📚 Year 13 CIE Philosophy: 2026 Exam Changes and Trends | Year 13 CIE 哲学：2026年考试变化与趋势
From the 2026 examination series, CIE A Level Philosophy (9698) is undergoing its most significant structural revision in a generation. For Year 13 students, understanding these changes is not optional – it is the foundation of effective preparation. Gone are the four separate papers that defined the old specification. In their place, two extended papers now assess the full breadth of the A Level in a single, integrated format. This shift demands a re‑evaluation of how philosophical knowledge, reasoning and source analysis are practised in the classroom and at home. Below, we unpack every essential change and provide a clear guide to the new assessment landscape.
从2026年考试季开始，CIE A Level 哲学（9698）将迎来近几十年来最重大的结构改革。对于 Year 13 学生而言，理解这些变化不是可选项，而是高效备考的基础。旧版考纲中的四份独立试卷已经取消，取而代之的是两份扩展试卷，以一体化的形式覆盖整个 A Level 范围。这一转变要求我们重新审视课堂内外如何练习哲学知识、论证分析和材料解读。下文将逐一解析所有关键变化，为你清晰勾勒出全新的评估格局。
1. Introduction to the 2026 Syllabus Changes | 2026年考纲变化概述
The new 9698 syllabus for 2026–2028 replaces the previous model where AS and A Level candidates sat separate combinations of papers. The core revision is philosophical and practical: the board now treats the A Level as a unified two‑paper examination, removing the need for an additional A2 Paper 3 and Paper 4. Both AS and A Level candidates take the same two papers, but A Level papers are extended in time and depth. This creates a more coherent philosophical journey from AS to the full A Level and places a premium on synoptic understanding across themes.
新版9698考纲（2026–2028）取代了此前 AS 与 A Level 考生分别组合不同试卷的模式。其核心改革既是哲学上的，也是操作上的：考试局现在将 A Level 视为统一的两卷考试，取消了额外的 A2 试卷三和试卷四。AS 和 A Level 考生使用相同的两份试卷，但 A Level 的试卷在时间和深度上均进行了扩展。这构建了一条从 AS 到完整 A Level 更连贯的哲学学习路径，尤为强调跨主题的综合理解。
2. New Assessment Structure: Two Papers Only | 新的评估结构：仅两份试卷
The most visible change is the reduction to two compulsory papers for the full A Level. Paper 1 and Paper 2 each last 2 hours and contribute 50% to the final grade. There is no longer a separate AS qualification taken in a different room; instead, the AS papers are simply shorter versions of the same assessment. For Year 13, this means every revision session must prepare you for sustained, high‑level writing across all core and optional topics within one examination day.
最显著的变化是完整 A Level 只剩两份必考试卷。试卷一和试卷二各为 2 小时，各占总成绩的 50%。不再单独设立另一种 AS 考试，AS 试卷只是同一评估的缩短版。对于 Year 13 学生来说，这意味着每一次复习都必须训练你在同一个考试日中，围绕所有核心和选修主题进行持续且高水平的写作。
| Old Specification (up to 2025) | New Specification (2026–2028) |
|---|---|
| AS: Paper 1 (1h 30m) + Paper 2 (1h 30m) | AS: Paper 1 (1h 30m) + Paper 2 (1h 30m) |
| A Level: Paper 1, Paper 2, Paper 3, Paper 4 (each 1h 30m) | A Level: Paper 1 (2h) + Paper 2 (2h) |
| 4 separate question papers | 2 extended papers with integrated topics |
3. Paper 1: Core Questions and Source Analysis | 试卷一：核心问题与材料分析
Paper 1 is now explicitly structured around philosophical source material. Section A presents a compulsory source‑based question, requiring you to interpret, explain and evaluate a passage drawn from a classic or contemporary philosophical text. Section B offers a choice of essay questions on core themes such as epistemology, ethics, philosophy of religion and mind. The source element is new to CIE Philosophy and tests skills of close reading, contextualisation and critical response that were less central in the older papers.
试卷一明确围绕哲学材料构建。A 部分为必答的材料分析题，要求考生解释、解读并评价一段经典或当代哲学文本。B 部分提供关于认识论、伦理学、宗教哲学和心灵哲学等核心主题的论文题供选择。材料分析题型是 CIE 哲学的新增部分，考查精读、背景化和批判性回应等技能——这些在旧试卷中并不那么核心。
The challenge for Year 13 students is learning to move beyond summary. You must identify arguments, assumptions and implications in a given passage, then construct a balanced philosophical discussion that engages with the text’s position. Practising with annotated excerpts from Descartes, Hume, Mill or modern thinkers is now an essential part of exam preparation.
