📚 Year 12 AQA Sociology: High-Frequency Exam Topics and Common Mistakes Analysis | Year 12 AQA 社会学：高频考点与易错题分析
Mastering Year 12 AQA Sociology means knowing not just the key theories and studies, but also where students most commonly lose marks. This article breaks down the high-frequency topics across Education, Families and Households, and Research Methods, and highlights the typical mistakes that prevent you from moving from a grade C to an A. Each section pairs an English explanation with a Chinese translation so you can reinforce your understanding and avoid the pitfalls that examiners see year after year.
想要掌握 Year 12 AQA 社会学，不仅需要熟悉关键理论和研究，更要知道学生在哪些地方最常丢分。本文拆解了教育、家庭与家庭、以及研究方法三大模块中的高频考点，并重点分析那些阻碍你从 C 跃升到 A 的典型错误。每个部分都配有中英文对照讲解，帮助你巩固理解，避开 examiner 年复一年看到的常见失分点。
1. Education and Social Solidarity vs. The Hidden Curriculum | 教育与社会团结对比隐性课程
AQA examiners repeatedly test your ability to contrast the Functionalist view of education with the Marxist perspective. Emile Durkheim argued that education transmits shared norms and values, creating social solidarity. The mistake many students make is to describe solidarity in vague terms without linking it to specific school practices such as assemblies, history lessons, or the teaching of a national curriculum. You must be able to state that education prepares individuals for a wider society through secondary socialisation and a sense of belonging to something larger than themselves.
AQA 考官反复考查学生对比功能主义与马克思主义教育观的能力。涂尔干认为，教育传递共享的规范与价值观，从而创造社会团结。许多学生犯的错误是描述团结时过于空泛，没有将其与学校的具体实践联系起来，例如集会、历史课或国家课程的教学。你必须明确指出，教育通过次级社会化和一种归属于大于自身的事物的感觉，为个体步入更广阔的社会做准备。
In contrast, Marxists like Bowles and Gintis argue that education works through a hidden curriculum to reproduce class inequality by instilling passivity and obedience suited for capitalist workplaces. The common error here is to simply say 'schools prepare you for work' without explaining the correspondence principle: the way the relationships and structures in school mirror the hierarchy and alienation of the workplace. To access the top marks, use specific concepts such as the myth of meritocracy and the fragmentation of knowledge that prevents critical thinking.
相反，像鲍尔斯和金蒂斯这样的马克思主义者认为，教育通过隐性课程起作用，灌输适合资本主义工作场所的被动性和服从性，从而再生产阶级不平等。这里常见的错误是仅仅说“学校为你工作做准备”，而没有解释对应原则：学校中的关系与结构如何镜像反映工作场所的等级制度和异化。要拿到高分，必须使用具体的概念，如精英成就迷思和阻碍批判性思维的知识碎片化。
2. Marketisation of Education and the Parentocracy Myth | 教育市场化与“家长统治”迷思
The 1988 Education Reform Act introduced market principles into state education, with the aim of raising standards through competition. Students frequently misremember the detail: they confuse open enrolment, formula funding, and league tables, or they treat them as separate policies rather than a coherent package. A high-scoring answer will explain how these policies work together — open enrolment and formula funding create a quasi-market where popular schools expand while unpopular ones lose funding, and league tables provide parents with the information to choose.
1988 年教育改革法将市场原则引入公立教育，旨在通过竞争提高水准。学生经常记错细节：他们混淆了开放招生、公式拨款和排行榜，或者将它们当作孤立的政策而非一套连贯方案。高分答案会解释这些政策如何协同运作——开放招生和公式拨款创造了一个准市场，受欢迎的学校扩张而不受欢迎的学校失去资金，排行榜则为家长提供选择所需的信息。
A classic misconception is that marketisation genuinely empowers all parents. Sociologists such as Ball and Gewirtz show that the parentocracy is a myth because middle-class parents possess cultural and economic capital to work the system, for example by moving into catchment areas or using insider knowledge of admissions. An examiner looking for your analytical skills wants you to discuss the reproduction of class advantage through choice policies, not simply state that choice exists. Remember to define 'parentocracy' correctly: rule by parents, in theory, but in practice a reinforcement of middle-class privilege.
