📚 A-Level Eduqas Media Studies: 2026 Exam Changes and Trends | A-Level Eduqas 媒体研究：2026年考试变化与趋势
The media landscape evolves at an extraordinary pace, and Eduqas regularly updates its A Level Media Studies specification to keep students engaged with the most relevant and challenging content. For the 2026 examination series, a number of significant changes have been announced that will affect both the taught curriculum and the way candidates are assessed. These revisions reflect shifts in industry practice, digital convergence, audience behaviour and academic media theory. This article outlines the key updates, examines new Close Study Products, and explores the emerging trends that teachers and learners need to understand in order to succeed in the 2026 Eduqas A Level Media Studies exams.
媒体格局以惊人的速度演变，Eduqas 定期更新其 A Level 媒体研究课程大纲，以确保学生接触最相关且富有挑战性的内容。针对 2026 年考试系列，已公布若干重大变化，这些变化将同时影响教学内容与考生的评估方式。这些修订反映了行业实践、数字融合、受众行为以及学术媒体理论的变迁。本文概述了关键更新，审视了新的指定研究产品，并探讨了教师与学习者成功应对 2026 年 Eduqas A Level 媒体研究考试所需理解的新兴趋势。
1. Overview of the 2026 Specification Update | 2026年大纲更新概览
Eduqas has confirmed that from September 2024, a revised A Level Media Studies specification will be taught, with first assessment in summer 2026. The new specification retains the familiar three‑component structure but introduces refreshed Close Study Products (CSPs), updated theoretical frameworks, and a greater weighting on contemporary digital media forms. The proportion of unseen media products in examination will increase, testing students' ability to apply analytical skills to unfamiliar texts in the same media forms they have studied. This move is designed to discourage rote learning and reward genuine critical thinking.
Eduqas 已确认，自 2024 年 9 月起将教授修订后的 A Level 媒体研究课程大纲，首次评估于 2026 年夏季进行。新大纲保留了熟悉的三部分结构，但引入了更新的指定研究产品（CSP）、修订的理论框架，并加大了对当代数字媒体形式的重视。考试中非指定媒体产品的比例将增加，以测试学生将分析技能应用于与其所学媒体形式相同的不熟悉文本的能力。此举旨在抑制死记硬背，奖励真正的批判性思维。
The 2026 specification also places greater emphasis on issues of representation, global media industries, and the impact of algorithm-driven platforms. Students will need to engage with concepts such as datafication, influencer culture, and transmedia storytelling across all three components. A new mandatory area of study — 'Media, Technology and Society' — has been woven into Components 1 and 2, ensuring that learners examine the social and ethical dimensions of emerging technologies.
2026 年大纲还更加强调表征问题、全球媒体产业以及算法驱动平台的影响。学生需要在所有三个部分中参与数据化、影响者文化和跨媒体叙事等概念。一个新的必修研究领域——“媒体、技术与社会”——已被融入组件 1 和组件 2，确保学习者检视新兴技术的社会与伦理维度。
2. New Close Study Products (CSPs) for 2026 | 2026年新指定研究产品
Eduqas has replaced approximately forty per cent of the previous CSPs with contemporary products that better reflect the digital first media environment. The new CSPs for 2026 include a streaming television drama series, a podcast series, an online newspaper, a music video by an independent artist distributed via YouTube, and a social media campaign by a non‑profit organisation. These products have been selected to provide a balanced range of media forms, genres and institutional contexts, and to raise questions about the changing nature of production, distribution and consumption.
Eduqas 已将大约 40% 的旧 CSP 替换为更能反映数字化优先媒体环境的当代产品。2026 年的新 CSP 包括一部流媒体电视连续剧、一个播客系列、一份在线报纸、一首由独立艺人通过 YouTube 发行的音乐视频，以及一个非营利组织的社交媒体宣传活动。这些产品经过挑选，以提供均衡的媒体形式、类型和机构背景，并对生产、发行与消费的变化属性提出疑问。
Notable additions for Component 1 are a Netflix true‑crime documentary series and a video game with a strong user‑generated content element. For Component 2, teachers can now select from a refreshed set of options including a mainstream blockbuster film and its marketing campaign, an alternative print magazine, and a radio programme available exclusively on a streaming audio platform. The full list is published in the Eduqas CSP booklet, and it is vital that centres use only the 2026 approved products.
