📚 AQA A-Level Media Studies 2026: Exam Changes and Trends | AQA A-Level 媒体研究 2026：考试变化与趋势
As AQA continues to refine its A-Level Media Studies specification (7572), students aiming for the 2026 examination series must stay alert to subtle but important shifts in content, assessment style and theoretical emphasis. This article unpacks the key changes already introduced for 2025 onwards and identifies the emerging trends that will shape the 2026 papers, ensuring teachers and learners can plan with confidence.
随着AQA不断完善A-Level媒体研究大纲(7572)，准备参加2026年考试的学生必须留意在内容、评估风格和理论侧重点上的微妙而重要的变化。本文解析已经为2025年及以后考试引入的关键变化，并指出将塑造2026年试卷的新兴趋势，帮助教师和学生充满信心地进行规划。
1. Overview of the Qualification and Assessment Model | 资格与评估模式概览
The AQA A-Level Media Studies course is built on two examined units and one non-exam assessment. Paper 1 (Media Language and Representation) lasts 2 hours and is worth 35% of the A-Level, while Paper 2 (Media Industries and Audiences) also weighs 35% and runs for 2 hours. The remaining 30% is covered by the NEA, a cross-media production responding to a set brief.
AQA A-Level媒体研究课程由两个笔试单元和一个非考试评估构成。试卷一（媒体语言与表征）时长2小时，占A-Level总成绩的35%，试卷二（媒体产业与受众）同样占35%，时长2小时。剩余30%由NEA完成，即根据设定简报进行的跨媒体制作。
From 2025 onwards the fundamental exam blueprint remains unchanged, yet the internal balance of concepts and the depth of application demanded have quietly evolved. In 2026, expect a continuation of the 'theoretical framework' approach that integrates media language, representation, industries and audiences across both papers, making isolated topic revision less effective.
从2025年起，基本的考试蓝图保持不变，但各概念间的内部平衡以及要求的应用深度已在悄然演变。到2026年，预计将继续沿用'理论框架'方法，将媒体语言、表征、产业和受众贯穿两份试卷，使孤立的话题复习效果减弱。
2. The Evolution of Close Study Products (CSPs) | 关闭学习产品的演变
One of the most tangible updates for 2026 candidates is the refreshed CSP list introduced for first teaching in September 2023. AQA now rotates CSPs every few years to keep texts current and diverse. The 2025–2026 list includes products such as The Killing, Black Panther, I, Daniel Blake, Beyonce's 'Formation' and the magazine The Gentlewoman, ensuring a mix of historical and contemporary media.
对2026年考生而言，最实质的更新之一是2023年9月首次教学时引入的更新版CSP列表。AQA现在每隔几年轮换CSP，以保持文本的时效性和多样性。2025–2026年列表包含如《谋杀》《黑豹》《我是布莱克》、Beyonce的 'Formation' 和杂志《The Gentlewoman》等产品，确保历史与当代媒体的融合。
Compared with the previous cycle, there is a clear move towards more global and niche products, as well as increased representation of minority ethnic creators and female voices. This trend will certainly be tested in 2026, requiring learners to discuss media language in culturally specific contexts and to compare mainstream and independent production values.
与前一个周期相比，明显向更多全球性和小众产品转变，并增加了少数族裔创作者和女性声音的代表性。这一趋势必将在2026年受到考察，要求学习者在特定文化语境中讨论媒体语言，并比较主流和独立制作的价值。
| CSP category | Example for 2026 | Shift from previous |
|---|---|---|
| Television | The Killing (Forbrydelsen) | Focus on Nordic noir, subtitled drama |
| Film (cross-media) | Black Panther | Major franchise with complex industry contexts |
| Music video | Beyonce, 'Formation' | Politically engaged, rich in intertextuality |
| Magazine | The Gentlewoman | Niche independent, different from mass-market titles |
3. Renewed Focus on Theoretical Frameworks | 对理论框架的重新聚焦
The AQA specification has always been driven by the four key frameworks – media language, representation, industries and audiences. In recent exam series, questions have demanded more precise use of theorists, moving away from simple name-dropping towards critical application. For 2026, this trend is set to intensify.
AQA大纲始终由四个关键框架驱动——媒体语言、表征、产业和受众。在近期的考试中，题目要求更精准地运用理论家，从简单提及姓名转向批判性应用。到2026年，这一趋势预计将加剧。
Proprietary theories must be woven into arguments rather than bolted on. For example, a question on 'Formation' might ask how bell hooks' intersectional politics can be applied to analyse the video's challenge to dominant ideologies, requiring students to show how media language constructs counter-representations. Rote learning of a theorist quote will no longer suffice.
专属理论必须融入论证，而非生硬附加。例如，一道关于 'Formation' 的题目可能问如何运用bell hooks的交织性政治来分析视频对主流意识形态的挑战，要求学生展示媒体语言如何构建反表征。死记硬背理论家引语将不再足够。
- Media language: Barthes' semiotics, Levi-Strauss' binary oppositions, Todorov's narratology – applied to moving image and print.
