📚 Eduqas AS Philosophy: 2026 Exam Changes and Trends | Eduqas AS 哲学：2026年考试变化与趋势
Starting from the 2026 examination series, Eduqas is introducing a range of updates to its AS Level Philosophy specification. These changes are designed to strengthen conceptual clarity, encourage deeper comparative thinking, and align assessment more closely with university-level philosophical skills. Whether you are a student or a teacher, understanding these shifts now will help you prepare effectively for the new papers.
从2026年考试系列开始，Eduqas 将对其 AS 哲学课程大纲进行一系列更新。这些变化旨在强化概念清晰度，鼓励更深层的比较性思维，并使评估更贴近大学水平的哲学技能。无论你是学生还是老师，现在理解这些变化将有助于你为新的试卷做好有效准备。
1. Updated Specification Structure | 更新后的课程大纲结构
The most visible change for the 2026 cohort is a reorganisation of the specification content. While the core themes of epistemology, philosophy of religion, and ethics remain, the order of topics has been streamlined, and some subtopics have been merged to reduce overlap and assessment complexity.
对于2026届考生来说，最明显的变化是课程大纲内容的重新组织。虽然知识论、宗教哲学和伦理学的核心主题保持不变，但主题顺序得到了精简，一些子主题被合并以减少重复和评估的复杂性。
For example, the section on 'Perception as a Source of Knowledge' now explicitly integrates direct realism, indirect realism, and idealism under a single comparative heading, rather than treating them as fully separate units. This encourages students to see connections earlier in the course.
例如，'作为知识来源的知觉'这一部分现在明确地将直接实在论、间接实在论和观念论整合在一个比较性的标题下，而不是将它们作为完全独立的单元来处理。这鼓励学生在课程的早期阶段就看到其中的联系。
In ethics, the division between normative ethical theories and applied ethics has been blurred intentionally to promote real-time application of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics to issues such as animal ethics and lying.
在伦理学中，规范伦理理论与应用伦理学之间的界限被有意模糊，以促进将功利主义、义务论和美德伦理实时应用于动物伦理和说谎等问题。
2. Enhanced Assessment Objectives | 强化的评估目标
Eduqas has revised the weighting of Assessment Objectives (AOs) for the 2026 AS Philosophy exams. AO1 (knowledge and understanding) now accounts for 40% instead of 50%, while AO2 (analysis and evaluation) has increased to 60%. This shift signals a greater demand for critical engagement rather than mere recall.
Eduqas 已经修改了2026年 AS 哲学考试中评估目标（AOs）的权重。AO1（知识与理解）现在占40%，而不再是50%，同时 AO2（分析与评价）增加到60%。这一转变意味着对批判性参与的要求更高，而非仅仅是回忆。
This means that longer essay questions will reward students who can construct a line of argument, weigh competing views, and reach a justified conclusion. Simply outlining a thinker's position will no longer be sufficient for top marks.
这意味着较长的论文题将奖励那些能够构建论证线索、权衡对立观点并得出合理结论的学生。仅仅概述一位思想家的立场将不再足以获得最高分数。
Teachers are advised to integrate more 'agree/disagree' mini-tasks into lessons, while students should practise writing evaluative paragraphs that go beyond 'some people might say' and instead engage with the logical strength of arguments.
建议教师在课堂上融入更多的'同意/不同意'小任务，而学生应该练习撰写评价性段落，超越'有人可能会说'，转而关注论证的逻辑力度。
3. Greater Emphasis on Comparative Analysis | 更强调比较分析
A distinctive feature of the 2026 exam series is the inclusion of explicitly comparative questions in all components. For instance, a question might ask: 'Compare how indirect realism and Berkeley's idealism account for perceptual error.' Previously, such cross-theory synthesis was largely confined to top-band essays.
2026年考试系列的一个显著特点是在所有部分都包含了明确的比较性问题。例如，一个问题可能会问：'比较间接实在论和贝克莱的观念论如何解释知觉错误。'以前，这种跨理论的综合主要局限于最高等级的论文。
To support this, the mark scheme now allocates a specific strand to 'comparative insight' within the AO2 criteria. Students are expected to identify not only points of convergence but also the underlying metaphysical commitments that drive theories apart.
为了支持这一点，评分方案现在在 AO2 标准中为'比较洞察力'分配了一个特定的分支。学生不仅需要识别出趋同点，还要找出推动理论分歧的底层形而上学承诺。
When revising, create comparison grids that place theories side by side on key issues: the nature of reality, the role of God, the basis of moral obligation. This visual mapping makes it easier to generate sophisticated comparative arguments under timed conditions.
在复习时，创建比较表格，将各种理论在关键问题上并排展示：实在的本质、上帝的作用、道德义务的基础。这种视觉化的映射使得在限时条件下更容易产生精深的比较论证。
4. Integration of Contemporary Philosophical Issues | 当代哲学问题的融入
The 2026 specification introduces 'Contemporary Connections' boxes within each major theme. These are not directly examined as standalone topics, but are intended to inform students' evaluative judgements and can be used to develop A* evaluative points.