一个经典的误解是市场化真的赋予了所有家长权力。鲍尔和格维茨等社会学家指出，家长统治是一个迷思，因为中产阶级家长拥有文化资本和经济资本来操控体系，例如搬入学区或利用录取的内部信息。考察你分析能力的考官希望你能讨论通过择校政策发生的阶级优势再生产，而不是仅仅陈述选择的存在。记住要正确定义“家长统治”：理论上是由家长统治，实际上则强化了中产阶级特权。
3. Rapoport's Five Types of Family Diversity | Rapoport 的五种家庭多样性
When asked about family diversity, weaker candidates often only mention ethnic or class differences. The Rapoports' five types of diversity are an examiner favourite because they provide a clear analytical framework. You need to be able to name and explain all five: organisational diversity (different family structures like reconstituted or dual-worker), cultural diversity (values and beliefs shaping family forms), social class diversity (differences in resources, child-rearing), life-course diversity (changes over an individual's lifetime), and cohort diversity (generations sharing particular historical experiences).
当被问及家庭多样性时，较弱的考生往往只提及种族或阶级差异。Rapoport 的五种多样性是考官的最爱，因为它们提供了一个清晰的分析框架。你必须能够列出并解释所有五种：组织多样性（不同的家庭结构，如重组家庭或双职工家庭）、文化多样性（塑造家庭形式的价值观与信仰）、社会阶级多样性（资源、育儿方式的差异）、生命历程多样性（个体一生中的变化）以及同期群多样性（共享特定历史经历的一代人）。
The most common error is confusing cohort diversity with life-course diversity. Cohort refers to a generation, such as those who grew up during the post-war baby boom, whose life chances were different from millennials. Life-course diversity refers to an individual's own journey — being single, cohabiting, married, divorced, and remarried. To avoid muddling them, think of cohort as a shared external timeline and life-course as your personal biography. Always link your explanation to an actual study or trend, for example showing how the ageing population has increased the number of one-person households in later life.
最常见的错误是混淆同期群多样性与生命历程多样性。同期群指的是一代人，如战后婴儿潮中成长的一代，他们的人生机会与千禧一代不同。生命历程多样性指的是个人自己的旅程——单身、同居、结婚、离婚、再婚。为了避免混淆，可以把同期群想象为共享的外部时间线，而生命历程是你个人的传记。始终将你的解释联系到实际研究或趋势上，例如展示人口老龄化如何增加了晚年独居家庭的数量。
4. The Social Construction of Childhood (Aries and the Historical Shift) | 童年的社会建构（Aries 与历史变迁）
This topic appears almost every sitting, yet answers are often weak because students describe Ariès's work without engaging with its wider implications. Philippe Ariès argued that in medieval Europe the idea of childhood did not exist — children were miniature adults from the moment they could live without their mothers' constant care. The exam error lies in implying that Ariès said children were not loved. He did not say that. He claimed they were not separated from the adult world by a distinct concept of childhood; they worked, played the same games, and were depicted in art as small adults.
几乎每次考试都会出现这个主题，但答案往往薄弱，因为学生只描述 Ariès 的工作，而未涉及其更广泛的意义。Philippe Ariès 认为，在中世纪欧洲，童年的概念并不存在——儿童从不再需要母亲持续照料的那一刻起，就被视为微缩成人。考试中的错误在于暗示 Ariès 说儿童不被爱。他没有这样说。他声称儿童并没有因为一个独特的童年概念而与成人世界分离；他们工作、玩同样的游戏，并在艺术中被描绘为小大人。
To move into the higher bands, you need to evaluate this view by using contemporary evidence. For example, Postman argues that childhood is now disappearing because of television and digital media giving children access to adult secrets without the filter of literacy. Alternatively, Palmer's concept of 'toxic childhood' critiques the way technology, intensive marketing, and parental anxiety are eroding the protected space of childhood. A common mistake is failing to link these arguments to the social construction thesis — remember, the idea is that childhood is not a fixed biological stage but is shaped by social, economic, and cultural forces at a particular time.
