📚 Global Governance: Human Rights and the Environment | 全球治理：人权与环境
Global governance is no longer just about state-to-state diplomacy; it increasingly weaves together the protection of human rights and the stewardship of our natural world. This article examines how international frameworks, treaties, and institutions address the fundamental intersection where environmental degradation directly undermines the rights to life, health, water, and culture.
全球治理已不再仅仅是国与国之间的外交，它日益将人权保护与自然界的守护交织在一起。本文探讨国际框架、条约和机构如何应对环境退化直接损害生命权、健康权、水权和文化权这一根本性交叉议题。
1. Defining Global Governance | 定义全球治理
Global governance refers to the cooperative management of cross-border issues through a combination of international law, institutions, norms, and multi-stakeholder partnerships. It fills the vacuum where no single world government exists, coordinating responses to challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution that no nation can solve alone.
全球治理是指通过国际法、机构、规范和多利益攸关方伙伴关系的组合，对跨境问题进行合作管理。它填补了不存在单一世界政府的真空，协调应对气候变化、生物多样性丧失和污染等任何国家都无法独自解决的挑战。
In the environmental realm, governance extends from legally binding treaties to soft-law declarations, involving states, intergovernmental organisations, corporations, civil society, and scientific bodies. Its effectiveness depends on compliance mechanisms, funding, and the political will of participating actors, making it a dynamic but fragile architecture.
在环境领域，治理从具有法律约束力的条约延伸至软法宣言，涉及国家、政府间组织、企业、民间社会和科学机构。其有效性取决于遵约机制、资金和参与方的政治意愿，这使得它成为一种动态但脆弱的架构。
2. The Nexus Between Human Rights and the Environment | 人权与环境的联系
Human rights and environmental protection are inseparable because a healthy ecosystem underpins the most basic rights: the right to life, to adequate food, to clean water, and to the highest attainable standard of health. Degraded environments lead to displacement, disease, and conflict, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable populations.
人权与环境保护密不可分，因为健康的生态系统是最基本权利的基础：生命权、充足食物权、清洁水权和能达到的最高健康标准权。退化的环境会导致流离失所、疾病和冲突，对最脆弱群体造成不成比例的影响。
Environmental defenders—individuals who peacefully protest against resource exploitation or pollution—often face intimidation, violence, and imprisonment. Thus, protecting the environment also requires safeguarding procedural rights such as freedom of expression, access to information, and the right to participate in decision-making.
环境捍卫者——即和平抗议资源开发或污染的个人——经常面临恐吓、暴力和监禁。因此，保护环境还需要保障表达自由、信息获取权和参与决策权等程序性权利。
3. The Right to a Healthy Environment | 健康环境权
Although not originally included in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the right to a healthy environment has gained significant legal recognition through regional treaties and national constitutions. In October 2021, the UN Human Rights Council adopted a historic resolution recognising a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment as an autonomous human right.
尽管健康环境权最初未被纳入1948年《世界人权宣言》，但它已通过区域条约和国家宪法获得了重要的法律承认。2021年10月，联合国人权理事会通过了一项历史性决议，承认享有清洁、健康和可持续的环境为一项独立的人权。
This recognition pressures states to strengthen environmental regulations, reduce pollution, and ensure that development projects do not violate citizens' well-being. It also provides environmental activists and affected communities with a powerful legal tool to hold governments and corporations accountable in domestic and international courts.
这一承认迫使各国加强环境法规、减少污染，并确保发展项目不侵犯公民的福祉。它还为环境活动家和受影响的社区提供了一种强大的法律工具，在国内和国际法庭上追究政府和企业的责任。
4. International Frameworks and Agreements | 国际框架与协议
A dense web of international instruments now links environmental governance with human rights. The 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development established Principle 10, which enshrines access to information, public participation, and access to justice in environmental matters—procedural rights essential for democratic governance.
如今，一张密集的国际文书网络将环境治理与人权联系起来。1992年《关于环境与发展的里约宣言》确立了原则10，规定在环境事务中享有信息获取、公众参与和诉诸司法的权利——这些程序性权利对民主治理至关重要。
The Aarhus Convention (1998) further operationalises these rights in the European and Central Asian context, granting citizens the right to challenge public authorities that fail to disclose environmental data. At the global level, the Paris Agreement (2015) explicitly mentions the importance of respecting, promoting, and considering human rights in climate action, including the rights of indigenous peoples and migrants.
《奥胡斯公约》（1998年）在欧洲和中亚地区进一步落实了这些权利，赋予公民对未披露环境数据的公共当局提出质疑的权利。在全球层面，《巴黎协定》（2015年）明确提及在气候行动中尊重、促进和考虑人权的重要性，包括土著人民和移民的权利。
5. Role of the United Nations | 联合国的作用
The United Nations system hosts several key bodies that integrate human rights and environmental protection. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), headquartered in Nairobi, coordinates global environmental efforts and promotes the environmental rule of law. UNEP's work with the Human Rights Council has led to the appointment of a Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment.
