📚 AS Edexcel Law: Key Terms Memory Guide | AS 爱德思法律：核心术语速记指南
Mastering legal vocabulary is the foundation of success in AS Edexcel Law. This guide breaks down essential terminology into thematic sections, providing clear English definitions immediately followed by their Chinese counterparts. Use these paired explanations to reinforce your memory and build confidence when tackling problem questions and essays.
掌握法律词汇是在 AS 爱德思法律课程中取得成功的基础。本指南将核心术语按主题分组，提供清晰的英文定义并立即配以对应的中文解释。利用这些配对说明来强化记忆，在应对案例问题和论文时建立信心。
1. Sources of Law | 法律渊源
Legislation (Statute Law): Laws created and passed by Parliament. Acts of Parliament are the highest form of domestic law and can cover any area. They are written in the form of statutes and are binding on all courts.
立法（成文法）：由议会制定并通过的法律。议会法案是国内最高形式的法律，可以涉及任何领域。它们以法规的形式写成，对所有法院都具有约束力。
Delegated Legislation: Law made by bodies other than Parliament, but with Parliament's authority. This includes orders in council, statutory instruments, and by-laws. It allows detailed rules to be made quickly but raises concerns about democratic accountability.
授权立法：由议会以外的机构在议会授权下制定的法律。它包括枢密院令、法定条文和地方法规。授权立法可以快速制定详细规则，但也引发了对民主问责的担忧。
Common Law (Case Law): Law developed by judges through the decisions of courts. It is based on the doctrine of precedent, where similar cases are decided in a similar way to ensure consistency. Common law fills gaps where statute law is silent.
普通法（判例法）：法官通过法院判决发展出来的法律。它基于遵循先例原则，即相似案件以相似方式判决以确保一致性。在成文法未作规定时，普通法填补了空白。
2. Judicial Precedent | 司法先例
Stare Decisis: The Latin phrase meaning 'to stand by things decided'. It is the principle that courts must follow the rulings of higher courts in previous cases with similar material facts, promoting certainty in the law.
遵循先例：拉丁语短语，意为“遵从已判决的事项”。这是一项原则，即法院必须遵循上级法院在以往具有类似重要事实的案件中所作的判决，从而促进法律的确定性。
Ratio Decidendi: The legal reason for a judge's decision. It is the binding part of a judgment that forms precedent and must be followed by lower courts. Identifying the ratio is a key skill in case analysis.
判决理由：法官作出判决的法律依据。这是判决中具有约束力的部分，构成先例，下级法院必须遵循。识别判决理由是案例分析中的一项关键技能。
Obiter Dicta: Remarks made by a judge that are not essential to the decision. 'By the way' comments are not binding but may be highly persuasive, especially if made by a senior judge. An example is Lord Denning's 'neighbour principle' in Donoghue v Stevenson before it became ratio.
附带意见：法官作出的并非判决必要的评论。“顺便提及”的评论不具有约束力，但可能极具说服力，特别是由资深法官作出时。例如丹宁勋爵在Donoghue v Stevenson案中提出的“邻人原则”，后来才成为判决理由。
3. Statutory Interpretation | 法律解释
Literal Rule: Judges give words their plain, ordinary meaning even if the result seems absurd or harsh. The court respects Parliament's exact wording, as seen in Whiteley v Chappell where a dead person could not 'vote'.
字面规则：法官赋予词语其简单、通常的含义，即使结果显得荒谬或严苛。法院尊重议会的确切措辞，如在Whiteley v Chappell案中，死去的人不能“投票”。
Golden Rule: Used to modify the literal rule when it would lead to an absurd result. The narrow approach chooses between two literal meanings; the broad approach modifies the wording to avoid an outcome Parliament could not have intended, as in Re Sigsworth where a son who murdered his mother could not inherit.
黄金规则：当字面规则会导致荒谬结果时用来修正。狭义方法是在两个字面含义中选择；广义方法是修改措辞以避免出现议会不可能意图的结果，如在Re Sigsworth案中，杀害母亲的儿子不能继承遗产。
Mischief Rule: The court examines the 'mischief' the Act was designed to remedy and interprets the words to suppress that mischief. It looks at the common law position before the Act, as in Smith v Hughes about soliciting in the street.
填补漏洞规则：法院审视该法案旨在补救的“漏洞”，并解释词语以制止该漏洞。它考察法案颁布前的普通法状况，如Smith v Hughes案关于在街上拉客。
4. Criminal Liability Basics | 刑事责任基础
Actus Reus: The guilty act. It covers all elements of a crime other than the defendant's state of mind. This can be an act, a failure to act (omission) where there is a duty, or a state of affairs. For murder, it is the unlawful killing of a human being.