要进入高分档，你需要使用当代证据来评价这一观点。例如，Postman 认为，由于电视和数字媒体让儿童无需识字过滤即可接触成人秘密，童年正在消失。或者，Palmer 的“有毒童年”概念批判了科技、密集营销和家长焦虑侵蚀童年保护空间的方式。常见的错误是未能将这些论点与社会建构论点联系起来——记住，其核心观点是童年并非一个固定的生物学阶段，而是由特定时期的社会、经济和文化力量塑造的。
5. Sampling Methods: Representativeness vs. Generality | 抽样方法：代表性与推广性
Research methods questions repeatedly expose a confusion between representativeness and generalisability. A sample is representative if its characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, class) accurately reflect the target population. It is generalisable if the findings from that sample can be applied to the wider population. Students lose marks when they treat these as synonyms; a sample can be representative of a very small group but not generalisable to the whole population, as in a case study. You must be precise in your language.
研究方法题目反复暴露出代表性与可推广性之间的混淆。如果样本的特征（年龄、性别、种族、阶级）准确反映了目标总体，那么它就是有代表性的。如果来自该样本的发现能够应用于更广泛的人群，那么它就是可推广的。当学生将这两个词当作同义词时会失分；样本可以代表一个非常小的群体，但无法推广到整个总体，例如案例研究中的情况。你的用词必须精确。
Let’s apply this to a common AQA context: education research. If a researcher uses a stratified random sample of 200 pupils from one school, it may be representative of that school's population but is not generalisable to all schools in the UK. The exam-savvy student will explain that generalisability depends on the sampling frame, size, and the heterogeneity of the target population. Systematic sampling can also trick you: the mechanical selection process might appear objective, but if the starting point is not truly random and the sampling frame contains hidden periodicity, it can produce a biased, unrepresentative sample. Always question the sample, not just name it.
让我们将此应用到 AQA 常见的语境：教育研究。如果研究人员从一所学校中使用分层随机抽样抽取了 200 名学生，这个样本可能代表了该校的人口，但不能推广到英国所有学校。应试老手会解释，可推广性取决于抽样框架、样本规模和目标总体的异质性。系统抽样也可能让你上当：机械式的选择过程看似客观，但如果起始点不是真正随机，且抽样框架存在隐蔽的周期性，就可能产生一个有偏、不具代表性的样本。始终要对样本提出质疑，而不只是说出它的名称。
6. Experiments in Education: Lab vs. Field and the Hawthorne Effect | 教育中的实验：实验室实验、实地实验与霍桑效应
Expect a question that asks you to evaluate the use of experiments in educational settings. The frequent pitfall is to describe laboratory experiments as if they are commonly used in schools, which they are not, because of practical and ethical constraints applied to children. Your answer should acknowledge the theoretical appeal of lab experiments for establishing cause-and-effect relationships, but then immediately critique this with the artificiality argument and the Hawthorne effect — the phenomenon where participants alter their behaviour because they know they are being studied.
预期会有题目要求你评价实验法在教育环境中的使用。一个常见的陷阱是把实验室实验描述得好像在学校里很常用，但实际上并非如此，因为针对儿童存在实践和伦理方面的限制。你的回答应当承认实验室实验在确立因果关系方面的理论吸引力，但随后立即用人为性论点和霍桑效应进行批判——即参与者因知道自己被研究而改变行为的现象。
Field experiments, such as Rosenthal and Jacobson's 'Pygmalion in the Classroom', are more feasible but still pose ethical issues and difficulties in controlling variables. A surprising number of students mislabel this study as a lab experiment. It was a field experiment because it took place in a natural school setting, with teachers unknowingly receiving false information about specific pupils' potential. The key exam point: even though researchers avoided artificiality, the deception of the teachers raises serious ethical questions and the study cannot be easily replicated because of the unique context. Always link the method to the context of education — vulnerable participants, gatekeepers, and the complexity of isolating the independent variable in a busy classroom.
实地实验，如罗森塔尔和雅各布森的《教室中的皮格马利翁》，更为可行，但依然存在伦理问题以及控制变量的困难。令人惊讶的是，不少学生误将这项研究标记为实验室实验。它是一个实地实验，因为在真实的学校环境中进行，教师在不知情的情况下获得了关于特定学生潜力的虚假信息。关键的考试要点：即使研究者避免了人为性，对教师的欺骗却引发了严重的伦理问题，而且该研究因其独特情境而难以复制。始终要将方法联系到教育语境——弱势参与者、把门人，以及在繁忙的课堂中隔离自变量的复杂性。
7. Labelling, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy and Anti-School Subcultures | 标签、自我实现预言与反学校亚文化
Interactionist approaches to education appear frequently, combining labelling theory with subcultural responses. The standard account runs: teachers label students on the basis of appearance, speech, and perceived ability (Becker); this label becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy (Rosenthal and Jacobson); and students then polarise into pro-school and anti-school subcultures (Lacey). The common mistake is to present this as an inevitable linear process. High-level exam answers note that not all labelled pupils accept the label; some negotiate or reject it.