对 Year 13 学生来说，挑战在于学会超越摘要。你需要识别给定文本中的论证、预设和推论，然后构建一个均衡的哲学讨论，与该文本的立场进行对话。现在，用笛卡尔、休谟、密尔或现代思想家的带注释选段进行练习，已成为备考的必要环节。
4. Paper 2: Options and Synoptic Depth | 试卷二：选修模块与综合深度
Paper 2 allows candidates to specialise while still demanding synoptic breadth. The paper is divided into several sections, each corresponding to a thematic option such as Political Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Aesthetics or Moral Philosophy beyond the core. You will choose a set number of sections and answer essays that frequently encourage you to link ideas across the entire A Level. This design rewards students who can see connections – for example, how arguments about personal identity intersect with political obligations, or how scientific explanation relates to the philosophy of religion.
试卷二允许考生在专长的同时仍要求具备综合视野。试卷分为多个部分，每个部分对应一个专题选项，如政治哲学、科学哲学、美学或核心之外的道德哲学。你需要选择特定数量的部分作答，论文题目常常鼓励考生联系整个 A Level 中的思想。这样的设计奖励那些能够发现联系的学生——例如，人格同一性的讨论如何与政治义务交叉，或科学解释如何与宗教哲学相关联。
Because the A Level paper is 2 hours long, time management becomes more critical than ever. You must be able to plan and produce two extended essays that demonstrate philosophical precision, evaluation and independent thought, all within the same sitting.
由于 A Level 试卷时长 2 小时，时间管理变得比以往任何时候都关键。你必须能在同一场考试中规划并完成两篇扩展论文，且均展现出哲学严谨性、评估能力和独立思考。
5. Assessment Objectives and Weightings | 评估目标与权重
The new syllabus retains the two familiar assessment objectives but subtly shifts their balance. AO1 (Knowledge and Understanding) continues to assess accurate recall of philosophical concepts, arguments, terminology and texts. AO2 (Analysis and Evaluation) now carries greater weight and focuses more sharply on constructing reasoned critiques, resolving tensions between positions and reaching substantiated judgements. Although the exact percentages are weighted towards AO2 in extended responses, both objectives are fully integrated into every question. Year 13 candidates must therefore avoid the trap of simply describing theories; they must actively do philosophy under timed conditions.
新考纲保留了大家熟知的两大评估目标，但微妙地调整了其比重。AO1（知识与理解）仍然考查对哲学概念、论证、术语和文本的准确记忆。AO2（分析与评价）现在权重更大，且更集中地考察构建有理由的批判、消解立场之间的张力并得出有理有据的判断。尽管具体百分比较为复杂，但扩展性回答中 AO2 的比例明显提高，而且两项评估目标已完全融入到每一道题目中。Year 13 考生必须避免单纯描述理论；他们必须在限时条件下主动进行哲学思考。
6. Changes in Question Style: Source‑based and Extended Essays | 题型变化：材料题与扩展论文
Question phrasing has been redesigned to reflect the new emphasis on evaluation. You will encounter directives such as ‘Critically discuss’, ‘Evaluate the claim that’, and ‘With reference to the source, assess’. Single‑sentence knowledge questions are largely gone. Instead, each question embeds a philosophical stance or a direct quotation that you must engage with. This evolution means your revision notes should not just record definitions; they need to capture conflicting viewpoints, standard objections and possible replies.
题干的措辞经过重新设计，体现了对评估的新侧重。你会遇到“批判性讨论”、“评价如下主张”以及“参考材料，评估……”等指令语。单句知识题已基本消失。取而代之的是，每道题都内嵌一个哲学立场或一段直接引语，要求你与之对话。这一变化意味着你的复习笔记不能只记录定义，它们需要捕捉相互冲突的观点、标准反驳以及可能的回应。
Source‑based questions in Paper 1 Section A are particularly distinctive. You will read an unseen passage and respond to a set of sub‑questions that guide you towards a final evaluative essay. This format mirrors university‑style philosophy examinations and demands a layered response that moves from comprehension to critical engagement.
