸引力更强。
5. Periodicity and Group 2/7 Trends | 周期性与第2/7族趋势
Periodicity questions asked candidates to link trends in atomic radius and melting point across Period 3 to nuclear charge and bonding type.
周期性题目要求考生将第3周期原子半径和熔点的变化趋势与核电荷和键型联系起来。
A common weakness was describing melting point increases from Na to Al in terms of 'stronger bonds' without stating the increasing number of delocalised electrons and higher charge density of the metal ions.
常见不足是在解释从钠到铝熔点升高时仅说“化学键更强”，而未说明离域电子数增多以及金属离子电荷密度升高。
For Group 2, candidates often forgot that reactivity with water increases down the group due to decreasing ionisation energy and increasing atomic radius, but solubility of sulfates decreases down the group.
对于第2族，考生常忘记与水反应活性沿族向下增强（因电离能降低、原子半径增大），但硫酸盐溶解度沿族向下减小。
For Group 7, descriptions of a more reactive halogen displacing a less reactive one from solution were generally good, but some lost marks by missing colour changes or writing incorrect ionic equations without state symbols.
对于第7族，较活泼卤素从溶液中置换较不活泼卤素的描述普遍较好，但部分考生因漏写颜色变化或写错离子方程式且未标状态符号而失分。
6. Energetics and Calorimetry | 能量学与量热法
Enthalpy changes were assessed using the relationships below.
焓变通过以下关系式进行考查。
q = m × c × ΔT and ΔH = −q ÷ n
The report stressed that candidates must identify the limiting reactant before finding the number of moles reacted.
报告强调，考生必须先确定限量反应物，再求出实际反应的物质的量。
in q = m × c × ΔT, and from forgetting to convert J to kJ before calculating ΔH in kJ/mol.
许多错误源于在 q = m × c × ΔT 中使用了固体的质量而不是溶液的质量，以及在以 kJ/mol 计算 ΔH 前忘记将 J 转换为 kJ。
arrows in the wrong direction and then reversed signs incorrectly. A careful convention of 'up arrow = enthalpy increase' would prevent this.
绘制盖斯循环时，考生常将箭头方向画错，随后又错误地反转符号。使用“向上箭头 = 焓增加”的约定可以避免这一问题。
7. Kinetics and Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution | 动力学与麦克斯韦-玻尔兹曼分布
Maxwell-Boltzmann questions required candidates to sketch a curve with a lower peak and a tail extending to higher energy for higher temperature, and to label the most probable energy and activation energy.
麦克斯韦-玻尔兹曼分布题要求考生绘制温度更高时峰值更低、尾部向高能方向延伸的曲线，并标出最概然能量和活化能。
A frequent omission was not linking the area under the curve beyond Eₐ to the number of particles with sufficient energy to react, which is central to explaining why the rate increases with temperature.
一个常见的遗漏是未将 Eₐ 右侧曲线下的面积与具有足够能量反应的粒子数联系起来，而这正是解释速率随温度升高而增大的核心。
Catalyst questions were handled better, but some candidates stated that a catalyst 'lowers the
Published by TutorHao | AS Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图