📚 GCSE CIE Sociology: Teaching Tips and Lesson Plan Sharing | GCSE CIE 社会学：教师教学建议与教案分享
Welcome to this comprehensive guide designed for teachers delivering the CIE IGCSE Sociology syllabus (0495). This article offers practical teaching strategies, lesson planning advice, and ready-to-use ideas that can transform your classroom. Whether you are new to the subject or seeking fresh inspiration, the following sections provide a structured yet flexible approach to engaging students with sociological concepts. The aim is to help you foster critical thinking, link theory to real life, and prepare learners effectively for their examinations. Each section pairs a key suggestion with actionable steps, followed by sample resources and reflection points.
欢迎阅读这份专为教授 CIE IGCSE 社会学（0495）的教师设计的综合指南。本文提供实用的教学策略、教案设计建议和立即可用的课堂创意。无论您是新手教师还是希望寻找新灵感，以下章节都将以一种结构化但灵活的方式，帮助学生参与社会学概念的学习。目标在于培养批判性思维，将理论与现实生活联系起来，并有效帮助学生备考。每个部分都将关键建议与可操作步骤配对，随后附上示例资源和反思要点。
1. Understanding the CIE IGCSE Sociology Syllabus | 理解 CIE IGCSE 社会学大纲
Start by deeply familiarising yourself with the syllabus document. The CIE 0495 syllabus is divided into two papers: Paper 1 (2 hours) covers Theory and Methods, Culture, Identity and Socialisation, and Social Inequality. Paper 2 (1 hour 45 minutes) covers the Family, Education, Crime and Deviance, and the Media. Each paper assesses three Assessment Objectives: AO1 (knowledge and understanding), AO2 (application, analysis and interpretation), and AO3 (evaluation). Knowing the weightings helps you plan lessons that balance content coverage with skill development. For example, AO3 carries significant marks, so regular opportunities for evaluation must be built into schemes of work.
首先，要彻底熟悉大纲文件。CIE 0495 大纲分为两份试卷：试卷一（2 小时）涵盖理论与方法、文化、认同与社会化、社会不平等。试卷二（1 小时 45 分钟）涵盖家庭、教育、犯罪与异常、媒体。每份试卷都评估三个目标：AO1（知识与理解）、AO2（应用、分析与解释）和 AO3（评价）。了解各项权重能够帮助你在教案中平衡内容覆盖与技能培养。例如，AO3 占分较重，因此教学中必须持续提供评价练习。
Create a topic map that clusters related content. For instance, teach Theory and Methods alongside every substantive topic, not as a standalone unit. When you teach the Family, immediately introduce functionalist, Marxist and feminist perspectives so students see how theories apply. This integrated approach prevents the theory section from becoming abstract and last-minute. Also, identify the key studies named in the syllabus and ensure students can recall, summarise and critique them. Print a syllabus checklist for each learner to track progress, which promotes ownership of learning.
创建一张将相关内容聚类的话题地图。例如，将理论与方法融入每一个实质话题中教学，而不是作为独立单元。在教授“家庭”时，立即引入功能主义、马克思主义和女性主义视角，让学生理解理论如何应用。这种整合式方法可以避免理论部分变得抽象和仓促。同时，识别大纲中列出的关键研究，确保学生能够回忆、总结和批评它们。为每位学生打印一份大纲检查清单以追踪进度，这能促进学习的自主性。
2. Effective Lesson Planning: Backward Design | 有效教案设计：以终为始
Begin lesson planning with the end in mind: identify the specific learning outcomes you want students to achieve by the end of the lesson, then design activities and assessments that evidence those outcomes. A clear lesson objective written as "By the end of this lesson, you will be able to explain two reasons for the increase in divorce rates using statistics" gives both you and the students a measurable target. Always share this objective at the start and return to it in the plenary. Use a three-part lesson structure: a starter to activate prior knowledge, a main body with varied tasks, and a plenary that consolidates learning.
