📚 Year 12 CIE Psychology: 2026 Exam Changes and Trends | 2026年CIE心理学考试变化与趋势
The Cambridge International AS Level Psychology syllabus (9990) has undergone a significant refresh with the 2024–2026 syllabus update. As the 2026 examination approaches, students and teachers are noticing not only the structural modifications but also emerging trends in question style, depth of assessment, and the practical application of psychological knowledge. This article unpacks these changes and forecasts the likely direction of 2026 AS Psychology papers, helping Year 12 candidates to refine their revision strategies and maximise their performance in the final examinations.
剑桥国际 AS 水平心理学教学大纲（9990）在 2024 – 2026 年版本中经历了重大更新。随着 2026 年考试临近，学生和教师不仅注意到了结构上的调整，还察觉到问题风格、评估深度以及心理学知识实际应用方面的变化趋势。本文解析这些变化并预测 2026 年 AS 心理学考卷的可能走向，帮助 Year 12 考生优化复习策略，在最终考试中发挥出最佳水平。
1. Overview of the 2024–2026 Syllabus | 2024–2026 大纲概览
The current AS syllabus retains the two-paper structure: Paper 1 'Approaches, Issues and Debates' and Paper 2 'Research Methods'. However, the content has been reorganized to place greater stress on the interconnectedness of psychological approaches and real-world applications. The 2026 examinations will be the third sitting under this updated curriculum, meaning that the exam board now has sufficient statistical data to refine question difficulty and to test a broader range of critical thinking abilities. Teachers report that specimen materials and early live papers indicate a clear shift away from rote description towards evaluative and comparative tasks.
当前的 AS 大纲保持双卷结构：卷 1 '心理学取向、议题与争论'、卷 2 '研究方法'。但内容被重新组织，更加强调心理学流派之间的相互联系及其在现实世界中的应用。2026 年考试将是本更新课程的第三次实施，意味着考试局现在拥有足够统计数据来精细化调整题目难度，并测试更广泛的批判性思维能力。教师们反映，样卷和早期真题清楚地表明，机械描述已不再是重点，转而更侧重评估与比较任务。
2. Changes in Core Studies for AS Level | AS 核心研究的变化
One of the most palpable shifts is the updated set of twelve core studies for the AS syllabus. While classical studies such as Milgram's obedience experiment and Bandura's Bobo doll research remain to illustrate key approaches, several new studies have been introduced to better reflect contemporary psychology. For instance, studies examining cognitive neuroscience, social identity theory and positive psychology have been embedded. The 2026 papers are expected to feature detailed questions on these newer pieces, requiring candidates to evaluate methodology, ethics and cultural considerations with precision.
最显著的变化之一是 AS 大纲中十二项核心研究的更新。虽然 Milgram 的服从实验和 Bandura 的波波娃娃研究等经典研究得以保留以说明核心流派，但引入了若干新研究以更好地反映当代心理学。例如，探讨认知神经科学、社会认同理论和积极心理学的研究已被纳入。预计 2026 年考卷将针对这些较新的研究设置详细问题，要求考生精确评估方法、伦理和文化因素。
A comparison of the core study list between the previous syllabus (2020–2022) and the 2024–2026 syllabus reveals the deliberate inclusion of culturally diverse samples and field experiments. The table below summarises key replacements.
对比前一版大纲（2020 – 2022）与 2024 – 2026 大纲的核心研究列表，可以发现它有意纳入了文化多样化的样本和现场实验。下表概述了主要替换项。
| Previous Core Study | New 2024–2026 Core Study | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Schachter & Singer (1962) | Dement & Kleitman (1957) – updated focus | Biological |
| Tajfel (1970) | Sherif (1954) – Robbers Cave | Social |
| Freud (1909) | Kagan (1989) – temperament | Developmental |
3. Exam Format for 2026 | 2026 年考试形式
The overall format remains stable: Paper 1 is 1 hour 30 minutes with 60 marks, covering four sections (each dedicated to one approach: biological, cognitive, learning, social). Section A requires short-answer responses, while Section B presents an essay question demanding in-depth evaluation of core studies. Paper 2 remains 1 hour 30 minutes with 60 marks and focuses solely on research methods, including data analysis, experimental design and ethical critique. What is evolving is the internal balance: more marks are being allocated to 'design a study' tasks and to interpretation of quantitative and qualitative data, reflecting a trend towards assessing genuine research competency.
