📚 AS WJEC Law: Case Analysis Practical Exercises | AS WJEC 法律：案例分析实战演练
Case analysis is at the heart of AS WJEC Law. It requires you to deconstruct judicial decisions, identify legal principles, and apply them to new situations. This article offers a step-by-step practical guide, complete with real-world illustrations and a hands-on exercise, to build your confidence and exam technique.
案例分析是 AS WJEC 法律课程的核心。它要求你解构司法判决、识别法律原则，并将其应用于新情境。本文提供分步实战指南，辅以真实案例说明和动手练习，帮助你建立信心并提升应试技巧。
1. Reading a Law Report: Facts and Parties | 阅读判例报告：事实与当事人
Before you can analyse any case, you must read the law report with care. Identify the parties—the claimant who brings the action and the defendant who defends it—and note the court in which the case was heard. In 'Donoghue v Stevenson' [1932] AC 562, the claimant was Mrs Donoghue, who discovered a decomposing snail in a bottle of ginger beer; the defendant was the manufacturer, Stevenson. The material facts are the core events that gave rise to the dispute and form the foundation for all subsequent legal reasoning.
在分析任何案件之前，你必须仔细阅读判例报告。要识别当事人——提起索赔的原告和进行抗辩的被告——并注明审理该案的法院。在 "Donoghue v Stevenson" [1932] AC 562 案中，原告是 Donoghue 夫人，她在姜汁啤酒瓶中发现了腐烂的蜗牛；被告是制造商 Stevenson。关键事实是引发争议的核心事件，它们构成了后续所有法律推理的基础。
While reading, pay close attention to the procedural history—whether the case is a first-instance decision or an appeal—and the precise remedy sought by the claimant. Judges choose their language deliberately, so every phrase matters. A good fact summary avoids unnecessary detail but captures every element that could affect the legal outcome: who did what, when, and under what circumstances.
阅读时，要密切注意程序历史——该案是一审判决还是上诉案件——以及原告寻求的具体救济。法官措辞非常谨慎，因此每个措辞都很重要。优秀的事实摘要应避免不必要的细节，但须捕捉所有可能影响法律结果的要素：谁做了什么、何时以及在什么情况下。
2. Spotting the Legal Issues | 识别法律争议点
Once you have mastered the facts, you must pinpoint the legal issue or issues the court had to decide. Issues are typically framed as questions: 'Does a manufacturer owe a duty of care to the ultimate consumer of its product in the absence of a contract?' In 'Donoghue v Stevenson', this was the central issue. You should be able to distinguish between the legal question—the scope of a duty—and the factual disputes that the parties may have.
一旦你掌握了事实，就必须准确指出法院需要裁定的法律争议点。争议点通常以问题形式呈现："在缺乏合同关系的情况下，制造商是否对产品的最终消费者负有注意义务？" 在 "Donoghue v Stevenson" 案中，这就是核心争议点。你应该能够区分法律问题——义务的范围——和当事人可能存在的的事实争议。
For AS WJEC, you are also expected to separate questions of law from questions of fact. Questions of law, such as the meaning of a statutory term or the existence of a duty, are for the judge to determine. Questions of fact, such as whether a particular event actually occurred, are usually for the jury or the judge sitting alone. Spotting the issues correctly allows you to structure the rest of your analysis logically.
在 AS WJEC 考试中，你还需要区分法律问题与事实问题。法律问题，如某法律术语的含义或注意义务是否存在，由法官决定。事实问题，如某特定事件是否真的发生，则通常由陪审团或独任法官决定。正确识别争点能够让你逻辑清晰地构建后续分析。
3. Locating Relevant Legal Principles: Precedent and Statute | 查找相关法律原则：先例与成文法
After identifying the issues, search for the governing legal rules. These may arise from the common law, built through precedent, or from statutes passed by Parliament. The law of negligence, for instance, was largely developed through cases such as 'Donoghue v Stevenson' and refined in 'Caparo Industries plc v Dickman' [1990]
Published by TutorHao | AS 法律 Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图