教案设计应从终点出发：确定你希望学生在课时结束时达成的具体学习成果，然后设计能证明这些成果的活动与评估。一个清晰的课时目标，如“在本课结束时，你将能够用统计数据解释离婚率上升的两个原因”，为你和学生提供可衡量的目标。务必在课始分享此目标，并在课堂总结时回归它。使用三部分课时结构：激活已有知识的导入、包含多样化任务的主体部分，以及巩固学习的总结。
For a 60-minute lesson on social stratification, you might start with a photograph of a wealthy neighbourhood next to a deprived area to prompt discussion. The main phase could involve a carousel activity with sources about functionalist and Marxist views of class. End by asking students to write a "tweet" summarising one perspective in 140 characters. Always plan for questioning: prepare higher-order questions such as "To what extent do you agree that stratification is necessary?" to stretch thinking. Keep a bank of hinge questions that you can use mid-lesson to check understanding before moving on.
针对一节 60 分钟的社会分层课，你可以用一张富裕社区与贫困区域相邻的照片引发讨论。主体阶段可以设计轮转活动，使用关于功能主义与马克思主义阶级观的资料。最后让学生写一条 140 字符的“推文”总结某一视角。始终为提问做好准备：设计高阶问题，如“你在多大程度上同意分层是必要的？”，以拓展思维。积累一套可在课中用于检查理解情况的“门槛问题”，确保学生跟上再继续。
3. Active Learning Strategies for Sociology | 社会学主动学习策略
Move away from teacher-led lectures by embedding active learning techniques. Sociology thrives on debate, empathy and perspective-taking. Structured debates on whether the nuclear family is still the norm encourage students to use evidence and evaluate. Assign roles such as a functionalist, a feminist and a postmodernist, and let them argue from that standpoint. After the debate, facilitate a reflection on how perspectives shape arguments. Another strategy is "sociology speed-dating": students pair up and have two minutes to explain a concept before rotating, which builds fluency with terminology like "cultural capital" or "relative deprivation".
从以教师讲授为主的模式转向嵌入主动学习技术。社会学的生命力在于辩论、同理心和角色代入。就“核心家庭是否仍是常态”进行结构化辩论，能促使学生运用证据并进行评价。分配诸如功能主义者、女性主义者、后现代主义者等角色，让他们从各自立场展开争论。辩论后，引导学生反思视角如何塑造论点。另一个策略是“社会学快速约会”：学生结对，用两分钟解释一个概念后轮换，这能训练使用“文化资本”或“相对剥夺”等术语的流利度。
Use case-study jigsaws. Divide a complex topic like "explanations for gender differences in education" into sub-topics: teacher labelling, curriculum, peer pressure and parental aspirations. In home groups, each student becomes an expert on one sub-topic, then teaches their peers. This promotes collaborative learning and ensures all students engage with the full picture. Incorporate role play: simulate a social research interview to help learners grasp ethical issues and interviewer bias first-hand. Always debrief these activities by linking back to sociological terminology and exam requirements.
使用拼图式案例教学。将“教育中性别差异的解释”这类复杂主题拆分为子主题：教师贴标签、课程、同伴压力、家长期望。在原始小组中，每个学生成为某一子主题的专家，然后教会同伴。这能促进协作学习，确保所有学生都接触到完整图景。融入角色扮演：模拟一次社会研究访谈，帮助学生亲身体会伦理问题和访谈者偏见。活动结束后，一定要将总结与社会学术语及考试要求联系起来。
4. Teaching Sociological Theories Effectively | 有效教授社会学理论
Theories often intimidate students, but they can be made accessible by rooting them in everyday experience. When introducing functionalism, ask students to list the functions of schools they have experienced – not just academic, but socialisation, selection and custodial functions. Then connect these to Durkheim's ideas on moral education and Parsons on meritocracy. Use the analogy of the human body for organic analogy, drawing a diagram with labels for "institution" and "function". For Marxism, present a classroom scenario where the headteacher's rules benefit certain groups and ask who benefits and who loses, then bridge to concepts of bourgeoisie and proletariat.
理论常令学生畏惧，但通过扎根日常经验可以让它们易于理解。引入功能主义时，请学生列出他们亲历的学校功能——不仅是学术性的，还包括社会化、选拔和监护功能。然后将这些与涂尔干的道德教育思想、帕森斯的英才教育观联系起来。用人体类比来讲解有机体类比，画一张带“制度”和“功能”标签的示意图。对于马克思主义，呈现一个校长规则有利于某些群体的课堂情境，提问谁受益、谁受损，然后过渡到资产阶级和无产阶级的概念。
Create a theory comparison grid that students complete as they progress through the course. Columns can include: view of society, key concepts, strengths, weaknesses and a relevant study. Display this on the classroom wall and revisit regularly. Teach evaluation explicitly: model how to critique a theory using evidence, and provide sentence starters such as "While functionalism highlights stability, it overlooks..." Encourage students to write short "theory snapshots" for each perspective using only 50 words, which aids consolidation and revision.