整体形式保持稳定：卷 1 时长 1 小时 30 分钟，满分 60 分，涵盖四个部分（每部分针对一种心理学取向：生物、认知、学习、社会）。A 部分为简答题，B 部分为论述题，要求对核心研究进行深度评估。卷 2 时长同样为 1 小时 30 分钟，满分 60 分，专攻研究方法，包括数据分析、实验设计和伦理批判。正在演变的是内部平衡：更多分值被分配到'设计一项研究'任务以及定量与定性数据的解读上，反映出评估真实研究能力的大趋势。
4. Assessment Objectives and Weighting | 评估目标与权重
The weighting of Assessment Objectives (AOs) has been subtly adjusted. AO1 (Knowledge and understanding) now accounts for approximately 35% of the AS marks, while AO2 (Application) and AO3 (Evaluation) together carry around 65%. This is a deliberate move by Cambridge to promote higher-order thinking. In 2026, candidates should anticipate essay questions that explicitly command 'Discuss', 'Evaluate' or 'Compare' rather than 'Describe'. Command words will directly signal which AOs are being targeted, and marks will be heavily skewed towards evidence-based argumentation and critical analysis of methodological flaws.
评估目标（AO）的权重已悄然调整。AO1（知识与理解）现约占 AS 总分的 35%，而 AO2（应用）与 AO3（评价）合计约占 65%。这是剑桥为了提升高阶思维而有意采取的措施。在 2026 年，考生应预期论述题明确使用'讨论'、'评价'或'比较'等指令词，而非单纯的'描述'。指令词将直接标示所考查的评估目标，分值将大幅偏向基于证据的论证以及对方法缺陷的批判性分析。
5. Greater Emphasis on Research Methods | 研究方法更受重视
Paper 2 has historically been perceived as the more technical paper, but recent trends show that 2026 candidates will need more than formulaic knowledge. Questions increasingly embed scenarios about quasi-experiments, naturalistic observation and self-report techniques in novel contexts. Students must be able to design a piece of research from scratch, justify sampling strategies, choose appropriate levels of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval), and propose ethical safeguards. Familiarity with descriptive statistics – calculating mean, median, mode, range and standard deviation – remains essential, but there is now a push to interpret results in narrative form, linking findings back to psychological theories.
卷 2 历来被视为技术性更强的卷子，但近年的趋势显示，2026 年考生需要的不再只是公式化知识。题目越来越多地将准实验、自然观察和自我报告技术嵌入新情境中。学生必须能够从零开始设计一项研究，论证抽样策略，选择适当的测量层次（定类、定序、定距），并提出伦理保障措施。熟悉描述性统计——计算平均数、中位数、众数、极差和标准差——依然至关重要，但现在的趋势是以叙述形式解读结果，将发现与心理学理论联系起来。
For example, a typical 2026-style question might present raw data from a repeated measures design and ask candidates to calculate the mean and then 'explain one strength of using a repeated measures design in this study'. This blends calculation with conceptual understanding.
例如，一道典型的 2026 风格题目可能呈现一个重复测量设计的原始数据，要求考生计算平均值，然后'解释该研究采用重复测量设计的一个优点'。这融合了计算与概念理解。
6. Application to Real-life Scenarios | 实际场景应用
Context-based questions are becoming the norm rather than the exception. A 2026 Paper 1 may open with a short vignette describing a teenager's addiction to social media, then ask the candidate to explain how the learning approach (including operant conditioning) could account for the behaviour, followed by an evaluation of the reductionist nature of this explanation. Such questions demand that students move flexibly between theories and everyday situations. The ability to deconstruct a real-life problem using at least two psychological approaches and to weigh the strengths and limitations of each will be a distinguishing feature of high-scoring responses.
基于情境的问题正成为常态而非例外。2026 年卷 1 可能以一段描述青少年社交媒体成瘾的简短案例开头，接着要求考生解释学习取向（包括操作性条件反射）如何解释该行为，然后评价这种解释的还原论性质。这类问题要求学生灵活地游走于理论与日常情境之间。能够用至少两种心理学取向解构现实问题并权衡各自的优势与局限，将是高分答案的显著特征。
7. Critical Evaluation and Issues & Debates | 批判性评价与议题争论
The 'issues and debates' component – once a standalone section – now permeates the entire AS examination. Whether discussing the ethics of animal research in the biological approach or the nature-nurture interplay in developmental studies, candidates must embed these considerations naturally into their answers. In 2026, questions may ask students to 'Discuss the extent to which the cognitive approach is nomothetic' or 'Evaluate the social sensitivity of Piliavin's subway study'. This requires a sophisticated understanding of both the core study and the overarching themes, and an examiner will look for layered arguments that balance contrasting perspectives.