组件 1 值得注意的新增内容是一部 Netflix 真实罪案纪录片系列，以及一款具有强烈用户生成内容元素的视频游戏。对于组件 2，教师现在可以从一套更新的选项中进行选择，包括一部主流大制作电影及其营销活动、一本另类印刷杂志，以及一档仅在流媒体音频平台上提供的广播节目。完整列表已在 Eduqas CSP 手册中发布，各中心务必仅使用 2026 年批准的产品。
3. Changes to Component 1: Media Products, Industries and Audiences | 组件1的变化：媒体产品、产业与受众
Component 1 remains a written examination of two hours fifteen minutes, but its structure has been refined. Section A, 'Analysing Media Language and Representation', now features two unseen media products taken from the same media forms as the CSPs studied. One of these products will always be an online or social media text, such as a TikTok video, a Twitter thread or an interactive website. Students must compare this unseen product with a relevant CSP, demonstrating their ability to transfer analytical frameworks and consider how media language constructs meaning and representation in different contexts.
组件 1 仍为两小时十五分钟的笔试，但其结构得到了优化。A 部分“分析媒体语言与表征”现在包含两个取自与所学 CSP 相同媒体形式的非指定媒体产品。其中一件产品始终是在线或社交媒体文本，例如 TikTok 视频、Twitter 推文串或互动网站。学生必须将该非指定产品与相关 CSP 进行比较，展示他们迁移分析框架的能力，并考虑媒体语言如何在不同语境中构建意义与表征。
Section B, 'Understanding Media Industries and Audiences', has been updated to include questions on platform economics and algorithmic curation. Candidates might be asked to explain how a streaming service’s recommendation algorithm affects audience engagement with a CSP, or to discuss the implications of a newspaper’s shift to a digital‑first business model. The command words 'evaluate' and 'justify' appear more frequently, reflecting a higher demand for reasoned argument and the application of audience theories such as uses and gratifications, fandom and the end of audience.
B 部分“理解媒体产业与受众”已更新，包含有关平台经济学和算法策划的问题。考生可能被要求解释流媒体服务的推荐算法如何影响受众对某 CSP 的参与，或讨论报纸转向数字化优先商业模式的影响。指令词“评价”和“论证”出现得更频繁，反映出对理性论证和受众理论（如使用与满足、粉丝文化以及受众的终结）应用的更高要求。
4. Changes to Component 2: Media Forms and Products in Depth | 组件2的变化：媒体形式与产品深度研究
Component 2 remains a two‑hour thirty‑minute paper assessing three in‑depth studies from different media forms. The 2026 revision gives centres more flexibility; they choose one product from each of the three sections: Television, Magazines, and Online, Social and Participatory Media. For the first time, the Television section includes a choice between a long‑form streaming series and a public service broadcast programme, allowing schools to tailor the course to their students’ interests.
组件 2 仍为两小时三十分钟的试卷，评估三个来自不同媒体形式的深度研究。2026 年修订赋予了各中心更大的灵活性；他们从电视、杂志以及在线、社交与参与式媒体这三个部分中各选择一个产品。电视部分首次提供了长格式流媒体剧集与公共服务广播节目之间的选择，使学校能够根据学生的兴趣定制课程。
The Online, Social and Participatory Media section now mandates the study of a participatory platform such as a wiki, a fandom site or a creator‑driven platform like Patreon. This change reflects the growing importance of produsage and the blurring of producer‑audience boundaries. Questions increasingly require comparisons between historical CSPs and their contemporary counterparts, prompting learners to contextualise media products within the economic, political and cultural frameworks of their time.
在线、社交与参与式媒体部分现在要求研究一个参与式平台，如维基、粉丝网站或像 Patreon 这样的创作者驱动平台。这一变化反映了生产性使用以及生产者与受众界限模糊化的日益重要性。问题越来越多地要求将历史 CSP 与其当代对应物进行比较，促使学习者将媒体产品置于其时代的经济、政治和文化框架中进行语境化。
5. Component 3: Non-Exam Assessment (NEA) Modifications | 组件3：非考试评估修改
The NEA continues to account for thirty per cent of the A Level qualification, but the 2026 briefs have been redesigned to foster creativity and authentic digital production. Students must still create a cross‑media production in response to a set brief, but the brief now explicitly encourages the use of emerging formats such as short‑form vertical video, interactive social media stories or augmented reality (AR) filters. Technical skill is still assessed, but the marking criteria reward experimentation and a clear understanding of the chosen platform’s conventions and audience expectations.
