📚 A-Level CAIE Media: 2026 Exam Changes & Trends | A-Level CAIE 媒体：2026考试变化与趋势
For students and teachers preparing for the CAIE A-Level Media Studies (9607) examination, the 2026 series brings a significant refresh. This article unpacks the updated syllabus framework, evolving assessment methods, and key thematic trends that will shape the papers. Understanding these shifts is vital for achieving top marks in the new exam cycle.
对于正在备考CAIE A-Level媒体研究(9607)的学生和老师来说，2026年考试系列带来了一次重要更新。本文将剖析修订后的大纲框架、不断演变的评估方式，以及将影响试卷的关键主题趋势。理解这些变化对于在新考试周期中获得高分至关重要。
1. Updated Syllabus Framework | 更新的大纲框架
The 2026 exam marks the first full assessment under the refreshed CAIE Media Studies syllabus (9607 for examination from 2026). The curriculum has been restructured to reflect the contemporary media landscape, placing stronger emphasis on digital convergence, participatory culture, and global media flows. Compared to the previous 2023-2025 syllabus, the number of compulsory media forms and set products has been adjusted to allow deeper critical exploration.
2026年考试是更新后的CAIE媒体研究大纲（2026年起考试适用，课程代码9607）的首次全面考核。课程结构经过重组以反映当代媒体格局，更加强调数字融合、参与式文化和全球媒体流动。与2023-2025年大纲相比，必修媒体形式和规定产品数量有所调整，以便进行更深入的批判性探究。
Importantly, the updated assessment objectives give more weight to analysis and evaluation. Students must now demonstrate a more sophisticated understanding of how media products are constructed for specific audiences and shaped by institutional and regulatory contexts across different eras.
重要的是，更新后的评估目标赋予分析与评价更高权重。学生现在必须展现出更深刻的理解，能够说明媒体产品如何针对特定受众构建，并在不同时代受到制度和监管背景的塑造。
2. Digital Media and Platform Convergence | 数字媒体与平台融合
A central theme in the 2026 exam is digital convergence. Candidates will be expected to discuss how traditional platforms (e.g., broadcast television, newspapers) have integrated with online and social media environments. Set products now include multimedia websites, streaming services, and participatory platforms to exemplify this shift.
2026年考试的核心主题是数字融合。考生需要讨论传统平台（如广播电视、报纸）如何与网络和社交媒体环境融合。规定产品现在包括多媒体网站、流媒体服务和参与式平台，以体现这一转变。
For instance, analysis of a television drama may require evaluation of its transmedia extensions, second-screen apps, and fan-generated content across YouTube and TikTok. The syllabus encourages students to see media as an interconnected ecosystem rather than isolated texts.
例如，分析某一电视剧时可能需要评估其跨媒体延伸、第二屏应用以及YouTube和TikTok上的粉丝生成内容。大纲鼓励学生将媒体视为相互连接的生态系统，而非孤立的文本。
3. Global Media Institutions and Transnational Regulation | 全球媒体机构与跨国监管
The 2026 exam places greater emphasis on the power of global conglomerates such as Disney, Netflix, and News Corp. Candidates must examine how these institutions operate across national borders, adapt content for local markets (glocalisation), and navigate differing regulatory frameworks, from the UK's Ofcom to the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive.
2026年考试更加强调迪士尼、奈飞、新闻集团等全球传媒集团的力量。考生必须审视这些机构如何跨越国界运作、为本地市场调整内容（全球本土化），以及如何在英国Ofcom和欧盟《视听媒体服务指令》等不同监管框架下周旋。
Case studies now require comparative analysis. A question might ask how global streaming platforms challenge existing national media policies or how transnational ownership impacts cultural diversity. Students must support arguments with specific examples of regulatory disputes or co-production deals.