试卷一 A 部分的材料分析题尤为独特。你将阅读一篇未见过的短文，并回答一组子问题，这些子问题引导你最终完成一篇评价性论文。这种形式类似大学哲学考试，要求从理解走向批判性对话的层层回应。
7. Comparing Old and New Syllabus: Key Differences | 新旧大纲对比：关键差异
While the philosophical content – the study of classic problems and texts – remains largely intact, the method of examining that content has been overhauled. The older four‑paper model encouraged compartmentalised revision: a topic like ‘Moral Philosophy’ might appear only on Paper 3, allowing some students to neglect it until late in Year 13. The new integrated papers mean that every theme is fair game for any question. Furthermore, the elimination of Papers 3 and 4 removes the option of avoiding certain topics altogether. This makes the syllabus feel more demanding but also more philosophically honest.
尽管哲学内容——对经典问题和文本的研究——大体上得到了保留，但考查这些内容的方式已被彻底革新。旧的四卷模式容易导致模块化复习：像“道德哲学”这样的主题可能只出现在试卷三中，使部分学生可以拖延到 Year 13 后期才去应对。而新的综合试卷意味着每个主题都可能在任何题目中出现。此外，试卷三和试卷四的取消也排除了完全避开某些话题的可能。这让考纲感觉更有挑战性，但也更符合真正的哲学精神。
Another difference lies in the pre‑released sources. The old syllabus occasionally used stimulus passages, but they were not systematically integrated into a compulsory 60‑mark source section. Now, textual engagement is a cornerstone. Students must be comfortable extracting philosophical significance from a passage without external guidance, a skill that requires deliberate training throughout the course.
另一个区别在于预设材料的使用。旧考纲偶尔会使用刺激材料，但并未系统地将其整合为一个占 60 分的必答材料板块。而现在，文本对话已成为基石。学生必须能够在没有外部引导的情况下从篇章中提取哲学意涵，这一技能需要在课程中刻意训练。
8. Implications for Year 13 Students | 对 Year 13 学生的影响
For the 2026 cohort, the most immediate implication is that mock examinations and classroom assessments must mirror the new format from the start of Year 13. If your teachers are still using legacy papers for timed practice, you risk being unprepared for the pacing and structure of the real thing. The extended timed essays demand physical and mental stamina: writing philosophically for two consecutive hours is a different challenge from the old 90‑minute papers.
对 2026 届学生而言，最直接的影响是从 Year 13 开学起，模拟考试和课堂评估就必须全程采用新格式。如果你的老师仍在使用旧版试卷进行计时练习，你很可能在节奏和结构上无法适应真实考试。扩展性限时论文对身心耐力要求很高：连续进行两个小时的哲学写作，与旧版 90 分钟的试卷是截然不同的挑战。
Additionally, the higher AO2 weighting means that simply memorising arguments will not secure top marks. You must be able to compare and contrast positions, weigh up strengths and weaknesses, and defend a clear point of view. This shift favours students who regularly engage in Socratic debate, keep a philosophical journal, or participate in dialectical discussions outside the classroom.
此外，AO2 权重提高意味着单纯记忆论证无法获得高分。你必须能够比较和对照不同立场，权衡优劣，并捍卫一个清晰的观点。这一转变更青睐那些经常参与苏格拉底式辩论、坚持写哲学日记或在课外进行辩证讨论的学生。
9. Recommended Study Strategies | 推荐学习策略
Read primary texts actively. Prioritise short extracts from the canon – Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Mill, Russell, Anscombe – and annotate for argument structure, key terms and implicit assumptions. Active reading directly builds the skills tested in Paper 1 Section A.
主动阅读原著。优先阅读经典著作中的短篇选段——柏拉图、亚里士多德、康德、密尔、罗素、安斯康姆——并标注论证结构、关键术语和隐含预设。主动阅读直接建构试卷一 A 部分所考查的技能。
Structure essays around philosophical problems, not topic headings. Instead of simply revising ‘Utilitarianism’, frame your study around a problem: ‘Can happiness be quantified?’ This problem‑based approach mirrors the new exam questions and encourages evaluative thinking.
围绕哲学问题而非主题标题来组织论文。不要简单地复习“功利主义”，而是围绕一个问题来构建学习：“幸福可以被量化吗？”这种基于问题的方法与新的考题相匹配，并能激发评价性思维。
Practise source expansion regularly. Take a short philosophical passage and generate a plan for a full essay, including introduction, exposition, objection and reply. Do this weekly under timed conditions.