2026年的课程大纲在每个主要主题中都引入了'当代联系'方框。这些内容不作为独立主题直接考核，但旨在为学生的评价性判断提供信息，并可用于发展 A* 级别的评价要点。
For example, under the topic of religious experience, students are encouraged to explore the implications of neurotheology and the so-called 'God helmet' experiments for the veridicality of mystical experiences. Similarly, in ethics, discussion of effective altruism and algorithmic fairness bring modern relevance to utilitarianism and Kantian duties.
例如，在宗教经验的主题下，鼓励学生探索神经神学以及所谓的'上帝头盔'实验对神秘经验真实性的影响。同样，在伦理学中，关于有效利他主义和算法公平性的讨论为功利主义和康德式的义务带来了现代相关性。
While these connections are not mandatory knowledge, examiners' reports indicate that candidates who use them appropriately to nuance their essays are more likely to be placed in the highest mark band.
虽然这些联系不是必修知识，但考官报告指出，能够恰当运用它们来使论文更细致的考生更有可能被列入最高分数段。
5. Changes in Marking Criteria | 评分标准的变化
Alongside the shift in AO weighting, Eduqas has refined the level descriptors for AS Philosophy. The new criteria place less emphasis on the sheer number of arguments presented and more on the depth of philosophical engagement and the logical coherence of the overall response.
随着 AO 权重的变化，Eduqas 还完善了 AS 哲学的等级描述。新的标准较少强调所提出论点的数量，而更重视哲学参与的深度以及整体回答的逻辑连贯性。
In particular, the phrase 'sustained philosophical argument' now appears in the descriptors for Levels 4 and 5. This means that essays which jump rapidly from one point to another without development will be capped at a lower level, even if they display broad knowledge.
特别是，'持续的哲学论证'这一短语现在出现在等级4和5的描述中。这意味着那些没有发展就迅速从一个点跳到另一个点的论文将被限制在较低等级，即使它们展示了广泛的知识。
Students should focus on developing two or three core arguments in real depth, anticipating counterclaims and responding to them, rather than trying to cover every possible theory on a topic.
学生应该集中精力深入展开两到三个核心论证，预判反驳并对之做出回应，而不是试图涵盖一个主题中所有可能的理论。
6. Revised Textbook and Resource Alignment | 修订后的教材与资源对齐
The main Eduqas-endorsed textbooks have been updated for the 2026 specification. Key changes include new sections on comparative essay planning, updated glossaries that reflect the precise wording of the specification, and worked examples of 25-mark answers with examiner commentary in the new style.
与 Eduqas 官方认可的主要教材已经为2026年课程大纲进行了更新。主要变化包括新增比较性论文规划的章节、反映课程大纲精确措辞的更新词汇表，以及带有新风格考官评语的25分答案范例。
Online resources are also being expanded. The Eduqas Digital Resources website now hosts a bank of specimen assessment materials that replicate the new comparative command words such as 'Critically compare' and 'Assess the relative merits of...'.
在线资源也在扩展。Eduqas 数字资源网站现在提供了一个样本评估材料库，这些材料复制了新的比较性指令词，如'批判性地比较'和'评估……的相对优点'。
Additionally, students should be aware that some older revision guides circulating online may reflect the pre-2026 structure. Always check that any resource explicitly states it matches the '2026 specification onwards' when supplementing your study.
此外，学生应该注意，网上流传的一些较旧的复习指南可能反映的是2026年之前的结构。在补充学习时，务必检查任何资源是否明确标明其匹配'2026年及以后课程大纲'。
7. Digital Assessment Preparation | 数字化评估准备
While the 2026 AS Philosophy exams remain paper-based, Eduqas is encouraging centres to prepare students for eventual on-screen assessment by incorporating digital literacy in philosophical contexts. This includes the ability to extract arguments from online articles, evaluate the credibility of digital sources, and structure typed responses.
虽然2026年的 AS 哲学考试仍为纸质考试，但 Eduqas 鼓励各考试中心通过在哲学背景下融入数字素养，为学生最终的屏幕评估做好准备。这包括从在线文章中提取论证、评估数字来源的可信度以及构建打字回答的能力。
Practice questions are now available in digital format on the Eduqas secure website, and some schools are piloting the use of simple word-processing tasks in mock exams. Although not yet part of the live assessment, developing typing fluency for philosophical essays is recommended, especially for students who plan to continue to A2.
练习题现已在 Eduqas 安全网站上提供数字格式，一些学校正在模拟考试中试行简单的文字处理任务。虽然尚未成为正式评估的一部分，但建议学生为哲学论文培养打字流畅度，特别是对于那些计划继续学习 A2 的学生。
8. Skills Focus: Argument Diagramming | 技能聚焦：论证图解
One of the most interesting methodological shifts in the 2026 teacher guidance is the endorsement of argument diagramming as a revision and planning tool. This approach, common in university philosophy departments, involves mapping out premises, intermediate conclusions, and the main thesis using a visual structure.