案例分析现在要求进行比较分析。一道题目可能会问全球流媒体平台如何挑战现有国家媒体政策，或者跨国所有权如何影响文化多样性。学生必须用具体的监管纠纷或联合制作协议实例来支撑论点。
4. Evolving Audience Concepts | 演进的受众概念
Passive audience models have been firmly replaced by interactive and negotiated readings in the 2026 syllabus. Theories from Stuart Hall (encoding/decoding), Henry Jenkins (participatory culture), and Dan Gillmor (citizen journalism) are examined alongside up-to-date examples. Candidates must evaluate how digital platforms enable two-way communication and blur the line between producer and consumer — the prosumer.
在2026年大纲中，被动受众模型已被互动式和协商式解读彻底取代。斯图尔特·霍尔（编码/解码）、亨利·詹金斯（参与式文化）和丹·吉尔默（公民新闻）等理论将与最新案例一同考查。考生必须评价数字平台如何实现双向传播，并模糊生产者与消费者之间的界限——即产消者。
Furthermore, the concept of the 'algorithmic audience' has been introduced. Students should understand how recommender systems on Netflix or YouTube shape viewing habits, construct filtered realities, and raise ethical concerns regarding data privacy. Exam questions will likely ask for a balanced evaluation of audience empowerment versus algorithmic control.
此外，“算法受众”概念已被引入。学生应了解奈飞或YouTube的推荐系统如何塑造观看习惯、构建过滤后的现实，并引发数据隐私方面的伦理关切。考题很可能要求对受众赋权与算法控制进行平衡评价。
5. Representation and Intersectional Identities | 表征与交叉身份
Representation remains a core component, but the analytical lens has deepened. The 2026 syllabus expects candidates to move beyond simple positive/negative portrayals and engage with intersectionality — examining how gender, ethnicity, class, sexuality, and disability interact in media texts. David Gauntlett's identity theory and bell hooks' oppositional gaze are explicitly referenced.
表征仍然是核心组成部分，但分析视角更加深入。2026年大纲期望考生超越简单的正/负面刻画，运用交叉性理论——检视性别、种族、阶级、性取向和残障如何在媒体文本中相互作用。大卫·冈特莱特的身份理论和贝尔·胡克斯的对抗性凝视被明确引用。
For set products, one can expect close reading of genres like lifestyle magazines, music videos, and video games that construct complex identity narratives. Students must analyse how media can simultaneously challenge and reinforce dominant ideologies, using precise textual evidence and relevant academic theory.
对于规定产品，可以预见对生活方式杂志、音乐视频和电子游戏等构建复杂身份叙事的体裁进行细读。学生必须利用精确的文本证据和相关学术理论，分析媒体如何既能挑战又能强化主流意识形态。
6. Cross-Media Campaigns and Transmedia Storytelling | 跨媒体活动与跨媒介叙事
A new emphasis in the 2026 exam is the cross-media study of marketing campaigns and narrative worlds. Media products are no longer assessed in isolation; candidates must trace how a brand message or storyline travels across film, social media, print, and experiential marketing. Transmedia storytelling, as defined by Henry Jenkins, is now an explicit theoretical framework for analysis.
2026年考试的一个新重点是营销活动和叙事世界的跨媒体研究。媒体产品不再被孤立评估；考生必须追踪品牌信息或故事情节如何穿越电影、社交媒体、印刷品和体验式营销。亨利·詹金斯定义的跨媒介叙事现在已成为明确的分析理论框架。
This change is reflected in the set products, which may include integrated campaigns like the promotion of a blockbuster superhero film alongside its Instagram filters, behind-the-scenes podcasts, and merchandise. Students should pitch and deconstruct such campaigns in their coursework, showing understanding of synergy, narrative extension, and audience engagement.
这一变化体现在规定产品中，可能包括大片超级英雄电影的整合推广及其配套的Instagram滤镜、幕后播客和周边商品。学生应在课程作业中策划和解构此类活动，展现对协同效应、叙事延展和受众参与的理解。
7. Independent Coursework: New Requirements | 独立课程作业：新要求
Component 3 (Coursework) has been revised to align with the 2026 vision. The production task now requires a clear rationale that links creative choices to academic research and theory. Learners must produce a statement of intent and an evaluation that critically reflects on intertextuality, representation, and target audience feedback in greater depth than before.