NEA 仍占 A Level 资格的 30%，但 2026 年的命题已重新设计，以促进创意与真实的数字制作。学生仍须根据既定命题制作跨媒体作品，但命题现在明确鼓励使用新兴格式，例如竖屏短视频、互动社交媒体故事或增强现实滤镜。技术技能仍被评估，但评分标准奖励实验精神以及对所选平台惯例和受众期望的清晰理解。
Written submissions must include a digitally formatted Statement of Aims and Intent, which replaces the traditional paper‑based research report. This statement should analyse how the production targets a specific audience, applies relevant media theories and addresses industry contexts. Audio‑visual work can now be submitted entirely online via a secure portal, with an emphasis on streaming‑compatible export settings. The deadline for the 2026 NEA has been brought forward to the February half‑term to allow adequate moderation time.
书面提交必须包括一份数字化格式的《目标与意图声明》，该声明取代了传统的纸质研究报告。该声明应分析作品如何针对特定受众、应用相关媒体理论并处理行业语境。视听作品现在可以通过安全门户完全在线提交，并强调与流媒体兼容的输出设置。2026 年 NEA 的截止日期已提前至二月的期中假，以便留出充足的审核时间。
6. Increased Emphasis on Digital and Social Media | 对数字和社交媒体的强调增加
Digital and social media are no longer treated as supplementary case studies but as central objects of study throughout the specification. In 2026, every section of Components 1 and 2 includes at least one digital or social product. Concepts such as virality, algorithm literacy, data surveillance and platform regulation are embedded within both media language and audience categories. Students must be able to analyse the semiotics of an Instagram feed, the economics of a YouTube channel, and the regulatory challenges of TikTok with the same rigour they apply to broadcast television or print newspapers.
数字与社交媒体不再被视为补充案例研究，而是整个大纲中的核心研究对象。在 2026 年，组件 1 和组件 2 的每个部分都至少包含一个数字或社交产品。诸如病毒式传播、算法素养、数据监控和平台监管等概念被嵌入媒体语言和受众类别之中。学生必须能够以应用于广播电视或纸质报刊相同的严谨性，分析 Instagram 推送的符号学、YouTube 频道的经济学以及 TikTok 的监管挑战。
This shift has prompted the inclusion of new theoretical perspectives. The work of scholars like José van Dijck on platform society, danah boyd on networked publics, and Safiya Umoja Noble on algorithmic bias now appears alongside traditional theorists. Examiners expect candidates to use these names where appropriate, but the focus remains on the application of ideas rather than biographical recall.
这一转变促使纳入新的理论视角。像 José van Dijck 关于平台社会的著作、danah boyd 关于网络公众的著作，以及 Safiya Umoja Noble 关于算法偏见的著作，现在与传统理论家并肩出现。考官期望考生在合适之处使用这些名字，但重点仍在于观点的应用，而非传记式记忆。
7. Theoretical Frameworks: New Thinkers and Concepts | 理论框架：新思想家和概念
The theoretical framework has been expanded to reflect contemporary media scholarship. In addition to the established thinkers, the 2026 specification explicitly references eight new theorists, including Nick Couldry (media as practice), Lisa Gitelman (media as historical subjects), and Wendy Chun (programmed visions and software studies). These additions are designed to equip students with more nuanced tools for analysing digital culture and the materiality of media technologies.
理论框架已得到扩展，以反映当代媒体学术成果。除原有理论家外，2026 年大纲明确引用了八位新理论家，包括 Nick Couldry（作为实践的媒体）、Lisa Gitelman（作为历史主体的媒体）和 Wendy Chun（程序化愿景与软件研究）。这些新增内容旨在为学生提供更精细的工具，以分析数字文化与媒体技术的物质性。
However, the total number of compulsory named theorists has been reduced slightly to prevent content overload. Instead, the specification identifies a set of 'key orienting concepts' — mediation, identity, power, and globalisation — that students must be able to explore through whichever theoretical lens is most appropriate. This approach rewards flexibility and discourages formulaic responses. Past paper mark schemes from 2026 will credit accurate use of any relevant theory, even if it is not on the prescribed list, provided it is correctly applied and sourced.