制作一个随着课程推进由学生完成的观点比较表格。栏目可包括：社会观、核心概念、优点、局限及相关研究。将此表张贴在教室里并定期回顾。明确教授评价技巧：示范如何用证据批评理论，并提供句式提示如“虽然功能主义强调稳定，但它忽视了……”。鼓励学生为每个视角撰写仅 50 字的“理论快照”，这有助于巩固和复习。
5. Data, Research Methods and Practical Investigations | 数据、研究方法与实践调查
Research methods underpin the entire syllabus and appear in both papers. Teach methods in context: when covering the family, discuss the strengths and limitations of unstructured interviews for researching sensitive topics like domestic abuse. Have students design mini-research projects. For example, after teaching sampling, ask pairs to design a short questionnaire on attitudes to school rules, pilot it with classmates, and then suggest improvements. This hands-on approach builds deeper understanding of concepts like validity, reliability and representativeness than textbook definitions alone can provide.
研究方法是整个大纲的基础，并出现在两份试卷中。要在具体情境中教授方法：在讲家庭时，讨论非结构化访谈在研究家庭暴力等敏感话题时的优点和局限。让学生设计小型研究项目。例如，讲完抽样后，要求两人一组设计一份关于校规态度的简短问卷，在同学间测试，然后提出改进建议。这种实践性方法比单纯使用课本定义更能建立对效度、信度、代表性等概念的深刻理解。
Practice interpreting data with exam-style items regularly. Show a table on crime statistics by ethnicity, and ask students to identify two trends, then explain them using sociological theories. Explicitly teach the difference between primary and secondary data, quantitative and qualitative data, and practical, ethical and theoretical issues. Use a mnemonic like PET (Practical, Ethical, Theoretical) to help students recall considerations when evaluating a method. Keep a "research methods spotter" wall where students add real-world examples of questionnaires, observations and official statistics they encounter in the news.
定期练习解读数据，采用考试风格题目。展示一张按族裔统计的犯罪数据表格，要求学生识别两个趋势，然后用社会学理论加以解释。明确教授一手数据与二手数据、定量数据与定性数据的区别，以及实践、伦理和理论问题。使用类似 PET（实践、伦理、理论）的记忆法帮助学生回忆评价方法时需考量的因素。设立一面“研究方法发现”墙，让学生添加在新闻中遇到的问卷、观察和官方统计等现实例子。
6. Preparing Students for Assessment | 备考与评估准备
Begin exam preparation early, weaving command-word training into regular lessons. Teach students what "describe", "explain" and "evaluate" demand. For a 15-mark evaluation question, show a model answer that opens with a clear point, uses evidence, presents a counter-argument and reaches a justified conclusion. Give students a "PEEL" structure: Point, Evidence, Explain, Link. Practice writing full 50-minute essays under timed conditions from year 10 onwards. After marking, provide colour-coded feedback: yellow for knowledge, blue for analysis, pink for evaluation, so learners can visually identify gaps.
尽早开始备考，将指令词训练融入常规教学。教会学生“描述”“解释”和“评价”要求的不同。对于一道 15 分的评价题，展示一篇以明确观点开篇、运用证据、提出反论并得出合理结论的示范答案。向学生提供“PEEL”结构：观点、证据、解释、联系。从 10 年级起就训练在限定时间内完成整篇 50 分钟的论文。批改后，采用颜色标记反馈：黄色代表知识，蓝色代表分析，粉色代表评价，让学生能直观看出缺失。
Build a revision timetable that assigns specific topics to weeks and includes low-stakes quizzes. Conduct walking-talking mocks where you talk through your thought process while answering a paper under a visualiser. Co-construct mark schemes with students using real candidate responses, which deepens their understanding of examiner expectations. For Paper 2, which has a compulsory question on research methods, create a dedicated booklet of past research-method questions and model answers, as this is a highly predictable section that rewards focused revision.