定期练习材料拓展。选取一段哲学短文，生成一篇完整论文的提纲，包括引言、阐述、反驳与回应。每周在限时条件下完成一次。
10. Time Management and Exam Technique | 时间管理与考试技巧
With each paper lasting 120 minutes and carrying significant essay weight, a clear timing template is essential. For Paper 1, allocate approximately 30 minutes to the source‑based questions (reading, analysing and answering sub‑parts) and roughly 45 minutes per essay choice. On Paper 2, dedicate an equal 60 minutes to each of your two essay questions. Practise with a watch; never leave the planning stage out – a five‑minute outline saves far more time than it consumes, as it prevents mid‑essay drift.
由于每份试卷时长 120 分钟且论文分值占比极大，清晰的计时模板必不可少。对于试卷一，大约分配 30 分钟给材料分析题（阅读、分析并回答子问题），每道论文选题约 45 分钟。在试卷二中，每道论文题应各分配均等的 60 分钟。练习时一定使用手表；永远不要省去规划阶段——五分钟的提纲远比它消耗的时间节省更多，因为它能防止写作中途跑题。
Also, train yourself to recognise command terms instantly. When you see ‘Critically evaluate’, you must not only present arguments but also make an overall judgement. When you see ‘With reference to the source, discuss’, you must quote or closely paraphrase the source to ground your essay. A small mistake in interpreting the command term can cause you to miss entire bands of the mark scheme.
同时，要训练自己瞬间识别指令术语。看到“批判性评价”时，你不仅要呈现论证，还必须作出整体判断。看到“参考材料，讨论……”时，你必须引用或紧密转述材料，为论文奠定基础。指令术语理解上的小失误，可能导致你整个等级段的分数丢失。
11. Resources and Past Papers | 资源与历年真题
The 2026 syllabus marks the beginning of a new examination era, which means there will be only a limited number of specimen papers and perhaps one or two live papers before the summer series. Year 13 students should therefore use these official materials with extreme care, reserving the specimen papers for full timed mocks. In parallel, they can adapt older CIE essay questions by setting themselves source‑based exercises: find a relevant passage from a set text and treat it as a stimulus, then write an essay that incorporates close analysis of that passage.
2026 年考纲标志着一个新的考试时代的开始，这意味着在夏季考季之前，只有有限数量的样卷和或许一两份真题。Year 13 学生应极为谨慎地使用这些官方材料，将样卷留作完整的限时模拟。与此同时，他们可以通过设定材料分析练习来改编旧的 CIE 论文题目：从指定文本中找一个相关段落作为刺激材料，然后写一篇包含对该段落细致分析的论文。
Supplementary resources such as the Cambridge Elevate platform, the Philosophy for AS and A Level textbooks by Michael Lacewing, and the Think philosophy magazine help broaden contextual understanding. However, the most effective resource remains the syllabus document itself: it specifies all key concepts and the precise nature of the evaluation required.
补充资源如 Cambridge Elevate 平台、Michael Lacewing 的《Philosophy for AS and A Level》教材，以及《Think》哲学杂志，有助于拓展背景理解。然而，最有效的资源依然是考纲文件本身：它列明了所有关键概念以及评价所需的准确性质。
12. Final Thoughts on the 2026 Trends | 关于2026年趋势的最终思考
The 2026 CIE Philosophy changes are undeniably demanding, but they also represent an opportunity. By consolidating assessment into two papers with a strong emphasis on textual engagement and evaluative argument, the new specification encourages a more genuine philosophical education. Year 13 students who embrace the new format early – developing their source‑analysis skills, building a vocabulary of critique, and practising extended writing under timed conditions – will not only excel in the examination but also find themselves better prepared for university‑level philosophy. The trends point clearly towards depth over breadth, and towards the student who thinks like a philosopher rather than one who simply recalls philosophical facts.
2026 年 CIE 哲学的种种变化无疑是具有挑战性的，但也代表着机遇。通过将评估整合为两份试卷，并极力强调文本对话与评价性论证，新考纲鼓励一种更真实的哲学教育。Year 13 学生若能尽早适应新形式——发展材料分析技能、构建批判性词汇，并在限时条件下练习扩展性写作——不仅能在考试中脱颖而出，也会发现自己更好地为大学哲学学习做好了准备。趋势明确指向深度重于广度，指向像哲学家一样思考的学生，而非仅仅记忆哲学事实的学生。
Published by TutorHao | Philosophy Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图