互动论的教育观频繁出现，将标签理论与亚文化回应相结合。标准的叙述是：教师基于外表、言语和感知能力给学生贴上标签（贝克尔）；这种标签成为自我实现预言（罗森塔尔和雅各布森）；学生随之分化为拥护学校和反学校亚文化（Lacey）。常见的错误是将此呈现为一个不可避免的线性过程。高分考卷会指出，并非所有被贴标签的学生都接受标签；有些人会与之协商或予以拒绝。
Another error is conflating Willis's 'lads' with general anti-school subcultures without explaining the specific Marxist analysis. Willis argued that the lads saw through the meritocratic ideology and realised that school qualifications would not get them anywhere, so they formed a counter-school culture that celebrated manual labour and mocked the 'ear 'oles'. This was not just a reaction to teacher labelling but a class-based cultural reproduction of working-class factory shop-floor culture. To hit the top level, contrast Willis with the labelling theorist Fuller, who showed that black girls in a London comprehensive rejected their negative labels and worked hard to prove teachers wrong, thus demonstrating agency.
另一个错误是将威利斯的“小伙子们”与一般的反学校亚文化混为一谈，却没有解释具体的马克思主义分析。威利斯认为，这些小伙子看穿了贤能主义意识形态，意识到学校学历并不会让他们出人头地，于是形成了一种推崇体力劳动、嘲笑“书呆子”的反学校文化。这不仅仅是对教师标签的反应，更是工人阶级车间文化的阶级性文化再生产。要拿到最高分，将威利斯与标签理论家富勒的研究进行对比，后者表明伦敦一所综合学校的黑人女孩拒绝了她们的负面标签，并努力学习以证明老师错了，从而展示了能动性。
8. Gender Equality and the Domestic Division of Labour | 性别平等与家庭内的劳动分工
When discussing conjugal roles, a question on the symmetrical family (Willmott and Young) is highly likely. The symmetrical family thesis claims that family life is becoming more equal, with shared chores and joint decision-making. The error-prone area is failing to distinguish between the 'march of progress' view and feminist critiques. You must identify Willmott and Young's four stages of the family and explain that the symmetrical family is stage three, influenced by stratified diffusion — changes starting from the middle class and spreading.
谈到婚姻角色时，有关对称家庭（Willmott 和 Young）的题目很有可能出现。对称家庭理论声称，家庭生活正变得更加平等，夫妻分享家务和共同决策。容易出错的领域是未能区分“进步征程”观与女权主义批判。你必须辨认出 Willmott 和 Young 的家庭四个阶段，并解释对称家庭是第三阶段，受到分层扩散的影响——变革从中产阶级开始并向外扩散。
Feminist sociologists such as Oakley and Boulton directly attack this optimism. Oakley's research showed that while men may 'help' more, the primary responsibility for housework and childcare remains with women. This is the difference between involvement and responsibility, often missed by students. For a top-band response, bring in recent evidence like the British Social Attitudes survey showing a slow but persistent gap in who does housework, and link it to the cultural lag argument and the dual burden. Remember, AQA expects you to use the term 'emotion work' where relevant — managing family members' feelings and anxieties — which is disproportionately shouldered by women.
像奥克利和博尔顿这样的女权主义社会学家直接攻击这种乐观态度。奥克利的研究表明，虽然男性可能会更多地“帮忙”，但家务和育儿的主要责任仍然落在妇女身上。这就是参与与责任之间的区别，学生经常忽略。为了拿到高档答案，引入近期证据，如英国社会态度调查显示家务分工存在缓慢但持久的差距，并将其与文化滞后论点和双重负担联系起来。记住，AQA 期待你在相关之处使用“情感工作”一词——管理家庭成员的情绪和焦虑——这不成比例地由女性承担。
9. Ethical Issues in Sociological Research | 社会学研究中的伦理议题
A methods-in-context question will almost certainly require an ethical discussion. Many candidates provide a generic list — informed consent, anonymity, protection from harm — without applying them to the specific research scenario or linking them to the theoretical approach. The examiner wants to see you thread ethics through the entire practical and theoretical evaluation. For instance, studying a sensitive topic like domestic violence with unstructured interviews demands nuanced handling of informed consent because the participant may not fully understand the emotional cost until the interview begins.