制定复习时间表，将具体话题分配到周，并纳入低风险小测验。开展“边说边做”模拟考，您在实物投影仪下一边答题一边讲解自己的思考过程。与学生共同构建评分标准，使用真实考生答案，这能加深他们对考官期望的理解。针对包含必答研究方法题的试卷二，制作一份专门收录历年研究方法考题与示范答案的小册子，因为这个部分可预测性强，集中复习回报率高。
7. Differentiation and Inclusion in the Sociology Classroom | 社会学课堂的差异化与包容性
Every class includes students with varying prior attainment, language proficiency and learning needs. Provide scaffolded resources: for a task comparing family diversity, offer a writing frame with sentence starters for those who need support, and a card with extension questions for high achievers. Use visual aids extensively – diagrammatic summaries of theorists, infographics showing demographic trends, and key-word displays. For English as an additional language (EAL) learners, pre-teach essential sociological vocabulary using Frayer models that include a definition, characteristics, examples and non-examples.
每个班级都有先前成绩、语言水平和学习需求各异的学生。提供脚手架式材料：在比较家庭多样性的任务中，为需要支持的学生提供含句首的写作框架，为高成就者提供含拓展问题的卡片。广泛使用视觉辅助——理论家的图示总结、显示人口趋势的信息图、关键词展示。对于英语作为附加语言的学习者，用包含定义、特征、正例和反例的 Frayer 模型预先教授关键社会学术语。
Use flexible grouping and avoid streaming by ability all the time. In a lesson on the media, mix students so that strong writers can support others in a paired analysis of a newspaper front page. Assign roles such as researcher, illustrator or presenter based on individual strengths. Celebrate all contributions. Ensure resources reflect diversity in ethnicity, family structures, gender and social class, so every student sees their experiences represented. Provide dual-language glossaries and allow use of translation apps when appropriate, with a clear focus on learning the English terminology needed for the exam.
使用灵活的分组方式，避免始终按能力分班。在一节关于媒体的课上，混合分组让学生在合作分析报纸头版时互相支持。根据个人优势分配研究者、插图者或展示者等角色。表扬所有贡献。确保教学资源反映族裔、家庭结构、性别和社会阶层的多样性，让每个学生都能看到自己经历的代表。提供双语术语表，并允许在适当时使用翻译应用程序，同时明确聚焦于学习考试所需的英文术语。
8. Using Real-World Examples and Case Studies | 运用现实案例与实例
Sociology comes alive when connected to current events. Dedicate the first five minutes of every lesson to a "sociological snippet" – a news story related to the topic. For crime and deviance, report on a recent policy change in youth justice and ask students to discuss it from interactionist and Marxist perspectives. Build a digital repository of short video clips, such as BBC documentaries on class inequality, that you can embed in lessons. Ensure students not only enjoy the media but can also analyse it: provide a structured viewing sheet with prompts like "Which theory does this clip support? What evidence is missing?"
社会学在与当下事件连接时会变得鲜活。每节课留出前五分钟进行“社会学快讯”——一个与话题相关的新闻故事。在犯罪与异常领域，报道近期青少年司法政策的变动，让学生从互动论和马克思主义视角讨论它。建立一个短视频片段资源库，如 BBC 关于阶级不平等的纪录片，可以嵌入课堂。确保学生不仅欣赏这些媒体，还能分析它们：提供结构化观看表，列出“这段视频支持哪种理论？缺少什么证据？”等提示。
Incorporate longitudinal data. Show graphs of changing divorce rates over 50 years and ask students to link these to legislation, changing attitudes and secularisation. When teaching education, use school league tables and Ofsted reports to examine the concept of marketisation. Encourage students to gather their own examples as part of homework: they can take a photo of an advertisement that reflects gender roles, or interview a family member about their experience of social mobility. These personal connections deepen engagement and provide excellent material for exam answers.
融入纵向数据。展示 50 年来离婚率变化的图表，让学生将其与立法、观念变化和世俗化联系起来。在教授教育时，使用学校排名表和 Ofsted 报告来探讨市场化概念。鼓励学生将收集自己的实例作为家庭作业：他们可以拍下反映性别角色的广告照片，或采访家人关于其社会流动的经历。这些人际链接加深投入度，并为考试答案提供极佳素材。
9. Formative Assessment Techniques | 形成性评估技巧
Move beyond simple questioning to techniques that provide meaningful feedback. Use exit tickets: at the end of a lesson on social control, ask students to write one thing they understand about formal and informal control, and one question they still have. Review these to inform the next lesson's starter. Implement "no-hands-up" questioning using lolly sticks with names, which ensures broad participation and allows you to gauge the class's overall understanding. Introduce mini-whiteboards for quick multiple-choice or true/false checks on theories; scan the room and address misconceptions immediately.