犯罪行为：即犯罪行为。它涵盖犯罪中除被告心理状态之外的所有要素。可以是一个作为，有义务时的不作为，或者一种状态。就谋杀罪而言，是指非法杀害一个人。
Mens Rea: The guilty mind. It refers to the mental element required for a particular crime. Examples include intention (direct or oblique) and recklessness. The prosecution must prove both actus reus and mens rea for the defendant to be guilty.
犯罪意图：即犯罪心理。指特定犯罪所要求的心理要素。示例包括故意（直接或间接故意）和轻率。控方必须同时证明犯罪行为和犯罪意图，才能判定被告有罪。
Strict Liability: Offences that do not require proof of mens rea for at least part of the actus reus. The defendant can be convicted simply by doing the prohibited act. Regulatory offences such as selling alcohol to minors are often strict liability, promoting public protection.
严格责任：对于至少部分犯罪行为不要求证明犯罪意图的罪行。被告只要实施了被禁止的行为就可能被定罪。监管类犯罪如向未成年人售酒通常属于严格责任，以促进公众保护。
5. Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person | 人身伤害罪
Assault: An act that causes the victim to apprehend immediate, unlawful personal violence. No physical contact is needed; words alone or a threatening gesture can be an assault. It is a summary offence under the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
企图伤害（威胁罪）：导致被害人担心即将遭受非法人身暴力的行为。不需要实际身体接触；单纯言语或威胁性手势即可构成企图伤害。根据1988年《刑事司法法》，这是一项简易罪行。
Battery: The actual infliction of unlawful force on another person. Touching without consent, even a slight touch, can be battery. It often follows an assault but may occur independently, for example a blow from behind.
殴打（人身侵犯）：对他人实际施加非法暴力。未经同意触碰他人，即使是轻微触碰，也可能构成殴打。它常随企图伤害之后发生，但也可独立发生，如从背后袭击。
ABH (Actual Bodily Harm): Under s.47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, this is assault or battery that causes 'actual bodily harm'. The harm need not be permanent but must be more than transient trifling. Psychiatric injury can amount to ABH.
实际身体伤害：根据1861年《人身伤害罪法》第47条，这是造成“实际身体伤害”的企图伤害或殴打。伤害不必是永久性的，但必须超越轻微短暂的程度。精神伤害可构成实际身体伤害。
6. Tort Law: Negligence | 侵权法：过失侵权
Duty of Care: The first element of negligence. A person owes a duty to those directly affected by their actions. The modern test comes from Caparo v Dickman: foreseeability of damage, proximity between the parties, and it must be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty.
注意义务：过失侵权的第一个要素。一个人对其行为直接影响的人负有注意义务。现代检验标准来自Caparo v Dickman案：损害的可预见性、当事人之间的邻近性，以及施加义务必须公平、公正和合理。
Breach of Duty: The defendant falls below the standard of care expected of a reasonable person. The court considers factors such as the likelihood of harm, the seriousness of potential injury, the cost of precautions, and any special characteristics of the defendant (e.g., a learner driver is judged by the standard of a competent driver).
违反义务：被告的行为未达到合理谨慎者所应具备的标准。法院考量因素包括损害发生的可能性、潜在伤害的严重性、预防措施的成本，以及被告的任何特殊特征（例如，学习驾驶者按合格驾驶员标准评判）。
Causation and Remoteness: The claimant must prove factual causation (the 'but for' test) and legal causation (the breach was a more than minimal cause). The damage must not be too remote; the type of damage must be reasonably foreseeable, as established in The Wagon Mound.
因果关系与损害的遥远性：原告必须证明事实因果关系（“若无则不”标准）和法律因果关系（违反义务是超出最低限度的原因）。损害不能过于遥远；损害类型必须可合理预见，如The Wagon Mound案所确立。
7. Contract Law: Formation | 合同法：合同成立
Offer: An expression of willingness to contract on specific terms, made with the intention that it will become binding upon acceptance. It must be clear and certain, and can be distinguished from an invitation to treat, which is merely an invitation to negotiate (e.g., goods on a shelf in a shop as per Pharmaceutical Society v Boots).
要约：一种愿意按特定条款订立合同的意思表示，并怀有该意思一经承诺即具有约束力的意图。要约必须明确肯定，并可与要约邀请区分开来，后者仅是邀请谈判（如Pharmaceutical Society v Boots案中货架上的商品）。
Acceptance: A final and unqualified expression of assent to the terms of an offer. Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror (except for the postal rule) and must match the terms of the offer exactly; a counter-offer destroys the original offer.