课程作业（第三部分）经修订以与2026年愿景保持一致。制作任务现在要求一份清晰的创作理据，将创意选择与学术研究和理论联系起来。学习者必须撰写意图声明和一份评估报告，比以往更深入地批判反思互文性、表征和目标受众反馈。
Moreover, the range of permitted production formats has been expanded to include digital artefacts such as interactive websites, augmented reality filters, or podcast episodes. This expansion acknowledges the industry shift towards screen-based and immersive media, but it also demands higher-level technical competence and documentation of the production process.
此外，允许的制作形式范围已扩大，包含交互式网站、增强现实滤镜或播客单集等数字制品。这一扩展承认了产业向屏幕媒介和沉浸式媒体的转移，但也要求更高水平的技术能力和制作过程记录。
8. Assessment Objectives and Mark Schemes | 评估目标与评分方案
The proportion of marks allocated to evaluation (AO3) has increased in the 2026 specifications. Students must not only analyse (AO2) media texts but also make substantiated judgements about their effectiveness, ethics, and wider cultural impact. Knowledge and understanding (AO1) remains foundational but is assessed more through application than through standalone definition questions.
在2026年的考试规格中，评价（AO3）所占分数比例有所增加。学生不仅要分析（AO2）媒体文本，还要对其有效性、伦理和更广泛的文化影响做出有理有据的判断。知识与理解（AO1）仍是基础，但更多通过应用来考核，而非单独的定义题。
The mark schemes now reward integrated theoretical application and synoptic thinking. For example, a top-band response about a newspaper should link institutional ownership, political bias, audience interpretation, and digital disruption in a single coherent argument. Teachers should encourage students to move beyond the siloed discussion of each conceptual area.
评分方案现在奖励融合理论应用和概论思维。例如，一篇关于报纸的高级回答应在单一连贯的论证中将机构所有权、政治偏见、受众解读和数字颠覆联系起来。教师应鼓励学生超越对各概念领域的孤立讨论。
9. Exam Question Formats and Stems | 试题格式与题干
While the structure of two written papers remains, the question stems have been refined to elicit higher-order thinking. Command words such as 'evaluate', 'to what extent', and 'critically assess' have become more frequent. Comparison questions appear in Paper 1, requiring students to juxtapose historical and contemporary products or analyse cross-platform strategies directly.
虽然两份笔试卷的结构保持不变，但问题题干经优化以引出高阶思维。“评价”、“在何种程度上”和“批判性评估”等指令词出现得更频繁。试卷一中会出现比较题，要求学生直接并列对比历史和当代产品，或分析跨平台策略。
Below is a simplified comparison of the 2026 paper structure to help you plan your revision:
以下是2026年试卷结构的简化对比，以帮助你规划复习：
| Paper | 2023-25 Focus | 2026+ Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1: Media Texts, Industries & Audiences | Single media form analysis; discrete theory application | Cross-media comparison; institutional regulation; algorithmic audiences |
| Paper 2: Media Forms & Set Products in Depth | Genre and narrative within one era | Historical evolution; transmedia storytelling; intersectional representation |
| Component 3: Coursework | Individual production + written reflection | Cross-media campaign; digital artefact option; detailed academic rationale |
Students should practise planning timed essays that integrate multiple theoretical lenses and directly address the command term. Examiner reports from previous series highlight that many candidates lost marks by failing to fully address 'evaluate' or by providing generic descriptions.