超越简单提问，采用能提供有意义反馈的技巧。使用“出口票”：在社会控制一课结束时，让学生写下他们对正式与非正式控制已理解的一点，以及仍存疑的一个问题。检阅这些内容以指导下一节课的导入活动。推行“不举手”提问法，使用写有名字的冰棒棍，这能确保广泛参与并帮您诊断全班理解情况。引入迷你白板进行理论的快速选择题或正误判断；扫视全班并立即纠正错误观念。
Employ cumulative mind maps. At the start of the "Family" topic, give each group a large sheet of paper to draw a central bubble labelled "Family Diversity". Each week, as new concepts are introduced (e.g. cohabitation, lone-parent families, same-sex families), groups add branches with definitions and links to key studies. This visual record of learning becomes a powerful revision tool. Also, train students in peer assessment using success criteria: after an essay, they use a checklist to give specific feedback like "You have explained the study but have not evaluated it."
采用累积式思维导图。在“家庭”话题开始时，给每组一大张纸，画一个中心气泡，标注“家庭多样性”。此后每周，当新概念（如同居、单亲家庭、同性家庭）引入时，各组添加分支，附上定义和与关键研究的关联。这份可视化的学习记录将成为强有力的复习工具。此外，培训学生根据成功标准进行同伴互评：在一篇论文后，他们用检查清单给出具体反馈，如“你解释了这项研究，但没有评价它”。
10. Integrating Technology Thoughtfully | 谨慎融入技术
Technology should enhance, not replace, sound pedagogy. Use online platforms like Quizlet to create flashcards for sociological concepts and named studies; the "live" mode promotes collaborative revision. A shared Padlet board can be used for an "ask the teacher" wall where students post questions anonymously, encouraging those who are shy to participate. For research-methods teaching, use a Google Form to replicate a questionnaire and then instantly analyse the anonymous class data to explore issues of validity and sampling bias. Screen recorded tutorials on how to structure a 15-mark answer can be a valuable resource for homework and revision.
技术应增强而非取代健全的教学法。使用 Quizlet 等在线平台制作社会学概念和命名研究的闪卡；“现场”模式能促进协作复习。共享 Padlet 看板可充当“提问墙”，供学生匿名张贴问题，鼓励害羞者参与。在研究方法教学中，用 Google 表单模拟问卷，随即分析匿名班级数据，以探讨效度和抽样偏差问题。关于如何撰写 15 分答案的录屏讲解可以作为家庭作业和复习的宝贵资源。
However, be mindful of screen fatigue and keep digital activities focused. Use short, curated video clips rather than lengthy documentaries during class, followed by a discussion. Virtual simulations, such as the Inequality.is website that illustrates wealth distribution, can provide powerful visual impact. Always tie digital usage back to exam skills: after a simulation, ask students to write a paragraph explaining what the simulation shows about social inequality, using sociological terms. A class blog where students summarise weekly learnings in 150 words can build a sense of community and serve as a shared revision archive.
然而，要警惕屏幕疲劳，保持数字活动的聚焦。课堂中使用经过筛选的短视频段落，而非冗长的纪录片，之后进行讨论。虚拟仿真，如展示财富分配的 Inequality.is 网站，能提供强大的视觉冲击。永远将数字工具的使用与考试技能挂钩：仿真结束后，请学生用社会学术语写一段文字，说明仿真所展示的社会不平等。开设班级博客，让学生每周用 150 字总结所学，可以建立社群感并充当共享的复习档案。
11. Sample Lesson Plan: Social Stratification | 教案示例：社会分层
This 60-minute lesson plan illustrates the integration of the tips above.
Topic: Functionalist vs Marxist views on social stratification.
Learning Objective: To compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist explanations of social class, and to evaluate their usefulness.
Starter (10 mins): Show two images: a CEO in a boardroom and a cleaner in an office. Students write three words for each and then discuss "Why does society have different layers?" Note initial ideas.
Main Activity 1 (20 mins): Expert groups – half the class receives a card summarising Davis and Moore's role allocation theory with key terms like "functional importance" and "reward". The other half receives a card on Marx's class conflict including bourgeoisie, proletariat, exploitation, false consciousness. Groups read, discuss and create a quick role-play or diagram to teach the other half. Pair up experts from each side to share their learning.