承诺：对要约条款作出的最终且无保留的同意表示。承诺必须传达给要约人（邮政规则除外），且必须与要约条款完全一致；反要约会消灭原要约。
Consideration: Something of value given by each party. It can be a benefit to one party or a detriment to the other. Rules include that consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate, it must not be past, and performance of an existing duty is generally not good consideration, except where there is a practical benefit.
对价：每一方当事人提供的具有价值的东西。可以是一方获得的利益或另一方遭受的损害。规则包括：对价必须充分但不必相当，不能是过去的对价，履行既有义务通常不构成良好对价，除非存在实际利益。
8. Legal Personnel and Courts | 法律人员与法院
Barrister and Solicitor: Barristers are specialist advocates who have rights of audience in all courts and provide expert legal opinions. Solicitors deal directly with clients, prepare cases, and may now also obtain rights to appear in higher courts. Both are professionals regulated by their respective bodies.
出庭律师与事务律师：出庭律师是专业辩护人，在所有法院都有出庭发言权，并提供专家法律意见。事务律师直接与客户打交道、准备案件，现在也可以获得在高级法院出庭的权利。两者都是受各自机构监管的专业人士。
Lay Magistrates: Unpaid, legally unqualified volunteers who hear about 95% of criminal cases in the Magistrates' Court. They sit as a bench of three and deal with summary offences and either-way cases. They rely on a legal adviser for points of law.
非专业治安法官：无偿、不具备法律资格的志愿者，在治安法院审理约95%的刑事案件。他们以三人合议庭形式开庭，处理简易罪行和可选择审判方式的案件。在法律问题上依赖法律顾问。
Jury: A group of 12 randomly selected lay people in the Crown Court who decide the guilt of the defendant based on facts. Their role is to listen to evidence and return a verdict. Juries are independent and ensure community participation in justice, as established by Bushell's Case.
陪审团：在刑事法院由12名随机选出的非专业人士组成的团体，基于事实裁决被告是否有罪。他们的职责是听取证据并作出裁断。陪审团保持独立，并确保社区参与司法，如Bushell's Case案所确立。
9. European Law and Human Rights | 欧洲法律与人权
ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights): An international treaty that protects fundamental rights and freedoms in Europe. The UK incorporated the Convention into domestic law via the Human Rights Act 1998, requiring courts to read legislation compatibly where possible and granting certain remedies.
《欧洲人权公约》：一项保护欧洲基本权利和自由的国际条约。英国通过1998年《人权法》将公约纳入国内法，要求法院尽可能以兼容方式解释立法，并赋予特定救济措施。
Declaration of Incompatibility: A mechanism under the Human Rights Act 1998. If a higher court finds that a UK statute cannot be interpreted compatibly with a Convention right, it may issue a declaration. This does not invalidate the law but signals Parliament to consider amending it.
不一致声明：1998年《人权法》下的一种机制。如果较高级别的法院认为一部英国法律无法解释为与公约权利兼容，它可以发布一份声明。这不使法律无效，但提示议会考虑修改法律。
Preliminary Ruling (EU Law history): Although the UK has left the EU, retained EU law concepts are still relevant. A preliminary ruling allowed national courts to refer questions of EU law to the Court of Justice for a binding interpretation, promoting uniformity.
初步裁决（欧盟法历史）：尽管英国已脱离欧盟，保留的欧盟法概念仍然相关。初步裁决允许国内法院将欧盟法问题提交给欧洲法院以获得具有约束力的解释，从而促进统一性。
10. Key Phrases for Legal Reasoning | 法律推理关键短语
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: The standard of proof in criminal cases. The prosecution must make the jury sure of the defendant's guilt. It does not mean absolute certainty, but no reasonable person could have a doubt based on the evidence.
排除合理怀疑：刑事案件中的证明标准。控方必须让陪审团确信被告有罪。这并不意味着绝对的确定性，但基于证据一个理性的人不会产生怀疑。
Balance of Probabilities: The standard of proof in civil cases. The claimant must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant is liable. If the evidence tips the scales even slightly in the claimant's favour, the burden is discharged.
盖然性权衡：民事案件中的证明标准。原告必须证明被告承担责任的可能性大于不可能性。如果证据使天平即使略微倾向于原告，证明责任即已完成。
Ratio Decidendi / Obiter Dicta (applied): When arguing a case, you must distinguish the binding ratio from non-binding obiter. Cite relevant precedents and apply the stare decisis principle to strengthen your legal reasoning, ensuring you refer to the correct hierarchy of courts.
判决理由与附带意见（应用）：在论证案件时，你必须区分具有约束力的判决理由和不具约束力的附带意见。引用相关先例，运用遵循先例原则来加强你的法律推理，确保引用正确的法院等级。
Published by TutorHao | Law Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图