情境化方法类题目几乎必然要求伦理讨论。许多考生给出一个通用的清单——知情同意、匿名性、免受伤害——却没有将它们应用于具体的研究情境，或将其与理论方法联系。考官希望看到你从头到尾将伦理贯通于整个实践和理论评价之中。例如，用非结构性访谈研究家庭暴力这样敏感的话题，需要对知情同意有精细的处理，因为参与者可能直到访谈开始才完全理解情感上的代价。
Covert participant observation raises the ethical dilemma of deception and the right to withdraw. Laud Humphreys' 'Tearoom Trade' is the classic example but must be handled carefully: describe the study briefly, then analyse why it would be unlikely to pass a research ethics committee today. A common mistake is failing to weigh the ethical costs against the validity benefits — covert methods may yield authentic data because no Hawthorne effect occurs, but if the researcher violates the trust of a vulnerable group, the professional body and the integrity of sociological research are damaged. Always discuss gatekeeper consent when children are involved; parental consent is required but may not be sufficient if the child shows distress.
隐蔽式参与观察带来了欺骗和退出权的伦理困境。Laud Humphreys 的《茶室交易》是经典例子，但必须小心处理：简要描述研究，然后分析为什么它在今天不太可能通过研究伦理委员会的审核。常见的错误是未能权衡伦理代价与效度收益——隐蔽方法可能因为不发生霍桑效应而生成真实数据，但如果研究者辜负了弱势群体的信任，那么专业机构和整个社会学研究的诚信都会受损。当涉及儿童时，始终要讨论把门人同意；需要家长同意，但如果儿童表现出痛苦，这可能仍不充分。
10. Structure vs. Action Theories: Macro and Micro Integration | 结构论与行动论：宏观与微观的整合
Year 12 theoretical debates often come down to the structure–action dichotomy. Structural theories (Functionalism, Marxism, Feminism) see society as shaping individuals via social institutions, while action theories (Symbolic Interactionism, Phenomenology) focus on micro-level meanings and agency. A typical mark-losing answer lists these categories without showing how they relate or why they matter. Examiners are looking for you to argue that a full sociological explanation needs both, a position known as methodological pluralism or structuration.
Year 12 的理论辩论往往归结为结构–行动的二元对立。结构理论（功能主义、马克思主义、女权主义）认为社会通过社会制度塑造个体，而行动理论（符号互动论、现象学）关注微观层面的意义和能动性。典型的失分答案是罗列这些类别，却没有展示它们如何关联或为何重要。考官期待你论证一个全面的社会学解释需要两者，这一立场被称为方法多元论或结构化理论。
Use Giddens's structuration theory as your bridge. He argues that structure and action are not opposites but a duality: structures are both the medium and the outcome of the practices they recursively organise. For example, language is a structure of rules, but we reshape it every time we speak. A common error is to present the debate as resolved when it is not — point out that interpretivist methods (unstructured interviews) gain valid, deep meaning but struggle to establish social causation, while structural methods (official statistics) map large-scale trends but may miss the reasons behind them. The best answers show how combining both in triangulation can offset these weaknesses.
用吉登斯的结构化理论作为你的桥梁。他认为结构与行动并非对立，而是一种二重性：结构既是它们递归组织的实践的中介，也是其结果。例如，语言是一个规则的结构，但我们每次说话都在重塑它。常见的错误是把这场争论描述为已然解决，其实并没有——指出解释主义方法（非结构性访谈）获取了有效、深层的意义，但难以建立社会因果关系，而结构方法（官方统计）描绘了大规模趋势，却可能遗漏背后的原因。最好的答案会展示如何通过三角互证将两者结合起来，抵消这些弱点。
11. Compensatory Education and Cultural Deprivation | 补偿教育与文化匮乏理论
Cultural deprivation theories maintain that working-class underachievement stems from deficiencies in attitudes, values, and language. This is a borderline area where students often slip into value judgments. You must accurately describe Bernstein's speech codes — elaborated code and restricted code — and explain that the elaborated code is valued by the education system, putting those who only have access to a restricted code at a disadvantage. The common mistake is to equate 'restricted code' with 'deficit'. Bernstein argued it was a difference, not a deficit, but the school system does not treat it as such, creating an obstacle.