这份 60 分钟的教案示例融汇了上述多项建议。
话题：功能主义与马克思主义的社会分层观。
学习目标：比较对比功能主义与马克思主义对社会阶级的解释，并评价其效用。
导入（10 分钟）：展示两张图片：一位 CEO 在会议室，一位清洁工在办公室。学生为每张图写下三个词，然后讨论“为什么社会会有不同层级？”记录初步想法。
主体活动一（20 分钟）：专家小组——一半班级收到一张卡，上面总结了戴维斯和莫尔的角色分配理论，包含“功能重要性”和“回报”等关键术语；另一半收到关于马克思阶级冲突的卡，包含资产阶级、无产阶级、剥削、虚假意识。各组阅读、讨论并创作一个简短的角色扮演或示意图，以便教给另一半同学。将双方专家配对以分享学习。
Main Activity 2 (15 mins): Whole-class evaluation. Draw a two-column table on the board: "Strengths" and "Weaknesses". Using lolly-stick questioning, compile points from both perspectives. Push students by asking "Does functionalism justify inequality?" and "Does Marxism ignore the growth of the middle class?"
Plenary (15 mins): Exit ticket: "Explain which theory you find most convincing about social class in the UK today and why. Use at least two key concepts." Collect these for formative assessment.
Homework: Find a recent news article about wealth inequality and annotate it with how functionalists and Marxists would interpret it.
主体活动二（15 分钟）：全班评价。在黑板上画一个两列表格：“优点”和“缺点”。通过抽冰棒棍提问，收集来自两种视角的观点。通过提问“功能主义是否为不平等辩护？”和“马克思主义是否忽视了中产阶级的增长？”推动学生思考。
总结（15 分钟）：出口票：“解释你认为哪种理论最能说明当今英国的社会阶级及其原因。至少使用两个关键概念。”收集这些用于形成性评估。
家庭作业：找一篇关于财富不平等的近期新闻，并注解功能主义者和马克思主义者会如何解释它。
12. Case Study: Teaching the 'Family' Topic | 案例研究：教学“家庭”话题
The family is a core topic that students often find relatable but conceptually dense. Begin by exploring the diversity of family forms. Show a spectrum of family types – nuclear, extended, lone-parent, blended, same-sex, single-person households – and challenge the notion of a "normal" family. Introduce the concept of the cereal packet family and why it is criticised. Use statistical data from national censuses to ground the discussion in evidence. This sets the stage for later theoretical debates about functionalist views on the nuclear family versus feminist and personal life perspectives.
家庭是核心话题，学生通常感到亲切，但概念密度高。从探索家庭形式的多样性开始。展示家庭类型的谱系——核心、扩展、单亲、重组、同性、单人户——并挑战“正常”家庭的观念。引入“麦片包装盒家庭”的概念及其为何受到批评。使用全国人口普查的统计数据，使讨论有据可依。这为之后关于功能主义对核心家庭的看法与女性主义、个人生活视角之间的理论争论奠定基础。
Sequence the subtopics logically: after diversity, teach changes in marriage, divorce and cohabitation, making explicit links to social policies and laws such as the Divorce Reform Act. When covering gender roles, use a carousel of research summaries (Oakley, Young and Willmott, decision-making studies) that students analyse using a "conventional vs symmetrical family" grid. End the unit with a synoptic lesson linking the family to social stratification and the media. For example, analyse how media representations of the family influence social norms. A mock exam question: "Evaluate the view that the family has lost its functions" brings together Parsons, feminist critiques and postmodern ideas, building essential AO3 skills.
按逻辑顺序排列子话题：多样性之后，教授婚姻、离婚和同居的变化，明确联系社会政策和法律，如《离婚改革法》。在涉及性别角色时，采用一个轮转活动，呈现多项研究摘要（奥克利、杨和威尔莫特、决策研究），学生用“传统与对称家庭”表格加以分析。以一节综合课收尾本单元，将家庭与社会分层、媒体联系起来。例如，分析媒体对家庭的呈现如何影响社会规范。一道“评价‘家庭已失去其功能’这一观点”的模拟考题可汇集帕森斯、女性主义批评和后现代理念，培养关键的 AO3 技能。
Published by TutorHao | Sociology Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图