- Representation: Hall's representation theory, hooks' intersectionality, Gilroy's postcolonialism.
- Industries: Curran and Seaton's power and media industries, Livingstone and Lunt's regulation.
- Audiences: Bandura's media effects, Shirky's 'end of audience', Jenkins' participatory culture.
- 媒体语言：Barthes的符号学、Levi-Strauss的二元对立、Todorov的叙事学——应用于动态影像和印刷品。
- 表征：Hall的表征理论、hooks的交织性、Gilroy的后殖民主义。
- 产业：Curran和Seaton的权力与媒体产业、Livingstone和Lunt的监管。
- 受众：Bandura的媒体效果、Shirky的'受众的终结'、Jenkins的参与式文化。
4. Deepening Contextual Understanding | 加深语境理解
2026 mark schemes will continue to reward thorough contextual analysis. This means situating CSPs within their historical, social, cultural and political moments. For instance, I, Daniel Blake cannot be fully understood without reference to austerity Britain, while The Killing requires awareness of Scandinavian welfare state anxieties and gender politics.
2026年的评分方案将继续奖励深入的语境分析。这意味着将CSP置于其历史、社会、文化和政治时刻中。例如，不提及英国紧缩政策就无法完全理解《我是布莱克》，而《谋杀》则需要了解斯堪的纳维亚福利国家的焦虑和性别政治。
Examiners are explicitly looking for the way contextual factors shape both the construction of media products and the readings audiences bring to them. A strong answer will connect production context (e.g., BBC's public service remit) to narrative and visual codes, and then extend the analysis to contrasting audience interpretations.
考官明确寻找语境因素如何影响媒体产品的构建以及受众带来的解读。一份出色的答案会将生产语境（如BBC的公共服务职责）与叙事和视觉符码联系起来，然后将分析延伸至对比性的受众解读。
5. Comparative and Synoptic Skills in Exam Questions | 考试题目中的比较与综合技能
Both papers in 2026 are expected to feature more explicit comparative commands. Paper 1 may ask candidates to compare the use of media language across a contemporary and a historical product; Paper 2 could pair an established CSP with an unseen text to test how audiences are positioned differently in the digital age.
预计2026年两份试卷将出现更明确的比较指令。试卷一可能要求考生比较当代和历史产品中媒体语言的运用；试卷二可能将既定CSP与一篇未见文本配对，以测试在数字时代受众如何被不同地定位。
This synoptic demand mirrors the skills universities value: drawing connections across forms, periods and platforms. To prepare, students should regularly construct comparative grids that map similarities and differences in representation, industry ownership and audience targeting between CSPs they have studied.
这种综合要求反映了大学所看重的技能：在不同形式、时期和平台之间建立联系。为了准备，学生应定期构建比较表格，列出所学CSP之间在表征、产业所有权和受众定位上的相似与差异。
6. Non-Exam Assessment (NEA) Updates and Trends | 非考试评估的更新与趋势
The NEA remains a substantial 30% component where students create a cross-media production in response to a set brief. AQA has gradually clarified its expectations around the Statement of Intent, making it a more structured document. For the 2026 cohort, the briefs will likely continue to encourage engagement with digital convergence and social media marketing.
NEA仍然是占比30%的重要部分，学生在此需根据设定简报创作跨媒体制作。AQA逐步明确了对其创作说明(Statement of Intent)的要求，使其成为更具结构性的文件。对于2026年届学生，简报很可能继续鼓励融入数字融合和社交媒体营销。
Emerging trends suggest a stronger emphasis on authentic industry practice. Learners are expected to research real-world media brands, demonstrate understanding of regulatory frameworks such as the ASA/CAP codes, and reflect on how their product would appeal to a psychographically defined audience. Simply producing a nice video or magazine spread no longer guarantees top marks.
新兴趋势表明更强调真实的行业实践。学生需要研究现实中的媒体品牌，展现对ASA/CAP准则等监管框架的理解，并反思其产品如何吸引心理图示定义的受众。仅仅制作漂亮的视频或杂志跨页不再保证获得高分。
Furthermore, AQA has tightened its plagiarism checks and requires that all sourced assets be clearly credited. The NEA in 2026 will reward original photography, hand-crafted illustrations and genuine audience research over generic stock images.
此外，AQA收紧了抄袭检查，要求所有使用的素材明确标注来源。2026年的NEA将奖励原创摄影、手工插图和真实的受众调研，而非通用的素材图库图片。
7. Digital Convergence and Transmedia Storytelling | 数字融合与跨媒体叙事
The AQA specification has progressively embraced the concept of digital convergence, and 2026 exams will almost certainly ask students to explore how media products exist across multiple platforms. This is evident in CSPs like Black Panther, which extends into trailers, social media campaigns, hashtag activism and merchandise, creating a unified brand experience.