然而，必修指定理论家的总人数略有减少，以防止内容负担过重。取而代之的是，大纲确定了一套“核心导向概念”——中介、身份认同、权力和全球化——学生必须能够通过最合适的理论视角来探讨这些概念。这种方法奖励灵活性，并抑制公式化回答。2026 年的历年试卷评分方案将对任何相关理论的准确运用给予分数，即使该理论不在规定列表上，只要其应用正确并注明出处即可。
8. Representation and Diversity: Updated Focus | 表征与多样性：更新的焦点
Representation remains a crucial area of study, but the 2026 specification adopts a more intersectional and global approach. CSPs have been chosen to ensure coverage of gender, ethnicity, age, class, disability and sexuality, as well as less frequently explored categories such as neurodiversity and body size. Students are expected to move beyond simple positive/negative binary analysis and to explore how media representations can be both progressive and regressive simultaneously, depending on the context and audience interpretation.
表征仍是一个关键研究领域，但 2026 年大纲采用了更为交叉性和全球化的方法。所选 CSP 确保了性别、种族、年龄、阶级、残疾和性取向的覆盖，还包括了神经多样性和体型等较少被探讨的类别。学生应超越简单的积极/消极二元分析，探讨媒体表征如何根据语境和受众解读同时具有进步性和倒退性。
Section B of Component 2 now includes a mandatory comparative question that asks candidates to analyse representations in two CSPs, one historical and one contemporary. This encourages learners to track how representations of a particular social group have evolved in response to social change, audience activism, and industry pressures. The work of theorists such as Stuart Hall, bell hooks and Paul Gilroy continues to be essential, but students may also draw on more recent scholarship concerning decolonising media and inclusive design.
组件 2 的 B 部分现在包含一道必答的比较题，要求考生分析两个 CSP（一个历史、一个当代）中的表征。这鼓励学习者追踪某一特定社会群体的表征如何因应社会变迁、受众行动主义和行业压力而演变。Stuart Hall、bell hooks 和 Paul Gilroy 等理论家的著作依然至关重要，但学生也可以借鉴有关去殖民化媒体和包容性设计的最新学术成果。
9. Exam Paper Structure and Question Types | 试卷结构与题型
The overall structure of the examination papers has been streamlined to allow more time for extended writing. Component 1 now contains four longer questions instead of five, with the final twenty‑mark essay bringing together knowledge from across the entire specification. Component 2 still has three sections, but each section now comprises one fifteen‑mark and one thirty‑mark question. The thirty‑mark question is synoptic, requiring candidates to connect their in‑depth study with the broader media contexts and theoretical frameworks introduced throughout the course.
试卷的整体结构得到了精简，以便为扩展写作留出更多时间。组件 1 现在包含四道较长的题目，而非五道，最后一道 20 分的论述题汇集了整个大纲的知识。组件 2 仍包含三个部分，但每部分现在由一道 15 分和一道 30 分的题目组成。30 分题目是综合性的，要求考生将其深度研究与贯穿课程始终的更广泛媒体语境和理论框架联系起来。
New question types include 'stimulus‑response' tasks where candidates are provided with a short extract or data set and must answer a series of linked questions. For example, a graph showing YouTube engagement metrics for a CSP might be accompanied by questions on audience behaviour, platform economics, and media regulation. Multiple‑choice questions have been removed entirely from both components, reinforcing the focus on extended prose and evidence‑based argument.
新题型包括“刺激‑反应”任务，考生会获得一段简短摘录或数据集，并必须回答一系列关联问题。例如，显示某 CSP 的 YouTube 参与度指标的图表可能伴随有关受众行为、平台经济学和媒体监管的问题。选择题已从两个组件中完全移除，强化了对扩展散文和基于证据的论证的重视。
10. Marking Criteria and Assessment Objectives | 评分标准与评估目标
The assessment objectives (AOs) remain unchanged: AO1 (knowledge and understanding), AO2 (application of knowledge and analysis) and AO3 (evaluation and judgement). However, their distribution across components has been adjusted. In Component 1, AO3 now carries a fifteen per cent heavier weighting, reflecting the increased emphasis on evaluation and the ability to form critical judgements. In the NEA, AO3 has been elevated to twenty per cent, with candidates required to evaluate their own production choices and justify how they have met the brief.