联合国系统设有多个关键机构，将人权与环境保护相结合。总部位于内罗毕的联合国环境规划署（UNEP）协调全球环境努力，并促进环境法治。环境署与人权理事会的合作促成了人权与环境问题特别报告员的任命。
Special Rapporteur David Boyd has documented how states can implement the right to a healthy environment through air quality laws, sustainable management of ecosystems, and phasing out toxic substances. Furthermore, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted in 2015, blend poverty eradication (SDG 1), water and sanitation (SDG 6), clean energy (SDG 7), and climate action (SDG 13), all of which have clear human rights dimensions.
特别报告员戴维·博伊德记录了各国如何通过空气质量法、生态系统可持续管理和逐步淘汰有毒物质来落实健康环境权。此外，2015年通过的可持续发展目标（SDGs）融合了消除贫困（SDG1）、水和环境卫生（SDG6）、清洁能源（SDG7）和气候行动（SDG13），所有这些都具有明确的人权维度。
6. Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) | 多边环境协议
Multilateral Environmental Agreements are crucial instruments of global governance, many of which now incorporate human rights language or impact assessments. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recognises the dependency of indigenous and local communities on biological resources and promotes the equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources.
多边环境协议是全球治理的关键工具，其中许多现已纳入人权语言或影响评估。《生物多样性公约》承认土著和地方社区对生物资源的依赖，并促进遗传资源所产生的惠益公平分享。
The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Paris Agreement explicitly reference human rights, a significant step from the original 1992 treaty which was silent on the matter. The Basel Convention on hazardous waste and the Minamata Convention on mercury both protect communities from toxic exposure, safeguarding the right to health and life. Compliance with these MEAs is monitored through reporting, peer review, and in some cases financial penalties.
《联合国气候变化框架公约》及其《巴黎协定》明确提及人权，这是自1992年未涉及该问题的原条约以来的重大进步。关于危险废物的《巴塞尔公约》和关于汞的《水俣公约》都保护社区免受有毒物质侵害，保障健康权和生命权。对这些多边环境协议的遵约情况通过报告、同行评审以及某些情况下的经济处罚进行监测。
7. Environmental Justice and Equity | 环境正义与公平
Environmental justice is a movement and a legal principle that demands fair distribution of environmental benefits and burdens. Globally, low-income nations and marginalised groups, particularly Indigenous peoples, bear the brunt of climate impacts, resource extraction, and pollution, despite having contributed least to the causes. This inequity violates the core human rights principle of non-discrimination.
环境正义是一场运动，也是一项法律原则，要求公平分配环境利益和负担。全球范围内，低收入国家和边缘化群体，特别是土著人民，承受着气候影响、资源开采和污染的最严重冲击，尽管他们对成因的贡献最小。这种不平等违反了不歧视这一核心人权原则。
The concept of climate justice extends this logic by demanding that historical emitters provide finance, technology transfer, and capacity-building to developing nations. The Loss and Damage Fund established at COP27 in 2022 represents a governance innovation aimed at compensating vulnerable countries for irreversible harm, linking empathy to structural accountability.
气候正义的概念扩展了这一逻辑，要求历史排放国向发展中国家提供资金、技术转让和能力建设。2022年在COP27上设立的损失和损害基金代表了一种治理创新，旨在补偿脆弱国家遭受的不可逆转的损害，将同理心与结构性问责联系起来。
8. Case Study: Climate Change and Human Rights | 案例研究：气候变化与人权
Climate change is the ultimate stress test for the human rights–environment nexus. Rising sea levels threaten the right to life and territory of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) such as Tuvalu and the Maldives. Extreme weather events destroy homes, livelihoods, and access to education, disproportionally affecting children and women.
气候变化是对人权与环境联系性的终极压力测试。海平面上升威胁着图瓦卢、马尔代夫等小岛屿发展中国家的生命权和领土权。极端天气事件摧毁家园、生计和受教育机会，对儿童和妇女造成不成比例的影响。
The Dutch Urgenda case (2019) marked a landmark, where the Supreme Court of the Netherlands ordered the government to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 25% from 1990 levels, citing the state’s duty of care under the European Convention on Human Rights. Similarly, youth-led lawsuits in Germany, Colombia, and the Philippines are reshaping governance, compelling courts to interpret climate inaction as a human rights violation.