AQA大纲逐渐接纳数字融合的概念，2026年考试几乎肯定会要求学生探究媒体产品如何存在于多个平台之上。这一点在如《黑豹》的CSP中非常明显，它延伸至预告片、社交媒体活动、话题标签行动主义和周边商品，创造了统一的品牌体验。
Jenkins' idea of 'transmedia storytelling' – where each platform makes a distinctive contribution to the narrative world – is now a staple of top-band responses. Similarly, questions on audience may contrast passive 'lean-back' consumption of broadcast media with active, spreadable participation online. Preparing case studies that track a single brand across TV, web and social media will be essential.
Jenkins'跨媒体叙事'的观点——每个平台都为叙事世界做出独特贡献——如今已成为高分答案的常见内容。同样，有关受众的题目可能会对比广播媒体的被动'后仰式'消费与在线的主动、可传播参与。准备追踪单一品牌在电视、网站和社交媒体上的案例研究将至关重要。
8. Global Media and Representation Shifts | 全球媒体与表征变化
A notable trend in the 2026 CSP list is the inclusion of more international texts. The Danish series The Killing, for example, forces students to think beyond Anglophone media and consider subtitling, cultural proximity and the global circulation of crime drama. This aligns with AQA's aim to foster global media literacy.
2026年CSP列表中一个显著趋势是纳入了更多国际文本。例如，丹麦剧集《谋杀》迫使学生超越英语媒体进行思考，并考虑字幕、文化接近性和犯罪剧的全球流通。这与AQA培养全球媒体素养的目标一致。
In representation terms, the exam will test awareness of how different cultures approach identity. Students must be ready to discuss not only race and gender but also regional identity, social class and disability, using CSPs such as I, Daniel Blake to explore the intersection of class and geographical marginalisation. Gilroy's postcolonial perspective will be particularly useful when contrasting Hollywood outputs with European independent productions.
在表征方面，考试将测试对不同文化如何处理身份认同的认识。学生必须准备讨论的不仅是种族和性别，还有地域身份、社会阶层和残疾，利用《我是布莱克》等CSP探索阶层与地理边缘化的交织。Gilroy的后殖民视角在对比好莱坞产品与欧洲独立制作时尤其有用。
9. Marking and Assessment Objective Weightings | 评分与评估目标权重
While the overall weight of Assessment Objectives has remained static – AO1 (knowledge), AO2 (analysis) and AO3 (evaluation and conclusions) – the way marks are apportioned within questions has been subtly recalibrated. AO3, which involves making critical judgments and drawing substantiated conclusions, now carries greater weight in extended essay responses.
尽管评估目标的总体权重保持稳定——AO1（知识）、AO2（分析）和AO3（评价与结论）——但在题目内部分配分数的方式已悄然重新调整。涉及做出批判性判断并得出有据可依结论的AO3，如今在长篇论文回答中占有更大比重。
For 2026, this means that simply describing conventions or identifying theories will not access the highest bands. Students must evaluate effectiveness, weigh up opposing academic viewpoints, and justify their own interpretations using precise evidence from the CSPs and their contexts. The stem 'To what extent...' will be more prevalent, as will demands to assess the usefulness of a particular theory.
对2026年而言，这意味着仅仅描述惯例或识别理论将无法进入最高等级。学生必须评价有效性，权衡对立的学术观点，并利用CSP及其语境中的精确证据来论证自己的解读。'在多大程度上……'这样的提示词将更加普遍，对评估特定理论有用性的要求也将增多。
10. Effective Revision and Preparation Strategies | 有效的复习与备考策略
Given these shifts, successful revision for 2026 must move beyond flashcards and passive reading. Students should create living documents that link each CSP to the four frameworks, contextual bullet points, and at least two theoretical positions per product. Regular timed practice with comparative essay questions is non-negotiable.
鉴于这些变化，2026年的成功复习必须超越抽认卡和被动阅读。学生应创建动态文档，将每个CSP与四个框架、语境要点以及每个产品至少两个理论立场联系起来。定时练习比较性论文题目是不可或缺的。
Additionally, the habit of 'audit trails' – tracing how a media brand's campaign unfolds from a trailer drop on YouTube, through Instagram teasers, to user-generated TikTok content – will train the synoptic mind needed for high marks. Group discussion on how different audience segments read the same text can sharpen evaluation skills and reveal the polysemy central to modern media analysis.
此外，'线索追踪'的习惯——追踪一个媒体品牌的活动如何在YouTube预告片、Instagram预告到用户生成的TikTok内容中展开——将训练获得高分所需的综合思维。小组讨论不同受众群体如何解读同一文本，可以磨练评价技能，并揭示现代媒体分析核心的多义性。
Published by TutorHao | Media Studies Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图