文化匮乏理论主张，工人阶级学业表现不佳源于态度、价值观和语言的不足。这是一个界限模糊的领域，学生经常滑入价值判断。你必须准确描述伯恩斯坦的言语编码——精密型编码和局限型编码——并解释教育系统重视精密型编码，这使得那些只能接触到局限型编码的人处于劣势。常见的错误是将“局限型编码”等同于“缺陷”。伯恩斯坦认为这是一种差异，而不是缺陷，但学校系统并不如此对待，从而造成障碍。
Compensatory education policies like Operation Head Start in the US and Sure Start in the UK aimed to redress these cultural deficits. Students often describe them without evaluating whether they genuinely compensate or simply impose middle-class norms. The critical point is that these policies are funded on the assumption that the problem lies in the family rather than in wider structural inequalities. Link this to the myth of cultural deprivation: if working-class culture is presented as deficient, it diverts attention from material deprivation and poverty, which research shows has a more direct impact on educational achievement. A strong essay will always contrast cultural and material explanations.
像美国的启蒙计划（Head Start）和英国的 Sure Start 这样的补偿教育政策旨在纠正这些文化缺陷。学生经常描述它们，却不评价它们究竟是真补偿还是仅仅强加了中产阶级规范。关键要点在于，这些政策的资金来源基于一个假设：问题出在家庭内部，而非更广泛的结构性不平等。将此联系到文化匮乏迷思：如果工人阶级文化被呈现为有缺陷，就会转移人们对于物质匮乏和贫困的关注，而研究表明，后者对教育成就的影响更为直接。一篇有力的文章总会对比文化解释和物质解释。
12. The Dark Side of the Family: Domestic Violence and Abuse | 家庭的阴暗面：家庭暴力与虐待
This topic area often catches students off guard because they romanticise the family. The high-frequency exam demand is to challenge the 'myth of the safe haven' and analyse why the family can be a site of violence, especially against women and children. Start by defining domestic violence not just as physical assault but as encompassing emotional, financial, and coercive control — the AQA specification expects breadth. A significant error is treating the issue as rare; cite official statistics from the Crime Survey for England and Wales showing that the home is the place where women are most at risk.
这个主题领域经常让学生措手不及，因为他们理想化了家庭。高频的考试要求是挑战“安全港湾神话”，分析为什么家庭可能成为暴力的场所，特别是针对妇女和儿童。先要定义家庭暴力，不仅仅是身体攻击，还包括情感、经济以及强制性控制——AQA 大纲要求广度。一个重大错误是把这个问题当作罕见的；引用英格兰和威尔士犯罪调查的官方统计数据，显示家庭是妇女面临最大风险的地方。
Sociological explanations range from the radical feminist view (Dobash and Dobash) that marriage legitimates violence by giving men power, to materialist and stress explanations that link violence to overcrowding, financial strain, and lack of social support. The mistake is to pick one explanation without evaluation. The examiner wants you to synthesise, for example by arguing that a purely patriarchal explanation cannot account for violence in same-sex relationships, and that class and economic insecurity intersect with gender to produce different patterns of abuse. Always mention the difficulty of researching this sensitive topic — the dark figure of unreported crime and the ethical constraints of intervention.
社会学解释的范围从激进女权主义观点（多巴什和多巴什）认为婚姻通过赋予男性权力使暴力合法化，到唯物论和压力解释，将暴力与居住拥挤、经济紧张以及缺乏社会支持联系起来。错误在于只选择一种解释而不做评价。考官希望你综合理解，例如论证纯粹的父权制解释无法说明同性关系中的暴力，而阶级和经济不安定感与性别交叉，产生了不同的虐待模式。始终提及研究这一敏感话题的困难——未报告犯罪的暗数以及干预的伦理限制。
Published by TutorHao | Sociology Revision Series | aleveler.com
更多咨询请联系16621398022（同微信）
或截图后用「扫一扫 → 相册」选择本图