2019年的荷兰乌尔根达案具有里程碑意义，荷兰最高法院命令政府将温室气体排放量比1990年减少25%，援引了《欧洲人权公约》下国家的注意义务。类似地，德国、哥伦比亚和菲律宾的青年人主导的诉讼正在重塑治理，促使法院将气候不作为解释为侵犯人权。
9. Corporate Responsibility and Environmental Rights | 企业责任与环境权
Transnational corporations often operate in contexts where domestic environmental laws are weak, leading to oil spills, deforestation, and water contamination that infringe upon the rights of local communities. Global governance has responded with soft-law instruments like the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011), which clarify the state duty to protect and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights.
跨国公司在国内环境法薄弱的环境中运营，往往导致石油泄漏、森林砍伐和水污染，侵犯当地社区的权利。全球治理已通过《联合国工商业与人权指导原则》（2011年）等软法工具作出回应，该文件阐明了国家的保护义务和企业尊重人权的责任。
There is a growing push for a legally binding international treaty on business and human rights, aiming to hold companies liable for environmental harm across their supply chains. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria now compel investors to screen companies based on their environmental footprint and human rights record, integrating accountability into financial markets.
越来越多人推动制定一项关于工商业与人权的具有法律约束力的国际条约，旨在让公司为其供应链中的环境损害负责。环境、社会和治理（ESG）标准如今迫使投资者根据环境足迹和人权记录筛选公司，将问责制融入金融市场。
10. Challenges in Global Environmental Governance | 全球环境治理的挑战
Despite the proliferation of agreements, global environmental governance faces persistent challenges. The principle of state sovereignty often shields governments from external enforcement, and many treaties lack strong sanctions. Free riders benefit from collective action without contributing, weakening the system’s integrity. Furthermore, the fragmentation of institutions—with climate, biodiversity, and trade regimes operating in silos—impedes coherent policy.
尽管协议激增，全球环境治理仍面临持续的挑战。国家主权原则常常使政府免受外部强制执行，且许多条约缺乏强有力的制裁。搭便车者从集体行动中获益却不作出贡献，削弱了体系的完整性。此外，机构的碎片化——气候、生物多样性和贸易体制各自为政——阻碍了连贯的政策制定。
Power asymmetries between developed and developing nations persist, with developing countries often lacking the financial and technical capacity to implement treaty obligations. Geopolitical tensions, such as those surrounding the war in Ukraine, also divert attention and resources away from long-term environmental commitments, highlighting the volatile nature of multilateralism.
发达国家与发展中国家之间的权力不对称持续存在，发展中国家往往缺乏履行条约义务的资金和技术能力。地缘政治紧张局势，例如围绕乌克兰战争的局势，也转移了对长期环境承诺的关注和资源，凸显了多边主义的波动性。
11. The Role of NGOs and Civil Society | 非政府组织和民间社会的作用
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) act as watchdogs, advocates, and knowledge brokers in global environmental governance. Groups like Amnesty International and Greenpeace now run dedicated campaigns on environmental rights, documenting abuses such as illegal logging on indigenous lands and pollution from petrochemical plants. Their reports provide evidence used by UN rapporteurs and international courts.
非政府组织在全球环境治理中充当监督者、倡导者和知识中介。大赦国际和绿色和平等组织如今开展专门的环境权利运动，记录土著土地上的非法采伐和石化厂污染等侵权行为。它们的报告为联合国报告员和国际法庭提供了证据。
Civil society participation is enshrined in many environmental agreements; for example, the Aarhus Convention gives NGOs standing to sue public authorities for failure to conduct environmental impact assessments. Grassroots movements like the Fridays for Future have amplified youth voices, demanding that governments align policies with the 1.5 °C target, thereby reinforcing accountability through public pressure rather than formal law.
民间社会的参与被写入许多环境协议中；例如，《奥胡斯公约》赋予非政府组织起诉公共当局未进行环境影响评估的权利。“星期五为未来”等草根运动放大了青年人的声音，要求政府将政策与1.5°C目标对齐，从而通过公众压力而非正式法律加强问责制。
12. Conclusion: Towards a Sustainable and Just Future | 结论：迈向可持续和公正的未来
The integration of human rights into environmental governance represents a paradigm shift from viewing nature as a resource to recognising it as the foundation of all life and dignity. For A-level learners, understanding this nexus is essential for analysing contemporary conflicts, policy responses, and the role of law in shaping a sustainable future. The road ahead demands not only stronger treaties but also genuine empowerment of affected communities and robust enforcement mechanisms that transcend borders.
将人权融入环境治理代表了一种范式转变，从将自然视为一种资源，转变为认识到它是所有生命和尊严的基础。对于A-level学习者而言，理解这种联系对于分析当代冲突、政策应对以及法律在塑造可持续未来中的作用至关重要。前方的道路不仅需要更强有力的条约，还需要真正赋权受影响社区，以及超越国界的强有力执行机制。
Published by TutorHao | Environmental Science Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图