学生应练习规划限时论文，整合多种理论视角并直接回应指令词。往期考官报告指出，许多考生因未能充分回应“评价”或提供泛泛的描述而失分。
10. Critical Theories Updated | 批判理论的更新
The required theoretical framework has expanded to include more contemporary thinkers. Alongside established theorists such as Roland Barthes, Tzvetan Todorov, and Laura Mulvey, the 2026 syllabus explicitly references José van Dijck (platform society), Safiya Umoja Noble (algorithmic bias), and David Hesmondhalgh (cultural industries). This means students must be comfortable applying post-2015 scholarship to current media phenomena.
必需的理论框架已扩展，纳入了更多当代思想者。在罗兰·巴特、茨维坦·托多罗夫和劳拉·穆尔维等经典理论家的基础上，2026年大纲明确提到了何塞·范·迪克（平台社会）、萨菲亚·乌莫贾·诺布尔（算法偏见）和大卫·赫斯蒙德夫（文化产业）。这意味着学生必须自如地将2015年后的学术成果应用于当前媒体现象。
Additionally, the concept of 'post-truth' and theories of misinformation have gained prominence. In the new specification, students are expected to critically analyse news sources, deepfakes, and the role of social media algorithms in creating echo chambers. This aligns with Media Studies' growing role in digital literacy education.
此外，“后真相”概念和错误信息理论变得突出。在新大纲中，学生需要批判性地分析新闻来源、深度伪造以及社交媒体算法在制造回音室中的作用。这与媒体研究在数字素养教育中日益重要的角色相符。
11. Media Ethics and AI-Generated Content | 媒体伦理与人工智能生成内容
One of the most talked-about additions to the 2026 curriculum is the explicit inclusion of AI ethics. Candidates must grapple with questions surrounding generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Midjourney) and their implications for content creation, copyright, and journalistic integrity. The syllabus encourages debate on whether AI-assisted media can be considered creative or trustworthy.
2026年课程中最受关注的新增内容之一是明确纳入AI伦理。考生必须思考围绕生成式AI工具（如ChatGPT、Midjourney）及其对内容创作、版权和新闻诚信的影响所产生的问题。大纲鼓励就AI辅助媒体是否可被视为创造性或可信展开辩论。
Teachers and students should engage with real-world case studies, such as newsroom policies on AI usage or controversies over AI-generated influencers. In the exam, this topic often appears in Section B of Paper 1 or as a discussion point in the evaluation essay of Paper 2, requiring a nuanced position that considers both innovation and regulation.
师生应研究真实案例，例如新闻编辑室AI使用政策或AI生成网红的争议。在考试中，该话题常出现在试卷一B部分或作为试卷二评价论文的讨论点，需要一种兼顾创新与监管的细致立场。
12. Preparation Strategies for 2026 | 2026年备考策略
To excel in the 2026 Media Studies exam, active engagement with contemporary media is non-negotiable. Maintain a media diary tracking your consumption across platforms and note how theoretical concepts apply in real time. Regularly deconstruct set products against the updated specification checklist, paying close attention to the new cross-media and digital requirements.
要在2026年媒体研究考试中脱颖而出，积极接触当代媒体是不容商量的。坚持记录媒体日记，追踪你跨平台的消费习惯，并记录理论概念如何实时适用。定期对照更新的大纲清单解构规定产品，尤其关注新的跨媒体和数字化要求。
Practice writing under timed conditions using past paper questions adapted to the 2026 style. Focus on building fluent transitions between theory, textual evidence, and evaluation. Form study groups to debate controversial topics such as AI content and media ownership, as discussion sharpens evaluative vocabulary. Finally, use the tutor and examiner resources at aleveler.com to access model essays and mark scheme breakdowns tailored to the 2026 format.
使用贴近2026年风格的历年真题进行限时写作练习。专注于在理论、文本证据和评价之间构建流畅的过渡。组建学习小组辩论人工智能内容和媒体所有权等争议话题，因为讨论能够凝练评价性词汇。最后，利用aleveler.com上的导师和考官资源，获取针对2026年格式的范文和评分方案解析。
Published by TutorHao | Media Studies Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图