'议题与争论'部分——曾作为独立部分存在——现已渗透到整个 AS 考试之中。无论是讨论生物取向中动物研究的伦理，还是发展研究中先天与后天的相互作用，考生都必须在答案中自然地融入这些考量。在 2026 年，题目可能会要求学生'讨论认知取向在多大程度上是通则取向的'或'评价 Piliavin 地铁研究的社会敏感性'。这既需要深刻理解核心研究，也需要理解这些宏观主题，考官会期待能看到层次丰富、平衡对立观点的论证。
8. Ethical Considerations and Cultural Issues | 伦理考量和文化问题
Cross-cultural validity and the ethical protection of participants have been elevated in importance. The updated core studies include research from non-Western settings (e.g., studies on conformity in collectivist cultures), and candidates will be expected to comment on cultural bias. Furthermore, the British Psychological Society (BPS) guidelines for ethical conduct are now explicitly referenced in mark schemes. A 2026 trend will be to ask students to propose how an otherwise ethically questionable study could be redesigned to meet modern ethical standards while still producing valid data. Simple mention of 'informed consent' or 'debriefing' is insufficient; detailed procedural suggestions are expected.
跨文化效度与参与者伦理保护的重要性已被提升。更新后的核心研究纳入了非西方环境的研究（例如关于集体主义文化中从众行为的研究），考生需要就文化偏见发表评论。此外，英国心理学会（BPS）伦理行为准则现已在评分标准中被明确引用。2026 年的一个趋势是，要求考生提出如何重新设计原本存在伦理问题的研究，使之既符合现代伦理标准，又仍能生成有效数据。简单地提及'知情同意'或'事后解释'已不足够；需要详细的程序性建议。
9. Predicted Trends for 2026 Papers | 2026 年考卷趋势预测
Based on examiner reports and the first two years of the new syllabus (2024 and 2025), several clear predictions can be made for the 2026 examinations. First, there will be a continued increase in comparative essay prompts, such as 'Compare the biological and learning explanations of aggression'. Second, 'design a study' questions in Paper 2 will likely include confounding variable control and reliability checks. Third, data interpretation will blend bar charts, scatter graphs and tables, requiring candidates to derive conclusions from multiple sources. Fourth, the mark allocation for evaluation of methodology in core studies will tilt decisively towards 'usefulness and application' rather than mere 'internal validity'. Finally, a small but notable proportion of marks will test candidates' ability to synthesise information across the four defined approaches in Paper 1.
基于考官报告和新大纲最初两年（2024 和 2025）的考试情况，可以对 2026 年考试做出几点明确预测。首先，比较型论述题将继续增加，如'比较攻击行为的生物解释与学习解释'。其次，卷 2 的'设计一项研究'题目很可能包括混淆变量控制与信度检验。第三，数据解读将混合使用条形图、散点图与表格，要求考生从多个来源得出结论。第四，核心研究方法评估的分值分配将果断偏向'有用性与应用'，而非仅仅是'内部效度'。最后，将有一小部分但值得注意的分值测试考生在卷 1 的四种指定心理学取向之间进行综合的能力。
10. How to Prepare Effectively | 如何有效备考
To meet the demands of the 2026 CIE AS Psychology paper, students should move beyond passive note-taking. Mastery of the twelve core studies must include the ability to discuss each study in terms of its method, sample, ethical strengths and weaknesses, cultural generalisability, and links to the approach. Practical research skills should be honed through the regular practice of designing studies for given hypotheses, selecting inferential or descriptive statistics, and writing clear procedural summaries. Active revision techniques such as creating comparative grids for issues and debates, and practising timed essay plans under examination conditions, will build the evaluative fluency that the new mark schemes reward.
为满足 2026 年 CIE AS 心理学的考试要求，学生应超越被动记笔记的学习方式。掌握十二项核心研究必须包括能够从方法、样本、伦理优缺点、文化推广性以及与取向的联系等角度对每项研究展开讨论。实用研究技能应通过定期练习针对给定假设设计研究、选择推论性或描述性统计方法、撰写清晰的程序摘要来加以提升。积极的复习技巧，如为议题与争论制作比较表格，在模拟考试条件下定时练习论述题提纲，将培养出新的评分标准所奖励的评估流畅性。
Equally important is the nurturing of psychological literacy – reading short news articles about real-life psychology and mentally applying course concepts. For the 2026 cohort, the most successful candidates will be those who view psychology not as a collection of isolated facts but as a dynamic discipline that actively explains and shapes human behaviour.
同样重要的是培养心理学素养——阅读有关现实生活心理学的短篇新闻，并在头脑中将课程概念加以应用。对于 2026 届考生而言，最成功的将是那些不把心理学视为孤立事实的集合，而是将其看作一门能动态解释并塑造人类行为的学科的人。
Published by TutorHao | Psychology Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图