评估目标（AO）保持不变：AO1（知识与理解）、AO2（知识应用与分析）以及 AO3（评价与判断）。然而，它们在各个组件中的分布有所调整。在组件 1 中，AO3 现在的权重增加了 15%，反映出对评价和形成批判性判断能力的进一步强调。在 NEA 中，AO3 已提升至 20%，要求考生评价自己的制作选择，并论证其如何满足命题要求。
Top‑band descriptors now require explicit reference to historical, cultural and economic contexts in every answer, even when the question does not directly ask for it. Candidates who can integrate contexts seamlessly into their analysis will be rewarded, while those who treat context as a bolt‑on paragraph will struggle to achieve the highest marks. Mark schemes for 2026 also include a new 'digital literacy' descriptor, assessing a candidate’s ability to use media‑specific terminology accurately when discussing online and interactive products.
最高评分档的描述现在要求每个答案明确提及历史、文化和经济语境，即使问题未直接要求。能够将语境无缝融入分析中的考生将获得奖励，而那些将语境处理为附加段落的人将难以获得最高分。2026 年的评分方案还包括一个新的“数字素养”描述，评估考生在讨论在线和互动产品时准确使用媒体特定术语的能力。
11. Preparing for the 2026 Exams: Study Strategies | 备考2026：学习策略
Success in the 2026 exams requires a shift towards analytical independence. Rote memorisation of CSP facts and theories will not suffice. Students should engage regularly with a wide range of media products beyond the CSP set, building a personal 'media diet' that includes news, entertainment, advertising and user‑generated content from diverse global sources. Keeping a media journal where they apply theoretical concepts to daily media encounters is an effective way to develop fluency.
成功应对 2026 年考试需要转向分析独立性。对 CSP 事实和理论的死记硬背将不够。学生应定期接触 CSP 系列之外的各种媒体产品，构建个人“媒体食谱”，包括来自全球多元来源的新闻、娱乐、广告和用户生成内容。坚持记录媒体日志，将理论概念应用于日常媒体接触，是培养流畅度的有效方法。
Active revision techniques such as comparative grids, mind‑mapping connections between CSPs and theoretical frameworks, and timed essay practice under exam conditions are recommended. Past papers from the 2024–2025 series remain useful for practising foundational skills, but full 2026 specimen papers should be used to familiarise candidates with the new question formats and synoptic demands. Many centres will run mock exams using these specimens in early 2026 to diagnose areas for improvement.
推荐采用积极的复习技巧，例如比较表格、连接 CSP 与理论框架的思维导图，以及在考试条件下进行限时作文练习。2024 至 2025 年系列的历年试卷仍可用于练习基本技能，但应使用完整的 2026 年样卷，使考生熟悉新题型和综合性要求。许多中心将在 2026 年初使用这些样卷进行模拟考试，以诊断需要改进的领域。
12. Conclusion: Embracing the Changes | 结论：拥抱变化
The 2026 Eduqas A Level Media Studies specification represents a significant step forward in aligning classroom study with the realities of a digitally converged, globalised media environment. The changes demand more from students in terms of critical thinking, theoretical application and creative digital production, but they also offer richer opportunities for genuine engagement with the media that shapes our world. By understanding the new structure, mastering the updated CSPs and embracing an active, enquiry‑led approach to learning, candidates can approach the 2026 exams with confidence and achieve outstanding results.
2026 年 Eduqas A Level 媒体研究大纲是将课堂学习与数字化融合、全球化媒体环境的现实相结合的重要一步。这些变化在批判性思维、理论应用和创意数字制作方面对学生提出了更高要求，但也为真正参与塑造我们世界的媒体提供了更丰富的机会。通过理解新结构、掌握更新的 CSP 并采取积极、探究驱动的学习方法，考生可以满怀信心地迎接 2026 年考试，并取得优异成绩。
Published by TutorHao | Media Studies Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图