2026年教师指南中最有趣的方法论转变之一，是将论证图解作为一种复习和规划工具予以认可。这种方法在大学的哲学系中很常见，它涉及使用可视化结构勾勒出前提、中间结论和主论点。
While students will not be required to produce diagrams in the exam, the guidance suggests that practising argument diagramming at home can dramatically improve the internal coherence of essays. It trains students to see the inferential relationships that hold a philosophical argument together, rather than treating an essay as a list of disconnected points.
虽然不要求学生在考试中制作图解，但指南建议，在家练习论证图解可以极大地提高论文的内在连贯性。它训练学生看到维系一个哲学论证的推理关系，而不是将论文视为一系列不相连的要点。
Consider using simple tools like mind-mapping software or even a blank sheet of paper to map an argument like 'Anselm's ontological argument' before writing under timed conditions. Identify where the logical weakness lies and plan your critique around that node.
考虑在限时写作之前，使用简单的工具如思维导图软件甚至一张白纸来绘制一个论证，比如'安瑟伦的本体论论证'。找出逻辑弱点所在，并围绕那个节点规划你的批判。
9. Changes to Source Material in Exams | 考试中原始材料的变化
In the 2026 exam, the extracts provided for the compulsory two-part questions will be slightly shorter but more conceptually dense. This means that students will spend less time reading, but must be quicker at identifying the core philosophical claim and its supporting reasoning.
在2026年的考试中，为必答的两部分问题提供的选段将稍短，但概念密度更高。这意味着学生阅读的时间将减少，但必须更快地识别出核心哲学主张及其支撑推理。
Moreover, the extracts may now come from a wider range of sources, including contemporary journal articles and public philosophy blogs, adapted to the AS level. This change is intended to encourage students to engage with living philosophical discourse, not just classic texts.
此外，这些选段现在可能来自更广泛的范围，包括当代期刊文章和公共哲学博客，并改编到 AS 水平。这一变化旨在鼓励学生参与活的哲学对话，而不仅仅是经典文本。
A useful preparation strategy is to read short philosophy pieces from publications like 'Philosophy Now' or 'The Philosophers' Magazine' and practise summarising the argument structure in two or three sentences.
一个有用的准备策略是阅读来自'Philosophy Now'或'The Philosophers' Magazine'等出版物的简短哲学文章，并练习用两三句话概括其论证结构。
10. Future Trends: AI and Philosophy Assessment | 未来趋势：人工智能与哲学评估
Looking beyond 2026, Eduqas has signalled in its curriculum review documents that philosophy assessments will need to adapt to the presence of large language models. While the 2026 exams remain secure, teachers are being advised to place greater value on the process of doing philosophy — such as drafting, peer critique, and oral defence of ideas — rather than exclusively on final written products.
展望2026年以后，Eduqas 在其课程审查文件中表示，哲学评估将需要适应大型语言模型的存在。虽然2026年的考试仍然安全，但建议教师更加重视做哲学的过程——如起草、同伴互评和口头辩护——而不仅仅是最终的书面成果。
For students, this means that the skills of genuine philosophical dialogue and independent critical thought will become even more central to examination success in the coming years. Engaging in discussion, challenging your own assumptions, and crafting arguments from first principles are abilities that no AI can authentically replicate under exam conditions.
对学生来说，这意味着真正的哲学对话和独立批判性思维的技能在未来几年对考试成功将变得更加核心。参与讨论、挑战自己的假设以及从第一原理出发构建论证，是任何人工智能在考试条件下都无法真正复制的。
11. Recommended Revision Approach for the 2026 Papers | 2026年试卷的推荐复习方法
Given the changes outlined, a strategic revision plan for 2026 AS Philosophy should pivot from passive reading to active, comparative, and evaluative tasks. Here is a concise checklist to guide your preparation:
鉴于上述变化，针对2026年 AS 哲学的战略性复习计划应从被动阅读转向主动的、比较性和评价性的任务。以下是一份简明的清单来指导你的准备：
Create comparison tables for all major theories — include triads of realism/idealism, utilitarianism/deontology/virtue, design/cosmological/ontological.
为所有主要理论创建比较表格——包括实在论/观念论、功利主义/义务论/美德伦理、设计论/宇宙论/本体论的三方比较。
Practise writing timed essays under the new AO2 weighting, spending at least half the time on evaluation rather than exposition.
在计时条件下练习写作，适应新的 AO2 权重，至少将一半时间用于评价而不是阐述。
Incorporate one 'contemporary connection' into each practice essay to build fluency in linking classical arguments to current debates.
在每篇练习论文中融入一个'当代联系'，以培养将经典论证与当前辩论联系起来的流利度。
Download the 2026 sample assessment materials from the Eduqas secure website and familiarise yourself with the new question stems.
从 Eduqas 安全网站下载2026年样本评估材料，熟悉新的问题提示语。
By aligning your revision with these trends early, you position yourself not just to meet the demands of the new exams but to thoroughly enjoy the richer philosophical thinking they encourage.
通过尽早使你的复习与这些趋势保持一致，你不仅能满足新考试的要求，还能充分享受它们所鼓励的更丰富的哲学思考。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图